Replace old by new AspectJ GitHub URL

github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj -> github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.md b/CONTRIBUTING.md
index a90ea46fa1e97ff1fe5d6ad6cd5aef28ee0237ca..04562a58070461840fecf1a549087e8accadde8d 100644 (file)
--- a/CONTRIBUTING.md
+++ b/CONTRIBUTING.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Contributing to AspectJ
 
-AspectJ is a maven project, as such it should import cleanly into your IDE. The project uses github for issue tracking ( https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues ).
+AspectJ is a maven project, as such it should import cleanly into your IDE. The project uses github for issue tracking ( https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues ).
 
 ## Working on the codebase
 
@@ -50,4 +50,4 @@ Some issues involving compiler problems, for example if Java code isn't working
 
 Please contribute via Pull Request against the GitHub repository.
 
-Contributors should ensure they have signed the [Eclipse Contributor Agreement](https://accounts.eclipse.org/user/7644/eca/3.1.0), this will be verified by automatic validation that occurs against any Pull Requests.
\ No newline at end of file
+Contributors should ensure they have signed the [Eclipse Contributor Agreement](https://accounts.eclipse.org/user/7644/eca/3.1.0), this will be verified by automatic validation that occurs against any Pull Requests.

diff --git a/ajdoc/src/main/java/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/Main.java b/ajdoc/src/main/java/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/Main.java
index 9d8b61140ec49e42ab5341f824830be9553c970d..c44fdb50d5ecb923ecd4795810aab34382a64ecd 100644 (file)
--- a/ajdoc/src/main/java/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/Main.java
+++ b/ajdoc/src/main/java/org/aspectj/tools/ajdoc/Main.java
@@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ public class Main implements Config {
        /* This section of code handles errors that occur during compilation */
        static final String internalErrorMessage = "                                                                  \n"
                        + "If this has not already been logged as a bug raised please raise  \n"
-                       + "a new AspectJ bug at https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues \n"
+                       + "a new AspectJ bug at https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues \n"
                        + "including the text below. To make the bug a priority, please also \n"
                        + "include a test program that can reproduce this problem.\n ";
 

diff --git a/docs/developer/IDE.md b/docs/developer/IDE.md
index fbafbe384d06eae658a815458203c41df0f56c90..b8a34a04c3c338cd72e66ee2fc06c755e9f78adc 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/developer/IDE.md
+++ b/docs/developer/IDE.md
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ to your path and are good to go. You can now call tools like the Aspectj compile
 generator `ajdoc` (similar to Javadoc) from the command line.
 
 You can find older installer versions until 1.9.6 on the [AspectJ website](https://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/downloads.php),
-more recent ones are attached to AspectJ [GitHub releases](https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/releases) as
+more recent ones are attached to AspectJ [GitHub releases](https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/releases) as
 _aspectj-*jar_.
 
 ## Biased recommendation

diff --git a/docs/release/JavaVersionCompatibility.adoc b/docs/release/JavaVersionCompatibility.adoc
index 7fb1932964895031032daccc43c23801c536e138..b94a364ea7bdd778bbceeaabd62cf2be8750cc1e 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/release/JavaVersionCompatibility.adoc
+++ b/docs/release/JavaVersionCompatibility.adoc
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 = AspectJ Java version compatibility
 
-For reasons described e.g. in https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/139#issuecomment-1072946123[this comment],
+For reasons described e.g. in https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/139#issuecomment-1072946123[this comment],
 for AspectJ users it has become a little challenging to find out which minimum AspectJ version is required in order to
 process byte code or compile source code using features of a certain Java language version. Since Java 10, this cannot
 be easily concluded from the AspectJ version number anymore, and we are sorry for that. So here is a little overview:

diff --git a/docs/release/README-1.9.19.adoc b/docs/release/README-1.9.19.adoc
index c347868121553d689088412aa9fb589ccff556de..a8115693499577e910c28b11a5fe7fd1f7da26ee 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/release/README-1.9.19.adoc
+++ b/docs/release/README-1.9.19.adoc
@@ -5,10 +5,10 @@ _© Copyright 2022 Contributors. All rights reserved._
 _Release info: 1.9.19 available 21-Dec-2022_
 
 Please note that Bugzilla for issue management is deprecated and new issues should be filed as
-https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/new[GitHub issues]. The list of issues addressed for 1.9.19 can be found
+https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/new[GitHub issues]. The list of issues addressed for 1.9.19 can be found
 here:
 
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.19[GitHub 1.9.19]
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.19[GitHub 1.9.19]
 * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&f0=OP&f1=OP&f3=CP&f4=CP&j1=OR&list_id=16866879&product=AspectJ&query_format=advanced&target_milestone=1.9.19[Bugzilla 1.9.19]
 
 == New features
@@ -23,23 +23,23 @@ features, such as:
 
 Please note that the upstream Eclipse Java Compiler (ECJ) which the AspectJ Compiler (AJC) is a fork of still has some
 open issues concerning Java 19 preview feature support, see the list in
-https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/184#issuecomment-1272254940[this comment]. AJC therefore inherits the same
+https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/184#issuecomment-1272254940[this comment]. AJC therefore inherits the same
 problems for the specific cases described in the linked issues.
 
 == Improvements
 
 * Improve condy (constant dynamic) support. Together with some custom compilation or weaving options, this helps to
   avoid a problem when using JaCoCo together with AspectJ, see
-  https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/170#issuecomment-1214163297[this comment in #170] for more details.
+  https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/170#issuecomment-1214163297[this comment in #170] for more details.
 
 == Code examples
 
 You can find some sample code in the AspectJ test suite under the respective AspectJ version in which the features were
 first supported (possibly as JVM preview features):
 
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/tree/master/tests/features198/java17[Pattern matching for switch (preview 1)]
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/tree/master/tests/features199/java18[Pattern matching for switch (preview 2)]
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/tree/master/tests/features1919/java19[Pattern matching for switch (preview 3),
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/tree/master/tests/features198/java17[Pattern matching for switch (preview 1)]
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/tree/master/tests/features199/java18[Pattern matching for switch (preview 2)]
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/tree/master/tests/features1919/java19[Pattern matching for switch (preview 3),
   record patterns (preview 1)]
 * Please note that presently there is no specific sample code for virtual threads and structured concurrency in the
   AspectJ code base, because these are just new APIs, no Java language features. You can find sample code for these
@@ -52,9 +52,9 @@ first supported (possibly as JVM preview features):
   `SOURCE` retention on types, methods, constructors or fields. While declaring such annotations does not make sense to
   begin with, at least the AspectJ weaver or compiler should handle the situation gracefully, which now it does by
   simply ignoring errors caused by it. See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=366085[Bugzilla #366085] and
-  https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/pull/196[pull request #196]. Better than this workaround would be for the
+  https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/pull/196[pull request #196]. Better than this workaround would be for the
   compiler or weaver to actually print a warning when meeting source level annotations in declare statements. Hence,
-  follow-up issue https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/201[#201] was created.
+  follow-up issue https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/201[#201] was created.
 * Remove legacy AspectJ Browser code and documentation.
 * Thanks to Andrey Turbanov for several clean code contributions.
 

diff --git a/docs/release/README-1.9.20.adoc b/docs/release/README-1.9.20.adoc
index d44769238d1d77390ed5ea03797cb28b21ef53b3..8e1087358905949c8d3b932b343fed5641230bd4 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/release/README-1.9.20.adoc
+++ b/docs/release/README-1.9.20.adoc
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ This is a bugfix release for 1.9.20, fixing two problems:
   https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/256[AspectJ tracker issue 256]).
 
 The list of issues addressed for 1.9.20.1 can be found
-https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.20.1[here].
+https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.20.1[here].
 
 = AspectJ 1.9.20
 
@@ -28,11 +28,11 @@ _© Copyright 2023 Contributors. All rights reserved._
 _Release info: 1.9.20 available 16-Aug-2023_
 
 Please note that Bugzilla for issue management is deprecated and new issues should be filed as
-https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/new[GitHub issues]. The list of issues addressed for 1.9.20 can be found
+https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/new[GitHub issues]. The list of issues addressed for 1.9.20 can be found
 here:
 
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.20[GitHub 1.9.20]
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.20.1[GitHub 1.9.20.1]
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.20[GitHub 1.9.20]
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.20.1[GitHub 1.9.20.1]
 * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&f0=OP&f1=OP&f3=CP&f4=CP&j1=OR&list_id=16866879&product=AspectJ&query_format=advanced&target_milestone=1.9.20[Bugzilla 1.9.20]
 
 == New features
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ features, such as:
 
 Please note, that the upstream Eclipse Java Compiler (ECJ), which the AspectJ Compiler (AJC) is a fork of, still has
 some open issues concerning Java 20 preview feature support, see the list in
-https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/184#issuecomment-1272254940[this comment]. AJC therefore inherits the same
+https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/184#issuecomment-1272254940[this comment]. AJC therefore inherits the same
 problems for the specific cases described in the linked issues.
 
 == Improvements
@@ -68,11 +68,11 @@ problems for the specific cases described in the linked issues.
 You can find some sample code in the AspectJ test suite under the respective AspectJ version in which the features were
 first supported (possibly as JVM preview features):
 
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/tree/master/tests/features198/java17[Pattern matching for switch (preview 1)]
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/tree/master/tests/features199/java18[Pattern matching for switch (preview 2)]
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/tree/master/tests/features1919/java19[Pattern matching for switch (preview 3),
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/tree/master/tests/features198/java17[Pattern matching for switch (preview 1)]
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/tree/master/tests/features199/java18[Pattern matching for switch (preview 2)]
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/tree/master/tests/features1919/java19[Pattern matching for switch (preview 3),
   record patterns (preview 1)]
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/tree/master/tests/features1920/java20[Pattern matching for switch (preview 4),
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/tree/master/tests/features1920/java20[Pattern matching for switch (preview 4),
   record patterns (preview 2)]
 * Please note that presently there is no specific sample code for virtual threads and structured concurrency in the
   AspectJ code base, because these are just new APIs, no Java language features. You can find sample code for these

diff --git a/docs/release/README-1.9.21.adoc b/docs/release/README-1.9.21.adoc
index 66a38162e456cad48860bc904c652a8c18331cba..6d5d2af976c4173efb0bf50867d75d80ed142fb8 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/release/README-1.9.21.adoc
+++ b/docs/release/README-1.9.21.adoc
@@ -5,11 +5,11 @@ _© Copyright 2023 Contributors. All rights reserved._
 _Release info: 1.9.21 available 11-Dec-2023_
 
 Please note that Bugzilla for issue management is deprecated and new issues should be filed as
-https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/new[GitHub issues]. The list of issues addressed for 1.9.21 can be found
+https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/new[GitHub issues]. The list of issues addressed for 1.9.21 can be found
 here:
 
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.21[GitHub 1.9.21]
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.21.1[GitHub 1.9.21.1]
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.21[GitHub 1.9.21]
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.21.1[GitHub 1.9.21.1]
 * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&f0=OP&f1=OP&f3=CP&f4=CP&j1=OR&list_id=16866879&product=AspectJ&query_format=advanced&target_milestone=1.9.21[Bugzilla 1.9.21]
 
 == New features

diff --git a/docs/release/README-1.9.7.adoc b/docs/release/README-1.9.7.adoc
index c58c78b5df61c726baab327769d81fdede7893d9..c59d838dc4aad44373fdf7a823800ce3bde8a2b1 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/release/README-1.9.7.adoc
+++ b/docs/release/README-1.9.7.adoc
@@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ Public License v 2.0].
 
 Please note, that going forward Bugzilla for issue management is
 deprecated, and new issues should be filed as
-https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/new[GitHub issues]. The
+https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/new[GitHub issues]. The
 list of issues addressed for 1.9.7 can be found
 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&f0=OP&f1=OP&f3=CP&f4=CP&j1=OR&list_id=16866879&product=AspectJ&query_format=advanced&target_milestone=1.9.7[here
 for Bugzilla] and
-https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.7[here
+https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.7[here
 for GitHub issues].
 
 == New features
@@ -43,11 +43,11 @@ You can find some sample code in the AspectJ test suite under the
 respective AspectJ version in which the features were first supported
 (possibly as JVM preview features):
 
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/tree/master/tests/features195/textblock[AspectJ
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/tree/master/tests/features195/textblock[AspectJ
 1.9.5: text blocks]
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/tree/master/tests/features196/java14[AspectJ
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/tree/master/tests/features196/java14[AspectJ
 1.9.6: records, instanceof patterns]
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/tree/master/tests/features197/java15[AspectJ
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/tree/master/tests/features197/java15[AspectJ
 1.9.7: hidden classes, sealed classes]
 
 == Using LTW on Java 16+

diff --git a/docs/release/README-1.9.8.adoc b/docs/release/README-1.9.8.adoc
index f42916a7ba713854bbb9fd8371fc46dd7badc086..33208450f96c526f7a37a2837cd88a613094f156 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/release/README-1.9.8.adoc
+++ b/docs/release/README-1.9.8.adoc
@@ -5,9 +5,9 @@ _© Copyright 2022 Contributors. All rights reserved._
 _Release info: 1.9.8 available 11-Feb-2022_
 
 Please note, that Bugzilla for issue management is deprecated, and new issues should be filed as
-https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/new[GitHub issues]. The list of issues addressed for 1.9.8 can be found
+https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/new[GitHub issues]. The list of issues addressed for 1.9.8 can be found
 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&f0=OP&f1=OP&f3=CP&f4=CP&j1=OR&list_id=16866879&product=AspectJ&query_format=advanced&target_milestone=1.9.8[here for Bugzilla] and
-https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.8[here for GitHub issues].
+https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.8[here for GitHub issues].
 
 == New features
 
@@ -30,17 +30,17 @@ The following new properties can improve performance, e.g. Spring start-up time:
 For now, they all default to `false` for backward compatibility. This might change in a future Aspect release, if user
 feedback is positive and no negative side effects are found. Please try using them as much as you can and report back
 questions (to the AspectJ users mailing list) or problems (as a GitHub issue), if any. Thanks to Stefan Starke for his
-contribution. See also https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/pull/37[PR #37].
+contribution. See also https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/pull/37[PR #37].
 
 == Code examples
 
 You can find some sample code in the AspectJ test suite under the respective AspectJ version in which the features were
 first supported (possibly as JVM preview features):
 
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/tree/master/tests/features198/compiler_release[Cross-compilation to legacy JDK]:
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/tree/master/tests/features198/compiler_release[Cross-compilation to legacy JDK]:
   An example class which only works correctly on JDK 8 when compiled with `--release 8` due to API changes in
   the JDK. Simply `-source 8 -target 8` would not be enough in this case.
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/tree/master/tests/features198/java17[Pattern matching for `switch`]
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/tree/master/tests/features198/java17[Pattern matching for `switch`]
 
 == Other changes and bug fixes
 
@@ -52,15 +52,15 @@ first supported (possibly as JVM preview features):
   `aspectjweaver` still only require JRE 8+.
 * Document build profiles and properties in _docs/developer/BUILD.md_
 * Add a guide for setting up an AspectJ development environment in _docs/developer/IDE.md_
-* Fix https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/105[issue #105]: Compilation fails when using an aspect library via
+* Fix https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/105[issue #105]: Compilation fails when using an aspect library via
   `-aspectpath` in combination with introducing an annotation via ITD. This was broken since version 1.9.5 and fixed in
   1.9.8.RC3.
-* Fix https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/68[issue #68]: Correctly process class files containing
+* Fix https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/68[issue #68]: Correctly process class files containing
   https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/309[dynamic class-file constants (JEP 309)], which were introduced in Java 11 and broken
   in AspectJ ever since their introduction in 1.9.2. Java itself currently does not use "condy" and neither do other
   widespread JVM languages. Byte code engineering libraries like ASM or Byte Buddy and some instrumentation tools like
   JaCoCo can however produce condy code. Therefore, in order to create a regression test, we actually had to
-  https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/blob/de63b63d/tests/bugs198/github_68/Generator.java#L50-L61[craft a condy
+  https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/blob/de63b63d/tests/bugs198/github_68/Generator.java#L50-L61[craft a condy
   class with ASM].
 * Thanks to Andrey Turbanov for several clean code contributions and to Dmitry Mikhaylov for fixing a potential
   concurrency problem.

diff --git a/docs/release/README-1.9.9.adoc b/docs/release/README-1.9.9.adoc
index b4dda99baf16531e99e81b0df1b9b8bfe36a4149..98834a7bb086ef7034b14ad997f13ea88fbecedc 100644 (file)
--- a/docs/release/README-1.9.9.adoc
+++ b/docs/release/README-1.9.9.adoc
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ _Release info: 1.9.9.1 available 31-Mar-2022_
 
 Bugfix release for some compiler options related to the Java Platform Module System (JPMS) which were not working, most
 importantly `--add-modules`, `--add-exports` and `--add-reads`. See
-https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/145[issue #145].
+https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/145[issue #145].
 
 This probably was broken for a long time. AspectJ still is not boasting extensive JPMS support or test coverage, but
 this improvement seems substantial enough to justify a minor release, instead of keeping users waiting for the next
@@ -23,11 +23,11 @@ _© Copyright 2022 Contributors. All rights reserved._
 _Release info: 1.9.9 available 24-Mar-2022_
 
 Please note that Bugzilla for issue management is deprecated and new issues should be filed as
-https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/new[GitHub issues]. The list of issues addressed for 1.9.9 can be found
+https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/new[GitHub issues]. The list of issues addressed for 1.9.9 can be found
 here:
 
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.9[GitHub 1.9.9]
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.9.1[GitHub 1.9.9.1]
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.9[GitHub 1.9.9]
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed++milestone%3A1.9.9.1[GitHub 1.9.9.1]
 * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&f0=OP&f1=OP&f3=CP&f4=CP&j1=OR&list_id=16866879&product=AspectJ&query_format=advanced&target_milestone=1.9.9[Bugzilla 1.9.9]
 
 == New features
@@ -43,17 +43,17 @@ the advice. Previously, this was only working in native syntax aspects. There is
 asynchronous proceed, if you do not create the thread in the advice but want to use e.g. an `ExecutorService` with its
 own thread pool. This still is not working in annotation style aspects, only in native syntax ones.
 
-See https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/128[issue #128] and
-https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/pull/132[pull request #132] for more details.
+See https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/128[issue #128] and
+https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/pull/132[pull request #132] for more details.
 
 == Code examples
 
 You can find some sample code in the AspectJ test suite under the respective AspectJ version in which the features were
 first supported (possibly as JVM preview features):
 
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/tree/master/tests/features198/java17[Pattern matching for switch, preview 1]
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/tree/master/tests/features199/java18[Pattern matching for switch, preview 2]
-* https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/tree/master/tests/bugs199/github_128[Asynchronous proceed in native vs.
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/tree/master/tests/features198/java17[Pattern matching for switch, preview 1]
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/tree/master/tests/features199/java18[Pattern matching for switch, preview 2]
+* https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/tree/master/tests/bugs199/github_128[Asynchronous proceed in native vs.
   annotation style syntax]
 
 == Other changes and bug fixes
@@ -62,10 +62,10 @@ first supported (possibly as JVM preview features):
   the value of system property `org.aspectj.weaver.openarchives` (1,000 by default). The AspectJ compiler is meant to
   close archives upon cache exhaustion and then re-open them, if it needs them again later. Re-opening was broken, but
   now the compiler works reliably even for cache sizes as small as 20. See
-  https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/125[issue #125].
+  https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/125[issue #125].
 * Improvements for `if()` pointcuts in annotation syntax, see issues
-  https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/115[#115], https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/120[#120],
-  https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/122[#122].
+  https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/115[#115], https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/120[#120],
+  https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/122[#122].
 * Thanks to Andrey Turbanov for several clean code contributions.
 
 == AspectJ usage hints

diff --git a/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/main/java/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/AspectDeclaration.java b/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/main/java/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/AspectDeclaration.java
index 0daa12747087c1719e99e2869da4dd022fa1e3c8..ca61d85aef71280a6dbc38a6ebbe97c9eec4ec25 100644 (file)
--- a/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/main/java/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/AspectDeclaration.java
+++ b/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/main/java/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/AspectDeclaration.java
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ public class AspectDeclaration extends TypeDeclaration {
                        if (
                                !Modifier.isStatic(modifiers) &&
                                // Inner classes/aspects of interfaces are implicitly static,
-                               // see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/162
+                               // see https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/162
                                (this.enclosingType.modifiers & ClassFileConstants.AccInterface) == 0
                        ) {
                                scope.problemReporter().signalError(sourceStart, sourceEnd, "inner aspects must be static");

diff --git a/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/main/java/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/ValidateAtAspectJAnnotationsVisitor.java b/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/main/java/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/ValidateAtAspectJAnnotationsVisitor.java
index d27b2b62a7f54a61ba432268093e59da366ddbb7..9ecf56d2d9bc4ab8446df22fd95ac5d7a466aa16 100644 (file)
--- a/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/main/java/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/ValidateAtAspectJAnnotationsVisitor.java
+++ b/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/main/java/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/ValidateAtAspectJAnnotationsVisitor.java
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ public class ValidateAtAspectJAnnotationsVisitor extends ASTVisitor {
                        if (
                                !Modifier.isStatic(typeDecl.modifiers) &&
                                // Inner classes/aspects of interfaces are implicitly static,
-                               // see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/162
+                               // see https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/162
                                (typeDecl.enclosingType.modifiers & ClassFileConstants.AccInterface) == 0
                        ) {
                                typeDecl.scope.problemReporter().signalError(typeDecl.sourceStart, typeDecl.sourceEnd,

diff --git a/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/main/java/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/core/builder/AjBuildManager.java b/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/main/java/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/core/builder/AjBuildManager.java
index 4f45959df7fdd4fca4f8293f9ef4c412298c0770..a937d328ee8a02bee5d8b9c857b1e8fff642ab55 100644 (file)
--- a/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/main/java/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/core/builder/AjBuildManager.java
+++ b/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/main/java/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/core/builder/AjBuildManager.java
@@ -1045,7 +1045,7 @@ public class AjBuildManager implements IOutputClassFileNameProvider, IBinarySour
                        FileSystem fileSystem = getLibraryAccess(classpaths, filenames);
 
                        // Use upstream method to generate '--add-reads', '--add-exports' info and copy it into our FileSystem instance.
-                       // See https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/145.
+                       // See https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/145.
                        FileSystem fileSystemTemp = buildConfig.getBuildArgParser().getLibraryAccess();
                        fileSystem.moduleUpdates = fileSystemTemp.moduleUpdates;
                        fileSystemTemp.cleanup();

diff --git a/tests/bugs1920/github_162/InterfaceWithInnerClass.java b/tests/bugs1920/github_162/InterfaceWithInnerClass.java
index f26975cc021ed2f18be5b1aa0543753878686798..507bef54ff05889d3dae0dd2c06364dcc5fe897c 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/bugs1920/github_162/InterfaceWithInnerClass.java
+++ b/tests/bugs1920/github_162/InterfaceWithInnerClass.java
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Before;
 import org.aspectj.lang.JoinPoint;
 
 /**
- * https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/162
+ * https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/162
  */
 public interface InterfaceWithInnerClass {
   public class ImplicitlyStatic {

diff --git a/tests/bugs1920/github_20/ParenthesisedAJKeywords.java b/tests/bugs1920/github_20/ParenthesisedAJKeywords.java
index 1ba013c575647059b58d10e64eeffe44e73fac6f..477eac5b0aa43f37a4ce0bee79683d96e2289980 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/bugs1920/github_20/ParenthesisedAJKeywords.java
+++ b/tests/bugs1920/github_20/ParenthesisedAJKeywords.java
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /**
- * https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/20
+ * https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/20
  */
 public class ParenthesisedAJKeywords {
   public static void main(String[] args) {

diff --git a/tests/bugs198/github_105/Application.java b/tests/bugs198/github_105/Application.java
index bcf4f5624aaf0ccbe0cba0c8236b822fa425c007..e32bd0a88a8cd1b986c53583d139bea5c81c214b 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/bugs198/github_105/Application.java
+++ b/tests/bugs198/github_105/Application.java
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import java.lang.annotation.Annotation;
  * This fails in AspectJ 1.9.5 to 1.9.8.RC2 due to a removed safeguard in JDT Core,
  * if the aspect is in a separate library on the aspectpath.
  * <p>
- * See https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/105
+ * See https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/105
  */
 @FooAnnotation
 public class Application {

diff --git a/tests/features164/declareMixin/CaseEConcurrent.java b/tests/features164/declareMixin/CaseEConcurrent.java
index 874f249d54f2cadc9b84ffd3696cdbd21c3cc9c3..e52ad7101739c9dcaf0ef2fede3956d892c2c1e0 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/features164/declareMixin/CaseEConcurrent.java
+++ b/tests/features164/declareMixin/CaseEConcurrent.java
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 // TESTING: multiple instances causing factory invocation multiple times (but is cached correctly)
-// Concurrency fix regression test for https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/198
+// Concurrency fix regression test for https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/198
 import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.*;
 import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
 
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ public class CaseEConcurrent {
   }
 
   // Helper methods 'doSomething' and 'callMe' help to produce byte code similar to what we need in order to fix
-  // https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/198. If necessary, just temporarily uncomment, compile and analyse
+  // https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/198. If necessary, just temporarily uncomment, compile and analyse
   // the byte code, e.g. with JDK tool 'javap -v'.
   /*
   public void doSomething() {

diff --git a/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/DeclareMixinTests.java b/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/DeclareMixinTests.java
index 1c312d18b91ffc7c0fa7e71dc98f2498ff3bd2b2..4ae5fca6838a41592815f00c73d6cfa5ec74cb4c 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/DeclareMixinTests.java
+++ b/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/DeclareMixinTests.java
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ public class DeclareMixinTests extends org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase {
        }
 
        // multiple instances causing factory invocation multiple times (but is cached), concurrent case
-       // see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/198
+       // see https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/198
        public void testCaseEConcurrent() {
                runTest("casee_concurrent");
        }

diff --git a/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc199/Bugs199Tests.java b/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc199/Bugs199Tests.java
index 9d1dc6c6d9f1c8f1056f6963f27fb53f6d28134d..6ec1291d4d45867bedf41ba2bac4e4209257aec4 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc199/Bugs199Tests.java
+++ b/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc199/Bugs199Tests.java
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ public class Bugs199Tests extends XMLBasedAjcTestCase {
   }
 
   public void testAsyncProceedNestedAroundAdviceThreadPool_gh128() {
-    // TODO: future improvement, see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/141
+    // TODO: future improvement, see https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/141
     // runTest("asynchronous proceed for nested around-advice (@AspectJ, thread pool)");
   }
 

diff --git a/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/declareMixin.xml b/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/declareMixin.xml
index c397fae87fe11d1687d8969d2bfca81f5a578440..a9da3cafb4dc149825d25a730fd884317921d1db 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/declareMixin.xml
+++ b/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/declareMixin.xml
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
      <run class="CaseEConcurrent">
        <stdout ordered="no">
          <!--
-           Without the concurrency fix from https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/198, each delegate factory
+           Without the concurrency fix from https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/198, each delegate factory
            would be invoked twice
          -->
          <line text="Delegate factory invoked for CaseEConcurrent instance: a"/>

diff --git a/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/ajc1920.xml b/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/ajc1920.xml
index 98a255088b7777201916bd21ffcaf800baea5aeb..37ac7e9a30f0be249dee99d2c94e2e465a24d445 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/ajc1920.xml
+++ b/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/ajc1920.xml
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
                </run>
        </ajc-test>
 
-       <!-- RuntimeException in BcelWeaver, see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/190 -->
+       <!-- RuntimeException in BcelWeaver, see https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/190 -->
        <ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_190" vm="1.5" title="switch with Integer.MAX_VALUE case">
                <compile files="SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
                        <message kind="weave" text="Join point 'method-execution(java.lang.String SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.switchTest(int))'"/>
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@
 
        <!--
                'Syntax error, insert "Expression" to complete Expression' when compiling parenthesised expressions
-               containing AspectJ keywords, e.g. '(before)', see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/20
+               containing AspectJ keywords, e.g. '(before)', see https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/20
        -->
        <ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_20" vm="1.5" title="parenthesised expression with AspectJ keyword">
                <compile files="ParenthesisedAJKeywords.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo"/>
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@
 
        <!--
                'inner aspects must be static' when compiling an interface with an inner aspect which was not explicitly declared
-               static, see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/162
+               static, see https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/162
        -->
        <ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_162" vm="1.5" title="inner aspect of interface is implicitly static">
                <compile files="InterfaceWithInnerClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@
 
        <!--
                When compiling aspect and target class together, matching works as expected,
-               see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
+               see https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/24
        -->
        <ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_24" vm="1.5" title="exact array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class">
                <compile files="ExactlyMatchingAspect.aj MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@
 
        <!--
                When compiling aspect and target class separately, too many joinpoints are matched,
-               see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
+               see https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/24
        -->
        <ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_24" vm="1.5" title="exact array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class">
                <compile files="ExactlyMatchingAspect.aj" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" outjar="aspect.jar">
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@
 
        <!--
                When compiling aspect and target class together, too many joinpoints are matched,
-               see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
+               see https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/24
        -->
        <ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_24" vm="1.5" title="fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class">
                <compile files="FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@
 
        <!--
                When compiling aspect and target class separately, too many joinpoints are matched,
-               see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
+               see https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/24
        -->
        <ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_24" vm="1.5" title="fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class">
                <compile files="FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" outjar="aspect.jar">
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@
        </ajc-test>
 
        <!--
-               https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/214
+               https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/214
                https://github.com/mojohaus/aspectj-maven-plugin/issues/164
                Problem with multiple, subsequent weaving steps and '-Xlint:warning' or '-Xlint:unorderedAdviceAtShadow=warning'
                        java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 1

diff --git a/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc198/ajc198.xml b/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc198/ajc198.xml
index be4957134977f36d90ced9e8974ed3d0a0d7845f..62861cfea304a371f2c1f51ef5204a9626e7cde0 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc198/ajc198.xml
+++ b/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc198/ajc198.xml
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 <suite>
 
-       <!-- https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/68 -->
+       <!-- https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/68 -->
        <ajc-test dir="bugs198/github_68" vm="11" title="correctly weave code using constant-dynamic">
                <compile files="Application.java MyAspect.aj" options="-11" inpath="condy.jar"/>
                <run class="Application">
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
                </run>
        </ajc-test>
 
-       <!-- https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/105 -->
+       <!-- https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/105 -->
        <ajc-test dir="bugs198/github_105" vm="8" title="ITD annotation with mandatory parameter via aspectpath">
                <compile files="FooAnnotation.java BarAnnotation.java FooAspect.aj" options="-8" outjar="aspect.jar"/>
                <compile files="Application.java" options="-8" aspectpath="aspect.jar"/>