Move 1.9.20 bug regression tests to the correct spots

Originally, I had intended to release a minor 1.9.19.1 release to fix
some bugs. But then, Java 20 support was implemented and merged, so the
next release will be 1.9.20. Therefore, I moved some bug regression
tests to the 1.9.20 suite.

Relates to #254.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>

15 files changed, 247 insertions, 247 deletions

diff --git a/tests/bugs1919/github_162/InterfaceWithInnerClass.java b/tests/bugs1920/github_162/InterfaceWithInnerClass.java
index f26975cc0..f26975cc0 100644
--- a/tests/bugs1919/github_162/InterfaceWithInnerClass.java
+++ b/tests/bugs1920/github_162/InterfaceWithInnerClass.java
diff --git a/tests/bugs1919/github_190/SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.java b/tests/bugs1920/github_190/SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.java
index d083fe60f..d083fe60f 100644
--- a/tests/bugs1919/github_190/SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.java
+++ b/tests/bugs1920/github_190/SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.java
diff --git a/tests/bugs1919/github_20/ParenthesisedAJKeywords.java b/tests/bugs1920/github_20/ParenthesisedAJKeywords.java
index 1ba013c57..1ba013c57 100644
--- a/tests/bugs1919/github_20/ParenthesisedAJKeywords.java
+++ b/tests/bugs1920/github_20/ParenthesisedAJKeywords.java
diff --git a/tests/bugs1919/github_214/Application.java b/tests/bugs1920/github_214/Application.java
index 5401e0875..5401e0875 100644
--- a/tests/bugs1919/github_214/Application.java
+++ b/tests/bugs1920/github_214/Application.java
diff --git a/tests/bugs1919/github_214/FirstAspect.java b/tests/bugs1920/github_214/FirstAspect.java
index 274e3a122..274e3a122 100644
--- a/tests/bugs1919/github_214/FirstAspect.java
+++ b/tests/bugs1920/github_214/FirstAspect.java
diff --git a/tests/bugs1919/github_214/MarkerOne.java b/tests/bugs1920/github_214/MarkerOne.java
index c59c42afc..c59c42afc 100644
--- a/tests/bugs1919/github_214/MarkerOne.java
+++ b/tests/bugs1920/github_214/MarkerOne.java
diff --git a/tests/bugs1919/github_214/MarkerTwo.java b/tests/bugs1920/github_214/MarkerTwo.java
index 213851d93..213851d93 100644
--- a/tests/bugs1919/github_214/MarkerTwo.java
+++ b/tests/bugs1920/github_214/MarkerTwo.java
diff --git a/tests/bugs1919/github_214/SecondAspect.java b/tests/bugs1920/github_214/SecondAspect.java
index a4cc1bdb2..a4cc1bdb2 100644
--- a/tests/bugs1919/github_214/SecondAspect.java
+++ b/tests/bugs1920/github_214/SecondAspect.java
diff --git a/tests/bugs1919/github_24/ExactlyMatchingAspect.aj b/tests/bugs1920/github_24/ExactlyMatchingAspect.aj
index a884d00fc..a884d00fc 100644
--- a/tests/bugs1919/github_24/ExactlyMatchingAspect.aj
+++ b/tests/bugs1920/github_24/ExactlyMatchingAspect.aj
diff --git a/tests/bugs1919/github_24/FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj b/tests/bugs1920/github_24/FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj
index b40c13c62..b40c13c62 100644
--- a/tests/bugs1919/github_24/FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj
+++ b/tests/bugs1920/github_24/FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj
diff --git a/tests/bugs1919/github_24/MaybeMissingClass.java b/tests/bugs1920/github_24/MaybeMissingClass.java
index 17952583b..17952583b 100644
--- a/tests/bugs1919/github_24/MaybeMissingClass.java
+++ b/tests/bugs1920/github_24/MaybeMissingClass.java
diff --git a/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1919/Bugs1919Tests.java b/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1919/Bugs1919Tests.java
index ba4f99ade..3c921f51a 100644
--- a/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1919/Bugs1919Tests.java
+++ b/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1919/Bugs1919Tests.java
@@ -19,38 +19,6 @@ public class Bugs1919Tests extends XMLBasedAjcTestCase {
     runTest("declare annotation with SOURCE retention");
   }
 
-  public void testSwitchWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE() {
-    runTest("switch with Integer.MAX_VALUE case");
-  }
-
-  public void testParenthesisedExpressionWithAjKeyword() {
-    runTest("parenthesised expression with AspectJ keyword");
-  }
-
-  public void testInterfaceInnerAspectImplicitlyStatic() {
-    runTest("inner aspect of interface is implicitly static");
-  }
-
-  public void testExactArrayTypeMatchCompiledTogether() {
-    runTest("exact array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class");
-  }
-
-  public void testExactArrayTypeMatchCompiledSeparately() {
-    runTest("exact array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class");
-  }
-
-  public void testFuzzyArrayTypeMatchCompiledTogether() {
-    runTest("fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class");
-  }
-
-  public void testFuzzyArrayTypeMatchCompiledSeparately() {
-    runTest("fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class");
-  }
-
-  public void test_GitHub_214() {
-    runTest("ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException with Xlint unorderedAdviceAtShadow=warning");
-  }
-
   public static Test suite() {
     return XMLBasedAjcTestCase.loadSuite(Bugs1919Tests.class);
   }
diff --git a/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/Bugs1920Tests.java b/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/Bugs1920Tests.java
index 593fdb198..574f1b7aa 100644
--- a/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/Bugs1920Tests.java
+++ b/tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/Bugs1920Tests.java
@@ -15,6 +15,38 @@ import org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase;
  */
 public class Bugs1920Tests extends XMLBasedAjcTestCase {
 
+  public void testSwitchWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE() {
+    runTest("switch with Integer.MAX_VALUE case");
+  }
+
+  public void testParenthesisedExpressionWithAjKeyword() {
+    runTest("parenthesised expression with AspectJ keyword");
+  }
+
+  public void testInterfaceInnerAspectImplicitlyStatic() {
+    runTest("inner aspect of interface is implicitly static");
+  }
+
+  public void testExactArrayTypeMatchCompiledTogether() {
+    runTest("exact array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class");
+  }
+
+  public void testExactArrayTypeMatchCompiledSeparately() {
+    runTest("exact array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class");
+  }
+
+  public void testFuzzyArrayTypeMatchCompiledTogether() {
+    runTest("fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class");
+  }
+
+  public void testFuzzyArrayTypeMatchCompiledSeparately() {
+    runTest("fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class");
+  }
+
+  public void test_GitHub_214() {
+    runTest("ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException with Xlint unorderedAdviceAtShadow=warning");
+  }
+
   /**
    * Add correct annotations to multiple ITD methods with the same name and same number of arguments, i.e. copy the
    * annotations correctly from the aspect into the target class instead of falsely always copying the annotations (if
diff --git a/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1919/ajc1919.xml b/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1919/ajc1919.xml
index f8bccce64..dd3f2b1a2 100644
--- a/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1919/ajc1919.xml
+++ b/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1919/ajc1919.xml
@@ -172,219 +172,4 @@
 		</compile>
 	</ajc-test>
 
-	<!-- RuntimeException in BcelWeaver, see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/190 -->
-	<ajc-test dir="bugs1919/github_190" vm="1.5" title="switch with Integer.MAX_VALUE case">
-		<compile files="SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
-			<message kind="weave" text="Join point 'method-execution(java.lang.String SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.switchTest(int))'"/>
-    </compile>
-		<run class="SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE">
-			<stdout>
-				<line text="execution(String SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.switchTest(int))"/>
-				<line text="CASE_1"/>
-			</stdout>
-		</run>
-	</ajc-test>
-
-	<!--
-		'Syntax error, insert "Expression" to complete Expression' when compiling parenthesised expressions
-		containing AspectJ keywords, e.g. '(before)', see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/20
-	-->
-	<ajc-test dir="bugs1919/github_20" vm="1.5" title="parenthesised expression with AspectJ keyword">
-		<compile files="ParenthesisedAJKeywords.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo"/>
-		<run class="ParenthesisedAJKeywords">
-			<stdout>
-				<line text="before"/>
-				<line text="after"/>
-				<line text="around"/>
-				<line text="aspect"/>
-				<line text="pointcut"/>
-				<line text="declare"/>
-				<line text="privileged"/>
-			</stdout>
-		</run>
-	</ajc-test>
-
-	<!--
-		'inner aspects must be static' when compiling an interface with an inner aspect which was not explicitly declared
-		static, see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/162
-	-->
-	<ajc-test dir="bugs1919/github_162" vm="1.5" title="inner aspect of interface is implicitly static">
-		<compile files="InterfaceWithInnerClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic.getNumber())' in Type 'InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic'"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(void InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic.main(java.lang.String[]))' in Type 'InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic'"/>
-		</compile>
-		<run class="InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic">
-			<stdout>
-				<line text="execution(void InterfaceWithInnerClass.ImplicitlyStatic.main(String[]))"/>
-				<line text="execution(int InterfaceWithInnerClass.ImplicitlyStatic.getNumber())"/>
-				<line text="11"/>
-			</stdout>
-		</run>
-	</ajc-test>
-
-	<!--
-		When compiling aspect and target class together, matching works as expected,
-		see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
-	-->
-	<ajc-test dir="bugs1919/github_24" vm="1.5" title="exact array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class">
-		<compile files="ExactlyMatchingAspect.aj MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
-			<!-- Even before the bugfix, in this case weaving worked as expected -->
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
-		</compile>
-		<run class="MaybeMissingClass">
-			<stdout>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f1"/>
-				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f2"/>
-				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f3"/>
-				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f4"/>
-				<line text="execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f5"/>
-				<line text="execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f6"/>
-				<line text="execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
-			</stdout>
-		</run>
-	</ajc-test>
-
-	<!--
-		When compiling aspect and target class separately, too many joinpoints are matched,
-		see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
-	-->
-	<ajc-test dir="bugs1919/github_24" vm="1.5" title="exact array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class">
-		<compile files="ExactlyMatchingAspect.aj" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" outjar="aspect.jar">
-			<message kind="warning" text="no match for this type name: MaybeMissingClass [Xlint:invalidAbsoluteTypeName]"/>
-			<message kind="warning" text="advice defined in ExactlyMatchingAspect has not been applied [Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch]"/>
-		</compile>
-		<compile files="MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" aspectpath="aspect.jar">
-			<!-- Before the bugfix, f1 would be woven twice, f2 not at all-->
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
-		</compile>
-		<run class="MaybeMissingClass" classpath="aspect.jar">
-			<stdout>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f1"/>
-				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f2"/>
-				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f3"/>
-				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f4"/>
-				<line text="execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f5"/>
-				<line text="execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f6"/>
-				<line text="execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
-			</stdout>
-		</run>
-	</ajc-test>
-
-	<!--
-		When compiling aspect and target class together, too many joinpoints are matched,
-		see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
-	-->
-	<ajc-test dir="bugs1919/github_24" vm="1.5" title="fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class">
-		<compile files="FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
-			<!-- Before the bugfix, both f1 and f2 would be woven twice -->
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
-		</compile>
-		<run class="MaybeMissingClass">
-			<stdout>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f1"/>
-				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f2"/>
-				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f3"/>
-				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f4"/>
-				<line text="execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f5"/>
-				<line text="execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f6"/>
-				<line text="execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
-			</stdout>
-		</run>
-	</ajc-test>
-
-	<!--
-		When compiling aspect and target class separately, too many joinpoints are matched,
-		see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
-	-->
-	<ajc-test dir="bugs1919/github_24" vm="1.5" title="fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class">
-		<compile files="FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" outjar="aspect.jar">
-			<message kind="warning" text="advice defined in FuzzilyMatchingAspect has not been applied [Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch]"/>
-		</compile>
-		<compile files="MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" aspectpath="aspect.jar">
-			<!-- Before the bugfix, both f1 and f2 would be woven twice -->
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
-		</compile>
-		<run class="MaybeMissingClass" classpath="aspect.jar">
-			<stdout>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f1"/>
-				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f2"/>
-				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f3"/>
-				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f4"/>
-				<line text="execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f5"/>
-				<line text="execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
-				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f6"/>
-				<line text="execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
-			</stdout>
-		</run>
-	</ajc-test>
-
-	<!--
-		https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/214
-		https://github.com/mojohaus/aspectj-maven-plugin/issues/164
-		Problem with multiple, subsequent weaving steps and '-Xlint:warning' or '-Xlint:unorderedAdviceAtShadow=warning'
-			java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 1
-			[ERROR] at org.aspectj.weaver.bcel.BcelShadow.prepareForMungers(BcelShadow.java:379)
-			[ERROR] at org.aspectj.weaver.Shadow.implement(Shadow.java:546)
-	-->
-	<ajc-test dir="bugs1919/github_214" vm="1.5" title="ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException with Xlint unorderedAdviceAtShadow=warning">
-		<compile files="FirstAspect.java MarkerOne.java" options="-1.8 -showWeaveInfo -Xlint:warning" outjar="first-aspect.jar">
-			<message kind="warning" text="can not build thisJoinPoint lazily for this advice since it has no suitable guard [Xlint:noGuardForLazyTjp]"/>
-			<message kind="warning" text="advice defined in FirstAspect has not been applied [Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch]"/>
-		</compile>
-		<compile files="Application.java MarkerTwo.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo -Xlint:warning" classpath="$sandbox/first-aspect.jar" outjar="application.jar"/>
-		<compile files="SecondAspect.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo -Xlint:warning" aspectpath="first-aspect.jar" inpath="application.jar" outjar="second-aspect.jar">
-			<message kind="warning" text="can not build thisJoinPoint lazily for this advice since it has no suitable guard [Xlint:noGuardForLazyTjp]"/>
-			<message kind="warning" text="at this shadow method-execution(void Application.greet(java.lang.String)) no precedence is specified between advice applying from aspect FirstAspect and aspect SecondAspect [Xlint:unorderedAdviceAtShadow]"/>
-			<message kind="warning" text="can not implement lazyTjp at joinpoint method-execution(void Application.greet(java.lang.String)) because of advice conflicts, see secondary locations to find conflicting advice [Xlint:multipleAdviceStoppingLazyTjp]"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(void Application.greet(java.lang.String))' in Type 'Application' (Application.java:4) advised by around advice from 'SecondAspect'"/>
-			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(void Application.greet(java.lang.String))' in Type 'Application' (Application.java:4) advised by before advice from 'FirstAspect'"/>
-		</compile>
-		<run class="Application" classpath="$sandbox/second-aspect.jar,$sandbox/first-aspect.jar">
-			<stdout>
-				<line text="FirstAspect: execution(void Application.greet(String))"/>
-				<line text="SecondAspect: execution(void Application.greet(String))"/>
-				<line text="Hello world!"/>
-			</stdout>
-		</run>
-	</ajc-test>
-
 </suite>
diff --git a/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/ajc1920.xml b/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/ajc1920.xml
index ed301b4f3..402f50a2f 100644
--- a/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/ajc1920.xml
+++ b/tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc1920/ajc1920.xml
@@ -176,6 +176,221 @@
 		</run>
 	</ajc-test>
 
+	<!-- RuntimeException in BcelWeaver, see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/190 -->
+	<ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_190" vm="1.5" title="switch with Integer.MAX_VALUE case">
+		<compile files="SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
+			<message kind="weave" text="Join point 'method-execution(java.lang.String SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.switchTest(int))'"/>
+		 </compile>
+		<run class="SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="execution(String SwitchCaseWith_Integer_MAX_VALUE.switchTest(int))"/>
+				<line text="CASE_1"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!--
+		'Syntax error, insert "Expression" to complete Expression' when compiling parenthesised expressions
+		containing AspectJ keywords, e.g. '(before)', see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/20
+	-->
+	<ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_20" vm="1.5" title="parenthesised expression with AspectJ keyword">
+		<compile files="ParenthesisedAJKeywords.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo"/>
+		<run class="ParenthesisedAJKeywords">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="before"/>
+				<line text="after"/>
+				<line text="around"/>
+				<line text="aspect"/>
+				<line text="pointcut"/>
+				<line text="declare"/>
+				<line text="privileged"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!--
+		'inner aspects must be static' when compiling an interface with an inner aspect which was not explicitly declared
+		static, see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/162
+	-->
+	<ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_162" vm="1.5" title="inner aspect of interface is implicitly static">
+		<compile files="InterfaceWithInnerClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic.getNumber())' in Type 'InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic'"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(void InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic.main(java.lang.String[]))' in Type 'InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic'"/>
+		</compile>
+		<run class="InterfaceWithInnerClass$ImplicitlyStatic">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="execution(void InterfaceWithInnerClass.ImplicitlyStatic.main(String[]))"/>
+				<line text="execution(int InterfaceWithInnerClass.ImplicitlyStatic.getNumber())"/>
+				<line text="11"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!--
+		When compiling aspect and target class together, matching works as expected,
+		see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
+	-->
+	<ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_24" vm="1.5" title="exact array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class">
+		<compile files="ExactlyMatchingAspect.aj MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
+			<!-- Even before the bugfix, in this case weaving worked as expected -->
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+		</compile>
+		<run class="MaybeMissingClass">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f1"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f2"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f3"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f4"/>
+				<line text="execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f5"/>
+				<line text="execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f6"/>
+				<line text="execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!--
+		When compiling aspect and target class separately, too many joinpoints are matched,
+		see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
+	-->
+	<ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_24" vm="1.5" title="exact array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class">
+		<compile files="ExactlyMatchingAspect.aj" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" outjar="aspect.jar">
+			<message kind="warning" text="no match for this type name: MaybeMissingClass [Xlint:invalidAbsoluteTypeName]"/>
+			<message kind="warning" text="advice defined in ExactlyMatchingAspect has not been applied [Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch]"/>
+		</compile>
+		<compile files="MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" aspectpath="aspect.jar">
+			<!-- Before the bugfix, f1 would be woven twice, f2 not at all-->
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+		</compile>
+		<run class="MaybeMissingClass" classpath="aspect.jar">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f1"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f2"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f3"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f4"/>
+				<line text="execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f5"/>
+				<line text="execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f6"/>
+				<line text="execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!--
+		When compiling aspect and target class together, too many joinpoints are matched,
+		see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
+	-->
+	<ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_24" vm="1.5" title="fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled together with target class">
+		<compile files="FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
+			<!-- Before the bugfix, both f1 and f2 would be woven twice -->
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+		</compile>
+		<run class="MaybeMissingClass">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f1"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f2"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f3"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f4"/>
+				<line text="execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f5"/>
+				<line text="execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f6"/>
+				<line text="execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!--
+		When compiling aspect and target class separately, too many joinpoints are matched,
+		see https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24
+	-->
+	<ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_24" vm="1.5" title="fuzzy array type matching, aspect compiled separately from target class">
+		<compile files="FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" outjar="aspect.jar">
+			<message kind="warning" text="advice defined in FuzzilyMatchingAspect has not been applied [Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch]"/>
+		</compile>
+		<compile files="MaybeMissingClass.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo" aspectpath="aspect.jar">
+			<!-- Before the bugfix, both f1 and f2 would be woven twice -->
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+		</compile>
+		<run class="MaybeMissingClass" classpath="aspect.jar">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f1"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass MaybeMissingClass.f1())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f2"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[] MaybeMissingClass.f2())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f3"/>
+				<line text="execution(MaybeMissingClass[][] MaybeMissingClass.f3())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f4"/>
+				<line text="execution(int MaybeMissingClass.f4())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f5"/>
+				<line text="execution(int[] MaybeMissingClass.f5())"/>
+				<line text="MaybeMissingClass.f6"/>
+				<line text="execution(int[][] MaybeMissingClass.f6())"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
+	<!--
+		https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/214
+		https://github.com/mojohaus/aspectj-maven-plugin/issues/164
+		Problem with multiple, subsequent weaving steps and '-Xlint:warning' or '-Xlint:unorderedAdviceAtShadow=warning'
+			java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 1
+			[ERROR] at org.aspectj.weaver.bcel.BcelShadow.prepareForMungers(BcelShadow.java:379)
+			[ERROR] at org.aspectj.weaver.Shadow.implement(Shadow.java:546)
+	-->
+	<ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_214" vm="1.5" title="ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException with Xlint unorderedAdviceAtShadow=warning">
+		<compile files="FirstAspect.java MarkerOne.java" options="-1.8 -showWeaveInfo -Xlint:warning" outjar="first-aspect.jar">
+			<message kind="warning" text="can not build thisJoinPoint lazily for this advice since it has no suitable guard [Xlint:noGuardForLazyTjp]"/>
+			<message kind="warning" text="advice defined in FirstAspect has not been applied [Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch]"/>
+		</compile>
+		<compile files="Application.java MarkerTwo.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo -Xlint:warning" classpath="$sandbox/first-aspect.jar" outjar="application.jar"/>
+		<compile files="SecondAspect.java" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo -Xlint:warning" aspectpath="first-aspect.jar" inpath="application.jar" outjar="second-aspect.jar">
+			<message kind="warning" text="can not build thisJoinPoint lazily for this advice since it has no suitable guard [Xlint:noGuardForLazyTjp]"/>
+			<message kind="warning" text="at this shadow method-execution(void Application.greet(java.lang.String)) no precedence is specified between advice applying from aspect FirstAspect and aspect SecondAspect [Xlint:unorderedAdviceAtShadow]"/>
+			<message kind="warning" text="can not implement lazyTjp at joinpoint method-execution(void Application.greet(java.lang.String)) because of advice conflicts, see secondary locations to find conflicting advice [Xlint:multipleAdviceStoppingLazyTjp]"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(void Application.greet(java.lang.String))' in Type 'Application' (Application.java:4) advised by around advice from 'SecondAspect'"/>
+			<message kind="weave" text="method-execution(void Application.greet(java.lang.String))' in Type 'Application' (Application.java:4) advised by before advice from 'FirstAspect'"/>
+		</compile>
+		<run class="Application" classpath="$sandbox/second-aspect.jar,$sandbox/first-aspect.jar">
+			<stdout>
+				<line text="FirstAspect: execution(void Application.greet(String))"/>
+				<line text="SecondAspect: execution(void Application.greet(String))"/>
+				<line text="Hello world!"/>
+			</stdout>
+		</run>
+	</ajc-test>
+
 	<!-- https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj/issues/246 -->
 	<ajc-test dir="bugs1920/github_246" vm="8" title="add correct annotations to multiple ITD methods with the same name and same number of arguments">
 		<compile files="First.java Second.java App.java ITDAspect.aj" options="-8"/>