Add a way to mark Conversation (code comment) resolved (#11037)

* Add a way to mark Conversation (code comment) resolved

mark Conversation is a way to mark a Conversation is stale
or be solved. when it's marked as stale, will be hided like
stale. all Pull Request writer , Offical Reviewers and poster
can add or remove Conversation resolved mark.

Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>

* fix lint

* Apply suggestions from code review

* Add ResolveDoer
* fix ui

Co-Authored-By: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-Authored-By: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>

* change IsResolved to an function
Add permission check in UpdateResolveConversation

* Apply suggestions from code review

* change return error for permisson check
* add default message for deleted user
* get issue message from comment
* add migration for ``ResolveDoerID`` column

another  change:
* block mark pending review as resolved because it's not necessary

Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>

* change button color

* resolve button size

* fix code style

* remove unusefull code

Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>

1 files changed, 60 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/models/review.go b/models/review.go
index d6bb77925e..7f23777c3e 100644
--- a/models/review.go
+++ b/models/review.go
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 package models
 
 import (
+	"fmt"
 	"strings"
 
 	"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/timeutil"
@@ -594,3 +595,62 @@ func RemoveRewiewRequest(issue *Issue, reviewer *User, doer *User) (comment *Com
 
 	return comment, sess.Commit()
 }
+
+// MarkConversation Add or remove Conversation mark for a code comment
+func MarkConversation(comment *Comment, doer *User, isResolve bool) (err error) {
+	if comment.Type != CommentTypeCode {
+		return nil
+	}
+
+	if isResolve {
+		if comment.ResolveDoerID != 0 {
+			return nil
+		}
+
+		if _, err = x.Exec("UPDATE `comment` SET resolve_doer_id=? WHERE id=?", doer.ID, comment.ID); err != nil {
+			return err
+		}
+	} else {
+		if comment.ResolveDoerID == 0 {
+			return nil
+		}
+
+		if _, err = x.Exec("UPDATE `comment` SET resolve_doer_id=? WHERE id=?", 0, comment.ID); err != nil {
+			return err
+		}
+	}
+
+	return nil
+}
+
+// CanMarkConversation  Add or remove Conversation mark for a code comment permission check
+// the PR writer , offfcial reviewer and poster can do it
+func CanMarkConversation(issue *Issue, doer *User) (permResult bool, err error) {
+	if doer == nil || issue == nil {
+		return false, fmt.Errorf("issue or doer is nil")
+	}
+
+	if doer.ID != issue.PosterID {
+		if err = issue.LoadRepo(); err != nil {
+			return false, err
+		}
+
+		perm, err := GetUserRepoPermission(issue.Repo, doer)
+		if err != nil {
+			return false, err
+		}
+
+		permResult = perm.CanAccess(AccessModeWrite, UnitTypePullRequests)
+		if !permResult {
+			if permResult, err = IsOfficialReviewer(issue, doer); err != nil {
+				return false, err
+			}
+		}
+
+		if !permResult {
+			return false, nil
+		}
+	}
+
+	return true, nil
+}