aspectj.git - A seamless aspect-oriented extension to the Java programming language: https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	test for pr84033 promoted from failing suite to real suite.	aclement	2005-10-03	1	-9/+0
\|
*	@testcase PR#84033 incremental declare error persists after fix	wisberg	2005-01-31	1	-0/+10
\|
*	Fix for Bug 83645: pertypewithin({interface}) illegal field modifier	aclement	2005-01-27	1	-6/+0
\| \| \| \|	- moving Wes' test to the regression set.
*	@testcase PR83645 pertypewithin on interface	wisberg	2005-01-25	1	-0/+5
\|
*	Fix for Bugzilla Bug 75129	aclement	2004-09-30	1	-9/+0
\| \| \| \|	NPE on thisJoinPoint mistake
*	@testcase PR#75129 NPE on thisJoinPoint mistake	wisberg	2004-09-27	1	-0/+9
\|
*	Tests for bug 65925. Already fixed !	aclement	2004-08-11	1	-10/+0
\|
*	A few extra failing tests I unearthed along the way.	acolyer	2004-08-04	1	-0/+20
\|
*	@testcase PR#65925 Valid but inaccessible type names should not be flagged ↵	wisberg	2004-06-07	1	-0/+9
\| \| \| \|	by XLint:invalidAbsoluteTypeName
*	fix for Bugzilla Bug 59895	acolyer	2004-04-26	1	-15/+1
\| \| \| \|	NPE updating an aspect in incremental mode
*	@testcase 59895 incremental full-rebuild	wisberg	2004-04-26	1	-0/+15
\|
*	Some of the fix for Bugzilla Bug 57432	aclement	2004-04-07	1	-27/+0
\| \| \| \| \|	NPE when creating declare messages [Moved the testcase across and added a second one for the variant with debug info]
*	@testcase PR#57432 NPE's when writing some declare error	wisberg	2004-04-05	1	-0/+27
\|
*	Fix for Bugzilla Bug 52107	aclement	2004-02-26	1	-21/+0
\| \| \| \|	NoSuchMethodError accessing field declared on interface
*	fix for Bugzilla Bug 51929	jhugunin	2004-02-19	1	-6/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Advice calling protected super method causing java.lang.VerifyError 'Bad access to protected data' Also expanded test to cover protected field access as well as methods Fix required getting the correct receiver type for both field access and method calls to correspond to Java's complicated rules for accessing protected members (JLSv2 6.6.2 and mentioned in passing in JVMv2 5.4.4)
*	@testcase PR#52107 declare [int \| String \| Object] field on interface	wisberg	2004-02-15	1	-0/+21
\|
*	mailing list verify error	wisberg	2004-02-13	1	-0/+6
\|
*	Fix for Bugzilla Bug 50641	aclement	2004-02-09	1	-16/+0
\| \| \| \| \|	Better binary compatibility for advice method names - I've run the tests a thousand times and they all pass, I'm still nervous about this first big commit though gulp
*	Fix for Bugzilla Bug 42668	ehilsdal	2004-01-29	1	-7/+0
\| \| \| \|	effect of an after returning type incompatible with a join point return type
*	fix for Bugzilla Bug 49295	jhugunin	2004-01-28	1	-10/+6
\| \| \| \|	duplicate warning or second join point for constructor-execution
*	Bugzilla Bug 50641	jhugunin	2004-01-26	1	-0/+16
\| \| \| \|	Better binary compatibility for advice method names
*	@testcase PR#49784 aspect declares interface method (abstract decl, default ↵	wisberg	2004-01-16	1	-2/+6
\| \| \| \|	impl)
*	Fix for Bugzilla Bug 49784	acolyer	2004-01-14	1	-34/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	declaring interface methods should work as it does in interface and Bugzilla Bug 45676 AspectJ enhanced code can not be used with plain old java anymo and Bugzilla Bug 43972 Static crosscutting makes interfaces unusable for javac
*	@testcase PR#49784 aspect declares interface method	wisberg	2004-01-09	1	-0/+22
\|
*	@testcase PR#49295 extra warning (join point?) for interface-typepattern ↵	wisberg	2003-12-23	1	-0/+10
\| \| \| \|	execution
*	Work on Bugzilla 42668: effect of an after returning type incompatible with ↵	ehilsdal	2003-11-18	1	-10/+8
\| \| \| \| \| \| \|	a join point return type * fix to semantics document to describe correct semantics * checkin of failing coverage test case for correct semantics
*	refactored test, annotated specification for JDT bug.	wisberg	2003-10-31	1	-15/+4
\|
*	@testcase PR#42574 ZIP and JAR extensions in classpath and extdirs	wisberg	2003-10-31	1	-1/+19
\|
*	fix for Bugzilla Bug 45441	jhugunin	2003-10-23	1	-10/+1
\| \| \| \|	IncompatibleClassChangeError at runtime when compiling with -1.4 option
*	Added test case for bug 45441	acolyer	2003-10-23	1	-0/+10
\|
*	added back-links to newly-submitted bug 43972	wisberg	2003-10-01	1	-0/+1
\|
*	presumed bug found on mailing list by Eric Jain, rendered both in harness ↵	wisberg	2003-09-29	1	-1/+13
\| \| \| \|	and Ant (to show behavior with javac)
*	@testcase PR#XXX omnibus privileged access from aspectj-users mail "Problem ↵	wisberg	2003-09-07	1	-1/+12
\| \| \| \|	with interfaces in method's signature"
*	@testcase PR#42668 after returning type incompatible with join point return type	wisberg	2003-09-06	1	-0/+10
\|
*	@testcase PR#41888 call PCD fails when given subtype of defining type	wisberg	2003-08-23	1	-0/+7
\|
*	fix for Bugzilla Bug 41175	jhugunin	2003-08-08	1	-30/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	binary aspect-declared methods conflict, lost their exception clauses larger fix to address more issues with aspect-declared methods in bytecode form also addressed declared exception issue more generally this fix should be more stable than a smaller hack that just fixed this specific bug report would have been. added a few tests to match increased scope.
*	BCException - not isolated, so no bug written	wisberg	2003-08-07	1	-0/+83
\|
*	@testcase PR#41175 aspect-declared methods with exception clauses fail in ↵	wisberg	2003-08-06	1	-0/+30
\| \| \| \| \| \|	binary libraries Corresponding non-binary passing tests added to ajcTests.xml
*	@testcase PR#41170 combine classpath on command line and in .lst file	wisberg	2003-08-06	1	-0/+7
\|
*	fix for Bugzilla Bug 40805	jhugunin	2003-08-05	1	-16/+1
\| \| \| \|	call pointcut with interface type fails if method declared on interface
*	fixes for Bugzilla Bug 40858	jhugunin	2003-08-04	1	-21/+2
\| \| \| \| \| \|	super-qualified pointcut reference cause weaver stack trace and Bugzilla Bug 40814 no error when defining interface pointcuts
*	fix for Bugzilla Bug 40876	jhugunin	2003-07-29	1	-7/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \|	ClassFormatError on external subtype-qualified ref to supertype pointcut This was an important bug that was caused by the static fields used in the implementation of cflow being placed on the wrong class. This broke the rules used for name mangling and could occasionally result in name collisions as shown here.
*	@testcase PR#40876 subtype-qualified pointcut reference	wisberg	2003-07-28	1	-0/+8
\| \| \| \|	(ClassFormatError)
*	@testcase PR#40858 weaver trace on mis-qualified pointcut reference	wisberg	2003-07-28	1	-0/+9
\|
*	@testcase PR#40814 compile error expected for pointcuts in interfaces	wisberg	2003-07-26	1	-3/+12
\|
*	@testcase PR#40805 interface call signatures when declaring method in aspect	wisberg	2003-07-26	1	-1/+16
\|
*	fix and moved test for Bugzilla Bug 39711	jhugunin	2003-07-24	1	-5/+1
\| \| \| \|	Class Literals as non final fields
*	added test for expanded version of Bugzilla Bug 39711	jhugunin	2003-07-23	1	-2/+6
\| \| \| \|	Class Literals as non final fields
*	fix and expanded tests for Bugzilla Bug 39462	jhugunin	2003-07-22	1	-6/+1
\| \| \| \|	Compiler crashes in jar and cflow
*	Fix for Bugzilla #39479, #40109	jhugunin	2003-07-16	1	-6/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	based on patch contributed by Andy Clement Generalizes the patch with a method org.aspectj.weaver.bcel.Utility.copyInstruction that works-around the bug in Select.copy(). Changed all calls to Instruction.copy() to use this new method, would be nice to add the rule: * declare error: * call(* Instruction.copy()) && within(org.aspectj.weaver) * && !withincode(* Utility.copyInstruction(Instruction)): * "use Utility.copyInstruction to work-around bug in Select.copy()";