From 0ae90ff0af83339150cc64b5239c6420b4e548a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: aclement Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:14:11 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] paramannos: lists outstanding work items on this --- .../ajc160/ParameterAnnotationMatchingTests.java | 14 +------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc160/ParameterAnnotationMatchingTests.java b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc160/ParameterAnnotationMatchingTests.java index 6065a9c4e..6c5c8b231 100644 --- a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc160/ParameterAnnotationMatchingTests.java +++ b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc160/ParameterAnnotationMatchingTests.java @@ -50,15 +50,6 @@ import junit.framework.Test; * the parentheses associating @B with the type of the parameter leaving @A outside to be * treated as a parameter annotation. * - -TODO BEFORE FIRST UPLOAD: -2. Don't set the param annos on the type patterns - add new methods and pass them through - -doc - - - - * Testplan: * Test cases for the parameter annotation matching: * DONE: @@ -78,13 +69,10 @@ doc * . Binding with the new syntax. * . complaining about annotations that dont target the right type * . itds - * . visibility tests + * . annotation visibility tests * . wildcarded @Ann*1 - broken (not my doing) * . ltw * - * to be done: - * - equals/hashcode where the new flags have been introduced - is it all ok? - * */ public class ParameterAnnotationMatchingTests extends XMLBasedAjcTestCase { -- 2.39.5