Declare annotation: Buckets of test cases!

1 files changed, 322 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/DeclareAnnotationTests.java b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/DeclareAnnotationTests.java
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e87e45fa9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/DeclareAnnotationTests.java
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+/*******************************************************************************
+ * Copyright (c) 2005 IBM 
+ * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
+ * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
+ * which accompanies this distribution, and is available at
+ * http://www.eclipse.org/legal/cpl-v10.html
+ *
+ * Contributors:
+ *    Andy Clement   initial implementation
+ *******************************************************************************/
+package org.aspectj.systemtest.ajc150;
+
+import java.io.File;
+import java.util.List;
+
+import junit.framework.Test;
+
+import org.aspectj.asm.AsmManager;
+import org.aspectj.asm.IHierarchy;
+import org.aspectj.asm.IProgramElement;
+import org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase;
+
+public class DeclareAnnotationTests extends XMLBasedAjcTestCase {
+
+  public static Test suite() {
+	return XMLBasedAjcTestCase.loadSuite(DeclareAnnotationTests.class);
+  }
+
+  protected File getSpecFile() {
+	return new File("../tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/ajc150.xml");
+  }
+  
+  // parsing the various forms of declare @
+  public void testDeclareAnnotationParsing() {
+  	runTest("basic declare annotation parse test");
+  }
+  
+  // declare @type
+
+  // declare @type for one simple annotation on one specific type
+  public void testAtType_OneAnnotationHittingOneType_Src() {
+  	runTest("declare @type 1");
+  }
+  
+  // declare @type for one simple annotation to multiple types
+  public void testAtType_OneAnnotationHittingMultipleTypes_Src() {
+  	runTest("declare @type 2");
+  }
+
+  // declare @type for one simple annotation and a pointcut that matches on it
+  public void testAtType_PointcutMatchingOnDeclaredAnnotation() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - with matching pointcut");
+  }
+  
+  // binary weaving declare @type, one annotation on one type
+  public void testAtType_OneAnnotationHittingOneType_Bin() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - binary weaving");
+  }
+  
+  // an annotation with multiple values (all the primitives and string)
+  // is declared upon a single type
+  public void testAtType_ComplexAnnotation_BinWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - complex annotation - binary weaving");
+  }
+  public void testAtType_ComplexAnnotation_SrcWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - complex annotation - source weaving");
+  }
+ 
+  
+  // two annotations are declared on a type  
+  public void testAtType_TwoAnnotationsOnOneType_BinWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - two annotations hit one type - binary weaving");
+  }
+  public void testAtType_TwoAnnotationsOnOneType_SrcWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - two annotations hit one type - source weaving");
+  }
+
+  
+  // decp and deca can interact, let's try some variants that should
+  // result in the same thing
+  public void testAtType_InteractingWithDeclareParents1_BinWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - declare parents interactions (order 1) - binary weaving");
+  }
+  public void testAtType_InteractingWithDeclareParents1_SrcWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - declare parents interactions (order 1) - source weaving");
+  }
+  public void testAtType_InteractingWithDeclareParents2_BinWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - declare parents interactions (order 2) - binary weaving");
+  }
+  public void testAtType_InteractingWithDeclareParents2_SrcWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - declare parents interactions (order 2) - source weaving");
+  }
+  public void testAtType_InteractingWithDeclareParents3_BinWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - declare parents interactions (order 3) - binary weaving");
+  }
+  public void testAtType_InteractingWithDeclareParents3_SrcWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - declare parents interactions (order 3) - source weaving");
+  }
+  public void testAtType_InteractingWithDeclareParents4_BinWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - declare parents interactions (order 4) - binary weaving");
+  }
+  public void testAtType_InteractingWithDeclareParents4_SrcWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - declare parents interactions (order 4) - source weaving");
+  }
+  
+  
+  
+  public void testAtType_AnnotatingAlreadyAnnotatedType_BinWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - annotating an already annotated type - binary weaving");
+  }
+  public void testAtType_AnnotatingAlreadyAnnotatedType_SrcWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - annotating an already annotated type - source weaving");
+  }
+  
+  
+  
+  // testing for error messages when exact type patterns used
+//  public void testAtType_UsingWrongAnnotationOnAType_BinWeaving() 
+//  	runTest("declare @type - annotations with different targets - binary weaving");
+//  }
+  public void testAtType_UsingWrongAnnotationOnAType_SrcWeaving() {
+  	  runTest("declare @type - annotations with different targets - source weaving");
+  }
+
+
+
+  // testing for the lint message when non exact patterns used
+//  public void testAtType_UsingWrongAnnotationOnAType_TypeSpecifiedByPattern_BinWeaving() {
+//  	runTest("declare @type - annotations with different targets (using type patterns) - binary weaving");
+//  }
+  public void testAtType_UsingWrongAnnotationOnAType_TypeSpecifiedByPattern_SrcWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - annotations with different targets (using type patterns) - source weaving");
+  }
+  
+  
+  
+  // testing how multiple decAtType/decps interact when they rely on each other
+  public void testAtType_ComplexDecpDecAtTypeInteractions_BinWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - complex decp decAtType interactions - binary weaving");
+  }
+  public void testAtType_ComplexDecpDecAtTypeInteractions_SrcWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - complex decp decAtType interactions - source weaving");
+  }
+  
+  
+  public void testAtType_PuttingIncorrectAnnosOnTypes_SrcWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - trying to put annotation targetting annos on normal types - source weaving");
+  }
+  public void testAtType_PuttingIncorrectAnnosOnTypes_BinWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - trying to put annotation targetting annos on normal types - binary weaving");
+  }
+  public void testAtType_PuttingIncorrectAnnosOnTypesWithPatterns_SrcWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - trying to put annotation targetting annos on normal types (uses pattern) - source weaving");
+  }
+  public void testAtType_PuttingIncorrectAnnosOnTypesWithPatterns_BinWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - trying to put annotation targetting annos on normal types (uses pattern) - binary weaving");
+  }
+  
+// I think this fails because of a freaky JDT compiler bug ...
+//  public void testAtType_UsingClassOrEnumElementValuesInAnnotations_SrcWeaving() {
+//  	runTest("declare @type - covering enum and class element values - source weaving");
+//  }
+  
+  public void testAtType_UsingClassOrEnumElementValuesInAnnotations_BinWeaving() {
+  	runTest("declare @type - covering enum and class element values - binary weaving");
+  }
+  
+  /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+  // declare @field
+  
+  public void testAtField_SimpleSource() {
+  	runTest("declare @field - simple source weaving");
+  }
+  
+  public void testAtField_SimpleBinary() {
+  	runTest("declare @field - simple binary weaving");
+  }
+  
+  // lint warning
+  public void testAtField_TwoTheSameOnOneSource() {
+  	runTest("declare @field - two the same on one - source weaving");
+  }
+  
+  // lint warning
+  public void testAtField_TwoTheSameOnOneBinary() {
+  	runTest("declare @field - two the same on one - binary weaving");
+  }
+  
+  public void testAtField_TwoDifferentOnOneSource() {
+  	runTest("declare @field - two different on one - source weaving");
+  }
+  
+  public void testAtField_TwoDifferentOnOneBinary() {
+  	runTest("declare @field - two different on one - binary weaving");
+  }
+  
+  public void testAtField_WrongTargetSource() {
+  	runTest("declare @field - wrong target - source weaving");
+  }
+  
+// Can't do a test like this - as verification of the declare @ is 
+// done when the aspect is first compiled.
+//  public void testAtField_WrongTargetBinary() {
+//  	runTest("declare @field - wrong target - binary weaving");
+//  }
+  
+  public void testAtField_RightTargetSource() {
+  	runTest("declare @field - right target - source weaving");
+  }
+  
+  public void testAtField_RightTargetBinary() {
+  	runTest("declare @field - right target - binary weaving");
+  }
+  
+  public void testAtField_RecursiveSource() {
+  	runTest("declare @field - recursive application - source weaving");
+  }
+  
+  public void testAtField_RecursiveBinary() {
+  	runTest("declare @field - recursive application - binary weaving");
+  }
+  
+  public void testAtField_RecursiveOtherOrderSource() {
+  	runTest("declare @field - recursive application (other order) - source weaving");
+  }
+    
+  public void testAtField_RecursiveOtherOrderBinary() {
+   	runTest("declare @field - recursive application (other order) - binary weaving");
+  }
+  /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+  // declare @method
+  
+  public void testAtMethod_SimpleSource() {
+  	runTest("declare @method - simple source weaving");
+  }
+  
+  public void testAtMethod_SimpleBinary() {
+  	runTest("declare @method - simple binary weaving");
+  }
+  
+  /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+  // declare @constructor
+  
+  public void testAtCtor_SimpleSource() {
+  	runTest("declare @constructor - simple source weaving");
+  }
+  
+  public void testAtCtor_SimpleBinary() {
+  	runTest("declare @constructor - simple binary weaving");
+  }
+
+  /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+  // declare @method @constructor
+  
+  public void testAtMethodCtor_WrongTargetSource() {
+  	runTest("declare @method @ctor - wrong target - source weaving");
+  }
+  
+  public void testAtMethodCtor_RightTargetSource() {
+  	runTest("declare @method @ctor - right target - source weaving");
+  }
+  
+  public void testAtMethodCtor_RightTargetBinary() {
+  	runTest("declare @method @ctor - right target - binary weaving");
+  }
+
+  // lint warning
+  public void testAtMethodCtor_TwoTheSameOnOneSource() {
+  	runTest("declare @method @ctor - two the same on one - source weaving");
+  }
+  
+  // lint warning
+  public void testAtMethodCtor_TwoTheSameOnOneBinary() {
+  	runTest("declare @method @ctor - two the same on one - binary weaving");
+  }
+  
+  public void testAtMethodCtor_TwoDifferentOnOneSource() {
+  	runTest("declare @method @ctor - two different on one - source weaving");
+  }
+  
+  public void testAtMethodCtor_TwoDifferentOnOneBinary() {
+  	runTest("declare @method @ctor - two different on one - binary weaving");
+  }
+  
+  // to debug this test, uncomment the first line which will give you a nice
+  // dump of the structure model in c:/debug.txt 
+  public void testStructureModel() {
+    // AsmManager.setReporting("c:/debug.txt",true,true,true,true);
+  	runTest("declare all annotations on one class - source weaving");
+  	IHierarchy top = AsmManager.getDefault().getHierarchy();
+  	
+  	IProgramElement ipe = top.findElementForLabel(top.getRoot(),
+  		IProgramElement.Kind.DECLARE_ANNOTATION_AT_TYPE,
+  		"declare at_type: p.q.DeathByAnnotations : @Colored(\"red\")");
+  	assertTrue("Couldn't find 'declare @type' element in the tree",ipe!=null);
+  	
+    List l = AsmManager.getDefault().getRelationshipMap().get(ipe);
+  	assertTrue("Should have a relationship but does not ",l.size()>0);
+  	
+  	ipe = top.findElementForLabel(top.getRoot(),
+  		IProgramElement.Kind.DECLARE_ANNOTATION_AT_METHOD,
+  		"declare at_method: * m*(..) : @Fruit(\"tomato\")");
+  	assertTrue("Couldn't find 'declare @method element in the tree",ipe!=null);
+  	
+    l = AsmManager.getDefault().getRelationshipMap().get(ipe);
+  	assertTrue("Should have a relationship but does not ",l.size()>0);
+  	
+  	ipe = top.findElementForLabel(top.getRoot(),
+  		IProgramElement.Kind.DECLARE_ANNOTATION_AT_CONSTRUCTOR,
+  		"declare at_constructor: p.q.DeathByAnnotations.new(..) : @Fruit(\"tomato\")");
+  	assertTrue("Couldn't find 'declare @constructor element in the tree",ipe!=null);
+    l = AsmManager.getDefault().getRelationshipMap().get(ipe);
+  	assertTrue("Should have a relationship but does not ",l.size()>0);
+  	
+  	ipe = top.findElementForLabel(top.getRoot(),
+  		IProgramElement.Kind.DECLARE_ANNOTATION_AT_FIELD,
+  		"declare at_field: * p.q.DeathByAnnotations.* : @Material(\"wood\")");
+  	assertTrue("Couldn't find 'declare @field element in the tree",ipe!=null);
+    l = AsmManager.getDefault().getRelationshipMap().get(ipe);
+  	assertTrue("Should have a relationship but does not ",l.size()>0);
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file