| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reproduces regression bug #285 when running
org.aspectj.systemtest.ajc171.NewFeatures::testSharedCache.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8326483
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and turn into javadoc.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also reformat compiler usage page to adhere to 80-character limit again.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Add short description to AJC usage message via
messages_aspectj.properties
- Add longer description to ajc.adoc in the AspectJ Development
Environment Guide
Closes https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=455014.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While researching how and what to document for AJJ option
'-xmlConfigured', I needed to find out what happens in case of multiple
XML config files. Result: They are merged. the new test case for the old
1.6.4 release verifies and documents that. It can also serve as an
example for reference in case of user questions.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also update the internal review ID of the OpenJDK bug I created, because
previously I had created a feature request, which has remained
unanswered. But actually, I think it is rather a regression bug, having
found out that before JDK 16 the behaviour was exactly how the feature
request describes it.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Replaces now obsolete base classes
- XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava[n]OrLater,
- XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava[n]Only.
The new class is parametrised with minimum and maximum Java version and
hence can replace all the other classes. This does not only apply the
DRY principle, but also makes adding tests for new Java versions less
tedious.
By chance, I also noticed missing sanity tests for Java 12, which I
added as a little drive-by benefit.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I was looking at this test for another reason and thought, it might be a
good idea to make it a little bit more compact and re-indent it.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SOURCE_INPUTS, TARGET_INPUTS, COMPLIANCE_INPUTS are now populated in a
'for' loop in a static initialiser block. I.e., adding support for a new
Java version is now as simple as incrementing field JAVA_VERSION_MAX. In
case ECJ raises the minimum supporter compiler source/target version,
field JAVA_VERSION_MIN needs to be incremented. But that should happen
less frequently.
This was done to make the 'AspectJ_JDK_Update' tasks as easy and as
little error-prone as possible.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
in favour of Constants.ClassFileVersion.of(int, int). The few ones
retained are used from production code, the vast majority of removed
ones only from test code.
This gets rid of yet another 'AspectJ_JDK_Update' tag. One less place to
check and update with each newly supported Java version. :-)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Replace them by a uniform method 'isVMGreaterOrEqual(double)', also
overloaded for int.
This gets rid of one 'AspectJ_JDK_Update' tag. One less place to check
and update with each newly supported Java version. :-)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The hint is meant to help AspectJ developers identify the places where
there are to-dos for releases supporting new Java versions. This is work
in progress, new tags can be added wherever necessary in the future. But
for now, the most important places should be covered:
- AJC version string
- Test infrastructure (test suites, classes and XML files)
- BCEL class file version MAJOR_*, MINOR_* constants
- AjcTask constants for compiler source, target, release
- LangUtil::is*VMOrGreater methods
- ASM and JDT Core dependency versions
- CI workflow file
- Release notes
The to-do to check the tagged places is also mentioned in RELEASE.md.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
by SLF4J system property, see
https://blogs.itemis.com/en/in-a-nutshell-removing-artifact-messages-from-maven-log-output
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Remove obsolete section "Deploying the AspectJ installer to
aspectj.dev", because we are publishing releases on GitHub, attaching
installers to them.
- Add section "Publish documentation on website".
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
One less warning in IntelliJ due to the entirely optional groupId for
that plugin, but IntelliJ still complains.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the one issue that cannot be solved regarding reproducible
builds by setting javadoc options, because that header comment is
hard-coded into the JDK with no option to avoid it. I just created an
OpenJDK issue (internal review ID 9076583, not published yet) for it,
but that does not help us today.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and smaller diffs when committing changes to the website,avoiding
timestamps, changing current copyright years, artifact versions.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
.skip'
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See https://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-reproducible-builds.html.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
FWIW, I just wanted to know if the tests in module 'build' would still
pass. They did not find copyrights for more recent years, so I added
them here.
But I am still unsure, if we need these tests at all. Obviously, they
were not running during CI builds, i.e. they seem to be non-essential.
But chances are, they were forgotten to be added to the suite.
BTW, running the tests in module 'build' with '-Drun.build.tests=true'
is failing, too, because some old JDK classes looked up there no longer
exist in more recent JDKs.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Set Asciidoctor option 'nofooter' to avoid the annoying timestamps. It
makes updating the website difficult, because always there are "changes"
in each file. Diffing real changes in generated files for the website
before committing becomes difficult. Furthermore, the user does not have
any immediate benefit for most documents, as they change infrequently or
never (e.g. old release notes).
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I found those in HTML only on the Eclipse web server, but not in the Git
repository. So, I manually converted them to ADOC.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Mapping file for Git committers, mapping e-mail addresses to names for
'git shortlog -sne'. See https://git-scm.com/docs/gitmailmap.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Maybe, the XML files and Maven wrapper files will follow. First, let us
find out if this breaks the build, maybe some tests are asserting on
"http:". But there, the replacement would also have taken place, so
probably it just works.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This part of the website is outdated and will be deleted. Instead, link
to ADOCs right in the GitHub repository.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Eclipse Compiler 8398f6c1210ec3 (13Feb2024) - Java21
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See also:
https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/eclipse.jdt.core/commit/5d2f2aecd2
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Classes and methods named '_' are no longer allowed in ECJ, obviously
also not for old target versions like 1.5. This probably is due to
the added support for unnamed patterns and classes in the latest
upstream JDT Core merge. Therefore, we simply rename '_' to '__'.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Needs eclipse-aspectj/eclipse.jdt.core#ed6050bb.
See also eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core#2006.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core/issues/1719 was fixed.
Change test to expect the correct strings for processed string pattern.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"same class woven concurrently in parallel-capable classloader".
Relates to #279.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8325536.
Relates to #277.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Drive-by cosmetics in the context of #279.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
|