aspectj.git - A seamless aspect-oriented extension to the Java programming language: https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	Remove indentation from <programlisting> blocks in docs	Alexander Kriegisch	2021-04-10	1	-97/+96
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Many dozens (hundreds?) of documentation code blocks were indented to match the surrounding XML or just arbitrarily. The thing is: Inside <programlisting> tags, similar to <pre> tags, line feeds and leading whitespace are being preserved, which looked very awkward in the HTML documentation. While a few files were mostly correct in this respect, which shows that it was meant to be like that, many others were not. This was tedious, stupid work to fix, but it had to be done. Please note that the documentation was in no way updated content-wise. This is also overdue, but not my focus here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
*	Remove JRockit LTW support, particularly JRockitAgent	Alexander Kriegisch	2021-04-10	1	-68/+70
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	In two places, the documentation now contains this text: "Since AspectJ 1.9.7, the obsolete Oracle/BEA JRockit agent is no longer part of AspectJ. JRockit JDK never supported Java versions higher than 1.6. Several JRockit JVM features are now part of HotSpot and tools like Mission Control available for OpenJDK and Oracle JDK." The decision to drop JRockit support was made during a discussion between Alexander Kriegisch and Andy Clement: Andy Clement wrote on 26 Mar 2021: > Yes I think so. > > > Alexander Kriegisch wrote on 26 Mar 2021: > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JRockit >> >> Can we get rid of that? AspectJ requires Java 8, JRockit never >> supported more than Java 6. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
*	168482: ref dtd	aclement	2008-06-12	1	-0/+4
\|
*	Bug 159854 "Problem Diagnosis Guide" (first draft)	mwebster	2006-10-30	1	-6/+23
\|
*	Bug 117854 "LTW with Hibernate/CGLIB/ASM" (document beforeandafter option of ↵	mwebster	2006-07-04	1	-8/+14
\| \| \| \|	dump element)
*	updates from pr132111	aclement	2006-03-27	1	-11/+24
\|
*	If aspects are required to compile, then weaving must be at compile-time. duh.	wisberg	2006-03-03	1	-2/+7
\|
*	matthews doc changes for ltw	aclement	2005-12-20	1	-77/+79
\|
*	aspects/include handling and doc update as per #115275	avasseur	2005-11-07	1	-6/+18
\|
*	pr93253: lazytjp the default. removed mention of lazytjp.	aclement	2005-11-01	1	-9/+2
\|
*	impl and test for dec precedence in aop.xml without extends	avasseur	2005-10-27	1	-2/+30
\|
*	precedence doc for concrete-aspect	avasseur	2005-10-27	1	-2/+6
\|
*	concrete-aspect impl and doc for LTW - see #95529	avasseur	2005-10-25	1	-8/+88
\| \| \| \|	pbly some issue on abstract @Pointcut() in ajdt core - fix coming
*	update for LTW and compatibility - minor updates	wisberg	2005-10-11	1	-11/+30
\|
*	update for LTW and compatibility - start with exact copy of adk15ProgGuideDB ↵	wisberg	2005-10-11	1	-0/+424
	variant