package org.aspectj.systemtest.ajc10x;
import java.io.File;
+
import junit.framework.Test;
+
import org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase;
public class Ajc10xTests extends org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase {
- public static Test suite() {
- return XMLBasedAjcTestCase.loadSuite(Ajc10xTests.class);
- }
-
- protected File getSpecFile() {
- return new File("../tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc10x/ajc10x.xml");
- }
-
-
- public void test001(){
- runTest("properly make choice between cast and parenthesis in parser");
- }
-
- public void test002(){
- runTest("field from implemented interface not found in advice");
- }
-
- public void test003(){
- runTest("make sure advice affects introduced methods and constructors");
- }
-
- public void test004(){
- runTest("new around construct");
- }
-
- public void test005(){
- runTest("aspect redefines a parameter");
- }
-
- public void test006(){
- runTest("introducing extends and implements");
- }
-
- public void test007(){
- runTest("(related) aspect on interface");
- }
-
- public void test008(){
- runTest("advice and package visibility");
- }
-
- public void test009(){
- runTest("advice and package visibility");
- }
-
- public void test010(){
- runTest("advice on implied empty constructor");
- }
-
- public void test011(){
- runTest("advice on * *(..) not mapping to initializers");
- }
-
- public void test012(){
- runTest("three type declarations in the scope of an advice");
- }
-
- public void test013(){
- runTest("introduction fails on class with an inner class that extends or implements something");
- }
-
- public void test014(){
- runTest("checks that methods are introduced on the topmost class implemented");
- }
-
- public void test015(){
- runTest("a couple different returns from around advice");
- }
-
- public void test016(){
- runTest("member finally advice paired with signature advice");
- }
-
- public void test017(){
- runTest("aspect of eachobject(instanceof(Interface))");
- }
-
- public void test018(){
- runTest("final member initialization broken with JDK before 1.1.8");
- }
-
- public void test019(){
- runTest("same package and var name clash in preprocessed code when aspectOf is used");
- }
-
- public void test020(){
- runTest("and PR#201 advice on static methods fails javac compile with this");
- }
-
- public void test021(){
- runTest("non-static advice on inner class defined inside of method body");
- }
-
- public void test022(){
- runTest("simple single-threaded eachcflow test (includes aspectOf)");
- }
+ public static Test suite() {
+ return XMLBasedAjcTestCase.loadSuite(Ajc10xTests.class);
+ }
- public void test023(){
- runTest("bad type resolution when var reassigned in same scope");
- }
+ @Override
+ protected File getSpecFile() {
+ return new File("../tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc10x/ajc10x.xml");
+ }
- public void test024(){
- runTest("generating the right throws clause for call-site advice (and around)");
- }
+ public void test001() {
+ runTest("properly make choice between cast and parenthesis in parser");
+ }
- public void test025(){
- runTest("advice on calls to static methods using several syntax");
- }
+ public void test002() {
+ runTest("field from implemented interface not found in advice");
+ }
- public void test026(){
- runTest(", PR#249, PR#250 advice on constructor sites");
- }
+ public void test003() {
+ runTest("make sure advice affects introduced methods and constructors");
+ }
- public void test027(){
- runTest("test after throwing advice in several ways");
- }
+ public void test004() {
+ runTest("new around construct");
+ }
- public void test028(){
- runTest("fancy name patterns for method names");
- }
+ public void test005() {
+ runTest("aspect redefines a parameter");
+ }
- public void test029(){
- runTest("calls: calls(...)");
- }
+ public void test006() {
+ runTest("introducing extends and implements");
+ }
- public void test030(){
- runTest("throws Exception clause is unnecessarily added to Driver.main method");
- }
+ public void test007() {
+ runTest("(related) aspect on interface");
+ }
- public void test031(){
- runTest("javac fails when this is referenced in the static main method");
- }
+ public void test008() {
+ runTest("advice and package visibility");
+ }
- public void test032(){
- runTest("and 276 cast error generated by ajc when type not in signature");
- }
+ public void test009() {
+ runTest("advice and package visibility");
+ }
- public void test033(){
- runTest("calls to methods to which we don't have source");
- }
+ public void test010() {
+ runTest("advice on implied empty constructor");
+ }
- public void test034(){
- runTest("more aspect inheritance");
- }
+ public void test011() {
+ runTest("advice on * *(..) not mapping to initializers");
+ }
- public void test035(){
- runTest("around and calls with both calling and called this params");
- }
+ public void test012() {
+ runTest("three type declarations in the scope of an advice");
+ }
- public void test036(){
- runTest("compiler crashes with eachobject and named pointcuts with parameters");
- }
+ public void test013() {
+ runTest("introduction fails on class with an inner class that extends or implements something");
+ }
- public void test037(){
- runTest("lookup rules for unqualified pointcut names");
- }
+ public void test014() {
+ runTest("checks that methods are introduced on the topmost class implemented");
+ }
- public void test038(){
- runTest("eachcflow only instantiated if the aspect has some advice in it");
- }
+ public void test015() {
+ runTest("a couple different returns from around advice");
+ }
- public void test039(){
- runTest("(DESIGN QUESTION) aspect of eachJVM advising its own initializer");
- }
+ public void test016() {
+ runTest("member finally advice paired with signature advice");
+ }
- public void test040(){
- runTest("after returning advice on calls to constructors");
- }
+ public void test017() {
+ runTest("aspect of eachobject(instanceof(Interface))");
+ }
- public void test041(){
- runTest("Does annotating 'new' with a type work as desired?");
- }
+ public void test018() {
+ runTest("final member initialization broken with JDK before 1.1.8");
+ }
- public void test042(){
- runTest("Referring to inner classes as {super}.{inner} confused ajc.");
- }
+ public void test019() {
+ runTest("same package and var name clash in preprocessed code when aspectOf is used");
+ }
- public void test043(){
- runTest("Advice on advice");
- }
+ public void test020() {
+ runTest("and PR#201 advice on static methods fails javac compile with this");
+ }
- public void test044(){
- runTest("Introductions on other introductions");
- }
+ public void test021() {
+ runTest("non-static advice on inner class defined inside of method body");
+ }
- public void test045(){
- runTest("Putting advice on array constructors.");
- }
+ public void test022() {
+ runTest("simple single-threaded eachcflow test (includes aspectOf)");
+ }
- public void test046(){
- runTest("call points within block inner classes are doubled");
- }
+ public void test023() {
+ runTest("bad type resolution when var reassigned in same scope");
+ }
- public void test047(){
- runTest("Gets and sets with other advice");
- }
+ public void test024() {
+ runTest("generating the right throws clause for call-site advice (and around)");
+ }
- public void test048(){
- runTest("Compiler can compile correct strictfp modifiers");
- }
+ public void test025() {
+ runTest("advice on calls to static methods using several syntax");
+ }
- public void test049(){
- runTest("basic test of callsto pointcuts");
- }
+ public void test026() {
+ runTest(", PR#249, PR#250 advice on constructor sites");
+ }
- public void test050(){
- runTest("package wildcards in packages");
- }
+ public void test027() {
+ runTest("test after throwing advice in several ways");
+ }
- public void test051(){
- runTest("around advice on calls and receptions with lots of context");
- }
+ public void test028() {
+ runTest("fancy name patterns for method names");
+ }
- public void test052(){
- runTest("! modifier and char in pointcut (no longer an error)");
- }
+ public void test029() {
+ runTest("calls: calls(...)");
+ }
- public void test053(){
- runTest("right number of aspect instances per cflow");
- }
+ public void test030() {
+ runTest("throws Exception clause is unnecessarily added to Driver.main method");
+ }
- public void test054(){
- runTest("many this's into around advice on calls");
- }
+ public void test031() {
+ runTest("javac fails when this is referenced in the static main method");
+ }
- public void test055(){
- runTest("Ensures introduction methods can have advice placed on them");
- }
+ public void test032() {
+ runTest("and 276 cast error generated by ajc when type not in signature");
+ }
- public void test056(){
- runTest("No boolean appearing in the 'if' clause for around advice with eachJVM()");
- }
+ public void test033() {
+ runTest("calls to methods to which we don't have source");
+ }
- public void test057(){
- runTest("Order of super introductions.");
- }
+ public void test034() {
+ runTest("more aspect inheritance");
+ }
- public void test058(){
- runTest("Ensuring backdoor methods are produced.");
- }
+ public void test035() {
+ runTest("around and calls with both calling and called this params");
+ }
- public void test059(){
- runTest("no duplicate advice methods in abstract aspects");
- }
+ public void test036() {
+ runTest("compiler crashes with eachobject and named pointcuts with parameters");
+ }
- public void test060(){
- runTest("no duplicate advice methods in abstract aspects extended");
- }
+ public void test037() {
+ runTest("lookup rules for unqualified pointcut names");
+ }
- public void test061(){
- runTest("Putting after-constructor advice on the wrong types implementing the same interface.");
- }
+ public void test038() {
+ runTest("eachcflow only instantiated if the aspect has some advice in it");
+ }
- public void test062(){
- runTest("Instantiating non-static inner classes in advice.");
- }
+ public void test039() {
+ runTest("(DESIGN QUESTION) aspect of eachJVM advising its own initializer");
+ }
- public void test063(){
- runTest("Referring to pointcut in of clauses");
- }
+ public void test040() {
+ runTest("after returning advice on calls to constructors");
+ }
- public void test064(){
- runTest("Confused referring to instance variables and locals");
- }
+ public void test041() {
+ runTest("Does annotating 'new' with a type work as desired?");
+ }
- public void test065(){
- runTest("Parsing C+ expressions without parens in super introductions.");
- }
+ public void test042() {
+ runTest("Referring to inner classes as {super}.{inner} confused ajc.");
+ }
- public void test066(){
- runTest("Introducing methods on classes that implements inner-interfaces with +implements.");
- }
+ public void test043() {
+ runTest("Advice on advice");
+ }
- public void test067(){
- runTest("Methods with the same name are generated when abstract aspects extend another abstract aspect.");
- }
+ public void test044() {
+ runTest("Introductions on other introductions");
+ }
- public void test068(){
- runTest("Making sure final variables stay final.");
- }
+ public void test045() {
+ runTest("Putting advice on array constructors.");
+ }
- public void test069(){
- runTest("Problem resolving meta-joinpoint names with around advice on methods called from around advice.");
- }
+ public void test046() {
+ runTest("call points within block inner classes are doubled");
+ }
- public void test070(){
- runTest("Make sure that names of lifted local classes are right when referenced in call-site advice");
- }
+ public void test047() {
+ runTest("Gets and sets with other advice");
+ }
- public void test071(){
- runTest("matching for throws clause");
- }
+ public void test048() {
+ runTest("Compiler can compile correct strictfp modifiers");
+ }
- public void test072(){
- runTest("basic test of declare soft");
- }
+ public void test049() {
+ runTest("basic test of callsto pointcuts");
+ }
- public void test073(){
- runTest("advice on calls to constructors of anonymous inners and access to context");
- }
+ public void test050() {
+ runTest("package wildcards in packages");
+ }
- public void test074(){
- runTest("inner aspects can't access outer pointcuts");
- }
+ public void test051() {
+ runTest("around advice on calls and receptions with lots of context");
+ }
- public void test075(){
- runTest("implements and extends are introduced before methods and fields");
- }
+ public void test052() {
+ runTest("! modifier and char in pointcut (no longer an error)");
+ }
- public void test076(){
- runTest("a static/inner aspect of a inner class of an aspect is pulled to the top level as static");
- }
+ public void test053() {
+ runTest("right number of aspect instances per cflow");
+ }
- public void test077(){
- runTest("Crashes with privileged aspect.");
- }
+ public void test054() {
+ runTest("many this's into around advice on calls");
+ }
- public void test078(){
- runTest("join points exist in the execution of field initializers");
- }
+ public void test055() {
+ runTest("Ensures introduction methods can have advice placed on them");
+ }
+
+ public void test056() {
+ runTest("No boolean appearing in the 'if' clause for around advice with eachJVM()");
+ }
+
+ public void test057() {
+ runTest("Order of super introductions.");
+ }
+
+ public void test058() {
+ runTest("Ensuring backdoor methods are produced.");
+ }
+
+ public void test059() {
+ runTest("no duplicate advice methods in abstract aspects");
+ }
+
+ public void test060() {
+ runTest("no duplicate advice methods in abstract aspects extended");
+ }
+
+ public void test061() {
+ runTest("Putting after-constructor advice on the wrong types implementing the same interface.");
+ }
+
+ public void test062() {
+ runTest("Instantiating non-static inner classes in advice.");
+ }
+
+ public void test063() {
+ runTest("Referring to pointcut in of clauses");
+ }
+
+ public void test064() {
+ runTest("Confused referring to instance variables and locals");
+ }
+
+ public void test065() {
+ runTest("Parsing C+ expressions without parens in super introductions.");
+ }
+
+ public void test066() {
+ runTest("Introducing methods on classes that implements inner-interfaces with +implements.");
+ }
+
+ public void test067() {
+ runTest("Methods with the same name are generated when abstract aspects extend another abstract aspect.");
+ }
+
+ public void test068() {
+ runTest("Making sure final variables stay final.");
+ }
+
+ public void test069() {
+ runTest("Problem resolving meta-joinpoint names with around advice on methods called from around advice.");
+ }
+
+ public void test070() {
+ runTest("Make sure that names of lifted local classes are right when referenced in call-site advice");
+ }
+
+ public void test071() {
+ runTest("matching for throws clause");
+ }
+
+ public void test072() {
+ runTest("basic test of declare soft");
+ }
+
+ public void test073() {
+ runTest("advice on calls to constructors of anonymous inners and access to context");
+ }
+
+ public void test074() {
+ runTest("inner aspects can't access outer pointcuts");
+ }
+
+ public void test075() {
+ runTest("implements and extends are introduced before methods and fields");
+ }
+
+ public void test076() {
+ runTest("a static/inner aspect of a inner class of an aspect is pulled to the top level as static");
+ }
+
+ public void test077() {
+ runTest("Crashes with privileged aspect.");
+ }
+
+ public void test078() {
+ runTest("join points exist in the execution of field initializers");
+ }
+
+ public void test079() {
+ try {
+ runTest("privileged aspects");
+ } finally {
+ System.out.println(ajc.getLastCompilationResult().getStandardError());
+ System.out.println(ajc.getLastCompilationResult().getStandardOutput());
+ }
+ }
+
+ public void test080() {
+ runTest("advice on field gets in privileged aspects");
+ }
+
+ public void test081() {
+ runTest("Two anonymous classes in the same scope");
+ }
+
+ public void test082() {
+ runTest("basic tests for initializer and staticinitializer PCDs");
+ }
+
+ public void test083() {
+ runTest("introduction of an initializer into a class");
+ }
+
+ public void test084() {
+ runTest("some method accessibility tests, particularly package-protected and inheritance");
+ }
+
+ public void test085() {
+ runTest("fairly monotonous (and non-covering) tests for expanded dot patterns");
+ }
+
+ public void test086() {
+ runTest("field patterns and subtyping");
+ }
+
+ public void test087() {
+ runTest("Checking formal matching as in Roeder's bug in 0.7b10");
+ }
+
+ public void test088() {
+ runTest("Introducing synchronized methods on interfaces.");
+ }
+
+ public void test089() {
+ runTest("The pointcut params (..,int..) is not recognizing (Object,int,Object).");
+ }
+
+ public void test090() {
+ runTest("calls advice on array objects causes error in code generation");
+ }
+
+ public void test091() {
+ runTest("join points in field initializers aren't showing up.");
+ }
+
+ public void test092() {
+ runTest("Handlers problem");
+ }
+
+ public void test093() {
+ runTest("work nicely with inner class method look-up rules and call-site advice");
+ }
+
+ public void test094() {
+ runTest("strictfp modifier allowed on advice");
+ }
+
+ public void test095() {
+ runTest("No argthis was being created for calls advice.");
+ }
+
+ public void test096() {
+ runTest("Ensuring no advice with instanceof(..) is run on static methods.");
+ }
+
+ public void test097() {
+ runTest("Null pointer on gets advice showing the case causing the error");
+ }
+
+ public void test098() {
+ runTest("try to make sure that dynamic JoinPoint objects aren't generated when used inside of if (false) { ... }");
+ }
+
+ public void test099() {
+ runTest("within and withincode (doesn't all work due to local class name issues)");
+ }
+
+ public void test100() {
+ runTest("around advice on calls within inner classes (including protected method calls)");
+ }
+
+ public void test101() {
+ runTest("around advice on calls within inner classes (including protected method calls)");
+ }
+
+ public void test102() {
+ runTest("Arguments to runNext should be final when needed");
+ }
+
+ public void test103() {
+ runTest("Method introductions");
+ }
- public void test079(){
- runTest("privileged aspects");
- }
+ public void test104() {
+ runTest("Putting an introduced method on each interface");
+ }
- public void test080(){
- runTest("advice on field gets in privileged aspects");
- }
+ public void test105() {
+ runTest("Extending interfaces");
+ }
- public void test081(){
- runTest("Two anonymous classes in the same scope");
- }
+ public void test106() {
+ runTest("Introducing private methods on interfaces");
+ }
- public void test082(){
- runTest("basic tests for initializer and staticinitializer PCDs");
- }
+ public void test107() {
+ runTest("Issuing errors for assigning variables thisJoinPoint -- not assigning thisJoinPoint.");
+ }
- public void test083(){
- runTest("introduction of an initializer into a class");
- }
+ public void test108() {
+ runTest("Static references inside of introduced bodies get bound correctly.");
+ }
- public void test084(){
- runTest("some method accessibility tests, particularly package-protected and inheritance");
- }
+ public void test109() {
+ runTest("cflow and object creations [of eachcflow]");
+ }
- public void test085(){
- runTest("fairly monotonous (and non-covering) tests for expanded dot patterns");
- }
+ public void test110() {
+ runTest("Doesn't import MightHaveAspect when compiling with more than 1 file. [eachobject]");
+ }
- public void test086(){
- runTest("field patterns and subtyping");
- }
+ public void test111() {
+ runTest("test binding to formals in calls to constructors (binding to null) (eachobject !!! now misnamed)");
+ }
- public void test087(){
- runTest("Checking formal matching as in Roeder's bug in 0.7b10");
- }
+ public void test112() {
+ runTest("After advice isn't being woven into after throwing advice");
+ }
- public void test088(){
- runTest("Introducing synchronized methods on interfaces.");
- }
+ public void test113() {
+ runTest("Throwing an EmptyStackException.");
+ }
- public void test089(){
- runTest("The pointcut params (..,int..) is not recognizing (Object,int,Object).");
- }
+ public void test114() {
+ runTest("check that MightHaveAspect interface is created correctly for an aspect in deep package");
+ }
- public void test090(){
- runTest("calls advice on array objects causes error in code generation");
- }
+ public void test115() {
+ runTest("Defines clfow$ajc0 more once. [eachcflow]");
+ }
- public void test091(){
- runTest("join points in field initializers aren't showing up.");
- }
+ public void test116() {
+ runTest("Various calls, receptions, and callsto tests [callsto]");
+ }
- public void test092(){
- runTest("Handlers problem");
- }
+ public void test117() {
+ runTest("Was throwing exception, now just an error. [eachobject]");
+ }
- public void test093(){
- runTest("work nicely with inner class method look-up rules and call-site advice");
- }
+ public void test118() {
+ runTest("different version of aspect inheritance, particularly empty pointcuts and abstract cflows [eachcflow]");
+ }
- public void test094(){
- runTest("strictfp modifier allowed on advice");
- }
+ public void test119() {
+ runTest("set advice on member initing throwing exception [eachobject]");
+ }
- public void test095(){
- runTest("No argthis was being created for calls advice.");
- }
+ public void test120() {
+ runTest("Testing class names with same name's with difference case as package. [eachobject]");
+ }
- public void test096(){
- runTest("Ensuring no advice with instanceof(..) is run on static methods.");
- }
+ public void test121() {
+ runTest("Null pointer on gets advice with coverage [painful]");
+ }
- public void test097(){
- runTest("Null pointer on gets advice showing the case causing the error");
- }
+ public void test122() {
+ runTest("Basic test for cflow pointcuts [eachcflow]");
+ }
- public void test098(){
- runTest("try to make sure that dynamic JoinPoint objects aren't generated when used inside of if (false) { ... }");
- }
+ public void test123() {
+ runTest("Crashing when looking up the type of array members.");
+ }
- public void test099(){
- runTest("within and withincode (doesn't all work due to local class name issues)");
- }
+ public void test124() {
+ runTest("PostfixExprs to various synthetic things are fixed correctly [eachobject]");
+ }
- public void test100(){
- runTest("around advice on calls within inner classes (including protected method calls)");
- }
+ public void test125() {
+ runTest("Dave Binkley's problem with eachcflowroot. [eachcflow]");
+ }
- public void test101(){
- runTest("around advice on calls within inner classes (including protected method calls)");
- }
+ public void test126() {
+ runTest("advice on an inherited method");
+ }
- public void test102(){
- runTest("Arguments to runNext should be final when needed");
- }
+ public void test127() {
+ runTest(", PR#115 checks the ordering of catch clauses");
+ }
- public void test103(){
- runTest("Method introductions");
- }
+ public void test128() {
+ runTest("various declared exception permutations");
+ }
- public void test104(){
- runTest("Putting an introduced method on each interface");
- }
+ public void test129() {
+ runTest("ordering of advice kinds as well as cflow and dominates");
+ }
- public void test105(){
- runTest("Extending interfaces");
- }
+ public void test130() {
+ runTest("advice on default constructor for a class only referenced via reflection");
+ }
- public void test106(){
- runTest("Introducing private methods on interfaces");
- }
+ public void test131() {
+ runTest("calling and called this params in calls points");
+ }
- public void test107(){
- runTest("Issuing errors for assigning variables thisJoinPoint -- not assigning thisJoinPoint.");
- }
+ public void test132() {
+ runTest("primitive parameters coercable to Object just like return values are");
+ }
- public void test108(){
- runTest("Static references inside of introduced bodies get bound correctly.");
- }
+ public void test133() {
+ runTest("join points in static/dynamic initializers aren't showing up.");
+ }
- public void test109(){
- runTest("cflow and object creations [of eachcflow]");
- }
+ public void test134() {
+ runTest("Gets and sets on a number of variables (field access ???)");
+ }
- public void test110(){
- runTest("Doesn't import MightHaveAspect when compiling with more than 1 file. [eachobject]");
- }
+ public void test135() {
+ runTest("Joinpoints are showing up on intermediate call sites");
+ }
- public void test111(){
- runTest("test binding to formals in calls to constructors (binding to null) (eachobject !!! now misnamed)");
- }
+ public void test136() {
+ runTest("Reception based on strictfp modifier");
+ }
- public void test112(){
- runTest("After advice isn't being woven into after throwing advice");
- }
+ public void test137() {
+ runTest("Subclasses that do not redefine a method are not being handled correctly");
+ }
- public void test113(){
- runTest("Throwing an EmptyStackException.");
- }
+ public void test138() {
+ runTest("making sure that super calls are bound to the right methods");
+ }
- public void test114(){
- runTest("check that MightHaveAspect interface is created correctly for an aspect in deep package");
- }
+ public void test139() {
+ runTest("inheritance, around advice and abstract pointcuts [eachobject] (still)");
+ }
- public void test115(){
- runTest("Defines clfow$ajc0 more once. [eachcflow]");
- }
+ public void test140() {
+ runTest("Priviledged aspect methods are missing for privates. [eachobject]");
+ }
- public void test116(){
- runTest("Various calls, receptions, and callsto tests [callsto]");
- }
+ public void test141() {
+ runTest("exceptions thrown and caught in advice, particularly try+proceed");
+ }
- public void test117(){
- runTest("Was throwing exception, now just an error. [eachobject]");
- }
+ public void test142() {
+ runTest("Not and And operators in pointcuts not working");
+ }
- public void test118(){
- runTest("different version of aspect inheritance, particularly empty pointcuts and abstract cflows [eachcflow]");
- }
+ public void test143() {
+ runTest("Member initializers should run before the current class constructor");
+ }
- public void test119(){
- runTest("set advice on member initing throwing exception [eachobject]");
- }
+ public void test144() {
+ runTest("Coverage tests for Member initializers should run before the current class constructor and after super");
+ }
- public void test120(){
- runTest("Testing class names with same name's with difference case as package. [eachobject]");
- }
+ public void test145() {
+ runTest("thisJoinPoint{Static} not visible in if() pcd of named pointcut");
+ }
- public void test121(){
- runTest("Null pointer on gets advice with coverage [painful]");
- }
+ public void test146() {
+ runTest("pcd if() expression visibility at compile-time (minimal operation)");
+ }
- public void test122(){
- runTest("Basic test for cflow pointcuts [eachcflow]");
- }
+ public void test147() {
+ runTest("pcd if() NPE in compiler when unwinding assignment in pcd if(expr)");
+ }
- public void test123(){
- runTest("Crashing when looking up the type of array members.");
- }
+ public void test148() {
+ runTest("pcd if() dup methods produced when pointcut after advice etc (javac)");
+ }
- public void test124(){
- runTest("PostfixExprs to various synthetic things are fixed correctly [eachobject]");
- }
+ public void test149() {
+ runTest("pcd if() variants: [anonymous, named] x [execution, call, callTyped, get, set, initializations] x [before, after, around]");
+ }
- public void test125(){
- runTest("Dave Binkley's problem with eachcflowroot. [eachcflow]");
- }
+ // moved to ajcTestsFailing.xml
+ // public void test150(){
+ // runTest("advice on advice in usejavac mode");
+ // }
- public void test126(){
- runTest("advice on an inherited method");
- }
+ public void test151() {
+ runTest("initialization order with this");
+ }
- public void test127(){
- runTest(", PR#115 checks the ordering of catch clauses");
- }
+ public void test152() {
+ runTest("!within and !this handling for callee-side call points");
+ }
- public void test128(){
- runTest("various declared exception permutations");
- }
+ public void test153() {
+ runTest("private inner interfaces and bytecode visibility");
+ }
- public void test129(){
- runTest("ordering of advice kinds as well as cflow and dominates");
- }
+ public void test154() {
+ runTest("elaborated into testing of around on all join points");
+ }
- public void test130(){
- runTest("advice on default constructor for a class only referenced via reflection");
- }
+ public void test155() {
+ runTest("type name hygiene when code comes from aspects in different packages");
+ }
- public void test131(){
- runTest("calling and called this params in calls points");
- }
+ public void test156() {
+ runTest("cflowbelow dependencies (from Chris Dutchyn)");
+ }
- public void test132(){
- runTest("primitive parameters coercable to Object just like return values are");
- }
+ public void test157() {
+ runTest("Compiler incorrectly flagging *1 (non-alphabetic start to signature pattern)");
+ }
- public void test133(){
- runTest("join points in static/dynamic initializers aren't showing up.");
- }
+ public void test158() {
+ runTest("Unable to bind privately-introduced field name from introduced method in the same aspect");
+ }
- public void test134(){
- runTest("Gets and sets on a number of variables (field access ???)");
- }
+ public void test159() {
+ runTest("anonymous inner class with aspect");
+ }
- public void test135(){
- runTest("Joinpoints are showing up on intermediate call sites");
- }
+ public void test160() {
+ runTest("Arguments are not being passed in to calls advice");
+ }
- public void test136(){
- runTest("Reception based on strictfp modifier");
- }
+ public void test161() {
+ runTest("interfaces as mixins with introduction");
+ }
- public void test137(){
- runTest("Subclasses that do not redefine a method are not being handled correctly");
- }
+ public void test162() {
+ runTest("functional modifiers work correctly with introduced members");
+ }
- public void test138(){
- runTest("making sure that super calls are bound to the right methods");
- }
+ public void test163() {
+ runTest("ExceptionInInitializerError accessing cflow in aspect initialization - before variants");
+ }
- public void test139(){
- runTest("inheritance, around advice and abstract pointcuts [eachobject] (still)");
- }
+ public void test164() {
+ runTest("NoClassDefFoundError accessing cflow in aspect initialization - after variants");
+ }
- public void test140(){
- runTest("Priviledged aspect methods are missing for privates. [eachobject]");
- }
+ public void test165() {
+ runTest("InternalCompilerError in JpPlan when args alone");
+ }
- public void test141(){
- runTest("exceptions thrown and caught in advice, particularly try+proceed");
- }
+ public void test166() {
+ runTest("compile error using pcd if() with advice on introduced methods.");
+ }
- public void test142(){
- runTest("Not and And operators in pointcuts not working");
- }
+ public void test167() {
+ runTest("compile errors boolean using cflow and unimplemented method using around advice on methods introduced by interface");
+ }
- public void test143(){
- runTest("Member initializers should run before the current class constructor");
- }
+ public void test168() {
+ runTest("aspect as member of interface");
+ }
- public void test144(){
- runTest("Coverage tests for Member initializers should run before the current class constructor and after super");
- }
+ public void test169() {
+ runTest("missing method name to synthetic invocation");
+ }
- public void test145(){
- runTest("thisJoinPoint{Static} not visible in if() pcd of named pointcut");
- }
+ public void test170() {
+ runTest("protected subclass impl of superclass method with default access and variants");
+ }
- public void test146(){
- runTest("pcd if() expression visibility at compile-time (minimal operation)");
- }
+ public void test171() {
+ runTest("Exception planning advice");
+ }
- public void test147(){
- runTest("pcd if() NPE in compiler when unwinding assignment in pcd if(expr)");
- }
+ public void test172() {
+ runTest("unreproduced bug with advice - probably UTR");
+ }
- public void test148(){
- runTest("pcd if() dup methods produced when pointcut after advice etc (javac)");
- }
+ public void test173() {
+ runTest("introduced inner interfaces accessible inside aspect");
+ }
- public void test149(){
- runTest("pcd if() variants: [anonymous, named] x [execution, call, callTyped, get, set, initializations] x [before, after, around]");
- }
+ public void test174() {
+ runTest("validate (enclosing) join point and source locations");
+ }
-// moved to ajcTestsFailing.xml
-// public void test150(){
-// runTest("advice on advice in usejavac mode");
-// }
+ public void test175() {
+ runTest("advice formals are just like method formals");
+ }
- public void test151(){
- runTest("initialization order with this");
- }
+ public void test176() {
+ runTest("advice formals produce errors just like method formals");
+ }
- public void test152(){
- runTest("!within and !this handling for callee-side call points");
- }
+ public void test177() {
+ runTest("advice throws clauses must be compatible with joinpoints they apply to");
+ }
- public void test153(){
- runTest("private inner interfaces and bytecode visibility");
- }
+ public void test178() {
+ runTest("potential method conflicts with introductions and interfaces and PR#561");
+ }
- public void test154(){
- runTest("elaborated into testing of around on all join points");
- }
+ public void test179() {
+ runTest("illegal method conflicts with introductions and interfaces and PR#561");
+ }
- public void test155(){
- runTest("type name hygiene when code comes from aspects in different packages");
- }
+ public void test180() {
+ runTest("AspectOf available for different aspect types");
+ }
- public void test156(){
- runTest("cflowbelow dependencies (from Chris Dutchyn)");
- }
+ public void test181() {
+ runTest("access to all members of class and inner class from privileged aspect");
+ }
- public void test157(){
- runTest("Compiler incorrectly flagging *1 (non-alphabetic start to signature pattern)");
- }
+ public void test182() {
+ runTest("cflow alone with around produces compiler bcg StackOverflowError");
+ }
- public void test158(){
- runTest("Unable to bind privately-introduced field name from introduced method in the same aspect");
- }
+ public void test183() {
+ runTest("get/set join points run for complex assignment operators (+=, etc.) (working)");
+ }
- public void test159(){
- runTest("anonymous inner class with aspect");
- }
+ public void test184() {
+ runTest("this available in introduced field initializers");
+ }
- public void test160(){
- runTest("Arguments are not being passed in to calls advice");
- }
+ public void test185() {
+ runTest("Introduced type unavailable to cast expressions in introduced methods");
+ }
- public void test161(){
- runTest("interfaces as mixins with introduction");
- }
+ public void test186() {
+ runTest("Introduced type unavailable to qualified new expressions in introduced methods");
+ }
- public void test162(){
- runTest("functional modifiers work correctly with introduced members");
- }
+ public void test187() {
+ runTest("Introduced type unavailable to cast expressions in introduced field initializers");
+ }
- public void test163(){
- runTest("ExceptionInInitializerError accessing cflow in aspect initialization - before variants");
- }
+ public void test188() {
+ runTest("Aspect type unavailable to qualified new expressions in body of introduced methods");
+ }
- public void test164(){
- runTest("NoClassDefFoundError accessing cflow in aspect initialization - after variants");
- }
+ public void test189() {
+ runTest("Introduced type unavailable to qualified new expressions in introduced field initializers");
+ }
- public void test165(){
- runTest("InternalCompilerError in JpPlan when args alone");
- }
+ public void test190() {
+ runTest("variable slots and finally/catch causing verify errors");
+ }
- public void test166(){
- runTest("compile error using pcd if() with advice on introduced methods.");
- }
+ public void test191() {
+ runTest("after advice on static method with pcd if() using result");
+ }
- public void test167(){
- runTest("compile errors boolean using cflow and unimplemented method using around advice on methods introduced by interface");
- }
+ public void test192() {
+ runTest("after advice on static method with pcd if() using result through pointcut");
+ }
- public void test168(){
- runTest("aspect as member of interface");
- }
+ public void test193() {
+ runTest("AbstractMethodError for introduced methods (order 1)");
+ }
- public void test169(){
- runTest("missing method name to synthetic invocation");
- }
+ public void test194() {
+ runTest("AbstractMethodError for introduced methods (order 2)");
+ }
- public void test170(){
- runTest("protected subclass impl of superclass method with default access and variants");
- }
+ public void test195() {
+ runTest("AbstractMethodError for introduced methods (order 3)");
+ }
- public void test171(){
- runTest("Exception planning advice");
- }
+ public void test196() {
+ runTest("AbstractMethodError for introduced methods (order 4)");
+ }
- public void test172(){
- runTest("unreproduced bug with advice - probably UTR");
- }
+ public void test197() {
+ runTest("AbstractMethodError for introduced methods (order 5)");
+ }
- public void test173(){
- runTest("introduced inner interfaces accessible inside aspect");
- }
+ public void test198() {
+ runTest("declare error and abstract pointcuts");
+ }
- public void test174(){
- runTest("validate (enclosing) join point and source locations");
- }
+ public void test199() {
+ runTest("Exercise runtime classes (optionally in 1.1 VM)");
+ }
- public void test175(){
- runTest("advice formals are just like method formals");
- }
+ public void test200() {
+ runTest("VerifyError after around advice falls off end of tryCatch");
+ }
- public void test176(){
- runTest("advice formals produce errors just like method formals");
- }
+ public void test201() {
+ runTest("Named within pointcuts failing");
+ }
- public void test177(){
- runTest("advice throws clauses must be compatible with joinpoints they apply to");
- }
+ public void test202() {
+ runTest("aspect with private abstract pointcut");
+ }
- public void test178(){
- runTest("potential method conflicts with introductions and interfaces and PR#561");
- }
+ public void test203() {
+ runTest("concrete aspect unable to access abstract package-private pointcut in parent for overriding");
+ }
- public void test179(){
- runTest("illegal method conflicts with introductions and interfaces and PR#561");
- }
+ public void test204() {
+ runTest("inner, outer, and outside-package subaspects of an aspect with abstract protected-, public-, and default-access pointcuts");
+ }
- public void test180(){
- runTest("AspectOf available for different aspect types");
- }
+ public void test205() {
+ runTest("inner subaspects of an aspect with private pointcut");
+ }
- public void test181(){
- runTest("access to all members of class and inner class from privileged aspect");
- }
+ public void test206() {
+ runTest("outer subaspects of an aspect with private pointcut");
+ }
- public void test182(){
- runTest("cflow alone with around produces compiler bcg StackOverflowError");
- }
+ public void test207() {
+ runTest("abstract aspect used statically should not cause instantiation of advice or pointcut");
+ }
- public void test183(){
- runTest("get/set join points run for complex assignment operators (+=, etc.) (working)");
- }
+ public void test208() {
+ runTest("private inner interface accessible in scope when declared on outer class");
+ }
- public void test184(){
- runTest("this available in introduced field initializers");
- }
+ public void test209() {
+ runTest("accessing protected superclass members in and outside CCC from body of method introduction");
+ }
- public void test185(){
- runTest("Introduced type unavailable to cast expressions in introduced methods");
- }
+ public void test210() {
+ runTest("accessing private superclass members from body of method introduction");
+ }
- public void test186(){
- runTest("Introduced type unavailable to qualified new expressions in introduced methods");
- }
+ public void test211() {
+ runTest("simple test for around and casting");
+ }
- public void test187(){
- runTest("Introduced type unavailable to cast expressions in introduced field initializers");
- }
+ public void test212() {
+ runTest("aroundInner 1 - around advice inner Thread subclass running proceed but not writing field");
+ }
- public void test188(){
- runTest("Aspect type unavailable to qualified new expressions in body of introduced methods");
- }
+ public void test213() {
+ runTest("aroundInner 2 - around advice inner Runnable running proceed and writing method-final proxy");
+ }
- public void test189(){
- runTest("Introduced type unavailable to qualified new expressions in introduced field initializers");
- }
+ public void test214() {
+ runTest("aroundInner 3 - around advice inner class running proceed and writing field");
+ }
- public void test190(){
- runTest("variable slots and finally/catch causing verify errors");
- }
+ public void test215() {
+ runTest("aroundInner 4 - around advice inner Thread subclass running proceed and writing field");
+ }
- public void test191(){
- runTest("after advice on static method with pcd if() using result");
- }
+ public void test216() {
+ runTest("aroundInner 5 - around advice inner Runnable (subinterface) running proceed and writing field introduced on subinterface");
+ }
- public void test192(){
- runTest("after advice on static method with pcd if() using result through pointcut");
- }
+ public void test217() {
+ runTest("Named local class closing over proceed invocation");
+ }
- public void test193(){
- runTest("AbstractMethodError for introduced methods (order 1)");
- }
+ public void test218() {
+ runTest("beautiful recursive computation of factorial with around is now supported");
+ }
- public void test194(){
- runTest("AbstractMethodError for introduced methods (order 2)");
- }
+ public void test219() {
+ runTest("multi-dispatch not used for named pcd references");
+ }
- public void test195(){
- runTest("AbstractMethodError for introduced methods (order 3)");
- }
+ public void test220() {
+ runTest("multi-dispatch implemented through around + args");
+ }
- public void test196(){
- runTest("AbstractMethodError for introduced methods (order 4)");
- }
+ public void test221() {
+ runTest("unrecognized aspect should not net Cloneable and Serializable warnings");
+ }
- public void test197(){
- runTest("AbstractMethodError for introduced methods (order 5)");
- }
+ public void test222() {
+ // FIXME AV - infinite loop on JRockit in m5 advice - don't know why
+ runTest("unreachable code generated by around advice on the execution of void methods");
+ }
- public void test198(){
- runTest("declare error and abstract pointcuts");
- }
+ public void test223() {
+ runTest("Overriding method implementations using introduction on interfaces");
+ }
- public void test199(){
- runTest("Exercise runtime classes (optionally in 1.1 VM)");
- }
+ public void test224() {
+ runTest("more coverage for around and concrete methods on interfaces");
+ }
- public void test200(){
- runTest("VerifyError after around advice falls off end of tryCatch");
- }
+ public void test225() {
+ runTest("invalid number and type of proceed arguments");
+ }
- public void test201(){
- runTest("Named within pointcuts failing");
- }
+ public void test226() {
+ runTest("after returning advice order");
+ }
- public void test202(){
- runTest("aspect with private abstract pointcut");
- }
+ public void test227() {
+ runTest("after returning advice param");
+ }
- public void test203(){
- runTest("concrete aspect unable to access abstract package-private pointcut in parent for overriding");
- }
+ public void test228() {
+ runTest("! and declaring types with callee-side call join points");
+ }
- public void test204(){
- runTest("inner, outer, and outside-package subaspects of an aspect with abstract protected-, public-, and default-access pointcuts");
- }
+ public void test229() {
+ runTest(". Binding the wrong arguments in withincode(..).");
+ }
- public void test205(){
- runTest("inner subaspects of an aspect with private pointcut");
- }
+ public void test230() {
+ runTest(". Matching arguments in cflow correctly.");
+ }
- public void test206(){
- runTest("outer subaspects of an aspect with private pointcut");
- }
+ public void test231() {
+ runTest(". Binding variables with numbers in their name with pertarget(..)'s.");
+ }
- public void test207(){
- runTest("abstract aspect used statically should not cause instantiation of advice or pointcut");
- }
+ public void test232() {
+ runTest("second arg in formal on shared joinpoint with pcd if() causes verify error ??");
+ }
- public void test208(){
- runTest("private inner interface accessible in scope when declared on outer class");
- }
+ public void test233() {
+ runTest("access to private members from privileged aspect");
+ }
- public void test209(){
- runTest("accessing protected superclass members in and outside CCC from body of method introduction");
- }
+ public void test234() {
+ runTest("inner classes of privileged aspects cannot see target class private members");
+ }
- public void test210(){
- runTest("accessing private superclass members from body of method introduction");
- }
+ public void test235() {
+ runTest("aspects should get package access outside the file");
+ }
- public void test211(){
- runTest("simple test for around and casting");
- }
+ public void test236() {
+ runTest("subclass advice not run for join points selected by superclass cflow-based pointcuts");
+ }
- public void test212(){
- runTest("aroundInner 1 - around advice inner Thread subclass running proceed but not writing field");
- }
+ public void test237() {
+ runTest("more issues with abstract aspects and cflow pointcuts");
+ }
- public void test213(){
- runTest("aroundInner 2 - around advice inner Runnable running proceed and writing method-final proxy");
- }
+ public void test238() {
+ runTest("compile fails for aspect derived from percflow base aspect unless pointcut excludes base aspect and subaspects");
+ }
- public void test214(){
- runTest("aroundInner 3 - around advice inner class running proceed and writing field");
- }
+ public void test239() {
+ runTest("pertarget stack overflow getting name of anonymous (Interface) class");
+ }
- public void test215(){
- runTest("aroundInner 4 - around advice inner Thread subclass running proceed and writing field");
- }
+ public void test240() {
+ runTest("pertarget stack overflow getting name of anonymous (Object) class");
+ }
- public void test216(){
- runTest("aroundInner 5 - around advice inner Runnable (subinterface) running proceed and writing field introduced on subinterface");
- }
+ public void test241() {
+ runTest("pertarget runtime stack overflow (getting name of anonymous (Object) class?)");
+ }
- public void test217(){
- runTest("Named local class closing over proceed invocation");
- }
+ public void test242() {
+ runTest("subaspect method declaration on superaspect inner interface (names)");
+ }
- public void test218(){
- runTest("beautiful recursive computation of factorial with around is now supported");
- }
+ public void test243() {
+ runTest("subaspect method declaration on superaspect inner interface (access)");
+ }
- public void test219(){
- runTest("multi-dispatch not used for named pcd references");
- }
+ public void test244() {
+ runTest("subaspect method declaration on superaspect inner interface (types)");
+ }
- public void test220(){
- runTest("multi-dispatch implemented through around + args");
- }
+ public void test245() {
+ runTest("around AST type XXX");
+ }
- public void test221(){
- runTest("unrecognized aspect should not net Cloneable and Serializable warnings");
- }
+ public void test246() {
+ runTest("around all execution with double assignment in initializer (simple)");
+ }
- public void test222(){
- //FIXME AV - infinite loop on JRockit in m5 advice - don't know why
- runTest("unreachable code generated by around advice on the execution of void methods");
- }
+ public void test247() {
+ runTest("around all execution with double assignment in initializer (coverage)");
+ }
- public void test223(){
- runTest("Overriding method implementations using introduction on interfaces");
- }
+ public void test248() {
+ runTest("changing this in around's proceed reported by Rich Price");
+ }
- public void test224(){
- runTest("more coverage for around and concrete methods on interfaces");
- }
+ public void test249() {
+ runTest("default package for aspect introductions is not the current package");
+ }
- public void test225(){
- runTest("invalid number and type of proceed arguments");
- }
+ public void test250() {
+ runTest("anon class written to wrong directory");
+ }
- public void test226(){
- runTest("after returning advice order");
- }
+ public void test251() {
+ runTest("unqualified transitive pointcut references not resolved");
+ }
- public void test227(){
- runTest("after returning advice param");
- }
+ public void test252() {
+ runTest("unqualified transitive pointcut references not resolved - 2");
+ }
- public void test228(){
- runTest("! and declaring types with callee-side call join points");
- }
+ public void test253() {
+ runTest("direct use outside aspect of defined abstract pointcut");
+ }
- public void test229(){
- runTest(". Binding the wrong arguments in withincode(..).");
- }
+ public void test254() {
+ runTest("direct use outside aspect of undefined abstract pointcut");
+ }
- public void test230(){
- runTest(". Matching arguments in cflow correctly.");
- }
+ public void test255() {
+ runTest("indirect use outside aspect of undefined abstract pointcut");
+ }
- public void test231(){
- runTest(". Binding variables with numbers in their name with pertarget(..)'s.");
- }
+ public void test256() {
+ runTest("simple call join point tests for JoinPoint SourceLocation context");
+ }
- public void test232(){
- runTest("second arg in formal on shared joinpoint with pcd if() causes verify error ??");
- }
+ public void test257() {
+ runTest("!target with second advice on casted call");
+ }
- public void test233(){
- runTest("access to private members from privileged aspect");
- }
+ public void test258() {
+ runTest("name binding in around cflow");
+ }
- public void test234(){
- runTest("inner classes of privileged aspects cannot see target class private members");
- }
+ public void test259() {
+ runTest("name binding in around cflow - 2");
+ }
- public void test235(){
- runTest("aspects should get package access outside the file");
- }
+ public void test260() {
+ runTest("around name-binding in cflows using factorial");
+ }
- public void test236(){
- runTest("subclass advice not run for join points selected by superclass cflow-based pointcuts");
- }
+ public void test261() {
+ runTest("replacing this or target in around advice");
+ }
- public void test237(){
- runTest("more issues with abstract aspects and cflow pointcuts");
- }
+ public void test262() {
+ runTest("after returning from initialization and after executing constructor");
+ }
- public void test238(){
- runTest("compile fails for aspect derived from percflow base aspect unless pointcut excludes base aspect and subaspects");
- }
+ public void test263() {
+ runTest("after returning from initialization causes ExceptionInInitializer in aspect");
+ }
- public void test239(){
- runTest("pertarget stack overflow getting name of anonymous (Interface) class");
- }
+ public void test264() {
+ runTest("name binding in before cflow containing cflowbelow");
+ }
- public void test240(){
- runTest("pertarget stack overflow getting name of anonymous (Object) class");
- }
+ public void test265() {
+ runTest("file order in type searching");
+ }
- public void test241(){
- runTest("pertarget runtime stack overflow (getting name of anonymous (Object) class?)");
- }
+ public void test266() {
+ runTest("simple declare warning (NPE)");
+ }
- public void test242(){
- runTest("subaspect method declaration on superaspect inner interface (names)");
- }
+ public void test267() {
+ runTest("ajc dies on cflow into field init anon class see knownbugs.txt");
+ }
- public void test243(){
- runTest("subaspect method declaration on superaspect inner interface (access)");
- }
+ public void test268() {
+ runTest("Incrementing interface-introduced field");
+ }
- public void test244(){
- runTest("subaspect method declaration on superaspect inner interface (types)");
- }
+ public void test269() {
+ runTest("The dynamic type, not the static one, should be used in if pcds");
+ }
- public void test245(){
- runTest("around AST type XXX");
- }
+ public void test270() {
+ runTest("bad interaction with after returning, around and void methods (from Rich Price)");
+ }
- public void test246(){
- runTest("around all execution with double assignment in initializer (simple)");
- }
+ public void test271() {
+ runTest("type pattern matching for inner classes (from Ken Horn)");
+ }
- public void test247(){
- runTest("around all execution with double assignment in initializer (coverage)");
- }
+ public void test272() {
+ runTest("static initializer member name");
+ }
- public void test248(){
- runTest("changing this in around's proceed reported by Rich Price");
- }
+ public void test273() {
+ runTest("cflow pcd syntax error");
+ }
- public void test249(){
- runTest("default package for aspect introductions is not the current package");
- }
+ public void test274() {
+ runTest("binding args with indeterminate prefix and suffix");
+ }
- public void test250(){
- runTest("anon class written to wrong directory");
- }
+ public void test275() {
+ runTest("check arg types with indeterminate prefix and suffix");
+ }
- public void test251(){
- runTest("unqualified transitive pointcut references not resolved");
- }
+ public void test276() {
+ runTest("testing and binding args with single indeterminate prefix and suffix");
+ }
- public void test252(){
- runTest("unqualified transitive pointcut references not resolved - 2");
- }
+ public void test277() {
+ runTest("binding handler args with indeterminate prefix and suffix");
+ }
- public void test253(){
- runTest("direct use outside aspect of defined abstract pointcut");
- }
+ public void test278() {
+ runTest("Compiling java.lang.Object with ajc yields non-verifying bytecode");
+ }
- public void test254(){
- runTest("direct use outside aspect of undefined abstract pointcut");
- }
+ public void test279() {
+ runTest("method-local class defined in around return statement");
+ }
- public void test255(){
- runTest("indirect use outside aspect of undefined abstract pointcut");
- }
+ public void test280() {
+ runTest("CE expected for assignment to arg in if pcd");
+ }
- public void test256(){
- runTest("simple call join point tests for JoinPoint SourceLocation context");
- }
+ public void test281() {
+ runTest("advising field get/sets when accessing via super");
+ }
- public void test257(){
- runTest("!target with second advice on casted call");
- }
+ public void test282() {
+ runTest("accessing private members in outer types");
+ }
- public void test258(){
- runTest("name binding in around cflow");
- }
+ public void test283() {
+ runTest("can't apply around advice to the execution of around advice");
+ }
- public void test259(){
- runTest("name binding in around cflow - 2");
- }
-
- public void test260(){
- runTest("around name-binding in cflows using factorial");
- }
-
- public void test261(){
- runTest("replacing this or target in around advice");
- }
-
- public void test262(){
- runTest("after returning from initialization and after executing constructor");
- }
-
- public void test263(){
- runTest("after returning from initialization causes ExceptionInInitializer in aspect");
- }
-
- public void test264(){
- runTest("name binding in before cflow containing cflowbelow");
- }
-
- public void test265(){
- runTest("file order in type searching");
- }
-
- public void test266(){
- runTest("simple declare warning (NPE)");
- }
-
- public void test267(){
- runTest("ajc dies on cflow into field init anon class see knownbugs.txt");
- }
-
- public void test268(){
- runTest("Incrementing interface-introduced field");
- }
-
- public void test269(){
- runTest("The dynamic type, not the static one, should be used in if pcds");
- }
-
- public void test270(){
- runTest("bad interaction with after returning, around and void methods (from Rich Price)");
- }
-
- public void test271(){
- runTest("type pattern matching for inner classes (from Ken Horn)");
- }
-
- public void test272(){
- runTest("static initializer member name");
- }
-
- public void test273(){
- runTest("cflow pcd syntax error");
- }
-
- public void test274(){
- runTest("binding args with indeterminate prefix and suffix");
- }
-
- public void test275(){
- runTest("check arg types with indeterminate prefix and suffix");
- }
-
- public void test276(){
- runTest("testing and binding args with single indeterminate prefix and suffix");
- }
-
- public void test277(){
- runTest("binding handler args with indeterminate prefix and suffix");
- }
-
- public void test278(){
- runTest("Compiling java.lang.Object with ajc yields non-verifying bytecode");
- }
-
- public void test279(){
- runTest("method-local class defined in around return statement");
- }
-
- public void test280(){
- runTest("CE expected for assignment to arg in if pcd");
- }
-
- public void test281(){
- runTest("advising field get/sets when accessing via super");
- }
-
- public void test282(){
- runTest("accessing private members in outer types");
- }
-
- public void test283(){
- runTest("can't apply around advice to the execution of around advice");
- }
-
- public void test284(){
- runTest("incompatible advice throws clause are a compile-time error");
- }
+ public void test284() {
+ runTest("incompatible advice throws clause are a compile-time error");
+ }
}
-
import org.aspectj.weaver.bcel.BcelTypeMunger;
import org.aspectj.weaver.bcel.BcelWorld;
-
public class GenericITDsDesign extends XMLBasedAjcTestCase {
private World recentWorld;
-
+
public static Test suite() {
return XMLBasedAjcTestCase.loadSuite(GenericITDsDesign.class);
}
return new File("../tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/ajc150.xml");
}
-
private void verifyDebugString(ResolvedMember theMember, String string) {
- assertTrue("Expected '"+string+"' but found "+theMember.toDebugString(),
- theMember.toDebugString().equals(string));
+ assertTrue("Expected '" + string + "' but found " + theMember.toDebugString(), theMember.toDebugString().equals(string));
}
- public static JavaClass getClassFromDisk(Ajc ajc,String classname) {
+ public static JavaClass getClassFromDisk(Ajc ajc, String classname) {
try {
- ClassPath cp =
- new ClassPath(ajc.getSandboxDirectory() + File.pathSeparator + System.getProperty("java.class.path"));
- SyntheticRepository sRepos = SyntheticRepository.getInstance(cp);
+ ClassPath cp = new ClassPath(ajc.getSandboxDirectory() + File.pathSeparator + System.getProperty("java.class.path"));
+ SyntheticRepository sRepos = SyntheticRepository.getInstance(cp);
return sRepos.loadClass(classname);
} catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
- fail("Couldn't find class "+classname+" in the sandbox directory.");
+ fail("Couldn't find class " + classname + " in the sandbox directory.");
}
return null;
}
-
- public static Signature getClassSignature(Ajc ajc,String classname) {
- JavaClass clazz = getClassFromDisk(ajc,classname);
+
+ public static Signature getClassSignature(Ajc ajc, String classname) {
+ JavaClass clazz = getClassFromDisk(ajc, classname);
Signature sigAttr = null;
Attribute[] attrs = clazz.getAttributes();
for (int i = 0; i < attrs.length; i++) {
Attribute attribute = attrs[i];
- if (attribute.getName().equals("Signature")) sigAttr = (Signature)attribute;
+ if (attribute.getName().equals("Signature"))
+ sigAttr = (Signature) attribute;
}
return sigAttr;
}
+
// Check the signature attribute on a class is correct
- public static void verifyClassSignature(Ajc ajc,String classname,String sig) {
- Signature sigAttr = getClassSignature(ajc,classname);
- assertTrue("Failed to find signature attribute for class "+classname,sigAttr!=null);
- assertTrue("Expected signature to be '"+sig+"' but was '"+sigAttr.getSignature()+"'",
- sigAttr.getSignature().equals(sig));
+ public static void verifyClassSignature(Ajc ajc, String classname, String sig) {
+ Signature sigAttr = getClassSignature(ajc, classname);
+ assertTrue("Failed to find signature attribute for class " + classname, sigAttr != null);
+ assertTrue("Expected signature to be '" + sig + "' but was '" + sigAttr.getSignature() + "'", sigAttr.getSignature()
+ .equals(sig));
}
-
- public List /*BcelTypeMunger*/ getTypeMunger(String classname) {
- ClassPath cp =
- new ClassPath(ajc.getSandboxDirectory() + File.pathSeparator +
- System.getProperty("java.class.path"));
+
+ public List /* BcelTypeMunger */getTypeMunger(String classname) {
+ ClassPath cp = new ClassPath(ajc.getSandboxDirectory() + File.pathSeparator + System.getProperty("java.class.path"));
recentWorld = new BcelWorld(cp.toString());
- ReferenceType resolvedType = (ReferenceType)recentWorld.resolve(classname);
+ ReferenceType resolvedType = (ReferenceType) recentWorld.resolve(classname);
CrosscuttingMembers cmembers = resolvedType.collectCrosscuttingMembers(true);
List tmungers = cmembers.getTypeMungers();
return tmungers;
}
-
- private BcelTypeMunger getMungerFromLine(String classname,int linenumber) {
+
+ private BcelTypeMunger getMungerFromLine(String classname, int linenumber) {
List allMungers = getTypeMunger(classname);
for (Iterator iter = allMungers.iterator(); iter.hasNext();) {
BcelTypeMunger element = (BcelTypeMunger) iter.next();
- if (element.getMunger().getSourceLocation().getLine()==linenumber) return element;
+ if (element.getMunger().getSourceLocation().getLine() == linenumber)
+ return element;
}
for (Iterator iter = allMungers.iterator(); iter.hasNext();) {
BcelTypeMunger element = (BcelTypeMunger) iter.next();
- System.err.println("Line: "+element.getMunger().getSourceLocation().getLine()+" > "+element);
+ System.err.println("Line: " + element.getMunger().getSourceLocation().getLine() + " > " + element);
}
- fail("Couldn't find a type munger from line "+linenumber+" in class "+classname);
+ fail("Couldn't find a type munger from line " + linenumber + " in class " + classname);
return null;
}
public Hashtable getMeTheFields(String classname) {
- JavaClass theClass = getClassFromDisk(ajc,classname);
+ JavaClass theClass = getClassFromDisk(ajc, classname);
Hashtable retval = new Hashtable();
org.aspectj.apache.bcel.classfile.Field[] fs = theClass.getFields();
for (int i = 0; i < fs.length; i++) {
Field field = fs[i];
- retval.put(field.getName(),field);
+ retval.put(field.getName(), field);
}
return retval;
}
-
- /*
- test plan:
- 1. Serializing and recovering 'default bounds' type variable info:
- a. methods
- b. fields
- c. ctors
- 2. Serializing and recovering 'extends' with a class bounded type variable info:
- a. methods
- b. fields
- c. ctors
- 3. Serializing and recovering 'extends' with an interface bounded type variable info:
- a. methods
- b. fields
- c. ctors
- 4. Multiple interface bounds
- a. methods
- b. fields
- c. ctors
- 5. wildcard bounds '? extends/? super'
- a. methods
- b. fields
- c. ctors
- 6. using type variables in an ITD from the containing aspect, no bounds
- a. methods
- b. fields
- c. ctors
-
-
- */
-
-
+
+ /*
+ * test plan: 1. Serializing and recovering 'default bounds' type variable info: a. methods b. fields c. ctors 2. Serializing
+ * and recovering 'extends' with a class bounded type variable info: a. methods b. fields c. ctors 3. Serializing and recovering
+ * 'extends' with an interface bounded type variable info: a. methods b. fields c. ctors 4. Multiple interface bounds a. methods
+ * b. fields c. ctors 5. wildcard bounds '? extends/? super' a. methods b. fields c. ctors 6. using type variables in an ITD
+ * from the containing aspect, no bounds a. methods b. fields c. ctors
+ */
+
// Verify: a) After storing it in a class file and recovering it (through deserialization), we can see the type
- // variable and that the parameter refers to the type variable.
+ // variable and that the parameter refers to the type variable.
public void testDesignA() {
- runTest("generic itds - design A");
- BcelTypeMunger theBcelMunger = getMungerFromLine("X",5);
+ runTest("generic itds - design A");
+ BcelTypeMunger theBcelMunger = getMungerFromLine("X", 5);
ResolvedType typeC = recentWorld.resolve("C");
ResolvedTypeMunger rtMunger = theBcelMunger.getMunger();
ResolvedMember theMember = rtMunger.getSignature();
// Let's check all parts of the member
- assertTrue("Declaring type should be C: "+theMember,
- theMember.getDeclaringType().equals(typeC));
-
+ assertTrue("Declaring type should be C: " + theMember, theMember.getDeclaringType().equals(typeC));
+
TypeVariable tVar = theMember.getTypeVariables()[0];
- TypeVariableReference tvrt = (TypeVariableReference)theMember.getParameterTypes()[0];
-
- theMember.resolve(recentWorld); // resolution will join the type variables together (i.e. make them refer to the same instance)
-
+ TypeVariableReference tvrt = (TypeVariableReference) theMember.getParameterTypes()[0];
+
+ theMember.resolve(recentWorld); // resolution will join the type variables together (i.e. make them refer to the same
+ // instance)
+
tVar = theMember.getTypeVariables()[0];
- tvrt = (TypeVariableReference)theMember.getParameterTypes()[0];
-
- assertTrue("Post resolution, the type variable in the parameter should be identical to the type variable declared on the member",
- tVar==tvrt.getTypeVariable());
+ tvrt = (TypeVariableReference) theMember.getParameterTypes()[0];
+
+ assertTrue(
+ "Post resolution, the type variable in the parameter should be identical to the type variable declared on the member",
+ tVar == tvrt.getTypeVariable());
}
-
+
// Verify: bounds are preserved and accessible after serialization
public void testDesignB() {
- runTest("generic itds - design B");
- BcelTypeMunger theBcelMunger = getMungerFromLine("X",7);
+ runTest("generic itds - design B");
+ BcelTypeMunger theBcelMunger = getMungerFromLine("X", 7);
ResolvedTypeMunger rtMunger = theBcelMunger.getMunger();
ResolvedMember theMember = rtMunger.getSignature();
- verifyDebugString(theMember,"<T extends java.lang.Number> void C.m0(T)");
-
- theBcelMunger = getMungerFromLine("X",9);
+ verifyDebugString(theMember, "<T extends java.lang.Number> void C.m0(T)");
+
+ theBcelMunger = getMungerFromLine("X", 9);
rtMunger = theBcelMunger.getMunger();
theMember = rtMunger.getSignature();
- verifyDebugString(theMember,"<Q extends I> void C.m1(Q)");
-
- theBcelMunger = getMungerFromLine("X",11);
+ verifyDebugString(theMember, "<Q extends I> void C.m1(Q)");
+
+ theBcelMunger = getMungerFromLine("X", 11);
rtMunger = theBcelMunger.getMunger();
theMember = rtMunger.getSignature();
- verifyDebugString(theMember,"<R extends java.lang.Number,I> void C.m2(R)");
+ verifyDebugString(theMember, "<R extends java.lang.Number,I> void C.m2(R)");
}
-
- // Verify: a) multiple type variables work.
- //
b) type variables below the 'top level' (e.g. List<A>) are preserved.
+
+ // Verify: a) multiple type variables work.
+ // b) type variables below the 'top level' (e.g. List<A>) are preserved.
public void testDesignC() {
- runTest("generic itds - design C");
- BcelTypeMunger theBcelMunger = getMungerFromLine("X",9);
- //System.err.println(theBcelMunger.getMunger().getSignature().toDebugString());
- verifyDebugString(theBcelMunger.getMunger().getSignature(),"<T extends java.lang.Number,Q extends I> void C.m0(T, Q)");
-
- theBcelMunger = getMungerFromLine("X",11);
+ runTest("generic itds - design C");
+ BcelTypeMunger theBcelMunger = getMungerFromLine("X", 9);
+ // System.err.println(theBcelMunger.getMunger().getSignature().toDebugString());
+ verifyDebugString(theBcelMunger.getMunger().getSignature(), "<T extends java.lang.Number,Q extends I> void C.m0(T, Q)");
+
+ theBcelMunger = getMungerFromLine("X", 11);
System.err.println(theBcelMunger.getMunger().getSignature().toDebugString());
- verifyDebugString(theBcelMunger.getMunger().getSignature(),"<A,B,C> java.util.List<A> C.m1(B, java.util.Collection<C>)");
+ verifyDebugString(theBcelMunger.getMunger().getSignature(),
"<A,B,C> java.util.List<A> C.m1(B, java.util.Collection<C>)");
}
-
+
// Verify: a) sharing type vars with some target type results in the correct variable names in the serialized form
public void testDesignD() {
- runTest("generic itds - design D");
- BcelTypeMunger theBcelMunger = getMungerFromLine("X",9);
+ runTest("generic itds - design D");
+ BcelTypeMunger theBcelMunger = getMungerFromLine("X", 9);
// System.err.println(theBcelMunger.getMunger().getSignature().toDebugString());
- verifyDebugString(theBcelMunger.getMunger().getSignature(),"void C.m0(R)");
-
- theBcelMunger = getMungerFromLine("X",11);
+ verifyDebugString(theBcelMunger.getMunger().getSignature(), "void C.m0(R)");
+
+ theBcelMunger = getMungerFromLine("X", 11);
// System.err.println(theBcelMunger.getMunger().getSignature().toDebugString());
- verifyDebugString(theBcelMunger.getMunger().getSignature(),"java.util.List<Q> C.m0(Q, int, java.util.List<java.util.List<Q>>)");
+ verifyDebugString(theBcelMunger.getMunger().getSignature(),
+ "java.util.List<Q> C.m0(Q, int, java.util.List<java.util.List<Q>>)");
}
-
+
// Verify: a) for fields, sharing type vars with some target type results in the correct entries in the class file
public void testDesignE() {
- runTest("generic itds - design E");
- BcelTypeMunger theBcelMunger = getMungerFromLine("X",9);
- verifyDebugString(theBcelMunger.getMunger().getSignature(),"java.util.List<Z> C.ln");
- assertTrue("Expected to find \"Z\": "+theBcelMunger.getTypeVariableAliases(),theBcelMunger.getTypeVariableAliases().contains("Z"));
-
- theBcelMunger = getMungerFromLine("X",11);
- verifyDebugString(theBcelMunger.getMunger().getSignature(),"Q C.n");
- assertTrue("Expected to find \"Q\": "+theBcelMunger.getTypeVariableAliases(),theBcelMunger.getTypeVariableAliases().contains("Q"));
+ runTest("generic itds - design E");
+ BcelTypeMunger theBcelMunger = getMungerFromLine("X", 9);
+ verifyDebugString(theBcelMunger.getMunger().getSignature(), "java.util.List<Z> C.ln");
+ assertTrue("Expected to find \"Z\": " + theBcelMunger.getTypeVariableAliases(), theBcelMunger.getTypeVariableAliases()
+ .contains("Z"));
+
+ theBcelMunger = getMungerFromLine("X", 11);
+ verifyDebugString(theBcelMunger.getMunger().getSignature(), "Q C.n");
+ assertTrue("Expected to find \"Q\": " + theBcelMunger.getTypeVariableAliases(), theBcelMunger.getTypeVariableAliases()
+ .contains("Q"));
}
-
+
// Verifying what gets into a class targetted with a field ITD
public void testDesignF() {
- runTest("generic itds - design F");
- Hashtable fields = getMeTheFields("C");
-
- // Declared in src as: List C.list1; and List<Z> C<Z>.list2;
- Field list1 = (Field)fields.get("ajc$interField$$list1");
- assertTrue("Field list1 should be of type 'Ljava/util/List;' but is "+list1.getSignature(),
- list1.getSignature().equals("Ljava/util/List;"));
- Field list2 = (Field)fields.get("ajc$interField$$list1");
- assertTrue("Field list2 should be of type 'Ljava/util/List;' but is "+list2.getSignature(),
- list2.getSignature().equals("Ljava/util/List;"));
-
- // Declared in src as: String C.field1; and Q C<Q>.field2;
- // bound for second field collapses to Object
- Field field1 = (Field)fields.get("ajc$interField$$field1");
- assertTrue("Field list1 should be of type 'Ljava/lang/String;' but is "+field1.getSignature(),
- field1.getSignature().equals("Ljava/lang/String;"));
- Field field2 = (Field)fields.get("ajc$interField$$field2");
- assertTrue("Field list2 should be of type 'Ljava/lang/Object;' but is "+field2.getSignature(),
- field2.getSignature().equals("Ljava/lang/Object;"));
+ runTest("generic itds - design F");
+ Hashtable fields = getMeTheFields("C");
+
+ // Declared in src as: List C.list1; and List<Z> C<Z>.list2;
+ Field list1 = (Field) fields.get("list1");// ajc$interField$$list1");
+ assertTrue("Field list1 should be of type 'Ljava/util/List;' but is " + list1.getSignature(), list1.getSignature().equals(
+ "Ljava/util/List;"));
+ Field list2 = (Field) fields.get("list2");// ajc$interField$$list1");
+ assertTrue("Field list2 should be of type 'Ljava/util/List;' but is " + list2.getSignature(), list2.getSignature().equals(
+ "Ljava/util/List;"));
+
+ // Declared in src as: String C.field1; and Q C<Q>.field2;
+ // bound for second field collapses to Object
+ Field field1 = (Field) fields.get("field1");// ajc$interField$$field1");
+ assertTrue("Field list1 should be of type 'Ljava/lang/String;' but is " + field1.getSignature(), field1.getSignature()
+ .equals("Ljava/lang/String;"));
+ Field field2 = (Field) fields.get("field2");// ajc$interField$$field2");
+ assertTrue("Field list2 should be of type 'Ljava/lang/Object;' but is " + field2.getSignature(), field2.getSignature()
+ .equals("Ljava/lang/Object;"));
}
-
// Verifying what gets into a class when an interface it implements was targetted with a field ITD
public void testDesignG() {
- runTest("generic itds - design G");
- Hashtable fields = getMeTheFields("C");
-
- // The ITDs are targetting an interface. That interface is generic and is parameterized with
- // 'String' when implemented in the class C. This means the fields that make it into C should
- // be parameterized with String also.
-
- // List<Z> I<Z>.ln; and Q I<Q>.n;
-// Field field1 = (Field)fields.get("ajc$interField$X$I$ln");
-// assertTrue("Field list1 should be of type 'Ljava/util/List;' but is "+field1.getSignature(),
-// field1.getSignature().equals("Ljava/util/List;"));
-// Field field2 = (Field)fields.get("ajc$interField$X$I$n");
-// assertTrue("Field list2 should be of type 'Ljava/lang/String;' but is "+field2.getSignature(),
-// field2.getSignature().equals("Ljava/lang/String;"));
+ runTest("generic itds - design G");
+ Hashtable fields = getMeTheFields("C");
+
+ // The ITDs are targetting an interface. That interface is generic and is parameterized with
+ // 'String' when implemented in the class C. This means the fields that make it into C should
+ // be parameterized with String also.
+
+ // List<Z> I<Z>.ln; and Q I<Q>.n;
+ // Field field1 = (Field)fields.get("ajc$interField$X$I$ln");
+ // assertTrue("Field list1 should be of type 'Ljava/util/List;' but is "+field1.getSignature(),
+ // field1.getSignature().equals("Ljava/util/List;"));
+ // Field field2 = (Field)fields.get("ajc$interField$X$I$n");
+ // assertTrue("Field list2 should be of type 'Ljava/lang/String;' but is "+field2.getSignature(),
+ // field2.getSignature().equals("Ljava/lang/String;"));
}
-
-// // Verify: a) sharing type vars with some target type results in the correct variable names in the serialized form
-// public void testDesignE() {
-// runTest("generic itds - design E");
-//
-// }
-
+ // // Verify: a) sharing type vars with some target type results in the correct variable names in the serialized form
+ // public void testDesignE() {
+ // runTest("generic itds - design E");
+ //
+ // }
+
}
projects / aspectj.git / commitdiff