* Some implementations might check for different things
* IT will not change how the current ones work
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
User "user1" is added when installing and configuring the server, so it
is already added in all tests.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
User "user1" is added when installing and configuring the server, so it
is already added in all tests. As the test verifies that just added
users can be searched in the contacts menu a new user should be actually
added.
The test did not fail because it assumed that "user1" did not exist and
just checked that it existed after "adding" it, but not whether adding
it failed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
The input element is always hidden, so the check always ended falling
back to the label. Moreover, the label is the element that the user
interacts with, so it must be the one used.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Although if the element could not be found an exception would be thrown
and the test aborted if an element is in the DOM but hidden it would be
found and the test would pass.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Instead of looking for the bundle button and then checking its value now
the expected value is included in the locator and the button is checked
similarly to other elements.
No "Disable all" locator was added as it was not currently needed
anywhere.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
"Actor::find" is a more robust way to look for elements, as it handles
some exceptions that may be thrown. Therefore, even if the elements are
not actually used and it is only checked whether they exist or not using
the actor is the preferred way when possible (and it also makes it
consistent with the rest of the acceptance tests).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Adding some missing asserts showed that the "delete user" acceptance
test was silently failing, as the deletion was not being confirmed in
the dialog and thus the user was not being deleted.
The dialog button contains a single quote ("user0's"), so the XPath
expression had to be adjusted (it seems that it is not possible to
escape a single quote in a string enclosed in single quotes in XPath
1.0).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
WaitFor::element... calls only perform the waiting and return whether
the condition succeeded or not, but that result needs to be explicitly
checked to prevent further steps from being executed if the wait failed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
As no timeout was specified the elements were tried to be found just
once. This caused the steps to fail if the elements did not appear yet
in the page when they were tried to be found.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Calviño Sánchez <danxuliu@gmail.com>
Psalm found an issue. However the issue found was because of lying
docblocks. Fixed those and did some typing to make it all better.
For #25839
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
Else you can end up that you renewed your password (LDAP for example).
But they still don't work because you did not use them before you logged
in.
Signed-off-by: Roeland Jago Douma <roeland@famdouma.nl>
