aspectj.git - A seamless aspect-oriented extension to the Java programming language: https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	Comment on newly pointcut parsing found problem in test class	Alexander Kriegisch	2023-01-15	1	-0/+25
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	A pointcut like execution(..Collection<?>[] (..)) leads to an AJ core dump, which is something I noticed while fixing a test in the previous commit. I am going to create a new issue for it and link to this commit later. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
*	Fix failing tests after previous commit	Alexander Kriegisch	2023-01-15	1	-3/+12
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	After the changes, the weaver's behaviour is now slightly different, but not actually buggy. Actually, in one case there is now a weaver warning for a non-matching pointcut which should have been there before, but was not. I.e., things have improved and the tests are even a bit better now. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
*	279983: test	aclement	2009-06-12	1	-0/+25
\|
*	277959: stack depth must be at least one if there is an exception handler	aclement	2009-05-28	2	-0/+46
\|
*	277508: more stable if_ method names	aclement	2009-05-22	2	-0/+40
\|
*	275625: test and fix: declare at method	aclement	2009-05-12	2	-0/+44
\|
*	275032: test and fix: itd of no-arg constructor should overwrite a generated ↵	aclement	2009-05-05	4	-0/+26
\| \| \| \|	default constructor
*	272825: test and fix: super method call with generic itds	aclement	2009-04-30	4	-0/+39
\|
*	273628: test and fix: use of if() pointcut in annotation style with ↵	aclement	2009-04-24	5	-0/+86
\| \| \| \|	annotation value binding!
*	272233: test and fix, using 'void<?>'	aclement	2009-04-16	2	-0/+37
\|
*	265356: positional info for anno style messages	aclement	2009-04-08	1	-0/+16
\|
*	271169: test and fix: npe in weave call method with 4 longs	aclement	2009-04-04	1	-0/+19