diff options
author | wisberg <wisberg> | 2003-08-06 09:42:08 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | wisberg <wisberg> | 2003-08-06 09:42:08 +0000 |
commit | 3e0524e928db98a4c36ab51dc00daef71fbdfb0b (patch) | |
tree | a306241ad9d1b44e356a0f1b442b1d81f54e182d /docs | |
parent | c09964fbdb4d97c60c3fc72b3061518369db5161 (diff) | |
download | aspectj-3e0524e928db98a4c36ab51dc00daef71fbdfb0b.tar.gz aspectj-3e0524e928db98a4c36ab51dc00daef71fbdfb0b.zip |
modular build questions, unauthoritative answers
Diffstat (limited to 'docs')
-rw-r--r-- | docs/faq/faq.xml | 239 |
1 files changed, 186 insertions, 53 deletions
diff --git a/docs/faq/faq.xml b/docs/faq/faq.xml index 22be7f32a..539f89edc 100644 --- a/docs/faq/faq.xml +++ b/docs/faq/faq.xml @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ 2003 Contributors. All rights reserved. </para> <!-- todo Update me! --> - <para>Last updated July 15, 2003. + <para>Last updated August 6, 2003. </para> <para> This FAQ covers AspectJ versions 1.0 and 1.1. @@ -1509,7 +1509,9 @@ aspect PublicErrorLogging { If this is too slow, then you can try to make reasonable divisions between sets of source files whose aspects do not interact to achieve a shorter compile cycle (particularly for development - aspects). However, if you get any problems + aspects). If you have aspects that apply to different modules, + you can try compiling them into a binary form and using them + to weave each module. However, if you get any problems or if you wish to run tests or do a release, you should recompile the entire system. </para> @@ -1870,6 +1872,66 @@ ajc -bootclasspath c:\jdk1.2\jre\lib\rt.jar \ </answer> </qandaentry> <qandaentry> + <question id="q:idesupportplans" + xreflabel="Q:What plans are there to support my IDE?"> + <para>What plans are there to support my IDE?</para> + </question> + <answer> + <para> + The AspectJ team directly provided components for JBuilder, Forte, + and Emacs and supported the open-source AspectJ plugin project + at <ulink url="http://eclipse.org/ajdt">http://eclipse.org/ajdt</ulink> + which uses the AJDE API support for IDE's. + Supporting new IDE's is a matter of building on the AJDE API's, + mostly likely adopting one of the existing open-source IDE + extensions as a design template. + Here are the IDE's where we know people have expressed interest, + so interested developer may want to join with others in their + developer communities to build the integration. + <itemizedlist> + <title></title> + <listitem> + <para>IDEA/IntelliJ has an enthusiastic community and + the developers are working on an extensibility API + - <ulink url="http://intellij.com">http://intellij.com</ulink> + </para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>jEdit comes from a very active open-source community.</para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para> + Oracle JDeveloper has an Extension SDK unfamiliar to us. + </para> + </listitem> + <listitem> + <para>Some have suggested Codeguide from Omnicore + <ulink url="http://www.omnicore.com">http://www.omnicore.com/</ulink> + </para> + </listitem> + </itemizedlist> + </para> + <para> + For questions on AJDE, join the developer's list + <literal>aspectj-dev@eclipse.org</literal>. + For questions on the current IDE integrations, contact those projects. + </para> + </answer> + </qandaentry> + <qandaentry> + <question id="q:portingajde" + xreflabel="Q:Can I port AJDE support to my development environment?"> + <para>Can I port AJDE support to my development environment?</para> + </question> + <answer> + <para>Yes. The core AJDE API is extensible and the source code is + available for download. Start by studying the sources + for the existing IDE support linked off the AspectJ site + <ulink url="http://eclipse.org/aspectj">http://eclipse.org/aspectj</ulink>. + </para> + </answer> + </qandaentry> + <qandaentry> <question id="q:hybridbuilds" xreflabel="Q:Setting up hybrid builds"> <para>I want the aspects for development builds but @@ -1917,61 +1979,120 @@ ajc -bootclasspath c:\jdk1.2\jre\lib\rt.jar \ </answer> </qandaentry> <qandaentry> - <question id="q:idesupportplans" - xreflabel="Q:What plans are there to support my IDE?"> - <para>What plans are there to support my IDE?</para> - </question> - <answer> + <question id="q:stepwiseBuilds" + xreflabel="Q:We compile module jars and then assemble them. Can we continue this with AspectJ?"> <para> - The AspectJ team directly provided components for JBuilder, Forte, - and Emacs and supported the open-source AspectJ plugin project - at <ulink url="http://eclipse.org/ajdt">http://eclipse.org/ajdt</ulink> - which uses the AJDE API support for IDE's. - Supporting new IDE's is a matter of building on the AJDE API's, - mostly likely adopting one of the existing open-source IDE - extensions as a design template. - Here are the IDE's where we know people have expressed interest, - so interested developer may want to join with others in their - developer communities to build the integration. - <itemizedlist> - <title></title> - <listitem> - <para>IDEA/IntelliJ has an enthusiastic community and - the developers are working on an extensibility API - - <ulink url="http://intellij.com">http://intellij.com</ulink> - </para> - </listitem> - <listitem> - <para>jEdit comes from a very active open-source community.</para> - </listitem> - <listitem> - <para> - Oracle JDeveloper has an Extension SDK unfamiliar to us. - </para> - </listitem> - <listitem> - <para>Some have suggested Codeguide from Omnicore - <ulink url="http://www.omnicore.com">http://www.omnicore.com/</ulink> - </para> - </listitem> - </itemizedlist> + We compile module jars and then assemble them. Can we continue this with AspectJ? </para> + </question> + <answer> <para> - For questions on AJDE, join the developer's list - <literal>aspectj-dev@eclipse.org</literal>. - For questions on the current IDE integrations, contact those projects. - </para> + Aspects apply to everything in a namespace, as if everything is + compiled together. + Sometimes you can break the build down into separate steps without breaking + this model, but we haven't stated exactly where it could break + because it depends on the interactions between all types. + You can try the approaches below, but remember to rebuild + everything in one go if there are problems. + </para> + <para> + The simplest scenario is when the aspects apply to all modules + and the modules compile without the aspects. In that case, + weaving in the aspects is just the final assembly step for + the build. + </para> + <para> + Next is the case where the aspects make changes to a common + library that are visible to other clients, which themselves + are otherwise unaffected by the aspects. In this case, the + common library can be built using ajc, and used on the + classpath for the module builds: + <programlisting> +<![CDATA[ + ajc -outjar common.jar -sourceroots "aspectj-src:src" ... + cd ../otherProject + javac -classpath "../common/common.jar:${aspectjrt.jar}" {src} +]]> + </programlisting> + </para> + <para> + Combining these last two, + there's the case where a common set of aspects should + affect two or more modules that are in a dependency relationship + to one another. It should work to reuse the aspects + in binary form for each compile, in dependency order: + + <programlisting> +<![CDATA[ + ajc -outjar common-aspects.jar + -sourceroots "aspectj-src" ... + + ajc -outjar common.jar + -sourceroots "src" + -aspectpath common-aspects.jar ... + + cd ../module1 + ajc -outjar module1.jar + -sourceroots "src" + -classpath common.jar + -aspectpath ../common-aspects.jar ... + + cd ../module2 + ajc -outjar module2.jar + -sourceroots "src" + -classpath "common.jar;../module1.jar" + -aspectpath ../common-aspects.jar ... +]]> + </programlisting> + </para> + <para> + If two modules are visibly affected by aspects and + mutually-dependent, the only thing to do is compile + them together. + </para> + <para> + It's safest to assume that all aspects can affect all + types in a namespace; using build boundaries to effect + crosscutting limits causes a dangerous dependency on + the build process and might cause problems. + </para> </answer> </qandaentry> <qandaentry> - <question id="q:portingajde" - xreflabel="Q:Can I port AJDE support to my development environment?"> - <para>Can I port AJDE support to my development environment?</para> + <question id="q:incrementalModuleCompiles" + xreflabel="Q: We use modules and would like to use incremental compilation. + Is that possible?"> + <para>We use modules and would like to use incremental compilation. + Is that possible? + </para> </question> <answer> - <para>Yes. The core AJDE API is extensible and the source code is - available for download. Start by studying the sources - for the existing IDE support. + <para> + Just incrementally-compile the whole system. + Specify to ajc the modules as multiple source roots + (or input jars if you are weaving libraries). + </para> + <para> + In Eclipse's AJDT, you can create a top-level project with symbolic + links out to the sources: + + <programlisting> +<![CDATA[ + app-assembly/ + {link common/aspects} + {link common/src} + {link module1/src} + ... +]]> + </programlisting> + + Then everything is part of one huge incremental compile. Also, you + can close this master project and work the others using the Java + compiler or AJDT. + </para> + <para> + The links make incremental development possible without affecting + the modularized Ant builds. (Our practice runs along those lines.) </para> </answer> </qandaentry> @@ -2537,11 +2658,21 @@ aspect MyMarker extends MarkerExample { </question> <answer> <para>Some libraries are distributed in the release under the - examples folder in the distribution. - If you develop a library and want to make it available to - other users, join the users mailing list + examples folder in the distribution. + These are "libraries" in the sense that they are reusable, + but they are delivered in source form. + If you develop such a library and want to make it available to + other users, feel to send it to the users mailing list <literal>aspectj-users@eclipse.org</literal>. </para> + <para>In AspectJ 1.1, ajc supports binary aspects, so + you can distribute aspect libraries without distributing the + source. For more information, see the + <literal>-aspectpath</literal> + option in the + <ulink url="devguide/devguide/ajc-ref.html"> + Reference for ajc</ulink>. + </para> </answer> </qandaentry> <qandaentry> @@ -4005,7 +4136,7 @@ vmparam -Xmx384m <answer> <para> This revision had still - more 1.1-driven changes and updated some process questions. + more 1.1-driven changes and updated some process and build questions. Entries changed since the earlier June, 2003 version: <itemizedlist> <listitem><para><xref linkend="q:support"/></para></listitem> @@ -4017,6 +4148,8 @@ vmparam -Xmx384m <listitem><para><xref linkend="q:ajdocneeds13"/></para></listitem> <listitem><para><xref linkend="q:differences"/></para></listitem> <listitem><para><xref linkend="q:schedule"/></para></listitem> + <listitem><para><xref linkend="q:incrementalModuleCompiles"/></para></listitem> + <listitem><para><xref linkend="q:stepwiseBuilds"/></para></listitem> </itemizedlist> </para> </answer> |