diff options
author | Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name> | 2023-01-15 01:16:24 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name> | 2023-01-15 14:41:51 +0100 |
commit | c9afd2ee1b1a701bffbe1d79f2a186b96c7e4f45 (patch) | |
tree | ced1bea74802933b361f02c01ea98ebedc071048 /tests | |
parent | 9cf956c2838cbb4f5fd3ad46064e579df3752456 (diff) | |
download | aspectj-c9afd2ee1b1a701bffbe1d79f2a186b96c7e4f45.tar.gz aspectj-c9afd2ee1b1a701bffbe1d79f2a186b96c7e4f45.zip |
WildTypePattern: fix hashCode and toString methods
Especially 'hashCode' did not correspond to 'equals', disregarding
several fields, array dimension information being only one of them. This
led to parts of pointcuts being ignored, because they were regarded as
duplicates. Example:
execution(Foo* *(..)) && !execution(Foo*[] *(..))
Here, the negated pattern was falsely regarded as equal to the first
pattern, leading to an "A && !A" situation, i.e. no match at all.
Furthermore, 'toString' did not print array strings, i.e. instead of
"Foo*[][]" something like "Foo*" was printed. This false information was
also present in annotations generated by the weaver.
FuzzilyMatchingAspect was adjusted to actually match exactly once, as
expected, for the "Foo*" return types, i.e. exclusions for the array
return types have been added.
Relates to #24.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests')
-rw-r--r-- | tests/bugs1919/github_24/FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj | 26 |
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/tests/bugs1919/github_24/FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj b/tests/bugs1919/github_24/FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj index d7c32a70a..b40c13c62 100644 --- a/tests/bugs1919/github_24/FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj +++ b/tests/bugs1919/github_24/FuzzilyMatchingAspect.aj @@ -1,25 +1,39 @@ public aspect FuzzilyMatchingAspect { - after() : execution(public MaybeMissing* MaybeMissing*.*()) { + + pointcut returnRefTypeSimpleOrArray() : execution(public MaybeMissing* MaybeMissing*.*()); + pointcut return1DimRefTypeArray() : execution(public MaybeMissing*[] MaybeMissing*.*()); + pointcut return2DimRefTypeArray() : execution(public MaybeMissing*[][] MaybeMissing*.*()); + + // Return type 'MaybeMissing*' also matches array types due to the '*' at the end. + // Therefore, explicitly exclude array pointcuts in order to only match the method returning the simple type. + after() : returnRefTypeSimpleOrArray() && !return1DimRefTypeArray() && !return2DimRefTypeArray() { System.out.println(thisJoinPoint); } - after() : execution(public MaybeMissing*[] MaybeMissing*.*()) { + after() : return1DimRefTypeArray() { System.out.println(thisJoinPoint); } - after() : execution(public MaybeMissing*[][] MaybeMissing*.*()) { + after() : return2DimRefTypeArray() { System.out.println(thisJoinPoint); } - after() : execution(public in* MaybeMissing*.*()) { + pointcut returnPrimitiveTypeSimpleOrArray() : execution(public in* MaybeMissing*.*()); + pointcut return1DimPrimitiveTypeArray() : execution(public in*[] MaybeMissing*.*()); + pointcut return2DimPrimitiveTypeArray() : execution(public in*[][] MaybeMissing*.*()); + + // Return type 'in*' also matches array types due to the '*' at the end. + // Therefore, explicitly exclude array pointcuts in order to only match the method returning the simple type. + after() : returnPrimitiveTypeSimpleOrArray() && !return1DimPrimitiveTypeArray() && !return2DimPrimitiveTypeArray() { System.out.println(thisJoinPoint); } - after() : execution(public in*[] MaybeMissing*.*()) { + after() : return1DimPrimitiveTypeArray() { System.out.println(thisJoinPoint); } - after() : execution(public in*[][] MaybeMissing*.*()) { + after() : return2DimPrimitiveTypeArray() { System.out.println(thisJoinPoint); } + } |