aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/bugs198
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Replace old by new AspectJ GitHub URLAlexander Kriegisch2024-02-081-1/+1
| | | | | | github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj -> github.com/eclipse-aspectj/aspectj Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Move GH-128 tests from 1.9.8 to 1.9.9 bugs test suite after mergeAlexander Kriegisch2022-03-237-160/+0
| | | | Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Merge branch 'master' into java-18Alexander Kriegisch2022-03-237-0/+160
|\ | | | | | | | | | | # Conflicts: # tests/src/test/java/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc198/Bugs198Tests.java # tests/src/test/resources/org/aspectj/systemtest/ajc198/ajc198.xml
| * Name annotation vs native style aspects uniformly in github_128 testsAlexander Kriegisch2022-03-234-8/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Trying to find the difference between byte code generated by AJC for functionally identical annotation vs native style aspect, I move the aspects into subdirectories in order to be able to name them identically. This way, when decompiling them with javap or Fernflower it is easier to diff them later. Why the decompilation? Because for the thread pool testing scenario native syntax passes while annotation syntax fails. I.e., we need to find the difference. That can be done by reading source code, if you know where to look, or by starting with reverse engineering in order to first understand more and look at the code later. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
| * Expand "asynchronous proceed for nested around-advice" to 4 scenarios:Alexander Kriegisch2022-03-235-12/+92
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1. @AspectJ syntax, threads created inside advice code 2. @AspectJ syntax, submit runnable to thread pool 3. native syntax, threads created inside advice code 4. native syntax, submit runnable to thread pool Scenarios 1, 3 and 4 are passing, while 2 is failing. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
| * Add test "asynchronous proceed for nested around-advice chain"Alexander Kriegisch2022-03-235-0/+85
| | | | | | | | | | | | Relates to #128. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* | Prepare code, tests and docs for Java 18Alexander Kriegisch2022-03-216-203/+0
|/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - JDT Core dependency in pom.xml - Constants.java - LangUtil.java - AjcTask.java - messages_aspectj.properties - XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava17Only.java - XMLBasedAjcTestCaseForJava18*.java - tests/bugs199 - tests/features199 - JavaVersionCompatibility.md - README-199.html - GitHub CI build Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Regression test for #125: Bugs198Tests.testGitHub_125Alexander Kriegisch2022-02-231-0/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This test fails when run against AspectJ 1.9.8 with JDT Core 1.9.8.RC3. It passes when using the latest JDT Core 1.9.9-SNAPSHOT. It sets system property 'org.aspectj.weaver.openarchives=20', provoking open classpath JAR file exhaustion when compiling a simple class with AJC, i.e. JARs are being forcibly closed and automatically re-opened, as soon as they are needed. Before the JDT Core bugfix, this test causes: java.lang.NullPointerException at ....compiler.batch.ClasspathJmod.getModulesDeclaringPackage With the bugfix incorporated into AspectJ Tools, the problem is gone. Note: New test dependency 'io.github.bmuskalla:scoped-system-properties' helps to test compilation with the temporarily changed global system property in isolation, saving the environment in a thread-local variable and later cleanly restoring the original values again. If we ever switch to parallel test execution, this would otherwise influence other tests and potentially cause weird side effects. Better safe than sorry. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Improve annotation style if pointcut handlingAndy Clement2022-01-313-0/+127
| | | | | | | | | This fixes: - negating annotation style if() pointcuts doesn't work - annotation style if() pointcut not able to use a binding that is not exposed Fixes #120,#122
* Fix annotation style support for if(true) and if(false)Andy Clement2022-01-172-0/+65
| | | | | | | | | | The documentation specifies annotation style pointcuts can use if(false) or if(true) and not require a boolean return value and body for the @Pointcut annotated method but it doesn't work without this change to validation that recognizes the situation. Fixes #115
* Add test for Java 11 constant-dynamicAlexander Kriegisch2022-01-084-0/+92
| | | | | | Relates to #68. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
* Incorporate JDT Core fix + test for #105Alexander Kriegisch2021-11-264-0/+41
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-12-23 08:02:58 +0000