Improve utils of slices (#22379)

- Move the file `compare.go` and `slice.go` to `slice.go`.
- Fix `ExistsInSlice`, it's buggy
  - It uses `sort.Search`, so it assumes that the input slice is sorted.
- It passes `func(i int) bool { return slice[i] == target })` to
`sort.Search`, that's incorrect, check the doc of `sort.Search`.
- Conbine `IsInt64InSlice(int64, []int64)` and `ExistsInSlice(string,
[]string)` to `SliceContains[T]([]T, T)`.
- Conbine `IsSliceInt64Eq([]int64, []int64)` and `IsEqualSlice([]string,
[]string)` to `SliceSortedEqual[T]([]T, T)`.
- Add `SliceEqual[T]([]T, T)` as a distinction from
`SliceSortedEqual[T]([]T, T)`.
- Redesign `RemoveIDFromList([]int64, int64) ([]int64, bool)` to
`SliceRemoveAll[T]([]T, T) []T`.
- Add `SliceContainsFunc[T]([]T, func(T) bool)` and
`SliceRemoveAllFunc[T]([]T, func(T) bool)` for general use.
- Add comments to explain why not `golang.org/x/exp/slices`.
- Add unit tests.

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/routers/web/repo/webhook.go b/routers/web/repo/webhook.go
index bf56e3d0bd..96261af674 100644
--- a/routers/web/repo/webhook.go
+++ b/routers/web/repo/webhook.go
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ func getOrgRepoCtx(ctx *context.Context) (*orgRepoCtx, error) {
 
 func checkHookType(ctx *context.Context) string {
 	hookType := strings.ToLower(ctx.Params(":type"))
-	if !util.IsStringInSlice(hookType, setting.Webhook.Types, true) {
+	if !util.SliceContainsString(setting.Webhook.Types, hookType, true) {
 		ctx.NotFound("checkHookType", nil)
 		return ""
 	}