aspectj.git - A seamless aspect-oriented extension to the Java programming language: https://github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	Globally replace HTTP links to eclipse.org by HTTPS	Alexander Kriegisch	2024-01-06	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
*	Bring Java9 branch in line with 1.8.11 progress	Andy Clement	2017-09-21	17	-0/+303
\|\
\| *	508661: testcode	Andy Clement	2016-12-09	6	-0/+45
\| \|
\| *	Fix 500035: handling target only binding in @AJ pointcut	Andy Clement	2016-11-18	8	-0/+201
\| \|
\| *	Upgraded to new JDT compiler - neon.1 and a bit	Andy Clement	2016-11-07	1	-0/+36
\| \|
\| *	Fix ambiguous binding problem on anonymous types	Andy Clement	2016-07-29	2	-0/+21
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	If an anonymous class calls a method ITD'd onto one of its own supertypes (e.g. new A() { xx(null); }) then it can be reported as an ambiguous method invocation on Java8. There is different handling for Java8 that is revealing an issue. The intertype method declarations are recorded in a member finder attached to the target type (A in this case). When the local type binding is built it gets all the methods from supertypes added to it - this unfortunately includes the ITD method. Then later when something asks for all 'xx' methods on A, it finds the ITD method from when A was constructed and an additional copy from the member finder. The quick fix is for the member finder to use a set rather than list when answering 'what are the xx methods'. If this proves a problem down the line the deeper fix would be to avoid including ITDs when the local type binding is built.
* \|	Merged post 1.8.5 changes into Java9 branch	Andy Clement	2017-09-20	16	-0/+217
\|\\|
\| *	Fix 493554 - Missing InnerClasses attribute for nested interfaces created by ↵	Andy Clement	2016-05-12	6	-0/+80
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	AspectJ
\| *	Fix 490315 - InvokeDynamic.java:126 there is no classname for invokedynamic	Andy Clement	2016-03-29	10	-0/+137
\|
*	Upgrading to latest 1.9 compiler	Andy Clement	2016-06-17	5	-0/+9