diff options
| author | acolyer <acolyer> | 2004-07-28 15:55:07 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | acolyer <acolyer> | 2004-07-28 15:55:07 +0000 |
| commit | b383dfb6458c3871fa09ac71768899e9c1683822 (patch) | |
| tree | 31d77b8b34d4ff2a93bb3725979da10b0b9cb212 /docs | |
| parent | 10c6de6fbc8a0b9eb07801f4ac19bea8304a9cb3 (diff) | |
| download | aspectj-b383dfb6458c3871fa09ac71768899e9c1683822.tar.gz aspectj-b383dfb6458c3871fa09ac71768899e9c1683822.zip | |
fix for Bugzilla Bug 64585
Stale ITD example code in Programming Guide
Diffstat (limited to 'docs')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/progGuideDB/semantics.xml | 18 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/docs/progGuideDB/semantics.xml b/docs/progGuideDB/semantics.xml index da0b772b0..650cc7345 100644 --- a/docs/progGuideDB/semantics.xml +++ b/docs/progGuideDB/semantics.xml @@ -2031,25 +2031,25 @@ <programlisting> aspect A { - private Registry otherPackage.*.r; - public void otherPackage.*.register(Registry r) { - r.register(this); - this.r = r; + private Registry otherPackage.onType.r; + public void otherPackage.onType.register(Registry r) { + r.register(this); + this.r = r; } } </programlisting> <para> - declares that every type in <literal>otherPackage</literal> has a field + declares that <literal>onType</literal> in <literal>otherPackage</literal> has a field <literal>r</literal>. This field, however, is only accessible from the code inside of aspect <literal>A</literal>. The aspect also declares - that every type in <literal>otherPackage</literal> has a method + that <literal>onType</literal> has a method "<literal>register</literal>", but makes this method accessible from everywhere. </para> <para> - If any type in <literal>otherPackage</literal> already defines a + If <literal>onType</literal> already defines a private or package-protected field "<literal>r</literal>", there is no conflict: The aspect cannot see such a field, and no code in <literal>otherPackage</literal> can see the inter-type @@ -2057,7 +2057,7 @@ </para> <para> - If any type in <literal>otherPackage</literal> defines a public field + If <literal>onType</literal> defines a public field "<literal>r</literal>", there is a conflict: The expression </para> @@ -2072,7 +2072,7 @@ </para> <para> - If any type in <literal>otherPackage</literal> defines any method + If <literal>onType</literal> defines a method "<literal>register(Registry)</literal>" there is a conflict, since it would be ambiguous to any code that could see such a defined method which "<literal>register(Registry)</literal>" method was applicable. |