aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authoracolyer <acolyer>2005-09-02 13:45:25 +0000
committeracolyer <acolyer>2005-09-02 13:45:25 +0000
commite29ca524955b2112bbf63e740ca71516c13fbb4c (patch)
treec6be1b77f9071cb24cdba1e2cf91f325c90ce9e1 /org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src
parent047173e8683e4ab9004ae2151a8abad886d1b84b (diff)
downloadaspectj-e29ca524955b2112bbf63e740ca71516c13fbb4c.tar.gz
aspectj-e29ca524955b2112bbf63e740ca71516c13fbb4c.zip
tests and fix for pr1202212 - poor job of testing modifiers on ITD methods
Diffstat (limited to 'org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src')
-rw-r--r--org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/InterTypeMethodDeclaration.java66
1 files changed, 66 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/InterTypeMethodDeclaration.java b/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/InterTypeMethodDeclaration.java
index 80271fbdf..a56f2a161 100644
--- a/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/InterTypeMethodDeclaration.java
+++ b/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/InterTypeMethodDeclaration.java
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ import org.aspectj.org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.flow.InitializationFlowCont
import org.aspectj.org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.ClassScope;
import org.aspectj.org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.MethodBinding;
import org.aspectj.org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.ReferenceBinding;
+import org.aspectj.org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.SourceTypeBinding;
import org.aspectj.org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.TagBits;
import org.aspectj.org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.TypeBinding;
import org.aspectj.org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.parser.Parser;
@@ -89,6 +90,7 @@ public class InterTypeMethodDeclaration extends InterTypeDeclaration {
public void resolveStatements() {
+ checkAndSetModifiersForMethod();
if ((modifiers & AccSemicolonBody) != 0) {
if ((declaredModifiers & AccAbstract) == 0)
scope.problemReporter().methodNeedBody(this);
@@ -275,4 +277,68 @@ public class InterTypeMethodDeclaration extends InterTypeDeclaration {
protected Shadow.Kind getShadowKindForBody() {
return Shadow.MethodExecution;
}
+
+ // XXX this code is copied from MethodScope, with a few adjustments for ITDs...
+ private void checkAndSetModifiersForMethod() {
+
+ // for reported problems, we want the user to see the declared selector
+ char[] realSelector = this.selector;
+ this.selector = declaredSelector;
+
+ final ReferenceBinding declaringClass = this.binding.declaringClass;
+ if ((declaredModifiers & AccAlternateModifierProblem) != 0)
+ scope.problemReporter().duplicateModifierForMethod(onTypeBinding, this);
+
+ // after this point, tests on the 16 bits reserved.
+ int realModifiers = declaredModifiers & AccJustFlag;
+
+ // check for abnormal modifiers
+ int unexpectedModifiers = ~(AccPublic | AccPrivate | AccProtected
+ | AccAbstract | AccStatic | AccFinal | AccSynchronized | AccNative | AccStrictfp);
+ if ((realModifiers & unexpectedModifiers) != 0) {
+ scope.problemReporter().illegalModifierForMethod(this);
+ declaredModifiers &= ~AccJustFlag | ~unexpectedModifiers;
+ }
+
+ // check for incompatible modifiers in the visibility bits, isolate the visibility bits
+ int accessorBits = realModifiers & (AccPublic | AccProtected | AccPrivate);
+ if ((accessorBits & (accessorBits - 1)) != 0) {
+ scope.problemReporter().illegalVisibilityModifierCombinationForMethod(onTypeBinding, this);
+
+ // need to keep the less restrictive so disable Protected/Private as necessary
+ if ((accessorBits & AccPublic) != 0) {
+ if ((accessorBits & AccProtected) != 0)
+ declaredModifiers &= ~AccProtected;
+ if ((accessorBits & AccPrivate) != 0)
+ declaredModifiers &= ~AccPrivate;
+ } else if ((accessorBits & AccProtected) != 0 && (accessorBits & AccPrivate) != 0) {
+ declaredModifiers &= ~AccPrivate;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // check for modifiers incompatible with abstract modifier
+ if ((declaredModifiers & AccAbstract) != 0) {
+ int incompatibleWithAbstract = AccStatic | AccFinal | AccSynchronized | AccNative | AccStrictfp;
+ if ((declaredModifiers & incompatibleWithAbstract) != 0)
+ scope.problemReporter().illegalAbstractModifierCombinationForMethod(onTypeBinding, this);
+ if (!onTypeBinding.isAbstract())
+ scope.problemReporter().abstractMethodInAbstractClass((SourceTypeBinding) onTypeBinding, this);
+ }
+
+ /* DISABLED for backward compatibility with javac (if enabled should also mark private methods as final)
+ // methods from a final class are final : 8.4.3.3
+ if (methodBinding.declaringClass.isFinal())
+ modifiers |= AccFinal;
+ */
+ // native methods cannot also be tagged as strictfp
+ if ((declaredModifiers & AccNative) != 0 && (declaredModifiers & AccStrictfp) != 0)
+ scope.problemReporter().nativeMethodsCannotBeStrictfp(onTypeBinding, this);
+
+ // static members are only authorized in a static member or top level type
+ if (((realModifiers & AccStatic) != 0) && declaringClass.isNestedType() && !declaringClass.isStatic())
+ scope.problemReporter().unexpectedStaticModifierForMethod(onTypeBinding, this);
+
+ // restore the true selector now that any problems have been reported
+ this.selector = realSelector;
+ }
}