diff options
| author | silverwind <me@silverwind.io> | 2024-02-07 03:17:59 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2024-02-07 10:17:59 +0800 |
| commit | 5849d4fde347cd1e47f2243b3239724c73b1261d (patch) | |
| tree | 625ab4954c3771de5f7438fdefb6f24973c0eb16 /package.json | |
| parent | f9072dbf3c558ba5d4365b551d95936a52e4c94d (diff) | |
| download | gitea-5849d4fde347cd1e47f2243b3239724c73b1261d.tar.gz gitea-5849d4fde347cd1e47f2243b3239724c73b1261d.zip | |
Remove lightningcss (#29070)
Remove lightningcss and minify with esbuild again. The size of output
CSS will increase by around 1.4%, but I think it's worth it to allow
building gitea in more cases like the one in the linked issue. We can
reconsider once lightningcss becomes more stable.
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/29058
Diffstat (limited to 'package.json')
| -rw-r--r-- | package.json | 1 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/package.json b/package.json index 3defca1a3d..569955d815 100644 --- a/package.json +++ b/package.json @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ "jquery": "3.7.1", "katex": "0.16.9", "license-checker-webpack-plugin": "0.2.1", - "lightningcss-loader": "2.1.0", "mermaid": "10.7.0", "mini-css-extract-plugin": "2.8.0", "minimatch": "9.0.3", |