From 0f75fcd2271c2917106f4a15c14fea513d69ff0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: acolyer <acolyer>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:38:19 +0000
Subject: finishResolveTypes now tests for CONCRETE as well as RESOLVED
 pointcuts

---
 .../org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/PointcutDesignator.java   | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src')

diff --git a/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/PointcutDesignator.java b/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/PointcutDesignator.java
index 65c362167..f741bff7b 100644
--- a/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/PointcutDesignator.java
+++ b/org.aspectj.ajdt.core/src/org/aspectj/ajdt/internal/compiler/ast/PointcutDesignator.java
@@ -61,7 +61,10 @@ public class PointcutDesignator extends AstNode {
 		//System.err.println("resolving: " + this);
 		//Thread.currentThread().dumpStack();
 		//XXX why do we need this test
-		if (pointcut.state == Pointcut.RESOLVED) return true;
+		// AMC added concrete too. Needed because declare declarations concretize their
+		// shadow mungers early.
+		if (pointcut.state == Pointcut.RESOLVED ||
+			pointcut.state == Pointcut.CONCRETE) return true;
 		
 		TypeBinding[] parameters = method.parameters;
 		Argument[] arguments = dec.arguments;
-- 
cgit v1.2.3