diff options
author | Andy Clement <aclement@pivotal.io> | 2016-07-29 10:05:50 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andy Clement <aclement@pivotal.io> | 2016-07-29 10:05:50 -0700 |
commit | 87856659869b9dbf72e1b329986fb2d727cfad18 (patch) | |
tree | be703a38baedd823689b7279e7641c19abb2dee6 /ajbrowser | |
parent | 784906d2ee0cb1b432a9aff6973c12cfd865db6e (diff) | |
download | aspectj-87856659869b9dbf72e1b329986fb2d727cfad18.tar.gz aspectj-87856659869b9dbf72e1b329986fb2d727cfad18.zip |
Fix ambiguous binding problem on anonymous types
If an anonymous class calls a method ITD'd onto one of its own
supertypes (e.g. new A() { xx(null); }) then it can be reported
as an ambiguous method invocation on Java8. There is different
handling for Java8 that is revealing an issue. The intertype
method declarations are recorded in a member finder attached to the
target type (A in this case). When the local type binding is
built it gets all the methods from supertypes added to it - this
unfortunately includes the ITD method. Then later when something
asks for all 'xx' methods on A, it finds the ITD method from when
A was constructed and an additional copy from the member finder.
The quick fix is for the member finder to use a set rather than
list when answering 'what are the xx methods'. If this proves
a problem down the line the deeper fix would be to avoid including
ITDs when the local type binding is built.
Diffstat (limited to 'ajbrowser')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions