aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/build/src/main
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Reduce 'Object' class usageAndrey Turbanov2022-04-153-8/+6
|
* Remove redundant casts after generics updateAndrey Turbanov2022-04-121-1/+1
|
* Remove AspectJ Browser (ajbrowser) code and documentationAlexander Kriegisch2022-04-022-7/+5
| | | | | | | Closes #148. TODO: Should more AJDE stuff be removed? Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Replace uses of StringBuffer with StringBuilder.Andrey Turbanov2021-11-209-14/+14
| | | | StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. StringBuilder is a direct replacement to StringBuffer which generally have better performance.
* Upgrade license from CPLv1/EPLv1 to EPLv2Alexander Kriegisch2021-06-0421-212/+203
| | | | | | | This was required by the Eclipse team as one precondition for the next release. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Remove JRockit LTW support, particularly JRockitAgentAlexander Kriegisch2021-04-101-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In two places, the documentation now contains this text: "Since AspectJ 1.9.7, the obsolete Oracle/BEA JRockit agent is no longer part of AspectJ. JRockit JDK never supported Java versions higher than 1.6. Several JRockit JVM features are now part of HotSpot and tools like Mission Control available for OpenJDK and Oracle JDK." The decision to drop JRockit support was made during a discussion between Alexander Kriegisch and Andy Clement: Andy Clement wrote on 26 Mar 2021: > Yes I think so. > > > Alexander Kriegisch wrote on 26 Mar 2021: > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JRockit >> >> Can we get rid of that? AspectJ requires Java 8, JRockit never >> supported more than Java 6. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Fix some deprecated Java and JUnit warnings by using newer API callsAlexander Kriegisch2021-03-212-3/+3
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Allow year 2021 in Checklics.LicenseAlexander Kriegisch2021-03-141-17/+7
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Support Windows 10 and Windows Server 2016/2019 in installerAlexander Kriegisch2021-03-041-2/+4
| | | | | | | | Those versions were not detected until now, which lead to bogus Windows batch files forwarding only 9 Ajc parameters to the Java process via "%1 %2 %3 %4 %5 %6 %7 %8 %9" instead of "%*". Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Merge branch 'master' into feature/collection-performanceAndy Clement2020-08-154-5/+0
|\
| * Cleanup unused importsLars Grefer2020-08-164-5/+0
| | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
* | Weaken Collection declarationsLars Grefer2020-08-156-10/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | Reports on declarations of Collection variables made by using the collection class as the type, rather than an appropriate interface. Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
* | Redundant Collection.addAll() callLars Grefer2020-08-152-4/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | Reports Collection.addAll() and Map.putAll() calls after instantiation of a collection using a constructor call without arguments. Such constructs can be replaced with a single call to a parametrized constructor which simplifies code. Also for some collections the replacement might be more performant. Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
* | Collection.toArray() call styleLars Grefer2020-08-151-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | There are two styles to convert a collection to an array: either using a pre-sized array (like c.toArray(new String[c.size()])) or using an empty array (like c.toArray(new String[0]). In older Java versions using pre-sized array was recommended, as the reflection call which is necessary to create an array of proper size was quite slow. However since late updates of OpenJDK 6 this call was intrinsified, making the performance of the empty array version the same and sometimes even better, compared to the pre-sized version. Also passing pre-sized array is dangerous for a concurrent or synchronized collection as a data race is possible between the size and toArray call which may result in extra nulls at the end of the array, if the collection was concurrently shrunk during the operation. Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
* | Collections.sort() can be replaced with List.sort()Lars Grefer2020-08-151-1/+1
|/ | | | | | Reports calls to Collections.sort(list, comparator) which could be replaced with list.sort(comparator). Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
* Use the diamond operator where possibleLars Grefer2020-08-138-30/+30
| | | | Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
* 'String.indexOf()' expression is replaceable with 'contains()'Lars Grefer2020-08-084-7/+7
| | | | | | Reports any String.indexOf() expressions which can be replaced with a call to the String.contains() method available in Java 5 and newer. Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
* 'for' loop replaceable with enhanced 'for' loopLars Grefer2020-08-089-241/+223
| | | | | | Reports for loops which iterate over collections or arrays, and can be replaced with an enhanced for loop (i.e. the foreach iteration syntax). Signed-off-by: Lars Grefer <eclipse@larsgrefer.de>
* Include JDTCore for Java14Andy Clement2020-04-201-7/+7
|
* polishAndy Clement2019-11-284-22/+20
|
* Move to 1.9.6.BUILD-SNAPSHOT versionAndy Clement2019-11-2810-289/+314
|
* tidyupAndy Clement2019-02-0810-0/+137
|
* Fix getSpecFile() to work with URLs and adjust installer unpackerAndy Clement2019-02-081-8/+32
|
* mavenizing build - doneAndy Clement2019-02-0122-0/+0
|
* mavenizing build - wipAndy Clement2019-02-0123-0/+8425
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2025-03-28 02:30:30 +0000