From bbe629bc4a5e8c76a0b31686eedc88add5d71360 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 11:57:10 +0700
Subject: Always use ":leveloffset: +1" with ":doctype: book"

Headlines per ADOC file should start at level 1, not 2. Adjusting the
level offset for books helps to avoid warnings when including book
chapters, but still allows to also use the chapters as stand-alone
documents.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
---
 docs/release/README-1.5.3.adoc | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

(limited to 'docs/release/README-1.5.3.adoc')

diff --git a/docs/release/README-1.5.3.adoc b/docs/release/README-1.5.3.adoc
index d5d9a228c..280181aeb 100644
--- a/docs/release/README-1.5.3.adoc
+++ b/docs/release/README-1.5.3.adoc
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-== AspectJ 5 v1.5.3 Readme
+= AspectJ 5 v1.5.3 Readme
 
 _© Copyright 2006 Contributors. All rights reserved._
 
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ bugzilla query].
 
 Notable changes since the 1.5.2 release include: +
 
-=== Pipeline compilation - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=146781[146781]
+== Pipeline compilation - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=146781[146781]
 
 Until this release, the memory profile for AspectJ looked like this
 (time is along the X axis, memory usage is the Y axis)
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ with memory. These savings will affect any code built from source: on
 the command line, in Ant, or in AJDT. It will not affect binary weaving
 - that is a future enhancement.
 
-=== Serviceability - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=150487[150487]
+== Serviceability - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=150487[150487]
 
 As AspectJ grows in popularity, we find that it is becoming more
 difficult for users to come up with the small testcases that recreate
@@ -87,9 +87,9 @@ https://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/released/pdguide/index.html[documentation]
 on how to configure these new features. Don't be surprised if you get
 asked for an AspectJ trace on a future bug report!
 
-=== LTW enhancements
+== LTW enhancements
 
-==== User and System Configuration Files - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=149289[149289]
+=== User and System Configuration Files - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=149289[149289]
 
 The `-outxml` option now generates a file named `META-INF/aop-ajc.xml`.
 This no longer clashes with a user defined `META-INF/aop.xml`
@@ -97,11 +97,11 @@ configuration file. Both file names along with an OSGi-friendly
 `org/aspectj/aop.xml` (which can also be signed) are used by default to
 configure LTW.
 
-==== Weaving Concrete Aspects Defined in aop.xml - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=132080[132080]
+=== Weaving Concrete Aspects Defined in aop.xml - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=132080[132080]
 
 Concrete aspects defined using aop.xml are now exposed for weaving.
 
-=== Pertypewithin enhancement - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=123423[123423]
+== Pertypewithin enhancement - https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=123423[123423]
 
 It is now possible to ask an instance of a ptw aspect which type it is
 'attached' to. The method:
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

