From 6dbe44d708bbd5d3754a8ab0de31f43c5144ef6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: aclement Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 10:46:47 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] tidied comments. --- .../aspectj/systemtest/ajc152/SynchronizationTests.java | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc152/SynchronizationTests.java b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc152/SynchronizationTests.java index 893ae9a3c..3d800a268 100644 --- a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc152/SynchronizationTests.java +++ b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc152/SynchronizationTests.java @@ -52,10 +52,6 @@ import org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase; * x ensure verifier runs over generated code (done by just executing the code as part of the test spec) * TAG: Completion of PHASE2 * - * - * Need sorting before claiming complete: - * - coping with asking 'regular' AspectJ to process an Aspect built by this variant of AJ that provides lock()/unlock() - * - targetting 1.2 runtime * * TAG: Finished * @@ -89,9 +85,6 @@ import org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase; * * Problems: * - Can't run it on a 1.2.1 runtime - just not practical - * - It ain't going to work with the aspectjrt.jar 1.5.0 that websphere will be shipping. - * *IF* someone manages to get into a situation where they ask for the signature of a lock jp, but the lock - * jp won't have been exposed if they weren't weaving with a 1.5 weaver... * * * Method transformation, example: -- 2.39.5