From b2714f437b60f303cf445649cf86a3008000ffdd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: aclement <aclement>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:27:57 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fix for Bug 83645: pertypewithin({interface}) illegal field
 modifier - Don't let the munger that adds the ptw field and methods match on
 an interface.

---
 .../src/org/aspectj/weaver/PerTypeWithinTargetTypeMunger.java | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/PerTypeWithinTargetTypeMunger.java b/weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/PerTypeWithinTargetTypeMunger.java
index 6f81df592..55a9d4b48 100644
--- a/weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/PerTypeWithinTargetTypeMunger.java
+++ b/weaver/src/org/aspectj/weaver/PerTypeWithinTargetTypeMunger.java
@@ -47,8 +47,10 @@ public class PerTypeWithinTargetTypeMunger extends ResolvedTypeMunger {
 	
 	// This is a lexical within() so if you say PerTypeWithin(Test) and matchType is an
 	// inner type (e.g. Test$NestedType) then it should match successfully
+	// Does not match if the target is an interface
 	public boolean matches(ResolvedTypeX matchType, ResolvedTypeX aspectType) {
-		return isWithinType(matchType).alwaysTrue();
+		return isWithinType(matchType).alwaysTrue() && 
+		       !matchType.isInterface();
 	}
 	
 	private FuzzyBoolean isWithinType(ResolvedTypeX type) {
-- 
2.39.5