aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/pom.xml
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Extend documentation for Antrun execution to fix javadocsAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-211-2/+8
| | | | | | | | | | Also update the internal review ID of the OpenJDK bug I created, because previously I had created a feature request, which has remained unanswered. But actually, I think it is rather a regression bug, having found out that before JDK 16 the behaviour was exactly how the feature request describes it. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Add 'AspectJ_JDK_Update' hint in various placesAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-191-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The hint is meant to help AspectJ developers identify the places where there are to-dos for releases supporting new Java versions. This is work in progress, new tags can be added wherever necessary in the future. But for now, the most important places should be covered: - AJC version string - Test infrastructure (test suites, classes and XML files) - BCEL class file version MAJOR_*, MINOR_* constants - AjcTask constants for compiler source, target, release - LangUtil::is*VMOrGreater methods - ASM and JDT Core dependency versions - CI workflow file - Release notes The to-do to check the tagged places is also mentioned in RELEASE.md. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Run Antrun post-javadoc task depending on Javadoc executionAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-171-2/+3
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Minor POM cosmeticsAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-171-0/+1
| | | | | | | One less warning in IntelliJ due to the entirely optional groupId for that plugin, but IntelliJ still complains. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Use Antrun plugin to eliminate javadoc version number in HTMLAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-171-0/+39
| | | | | | | | | | This is the one issue that cannot be solved regarding reproducible builds by setting javadoc options, because that header comment is hard-coded into the JDK with no option to avoid it. I just created an OpenJDK issue (internal review ID 9076583, not published yet) for it, but that does not help us today. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Maven Javadoc: Add options for reproducible build artifactsAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-171-0/+8
| | | | | | | and smaller diffs when committing changes to the website,avoiding timestamps, changing current copyright years, artifact versions. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Bump Maven Javadoc to 3.6.3Alexander Kriegisch2024-02-171-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Suppress "unresolved Maven property" warning in IntelliJ for 'maven.gpgAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-171-0/+1
| | | | | | .skip' Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Reproducible builds: set project.build.outputTimestampAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-171-0/+6
| | | | | | See https://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-reproducible-builds.html. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.22-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-141-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release 1.9.21.1V1_9_21_1Alexander Kriegisch2024-02-141-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Bump JDT Core to 1.9.21.1Alexander Kriegisch2024-02-131-1/+1
| | | | | | Eclipse Compiler 8398f6c1210ec3 (13Feb2024) - Java21 Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Workaround for non-English javadoc generationAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-011-0/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | On my workstation, more recent JDKs generate partly German javadocs. Background: Avoid non-English javadoc generation. Due to https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8222793 reoccurring at least in JDKs 19-21 and also being broken in some older JDKs, we cannot rely on just setting the locale parameter, but also need the 'user.language' and 'user.country' parameters in 'additionalJOptions' as a workaround. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* DRY: Centralise common Maven Javadoc configurationAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-011-0/+16
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Bump asciidoctor-maven-plugin to 2.2.5Alexander Kriegisch2024-01-291-7/+1
| | | | | | | getting rid of JRuby dependency workaround for https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor-maven-plugin/issues/553 Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Workaround for defining classes during LTWAlexander Kriegisch2024-01-291-0/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Overhaul ClassLoaderWeavingAdaptor to use statically initialised Unsafe instances and method handles pointing to their 'defineClass' methods. Those now work universally on JDKs 8-21. In older JDKs, the method used to be in sun.misc.Unsafe, in more recent ones on jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe. It is challenging to fetch instances, especially as reflection protection and module boundaries have been increased in the JDK progressively. But finally, a solution was adapted from Byte Buddy (BB). Kudos to BB author Rafael Winterhalter. The previous solution to use ClassLoader::defineClass and require '--add-opens' is no longer necessary for the first time since it became necessary in AspectJ 1.9.7 with Java 16 support. Add org.ow2.asm:asm-common as a dependency everywhere org.ow2.asm:asm was used before. Maybe that is too many places, but no worse than before. Add missing dependency on loadtime to aspectjweaver. This kept a build like "mvn install -am -pl aspectjweaver" from picking up changed loadtime classes. Fixes #117. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Add local Maven site to 'distributionManagement'Alexander Kriegisch2024-01-061-0/+5
| | | | | | | | | If we ever decide to add Maven site docs to the AspectJ website, now we can deploy them locally using 'mvn site:deploy' and publish them on a web server or even incorporate them into the binary distribution in the installer's belly. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Docs: Create separate CSS files, do not embed into HTMLAlexander Kriegisch2024-01-061-1/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | TODO: There still is one set of CSS files per subdirectory due to the way the docs directories are organised. It would be better to have them just once. But to achieve that, the ADOC-to-HTML conversion would have to be changed, e.g. using one central directory for images and reorganisation of the overall directory structure and build options. See https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor-maven-plugin/issues/729. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Asciidoc: Create PDFs from multi-page guidesAlexander Kriegisch2024-01-061-1/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Using Asciidoctor Maven, we now produce PDFs (which are also linked to from the main documentation index page) for - Programming Guide, - AspectJ 5 Developer's Notebook, - Development Environment Guide, - Problem Diagnosis Guide, - AspectJ Design Overview. Attention! PDF generation alone takes 3+ minutes, almost 4 minutes including asciidoc to HTML conversion. Just deactivate the 'create-docs' profile if you do not need docs during the build. Closes #272. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Fix warning in Asciidoctor Maven by JRuby version bumpAlexander Kriegisch2024-01-061-1/+9
| | | | | | | | Warning "Native subprocess control requires open access to the JDK IO subsystem" can be avoided by upgrading JRuby, see https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor-maven-plugin/issues/553. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Remove 'imagesdir' from Asciidoctor Maven configAlexander Kriegisch2024-01-061-1/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | User relative paths for images instead. In one case, we need to copy images from a subdirectory one level up, because otherwise the images are only found in the included document, but not in the single-page one including it from the subdirectory. In all other cases, included ADOCs are located in the same directory as the including document. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Experimentally add asciidoctor-maven-plugin to 'docs' moduleAlexander Kriegisch2024-01-061-0/+13
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Depend on JDT Core 1.9.21.1-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-12-151-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | The new version is compiled to target 17. This should avoid the strange "NoSuchFieldError: RELEASE_17" error message in AJC. Closes #269. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.21.1-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-12-151-1/+1
| | | | | | | Currently, the situation looks more like a Java 21 maintenance release than directly a Java 22 release. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.22-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-12-111-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release AspectJ 1.9.21V1_9_21Alexander Kriegisch2023-12-111-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.21-SNAPSHOT againAlexander Kriegisch2023-12-021-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release candidate 1.9.21.RC1V1_9_21_RC1Alexander Kriegisch2023-12-021-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Bump JDT Core to 1.9.21.RC1java-21Alexander Kriegisch2023-12-021-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version 1.9.21-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-11-191-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release milestone 1.9.21.M1V1_9_21_M1Alexander Kriegisch2023-11-191-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Bump ASM to 9.6 (new Opcodes.V22 constant for Java 22)Alexander Kriegisch2023-10-051-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Bump JDT Core to 1.9.21-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-09-261-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.21-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-09-041-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* AspectJ release 1.9.20.1Alexander Kriegisch2023-09-041-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.21-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-08-161-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Release 1.9.20V1_9_20Alexander Kriegisch2023-08-161-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Bump JDT Core to 1.9.20Alexander Kriegisch2023-08-161-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Bump jdt.core.version to 1.9.20-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2023-06-241-1/+1
| | | | | | | | Let's find out if the tests still pass - on Java 19, except for J19 preview features, - on Java 20, also except for J19 with changed syntax. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Use ASM 9.5 for Java 20 supportAlexander Kriegisch2023-06-241-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Depend on JDT Core 1.9.20.M1Alexander Kriegisch2023-02-281-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Fix parenthesised AJ keyword compiler problemAlexander Kriegisch2023-01-041-1/+1
| | | | | | Fixes #20. Needs JDT Core grammar fix. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set version to 1.9.20-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-12-211-1/+1
|
* AspectJ release 1.9.19V1_9_19Alexander Kriegisch2022-12-211-1/+1
|
* Bump JDT Core to release 1.9.19Alexander Kriegisch2022-12-211-1/+1
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Bump ASM to 9.4, supporting Java 20 class filesAlexander Kriegisch2022-10-021-1/+1
| | | | | | | Even though we just upgraded to 9.3 for Java 19, it does not hurt to have ASM recognise the Java 20 class file major version. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Set Maven version to 1.9.19-SNAPSHOTAlexander Kriegisch2022-10-021-2/+2
| | | | | | | It makes sense to indicate the Java version in the minor-minor of AspectJ artifacts. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* First Java 19 version, barely tested.Alexander Kriegisch2022-10-011-2/+2
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Remove AspectJ Browser (ajbrowser) code and documentationAlexander Kriegisch2022-04-021-1/+0
| | | | | | | Closes #148. TODO: Should more AJDE stuff be removed? Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Remove Aspectj.dev artifact and plugin repositoriesAlexander Kriegisch2022-04-011-28/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | After having removed the custom-built Maven Shade version, there should be no more references to artifacts in that repository left. Let us see if the build passes. Furthermore, since being a committer, I can also attach AspectJ installers to GitHub releases. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-12-23 01:40:02 +0000