diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tests')
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/bugs150/pr115038.aj | 5 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/Ajc150Tests.java | 1 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/ajc150.xml | 40 |
3 files changed, 18 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/tests/bugs150/pr115038.aj b/tests/bugs150/pr115038.aj new file mode 100644 index 000000000..46dc5a1d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bugs150/pr115038.aj @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +public abstract aspect pr115038<Observable, Observer, Event> { + public boolean Observer.handle(Observable o, Event e) { + return true; + } +} diff --git a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/Ajc150Tests.java b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/Ajc150Tests.java index 92b29d6b8..8d8f2a837 100644 --- a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/Ajc150Tests.java +++ b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/Ajc150Tests.java @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ public class Ajc150Tests extends org.aspectj.testing.XMLBasedAjcTestCase { */ public void testUnboundFormal_pr112027() { runTest("unexpected error unboundFormalInPC");} + public void testNPEScopeSetup_pr115038() { runTest("NPE in ensureScopeSetup");} public void testCCEGenerics_pr113445() { runTest("Generics ClassCastException");} public void testMatthewsAspect_pr113947_1() { runTest("maws generic aspect - 1");} public void testMatthewsAspect_pr113947_2() { runTest("maws generic aspect - 2");} diff --git a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/ajc150.xml b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/ajc150.xml index 4316e6ec8..b6b5e6bf8 100644 --- a/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/ajc150.xml +++ b/tests/src/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc150/ajc150.xml @@ -10,13 +10,22 @@ <ajc-test dir="bugs150" title="Problem with constructor ITDs"> <compile files="pr112783.aj" options="-1.5"/> </ajc-test> - - <ajc-test dir="bugs150" title="ITDC with no explicit cons call"> + + <ajc-test dir="bugs150" title="NPE in ensureScopeSetup"> + <compile files="pr115038.aj" options="-1.5"> + <!-- fixme asc the 'static ref' messages are a bit poor and ought to be eliminated... --> + <message kind="error" line="2" text="Cannot make a static reference to the non-static type Observable"/> + <message kind="error" line="2" text="Cannot make a static reference to the non-static type Event"/> + <message kind="error" line="2" text="Cannot make inter-type declarations on type variables"/> + </compile> + </ajc-test> + + <ajc-test dir="bugs150" title="ITDC with no explicit cons call"> <compile files="Pr62606.aj" options="-1.5"> <message kind="warning" line="6" text="[Xlint:noExplicitConstructorCall]"/> </compile> </ajc-test> - + <ajc-test dir="java5/generics/bugs" title="using same type variable in ITD"> <compile files="SameTypeVariable.aj" options="-1.5"> </compile> @@ -27,31 +36,6 @@ </compile> </ajc-test> - <ajc-test dir="java5/compliance" title="java 5 pointcuts and declares at pre-java 5 compliance levels"> - <compile files="AJ5FeaturesAtJ14.aj" options="-1.4"> - <message kind="error" line="3" text="the @annotation pointcut expression is only supported at Java 5 compliance level or above"/> - <message kind="error" line="11" text="the @within pointcut expression is only supported at Java 5 compliance level or above"/> - <message kind="error" line="13" text="the @withincode pointcut expression is only supported at Java 5 compliance level or above"/> - <message kind="error" line="5" text="the @this pointcut expression is only supported at Java 5 compliance level or above"/> - <message kind="error" line="7" text="the @target pointcut expression is only supported at Java 5 compliance level or above"/> - <message kind="error" line="9" text="the @args pointcut expression is only supported at Java 5 compliance level or above"/> - <message kind="error" line="15" text="declare @type is only supported at Java 5 compliance level or above"/> - <message kind="error" line="15" text="annotations are only available if source level is 5.0"/> - <message kind="error" line="15" text="cannot convert from Foo to Annotation"/> - <message kind="error" line="17" text="declare @method is only supported at Java 5 compliance level or above"/> - <message kind="error" line="17" text="annotations are only available if source level is 5.0"/> - <message kind="error" line="17" text="cannot convert from Foo to Annotation"/> - <message kind="error" line="19" text="declare @field is only supported at Java 5 compliance level or above"/> - <message kind="error" line="19" text="annotations are only available if source level is 5.0"/> - <message kind="error" line="19" text="cannot convert from Foo to Annotation"/> - <message kind="error" line="21" text="declare @constructor is only supported at Java 5 compliance level or above"/> - <message kind="error" line="21" text="annotations are only available if source level is 5.0"/> - <message kind="error" line="21" text="cannot convert from Foo to Annotation"/> - <message kind="error" line="25" text="annotation type patterns are only supported at Java 5 compliance level or above"/> - <message kind="error" line="27" text="annotation type patterns are only supported at Java 5 compliance level or above"/> - </compile> - </ajc-test> - <ajc-test dir="bugs150/pr86903" title="bcelrenderer bad"> <compile files="GenericService.java,Service.java,Main.java,BadWormhole.java"/> <run class="Main"/> |