aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/aspectjtools
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Add missing asm-commons to aspectjtoolsAlexander Kriegisch2024-04-071-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | Relates to #117. In commit f986c3d183, the asm-commons dependency became necessary to pull off the new trick to define classes in arbitrary class loaders during LTW. The dependency was added to aspectjweaver, but not to aspectjtools due to an oversight. As aspectjtools is meant to be a super set of aspectjweaver, add the dependency to the assembly descriptor. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.23-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2024-03-231-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release AspectJ 1.9.22Alexander Kriegisch2024-03-231-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.22-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2024-03-131-1/+1
|
* Release AspectJ 1.9.21.2V1_9_21_2Alexander Kriegisch2024-03-131-1/+1
|
* Run Antrun post-javadoc task depending on Javadoc executionAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-171-2/+3
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Use Antrun plugin to eliminate javadoc version number in HTMLAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-171-0/+13
| | | | | | | | | | This is the one issue that cannot be solved regarding reproducible builds by setting javadoc options, because that header comment is hard-coded into the JDK with no option to avoid it. I just created an OpenJDK issue (internal review ID 9076583, not published yet) for it, but that does not help us today. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.22-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-141-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release 1.9.21.1V1_9_21_1Alexander Kriegisch2024-02-141-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* DRY: Centralise common Maven Javadoc configurationAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-011-14/+0
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Unpack asm-commons during javadoc generationAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-011-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Workaround for defining classes during LTWAlexander Kriegisch2024-01-291-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Overhaul ClassLoaderWeavingAdaptor to use statically initialised Unsafe instances and method handles pointing to their 'defineClass' methods. Those now work universally on JDKs 8-21. In older JDKs, the method used to be in sun.misc.Unsafe, in more recent ones on jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe. It is challenging to fetch instances, especially as reflection protection and module boundaries have been increased in the JDK progressively. But finally, a solution was adapted from Byte Buddy (BB). Kudos to BB author Rafael Winterhalter. The previous solution to use ClassLoader::defineClass and require '--add-opens' is no longer necessary for the first time since it became necessary in AspectJ 1.9.7 with Java 16 support. Add org.ow2.asm:asm-common as a dependency everywhere org.ow2.asm:asm was used before. Maybe that is too many places, but no worse than before. Add missing dependency on loadtime to aspectjweaver. This kept a build like "mvn install -am -pl aspectjweaver" from picking up changed loadtime classes. Fixes #117. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Update assemblies to include AspectJ licenceAlexander Kriegisch2024-01-062-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The former HTML file was moved up one directory level and converted to asciidoc format. Therefore, include the ADOC file from the correct location now. Alternatively, we could have included the generated HTML from the aj-build/dist/docs/doc directory, but that would have meant adding a dependency to the 'docs' module to several other modules for this one file. Actually, asciidoc has become a widely used and accepted format for documentation and is human-readable by design. Therefore, it is OK to include the ADOC file. The important thing is that the licence information - is contained in each published artifact, - can be found easily, - its content is human-readable. All these requirements are still met with this change. Arguably, ADOC is easier to read than HTML and does not even need a web browser. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.21.1-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-12-151-1/+1
| | | | | | | Currently, the situation looks more like a Java 21 maintenance release than directly a Java 22 release. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.22-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-12-111-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release AspectJ 1.9.21V1_9_21Alexander Kriegisch2023-12-111-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.21-SNAPSHOT againAlexander Kriegisch2023-12-021-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release candidate 1.9.21.RC1V1_9_21_RC1Alexander Kriegisch2023-12-021-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version 1.9.21-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-11-191-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release milestone 1.9.21.M1V1_9_21_M1Alexander Kriegisch2023-11-191-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.21-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-09-041-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* AspectJ release 1.9.20.1Alexander Kriegisch2023-09-041-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.21-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-08-161-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release 1.9.20V1_9_20Alexander Kriegisch2023-08-161-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.20-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-12-211-1/+1
|
* AspectJ release 1.9.19V1_9_19Alexander Kriegisch2022-12-211-1/+1
|
* Set Maven version to 1.9.19-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-10-021-1/+1
| | | | | | | It makes sense to indicate the Java version in the minor-minor of AspectJ artifacts. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Add docs/dist/LICENSE-AspectJ.html to all public artifactsAlexander Kriegisch2022-10-012-0/+16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The license file will be included right in the main directory of both binary and source artifacts for - AspectJ Matcher, - AspectJ Runtime, - AspectJ Weaver, - AspectJ Tools (Compiler), - AspectJ Installer. Fixes #185. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Remove AspectJ Browser (ajbrowser) code and documentationAlexander Kriegisch2022-04-023-18/+0
| | | | | | | Closes #148. TODO: Should more AJDE stuff be removed? Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.10-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-03-311-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release AspectJ version 1.9.9.1V1_9_9_1Alexander Kriegisch2022-03-311-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.10-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-03-241-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.9V1_9_9Alexander Kriegisch2022-03-241-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.9-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-02-111-1/+1
|
* Set version to 1.9.8V1_9_8Alexander Kriegisch2022-02-111-1/+1
|
* Set version to 1.9.8-SNAPSHOTAndy Clement2021-06-241-1/+1
|
* 1.9.7 releaseV1_9_7Andy Clement2021-06-241-1/+1
|
* Document build profiles and properties in docs/developer/BUILD.mdAlexander Kriegisch2021-06-101-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In doing so, I also noticed a few things in need of improvement. So, documenting the build also drive those enhancements, such as - the new 'fast-build' profile skipping test compilation and execution as well as documentation generation, - an option to skip generating source assemblies, - to skip unzipping source assemblies if javadoc generation for them is to be skipped too, - activating the 'create-docs' profile by property which is true by default instead of using 'activeByDefault=true', because the latter does not work reliably if other profiles are activated manually according to a Maven bug that was closed as "won't fix", - no longer generating separate javadocs for the 'runtime' module, because that module is not deployed and the main artifacts recreate Javadocs from scratch for all of their constituent sources anyway. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Upgrade license from CPLv1/EPLv1 to EPLv2Alexander Kriegisch2021-06-041-2/+2
| | | | | | | This was required by the Eclipse team as one precondition for the next release. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.7-SNAPSHOT againAlexander Kriegisch2021-05-241-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.7.M2V1_9_7_M2Alexander Kriegisch2021-05-241-1/+1
| | | | | | Also depend on JDT Core 1.9.7.M2 Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Fix Javadoc generation by also unpacking relocated ASM sourcesAlexander Kriegisch2021-05-241-5/+10
| | | | | | | | | | Suddenly, for AspectJ Weaver + Tools Javadoc generation started to fail. This might be due to switching from ASM-renamed to dynamically shaded ASM. Either way, the Javadoc tool complains about the missing source files. Therefore, we also unpack them from the source uber JAR now via TrueZIP before generating Javadoc. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Upgrade Maven Shade Plugin to 3.2.4.MSHADE-252-391Alexander Kriegisch2021-05-241-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | Unfortunately, the issues fixed in the aspectj.dev fork are still not available upstream (MSHADE-252 is merged, but unreleased, MSHADE-391 is in review). Also use Maven Javadoc Plugin version from parent POM. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* housekeepingAndy Clement2021-05-231-0/+35
|
* Use canonical snapshot version 1.9.7-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2021-05-231-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | Before, we used 1.9.7.BUILD-SNAPSHOT, which according to Andy Clement was originally an intent across a group of Spring projects he was involved in, to ensure that SNAPSHOTS were sorted alphabetically ahead of MILESTONEs and ahead of RCs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Revert "polish"Andy Clement2021-05-221-0/+5
| | | | This reverts commit 9ba62b64fb2fd3a8b20d259189d392d9a4b30b72.
* polishAndy Clement2021-05-221-5/+0
|
* polishAndy Clement2021-05-221-7/+3
|
* Fix pom.xml problemAndy Clement2021-05-221-3/+2
|
* Merge remote-tracking branch 'xander/maven-central-deployment'Andy Clement2021-05-221-4/+175
|\
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2025-01-07 01:58:35 +0000