aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/org.aspectj.matcher
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Globally replace HTTP links to eclipse.org by HTTPSAlexander Kriegisch2024-01-061-4/+4
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.21.1-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-12-151-1/+1
| | | | | | | Currently, the situation looks more like a Java 21 maintenance release than directly a Java 22 release. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.22-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-12-111-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release AspectJ 1.9.21V1_9_21Alexander Kriegisch2023-12-111-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.21-SNAPSHOT againAlexander Kriegisch2023-12-021-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release candidate 1.9.21.RC1V1_9_21_RC1Alexander Kriegisch2023-12-021-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version 1.9.21-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-11-191-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release milestone 1.9.21.M1V1_9_21_M1Alexander Kriegisch2023-11-191-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Remove old '.cvsignore' filesAlexander Kriegisch2023-09-271-2/+0
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.21-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-09-041-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* AspectJ release 1.9.20.1Alexander Kriegisch2023-09-041-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* NotTypePattern: Fix matching problem for negated type patternsAlexander Kriegisch2023-08-231-1/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The implementation for boolean matchesArray(UnresolvedType type) was buggy. '!String' should match anything but String, no matter if it is an array or not, e.g. int, void, int[], String[], String[][]. '!String[]' should match anything but String[], no matter if it is an array or not, e.g. int, void, int[], String, String[][]. Fixes #257. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Fix Spring issue 27761Alexander Kriegisch2023-08-211-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | Fixes spring-projects/spring-framework#27761. Fixes #256. Bridge methods are now ignored in favour of their overriding namesakes during method matching. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.21-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-08-161-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release 1.9.20V1_9_20Alexander Kriegisch2023-08-161-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Add method ArrayReferenceType.equals to fix failing testsAlexander Kriegisch2023-06-261-0/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | This also fixes a bug. Previously, ResolvedType.equals was used for equality check, and in there is a '==' comparison, which does not work for two different ArrayReferenceType instances, even if the component type is the same. Relates to #246. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Add null checks for Shadow.getResolvedSignature()Alexander Kriegisch2023-06-131-3/+5
| | | | | | Fixes #243. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Add safeguards for And/Or/Not pattern node typesAlexander Kriegisch2023-01-299-15/+30
| | | | | | | | Affects *PointCut, *TypePattern, *AnnotationTypePattern. Relates to #215. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Add traverse methods for declare and pattern typesAlexander Kriegisch2023-01-2911-4/+86
| | | | | | Relates to #215. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Add traverse methods for pointcut typesAlexander Kriegisch2023-01-2916-0/+130
| | | | | | Relates to #215. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Fix PointcutRewriterTest, add LogicalPointcutStructure test helper classAlexander Kriegisch2023-01-152-169/+360
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | After WildTypePattern.hashCode was fixed in the previous commit, PointcutRewriterTest started failing, because in many places it was falsely relying on a specific order of hash codes, which cannot be guaranteed, especially since more instance fields are part of the hash code now in accordance with 'equals'. The new test helper class LogicalPointcutStructure is able to recognise chained '&&' and '||' pointcuts of the same logical nesting level, un-nesting them from the actual pointcut structure and making them comparable, disregarding their order. I.e., something like ((A && B) && C) && D is actually recognised to logically be A && B && C && D and equivalent to e.g. either of D && B && A && C A && B && D && C C && A && D && B This helps to compare rewritten pointcuts, as long as their logical structure has not been altered. Relates to #24. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* WildTypePattern: fix hashCode and toString methodsAlexander Kriegisch2023-01-151-4/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Especially 'hashCode' did not correspond to 'equals', disregarding several fields, array dimension information being only one of them. This led to parts of pointcuts being ignored, because they were regarded as duplicates. Example: execution(Foo* *(..)) && !execution(Foo*[] *(..)) Here, the negated pattern was falsely regarded as equal to the first pattern, leading to an "A && !A" situation, i.e. no match at all. Furthermore, 'toString' did not print array strings, i.e. instead of "Foo*[][]" something like "Foo*" was printed. This false information was also present in annotations generated by the weaver. FuzzilyMatchingAspect was adjusted to actually match exactly once, as expected, for the "Foo*" return types, i.e. exclusions for the array return types have been added. Relates to #24. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Improve array matching for all TypePattern subclassesAlexander Kriegisch2023-01-1513-19/+62
| | | | | | Relates to #24. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Handle one- and multi-dimensional array return types correctlyAlexander Kriegisch2023-01-155-6/+33
| | | | | | | | | | Fixes https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24, both the array return type matching as such as well as matching dimensionality patterns correctly. E.g., 'Foo*[]' is not the same as 'Foo*[][]'. This also works correctly in combination with asterisks, even for primitive types, i.e. 'in*[][]' correctly matches a 2-dimensional array of 'int'. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Simplify if-else in WildTypePattern.matchesExactlyByNameAlexander Kriegisch2023-01-151-5/+1
| | | | | | | | | A simple boolean condition is enough. Loosely relates to https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24, but actually it is just drive-by cosmetics. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Fix WildTypePattern.isArrayAlexander Kriegisch2023-01-151-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | The method falsely determined that a one-dimensional array was not an array due to a one-off bug. Relates to https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Improve code and documentation for #366085 fixAlexander Kriegisch2022-12-281-39/+52
| | | | | | | | | | | This commit is a follow-up for 65f1ec72. The SOURCE retention case is documented now and considered in a few more call sites. The previously already similar code structures in - DeclareAnnotation.ensureAnnotationDiscovered, - DeclareAnnotation.getAnnotationType have both been streamlined and still remain logically in sync. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.20-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-12-211-1/+1
|
* AspectJ release 1.9.19V1_9_19Alexander Kriegisch2022-12-211-1/+1
|
* Fix #366085 concerning declared annotations with source retentionAlexander Kriegisch2022-12-211-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=366085. See https://stackoverflow.com/q/74618269/1082681. The issue described in the Bugzilla issue is about 'declare @type', but similar issues also existed for 'declare @field', 'declare @method', 'declare @constructor'. This fix is rather superficial and leaves things to be desired, because it is rather hacky and simply ignores errors source retention annotation declarations during weaving. A better fix would drop the corresponding declarations while parsing and also issue compiler warnings in each case. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set Maven version to 1.9.19-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-10-021-1/+1
| | | | | | | It makes sense to indicate the Java version in the minor-minor of AspectJ artifacts. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Cleanup redundant null check before instanceofAndrey Turbanov2022-04-172-2/+2
|
* Reduce 'Object' class usageAndrey Turbanov2022-04-152-9/+9
|
* Remove redundant casts after generics updateAndrey Turbanov2022-04-1216-38/+33
|
* Set version to 1.9.10-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-03-311-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release AspectJ version 1.9.9.1V1_9_9_1Alexander Kriegisch2022-03-311-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.10-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-03-241-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.9V1_9_9Alexander Kriegisch2022-03-241-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Cleanup redundant type casts, due to too weak variable type declarationAndrey Turbanov2022-02-263-20/+8
|
* Set version to 1.9.9-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-02-111-1/+1
|
* Set version to 1.9.8V1_9_8Alexander Kriegisch2022-02-111-1/+1
|
* Improve annotation style if pointcut handlingAndy Clement2022-01-311-6/+32
| | | | | | | | | This fixes: - negating annotation style if() pointcuts doesn't work - annotation style if() pointcut not able to use a binding that is not exposed Fixes #120,#122
* polish - typoAndy Clement2022-01-311-1/+1
|
* Merge pull request #104 from turbanoff/use_generic_instead_of_raw_typesAndy Clement2022-01-1016-36/+36
|\ | | | | Update org.aspectj.matcher code to use generics.
| * Update org.aspectj.matcher code to use generics.Andrey Turbanov2021-11-2016-36/+36
| | | | | | | | Generics make code more type-safe and allows removing ugly type-casts.
* | Reduce empty array allocationsAndrey Turbanov2021-12-1810-21/+19
| |
* | Merge pull request #103 from turbanoff/redundant_boxingAndy Clement2021-12-131-1/+1
|\ \ | | | | | | Cleanup redundant boxing.
| * | Cleanup redundant boxing.Andrey Turbanov2021-11-201-1/+1
| |/ | | | | | | | | Methods Integer.parseInt/Boolean.parseBoolean should be preferred over Integer.valueOf/Boolean.valueOf/ if final result is primitive. They are generally faster and generate less garbage.
* | Replace more usages of StringBuffer with StringBuilderAndrey Turbanov2021-12-051-3/+3
| |
* | Merge pull request #102 from turbanoff/trim_trailing_whitespacesAndy Clement2021-11-302-4/+4
|\ \ | | | | | | Trim trailing whitespaces.
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2025-01-05 12:03:25 +0000