aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authoraclement <aclement>2009-02-20 20:57:15 +0000
committeraclement <aclement>2009-02-20 20:57:15 +0000
commite8309925eb9c0a86d3cf6a786cb95fc4be349242 (patch)
tree9d86655367b03ca5ff0c6c8655a1c5888d2b004a
parent57dbf696735070a818bf33bf5b7e8e51a5f0ba5c (diff)
downloadaspectj-e8309925eb9c0a86d3cf6a786cb95fc4be349242.tar.gz
aspectj-e8309925eb9c0a86d3cf6a786cb95fc4be349242.zip
265695: inherited anno matching
-rw-r--r--tests/bugs164/pr265695/Asp.aj35
-rw-r--r--tests/bugs164/pr265695/AspNew.aj32
-rw-r--r--tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/Ajc164Tests.java18
-rw-r--r--tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/ajc164.xml15
4 files changed, 93 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/tests/bugs164/pr265695/Asp.aj b/tests/bugs164/pr265695/Asp.aj
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..296cb1f36
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/bugs164/pr265695/Asp.aj
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
+import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
+
+@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
+@interface Secured {
+ String value();
+}
+
+interface DemoService {
+ @Secured("READ")
+ void secureMethod();
+}
+
+
+class DemoServiceImpl implements DemoService {
+ public void secureMethod() { }
+}
+
+aspect X {
+ // None of these match, the subject at execution(secureMethod()) does not have the annotation
+ // see http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/next/adk15notebook/join-point-modifiers.html
+ before(): execution(@Secured * *Service+.*(..)) { }
+
+ before(): execution(@Secured * *Service.*(..)) { }
+
+ before(): execution(@Secured * DemoService.*(..)) { }
+
+}
+
+public class Asp {
+ public static void main(String[] args) {
+ new DemoServiceImpl().secureMethod();
+ }
+}
+
diff --git a/tests/bugs164/pr265695/AspNew.aj b/tests/bugs164/pr265695/AspNew.aj
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ae99590fb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/bugs164/pr265695/AspNew.aj
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
+import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
+
+@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
+@interface Secured {
+ String value();
+}
+
+interface DemoService {
+ @Secured("READ")
+ void secureMethod();
+}
+
+
+class DemoServiceImpl implements DemoService {
+ public void secureMethod() { }
+}
+
+aspect X {
+ // None of these match, the subject at execution(secureMethod()) does not have the annotation
+ // see http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/next/adk15notebook/join-point-modifiers.html
+ before(): execution(@Secured! * *Service+.*(..)) { }
+
+
+}
+
+public class AspNew {
+ public static void main(String[] args) {
+ new DemoServiceImpl().secureMethod();
+ }
+}
+
diff --git a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/Ajc164Tests.java b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/Ajc164Tests.java
index 2351c665f..6de409bdd 100644
--- a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/Ajc164Tests.java
+++ b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/Ajc164Tests.java
@@ -32,6 +32,14 @@ import org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase;
public class Ajc164Tests extends org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase {
+ public void testAnnoInherited_pr265695() {
+ runTest("anno inherited");
+ }
+
+ // public void testAnnoInherited_pr265695_2() {
+ // runTest("new syntax for inherited anno - 1");
+ // }
+
public void testParserProblemSubArrayPatterns_pr148508() {
runTest("parser problem for array subtypes");
}
@@ -43,7 +51,7 @@ public class Ajc164Tests extends org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase {
public void testIncorrectDateResolution_pr265360() {
runTest("incorrect resolution of Date");
}
-
+
public void testDualPreClinit_pr233032() {
runTest("dual preClinit");
}
@@ -144,11 +152,9 @@ public class Ajc164Tests extends org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase {
}
/**
- * This test checks that local variable table for the interMethodDispatcher
- * is built correctly, for the related code see
- * IntertypeMethodDeclaration.generateDispatchMethod(). It checks non-static
- * and static ITDs. Once the information here is correct then around advice
- * on ITDs can also be correct.
+ * This test checks that local variable table for the interMethodDispatcher is built correctly, for the related code see
+ * IntertypeMethodDeclaration.generateDispatchMethod(). It checks non-static and static ITDs. Once the information here is
+ * correct then around advice on ITDs can also be correct.
*/
public void testBrokenLVT_pr194314_3() throws Exception {
runTest("broken lvt - 3");
diff --git a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/ajc164.xml b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/ajc164.xml
index 9dbe25479..11acc2979 100644
--- a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/ajc164.xml
+++ b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc164/ajc164.xml
@@ -1,6 +1,20 @@
<!DOCTYPE suite SYSTEM "../tests/ajcTestSuite.dtd"[]>
<suite>
+
+ <ajc-test dir="bugs164/pr265695" title="anno inherited">
+ <compile files="Asp.aj" options="-showWeaveInfo -1.5">
+ <message kind="warning" line="22" text="advice defined"/>
+ <message kind="warning" line="24" text="advice defined"/>
+ <message kind="warning" line="26" text="advice defined"/>
+ </compile>
+ </ajc-test>
+
+ <ajc-test dir="bugs164/pr265695" title="new syntax for inherited anno - 1">
+ <compile files="AspNew.aj" options="-1.5 -showWeaveInfo">
+ <message kind="weave" line="22" text="foo"/>
+ </compile>
+ </ajc-test>
<ajc-test dir="bugs164/pr265418" title="varargs">
<compile files="A.java" options="-1.5"/>
@@ -21,7 +35,6 @@
<run class="PR148508">
</run>
</ajc-test>
-
<ajc-test dir="bugs164/pr265360" title="incorrect resolution of Date">
<compile files="Foo.java Main.java" options="-1.5">