Merge pull request #116 from kriegaex/release-198

Add more info to 1.9.8 release notes

1 files changed, 53 insertions, 22 deletions

diff --git a/docs/dist/doc/README-198.html b/docs/dist/doc/README-198.html
index 7e30661da..af51cd314 100644
--- a/docs/dist/doc/README-198.html
+++ b/docs/dist/doc/README-198.html
@@ -37,16 +37,6 @@
   <li>Sealed classes (final in Java 17, previews in Java 15, 16 and AspectJ 1.9.7)</li>
   <li>Pattern matching for <tt>switch</tt></li>
 </ul>
-<p>
-  For features marked as preview on a given JDK, you need to compile with <tt>ajc --enable-preview</tt> and run with
-  <tt>java --enable-preview</tt> on that JDK.
-</p>
-<p>
-  Please note that you cannot run code compiled with preview features on any other JDK than the one used for
-  compilation. For example, records compiled with preview on JDK 15 cannot be used on JDK 16 without recompilation. This
-  is a JVM limitation unrelated to AspectJ. Also, e.g. sealed classes are preview-1 on JDK 15 and preview-2 on JDK 16.
-  You still need to recompile, no matter what.
-</p>
 
 <h2>Improvements</h2>
 
@@ -55,6 +45,22 @@
   supported by AJC. Previously, the option existed (inherited by ECJ) but did not work correctly.
 </p>
 
+<p>
+  The following new properties can improve performance, e.g. Spring start-up time:
+</p>
+<ul>
+  <li><tt>org.aspectj.apache.bcel.useSingleRepositoryInstance</tt></li>
+  <li><tt>org.aspectj.apache.bcel.useUnavailableClassesCache</tt></li>
+  <li><tt>org.aspectj.apache.bcel.ignoreCacheClearRequests</tt></li>
+</ul>
+<p>
+  For now, they all default to <tt>false</tt> for backward compatibility. This might change in a future Aspect release,
+  if user feedback is positive and no negative side effects are found. Please try using them as much as you can and
+  report back questions (to the AspectJ users mailing list) or problems (as a GitHub issue), if any. Thanks to Stefan
+  Starke for his contribution. See also <a href="https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/pull/37">PR #37</a>.
+</p>
+
+
 <h2>Code examples</h2>
 
 <p>
@@ -75,16 +81,6 @@
   </li>
 </ul>
 
-<h2>Using LTW on Java 16+</h2>
-
-<p>
-  Please note that if you want to use load-time weaving on Java 16+, the weaving agent collides with
-  <a href="https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/396">JEP 396 (Strongly Encapsulate JDK Internals by Default)</a>. Therefore,
-  you need to set the JVM parameter <tt>--add-opens java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED</tt> in order to enable aspect
-  weaving. This is due to the fact that the weaver uses internal APIs for which we have not found an adequate
-  replacement yet when defining classes in different classloaders.
-</p>
-
 <h2>Other changes and bug fixes</h2>
 
 <ul>
@@ -98,7 +94,6 @@
   </li>
   <li>Document build profiles and properties in <i>docs/developer/BUILD.md</i></li>
   <li>Add a guide for setting up an AspectJ development environment in <i>docs/developer/IDE.md</i></li>
-  <li>Allow JAR saving if <tt>-proceedOnError</tt> is specified</li>
   <li>
     Fix <a href="https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/105">issue #105</a>: Compilation fails when using an
     aspect library via <tt>-aspectpath</tt> in combination with introducing an annotation via ITD. This was broken since
@@ -114,10 +109,46 @@
     <a href="https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/blob/de63b63d/tests/bugs198/github_68/Generator.java#L50-L61">
       craft a condy class with ASM</a>.
   </li>
+  <li>
+    Fix <a href="https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/115">issue #115</a>: In annotation-style pointcuts,
+    <tt>if(false)</tt> and <tt>if(true)</tt> now work as expected and do not require a boolean return value and body for
+    the <tt>@Pointcut</tt> method.
+  </li>
+  <li>
+    Thanks to Andrey Turbanov for several clean code contributions and to Dmitry Mikhaylov for fixing a potential
+    concurrency problem.
+  </li>
 </ul>
 
+<h2>AspectJ usage hints</h2>
+
+<h3>Use LTW on Java 16+</h3>
+
+<p>
+  Please note that if you want to use load-time weaving on Java 16+, the weaving agent collides with
+  <a href="https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/396">JEP 396 (Strongly Encapsulate JDK Internals by Default)</a>. Therefore,
+  you need to set the JVM parameter <tt>--add-opens java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED</tt> in order to enable aspect
+  weaving. This is due to the fact that the weaver uses internal APIs for which we have not found an adequate
+  replacement yet when defining classes in different classloaders.
+</p>
+
+<h3>Compile with Java preview features</h3>
+
+<p>
+  For features marked as preview on a given JDK, you need to compile with <tt>ajc --enable-preview</tt> and run with
+  <tt>java --enable-preview</tt> on that JDK.
+</p>
+<p>
+  Please note that you cannot run code compiled with preview features on any other JDK than the one used for
+  compilation. For example, records compiled with preview on JDK 15 cannot be used on JDK 16 without recompilation. This
+  is a JVM limitation unrelated to AspectJ. Also, e.g. sealed classes are preview-1 on JDK 15 and preview-2 on JDK 16.
+  You still need to recompile, no matter what.
+</p>
+
+<hr>
+
 <p>
-  Available: 1.9.8 available DD-MMM-2021
+  <b>Available:</b> 1.9.8 available DD-MMM-2022
 </p>
 
 </body>