--- /dev/null
+public aspect PR118149 {
+
+ public pointcut pc1(String s)
+ : execution(* C.*()) && args(s) && if(s != null);
+
+ public pointcut pc2(String s)
+ : execution(C.new(String,..))
+ && args(s,..) && if(s != null);
+
+ public pointcut pcOR(String s) : pc1(s) || pc2(s);
+
+ before(String s) : pcOR(s) {
+ }
+
+}
+
+
+class C {
+
+ public C(String s, boolean b) {
+ }
+
+}
runTest("no NPE when inaccessible method is called within itd");
}
+ public void testNoNPEWithOrPointcutAndMoreThanOneArgs_pr118149() {
+ runTest("no NPE with or pointcut and more than one args");
+ }
// helper methods.....
<run class="foo.ITDWithACall"/>
</ajc-test>
+ <ajc-test dir="bugs150" title="no NPE with or pointcut and more than one args">
+ <compile files="PR118149.aj"/>
+ </ajc-test>
+
<!-- ============================================================================ -->
<!-- ============================================================================ -->
residueSource.findResidue(shadow, myState);
+ // pr118149
+ // It is possible for vars in myState (which would normally be set
+ // in the call to residueSource.findResidue) to not be set (be null)
+ // in an Or pointcut with if expressions in both branches, and where
+ // one branch is known statically to not match. In this situation we
+ // simply return Test.
for (int i=0; i < baseArgsCount; i++) {
Var v = myState.get(i);
+ if (v == null) continue; // pr118149
args.add(v);
ret = Test.makeAnd(ret,
Test.makeInstanceof(v,