aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Remove lib/jdtcore-ajAlexander Kriegisch2024-03-151-21/+0
| | | | | | | | | | If any of the old Ant builds, e.g. tests/profiling/build.xml, which have never been mavenised, need JDT Core, they should be converted to Maven builds and refer to it as a regular dependency. As is, the Ant builds would not run anyway, because other dependency locations have changed as well. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Remove lib/jarjarAlexander Kriegisch2024-03-151-12/+0
| | | | | | The jarjar library seems to be unused. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Remove lib/regexpAlexander Kriegisch2024-03-151-13/+0
| | | | | | The library seems to be unused. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Remove BCEL files from 'lib' moduleAlexander Kriegisch2024-03-154-0/+0
| | | | | | | | Both bcel.jar and bcel-verifier.jar seem to be obsolete. Possible next step: Remove bcel-builder/verifier-src. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Remove Apache Commons from 'lib' module, update remaining dependenciesAlexander Kriegisch2024-03-151-222/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | Of beanutils, collections, digester and logging actually only digester and logging are directly used in AspectJ code. Therefore, remove the unused ones and upgrade the remaining libraries' versions to ones which also have source JARs on Maven Central. This makes downloading sources from GitHub and packaging separate commons.jar and commons-src.zip artifacts superfluous. Hence, we can get rid of them completely. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.22-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2024-03-131-1/+1
|
* Release AspectJ 1.9.21.2V1_9_21_2Alexander Kriegisch2024-03-131-1/+1
|
* Improve unwoven class file handling in SimpleCacheAlexander Kriegisch2024-03-021-0/+0
| | | | | | | | | Also update lib/aspectj/aspectjweaver.jar to fix integration tests. Fixes #285. Co-authored-by: Kimming Lau <294001791@qq.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Bump AspectJ libraries in 'lib' subfolders to 1.9.21.1Alexander Kriegisch2024-03-026-0/+9
| | | | | | | This reproduces regression bug #285 when running org.aspectj.systemtest.ajc171.NewFeatures::testSharedCache. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Remove obsolete stuff from module 'build' and lib/buildAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-163-87/+0
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Globally replace "http:" by "https:" in non-XML filesAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-151-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | Maybe, the XML files and Maven wrapper files will follow. First, let us find out if this breaks the build, maybe some tests are asserting on "http:". But there, the replacement would also have taken place, so probably it just works. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.22-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-141-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release 1.9.21.1V1_9_21_1Alexander Kriegisch2024-02-141-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Replace HTML content of readme-lib-module.adoc by asciidocAlexander Kriegisch2024-01-061-49/+17
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Rename readme-lib-module.html to .adocAlexander Kriegisch2024-01-061-0/+0
| | | | | | | In the next step, the content, which is still HTML at this point, is going to be converted. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Remove obsolete DocBook build config in favour of AsciidoctorAlexander Kriegisch2024-01-062-107/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | Along with the Ant and Maven build configs, downloads of - DocBook DTD, - DocBook XSL, - FOP, - Batik, - Saxon also become obsolete. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.21.1-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-12-151-1/+1
| | | | | | | Currently, the situation looks more like a Java 21 maintenance release than directly a Java 22 release. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.22-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-12-111-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release AspectJ 1.9.21V1_9_21Alexander Kriegisch2023-12-111-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.21-SNAPSHOT againAlexander Kriegisch2023-12-021-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release candidate 1.9.21.RC1V1_9_21_RC1Alexander Kriegisch2023-12-021-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version 1.9.21-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-11-191-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release milestone 1.9.21.M1V1_9_21_M1Alexander Kriegisch2023-11-191-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.21-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-09-041-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Update AspectJ libraries in 'lib' subfoldersV1_9_20_1Alexander Kriegisch2023-09-044-0/+0
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* AspectJ release 1.9.20.1Alexander Kriegisch2023-09-041-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.21-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-08-161-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release 1.9.20V1_9_20Alexander Kriegisch2023-08-161-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.20-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-12-211-1/+1
|
* AspectJ release 1.9.19V1_9_19Alexander Kriegisch2022-12-211-1/+1
|
* Set Maven version to 1.9.19-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-10-021-1/+1
| | | | | | | It makes sense to indicate the Java version in the minor-minor of AspectJ artifacts. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Remove obsolete comments in POM mentioning GitHub PackagesAlexander Kriegisch2022-04-101-2/+0
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.10-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-03-311-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release AspectJ version 1.9.9.1V1_9_9_1Alexander Kriegisch2022-03-311-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.10-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-03-241-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.9V1_9_9Alexander Kriegisch2022-03-245-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Fix broken 'useFullLTW' test modeAlexander Kriegisch2022-03-231-0/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | It was referring to a no longer existent weaver under aj-build/dist/tools/lib/aspectjweaver.jar, which now has been replaced by the new file lib/aspectj/lib/aspectjweaver.jar. Several tests were broken, not finding the agent. But because those tests make no assertions, nobody ever noticed. Only when I had to change some LTW tests from in-process to full LTW mode (see next commit) due to them now obviously calling some code paths which need '--add-opens', I even noticed the problem. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Use 1.9.9-SNAPSHOT AspectJ libraries in libs/test, libs/aspectj/libAlexander Kriegisch2022-03-233-0/+0
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.9-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-02-111-1/+1
|
* Set version to 1.9.8V1_9_8Alexander Kriegisch2022-02-111-1/+1
|
* Bump download-maven-plugin to 1.6.7Alexander Kriegisch2021-09-051-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | After my PR https://github.com/maven-download-plugin/maven-download-plugin/pull/191 was merged and https://github.com/maven-download-plugin/maven-download-plugin/issues/186 was closed, use a new release containing the option misnomer fix in order to make the POM more readable. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.8-SNAPSHOTAndy Clement2021-06-241-1/+1
|
* 1.9.7 releaseV1_9_7Andy Clement2021-06-241-1/+1
|
* Detect previously failed downloads by verifying existing file checksumsAlexander Kriegisch2021-06-081-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There was a helpful option hiding in Download Maven plugin, which we use to download artifacts unavailable on Maven Central, such as the Ant installer and several source packages: 'checkSignature'. It has the effect of verifying checksums of existing, i.e. previously downloaded files too, not only newly downloaded ones. This helps detect interrupted downloads from previous runs or generally invalid files, whatever the reason. I was looking for this option before, but did not notice it because of the name. This is about verifying checksums, not checking signatures. Anyway, a maintainer just told me about it here: https://github.com/maven-download-plugin/maven-download-plugin/issues/186 I requested that the option be renamed and described better. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Use canonical snapshot version 1.9.7-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2021-05-231-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | Before, we used 1.9.7.BUILD-SNAPSHOT, which according to Andy Clement was originally an intent across a group of Spring projects he was involved in, to ensure that SNAPSHOTS were sorted alphabetically ahead of MILESTONEs and ahead of RCs. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Create javadoc for all public artifacts, fix dependenciesAlexander Kriegisch2021-05-161-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Sonatype OSSRH repository rules require source and javadoc JARs in order to create staging repositories for releases to be promoted to Maven Central. So I added build steps to unzip the source JARs and then create Javadocs for them. FIXME: This configuration works with JDK 16, but throws errors on other JDK versions, e.g. 14. It looks as if the Maven Javadoc plugin does not do a particularly good job applying the plugin settings in a way making it work with different JDK javadoc tool versions. I am saying that, because when using the tool directly on the console, it works with basic settings and the correct classpath. In order to enable creating uber JARs via Maven Shade in the future, I also added missing dependencies. Maven Assembly descriptors just assume that all the necessary class files and sources already exist where it copies them from. But several of the dependency modules were not explicitly listed as such by the uber JAR modules. I fixed that. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Remove jdiffAndy Clement2021-05-142-87/+0
|
* Move Enforcer Plugin to 'compile' phase in 'lib'Alexander Kriegisch2021-05-071-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There is a strange effect in Maven builds: Depending on which profiles are active when building the project - even seemingly unrelated ones like 'create-docs' or 'clean-libs' - the execution order of plugins in the 'process-resources' phase can vary. Specifically, Build Helper vs. Enforcer in module 'lib', which both were in the same phase, can sometimes be executed in lexical order, which I expected, or the other way around, which makes the build fail if the existence of the marker file is checked by Enforcer before Build Helper even had a chance to create it. Probably, this is because Build Helper is defined inside a profile and Enforcer outside of any. Therefore, the safest way to ensure correct ordering of the two is to place Enforcer in a later phase, in this case 'compile'. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Improve 'name' tags in POMsAlexander Kriegisch2021-05-061-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | I tripped over not finding aspectjtools in my IntelliJ Maven view many times, because it was listed as "AspectJ Compiler". So I renamed it to "AspectJ Tools (Compiler)". Now it resembles more the artifact ID and still retains the information that it is the artifact containing AJC. For the 'lib' module I removed the 'name' tag again, because it is not one of the main artifacts we publish. Now the POMs are more like Andy might have intended them to be, using a human-readable 'name' only for the main artifacts. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Bump download-maven-plugin 1.6.1 -> 1.6.3Alexander Kriegisch2021-05-051-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In the previous GitHub build, there were warnings in the log because of failed downloads. Actually, the default is to fail the build, but that did not happen. Let us try a more recent version, maybe it fixes an old bug, even though in the diff between the versions I did not see anything obvious here. Anyway, I created an issue ticket: https://github.com/maven-download-plugin/maven-download-plugin/issues/185 BTW, our build only failed later during the Maven Enforcer sanity check, because several files from the check list were missing after a seemingly successful provisioning. Actually, I am glad I added this "redundant" double-checking step to the build, otherwise the build would not have failed in the 'lib' module but much later in a hard to detect spot. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2025-01-05 17:42:28 +0000