From e8309925eb9c0a86d3cf6a786cb95fc4be349242 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: aclement <aclement>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:57:15 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] 265695: inherited anno matching

---
 tests/bugs164/pr265695/Asp.aj                 | 35 +++++++++++++++++++
 tests/bugs164/pr265695/AspNew.aj              | 32 +++++++++++++++++
 .../systemtest/ajc164/Ajc164Tests.java        | 18 ++++++----
 .../org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/ajc164.xml  | 15 +++++++-
 4 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tests/bugs164/pr265695/Asp.aj
 create mode 100644 tests/bugs164/pr265695/AspNew.aj

diff --git a/tests/bugs164/pr265695/Asp.aj b/tests/bugs164/pr265695/Asp.aj
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..296cb1f36
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/bugs164/pr265695/Asp.aj
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
+import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
+
+@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
+@interface Secured {
+	String value();
+}
+
+interface DemoService {
+    @Secured("READ")
+    void secureMethod();
+}
+
+
+class DemoServiceImpl implements DemoService {
+    public void secureMethod() {    }    
+}
+
+aspect X {
+	// None of these match, the subject at execution(secureMethod()) does not have the annotation
+	// see http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/next/adk15notebook/join-point-modifiers.html
+	before(): execution(@Secured * *Service+.*(..))  {	}
+	
+	before(): execution(@Secured * *Service.*(..))  {	}
+
+	before(): execution(@Secured * DemoService.*(..))  {	}
+	
+}
+
+public class Asp {
+	public static void main(String[] args) {
+		new DemoServiceImpl().secureMethod();
+	}
+}
+
diff --git a/tests/bugs164/pr265695/AspNew.aj b/tests/bugs164/pr265695/AspNew.aj
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ae99590fb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/bugs164/pr265695/AspNew.aj
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
+import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
+
+@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
+@interface Secured {
+	String value();
+}
+
+interface DemoService {
+    @Secured("READ")
+    void secureMethod();
+}
+
+
+class DemoServiceImpl implements DemoService {
+    public void secureMethod() {    }    
+}
+
+aspect X {
+	// None of these match, the subject at execution(secureMethod()) does not have the annotation
+	// see http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/next/adk15notebook/join-point-modifiers.html
+	before(): execution(@Secured! * *Service+.*(..))  {	}
+	
+	
+}
+
+public class AspNew {
+	public static void main(String[] args) {
+		new DemoServiceImpl().secureMethod();
+	}
+}
+
diff --git a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/Ajc164Tests.java b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/Ajc164Tests.java
index 2351c665f..6de409bdd 100644
--- a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/Ajc164Tests.java
+++ b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/Ajc164Tests.java
@@ -32,6 +32,14 @@ import org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase;
 
 public class Ajc164Tests extends org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase {
 
+	public void testAnnoInherited_pr265695() {
+		runTest("anno inherited");
+	}
+
+	// public void testAnnoInherited_pr265695_2() {
+	// runTest("new syntax for inherited anno - 1");
+	// }
+
 	public void testParserProblemSubArrayPatterns_pr148508() {
 		runTest("parser problem for array subtypes");
 	}
@@ -43,7 +51,7 @@ public class Ajc164Tests extends org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase {
 	public void testIncorrectDateResolution_pr265360() {
 		runTest("incorrect resolution of Date");
 	}
-	
+
 	public void testDualPreClinit_pr233032() {
 		runTest("dual preClinit");
 	}
@@ -144,11 +152,9 @@ public class Ajc164Tests extends org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase {
 	}
 
 	/**
-	 * This test checks that local variable table for the interMethodDispatcher
-	 * is built correctly, for the related code see
-	 * IntertypeMethodDeclaration.generateDispatchMethod(). It checks non-static
-	 * and static ITDs. Once the information here is correct then around advice
-	 * on ITDs can also be correct.
+	 * This test checks that local variable table for the interMethodDispatcher is built correctly, for the related code see
+	 * IntertypeMethodDeclaration.generateDispatchMethod(). It checks non-static and static ITDs. Once the information here is
+	 * correct then around advice on ITDs can also be correct.
 	 */
 	public void testBrokenLVT_pr194314_3() throws Exception {
 		runTest("broken lvt - 3");
diff --git a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/ajc164.xml b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/ajc164.xml
index 9dbe25479..11acc2979 100644
--- a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/ajc164.xml
+++ b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/ajc164.xml
@@ -1,6 +1,20 @@
 <!DOCTYPE suite SYSTEM "../tests/ajcTestSuite.dtd"[]>
 
 <suite>
+
+   <ajc-test dir="bugs164/pr265695" title="anno inherited">
+     <compile files="Asp.aj" options="-showWeaveInfo -1.5">
+       <message kind="warning" line="22" text="advice defined"/>
+       <message kind="warning" line="24" text="advice defined"/>
+       <message kind="warning" line="26" text="advice defined"/>
+     </compile>
+   </ajc-test>
+   
+   <ajc-test dir="bugs164/pr265695" title="new syntax for inherited anno - 1">
+     <compile files="AspNew.aj" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
+       <message kind="weave" line="22" text="foo"/>
+     </compile>
+   </ajc-test>
     
     <ajc-test dir="bugs164/pr265418" title="varargs">
       <compile files="A.java" options="-1.5"/>
@@ -21,7 +35,6 @@
      <run class="PR148508">
      </run>
    </ajc-test>
-   
     
     <ajc-test dir="bugs164/pr265360" title="incorrect resolution of Date">
       <compile files="Foo.java Main.java" options="-1.5">
-- 
2.39.5