| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Every user can already disable the filter manually, so the explicit
setting is absolutely useless and only complicates the logic.
Previously, there was also unexpected behavior when multiple query
parameters were present.
---------
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #22740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#22541)
Most of the time forks are used for contributing code only, so not
having
issues, projects, release and packages is a better default for such
cases.
They can still be enabled in the settings.
A new option `DEFAULT_FORK_REPO_UNITS` is added to configure the default
units on forks.
Also add missing `repo.packages` unit to documentation.
code by: @brechtvl
## :warning: BREAKING :warning:
When forking a repository, the fork will now have issues, projects,
releases, packages and wiki disabled. These can be enabled in the
repository settings afterwards. To change back to the previous default
behavior, configure `DEFAULT_FORK_REPO_UNITS` to be the same value as
`DEFAULT_REPO_UNITS`.
Co-authored-by: Brecht Van Lommel <brecht@blender.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
<img width="266" alt="Screenshot 2023-02-03 at 14 07 34"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/216611151-92e98305-c4b5-42f3-b2e2-8b1b805fa644.png">
After:
<img width="271" alt="Screenshot 2023-02-03 at 14 07 52"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/216611156-878a8a75-39a1-415b-9b6d-4f035985444e.png">
This is the only instance of such a button in all templates.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR follows #21535 (and replace #22592)
## Review without space diff
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22678/files?diff=split&w=1
## Purpose of this PR
1. Make git module command completely safe (risky user inputs won't be
passed as argument option anymore)
2. Avoid low-level mistakes like
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22098#discussion_r1045234918
3. Remove deprecated and dirty `CmdArgCheck` function, hide the `CmdArg`
type
4. Simplify code when using git command
## The main idea of this PR
* Move the `git.CmdArg` to the `internal` package, then no other package
except `git` could use it. Then developers could never do
`AddArguments(git.CmdArg(userInput))` any more.
* Introduce `git.ToTrustedCmdArgs`, it's for user-provided and already
trusted arguments. It's only used in a few cases, for example: use git
arguments from config file, help unit test with some arguments.
* Introduce `AddOptionValues` and `AddOptionFormat`, they make code more
clear and simple:
* Before: `AddArguments("-m").AddDynamicArguments(message)`
* After: `AddOptionValues("-m", message)`
* -
* Before: `AddArguments(git.CmdArg(fmt.Sprintf("--author='%s <%s>'",
sig.Name, sig.Email)))`
* After: `AddOptionFormat("--author='%s <%s>'", sig.Name, sig.Email)`
## FAQ
### Why these changes were not done in #21535 ?
#21535 is mainly a search&replace, it did its best to not change too
much logic.
Making the framework better needs a lot of changes, so this separate PR
is needed as the second step.
### The naming of `AddOptionXxx`
According to git's manual, the `--xxx` part is called `option`.
### How can it guarantee that `internal.CmdArg` won't be not misused?
Go's specification guarantees that. Trying to access other package's
internal package causes compilation error.
And, `golangci-lint` also denies the git/internal package. Only the
`git/command.go` can use it carefully.
### There is still a `ToTrustedCmdArgs`, will it still allow developers
to make mistakes and pass untrusted arguments?
Generally speaking, no. Because when using `ToTrustedCmdArgs`, the code
will be very complex (see the changes for examples). Then developers and
reviewers can know that something might be unreasonable.
### Why there was a `CmdArgCheck` and why it's removed?
At the moment of #21535, to reduce unnecessary changes, `CmdArgCheck`
was introduced as a hacky patch. Now, almost all code could be written
as `cmd := NewCommand(); cmd.AddXxx(...)`, then there is no need for
`CmdArgCheck` anymore.
### Why many codes for `signArg == ""` is deleted?
Because in the old code, `signArg` could never be empty string, it's
either `-S[key-id]` or `--no-gpg-sign`. So the `signArg == ""` is just
dead code.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Our trace logging is far from perfect and is difficult to follow.
This PR:
* Add trace logging for process manager add and remove.
* Fixes an errant read file for git refs in getMergeCommit
* Brings in the pullrequest `String` and `ColorFormat` methods
introduced in #22568
* Adds a lot more logging in to testPR etc.
Ref #22578
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Using the primary color for each label counter makes the use of color
redundant, as well as suggesting this is a call to action. Use the base
grey color instead.
![grey_lables](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/451841/215778889-0d5dddad-353f-4703-a48f-1540080dee26.jpg)
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was meant to land in #22073 but was blocked until #22732 was merged
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
as title
---------
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
|
|
|
|
| |
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #21740.
Updated the Pull Request template so that the 'Update branch by merge'
button is visible for WIP PR's. Making the behaviour match a non WIP-PR.
Previous WIP page with changes pending on the branch:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1656302/215738307-e68a2f92-5ff8-4f48-a541-35ca81d1f1a4.png)
Updated UI adding the update button:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1656302/215737872-e0e9d712-b7aa-4b90-b7ed-6a92a14fc182.png)
## Notes
* have not removed the **$canAutoMerge** variable from the pull.tmpl on
this
[line](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/36dc11869d0401b796a7a3f74627fec842a4a89a/templates/repo/issue/view_content/pull.tmpl#L131)
- doesn't appear to be used elsewhere but wasn't sure
* In order to avoid duplicating code corresponding UI code was added to
a new tmpl file, ```update_branch_by_merge.tmpl``` and is called in two
places from ```pull.tmpl```.
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #21994.
And fix #19470.
While generating new repo from a template, it does something like
"commit to git repo, re-fetch repo model from DB, and update default
branch if it's empty".
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/19d5b2f922c2defde579a935fbedb680eb8fff18/modules/repository/generate.go#L241-L253
Unfortunately, when load repo from DB, the default branch will be set to
`setting.Repository.DefaultBranch` if it's empty:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/19d5b2f922c2defde579a935fbedb680eb8fff18/models/repo/repo.go#L228-L233
I believe it's a very old temporary patch but has been kept for many
years, see:
[2d2d85bb](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/commit/2d2d85bb#diff-1851799b06733db4df3ec74385c1e8850ee5aedee70b8b55366910d22725eea8)
I know it's a risk to delete it, may lead to potential behavioral
changes, but we cannot keep the outdated `FIXME` forever. On the other
hand, an empty `DefaultBranch` does make sense: an empty repo doesn't
have one conceptually (actually, Gitea will still set it to
`setting.Repository.DefaultBranch` to make it safer).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The error reported when a user passes a private ssh key as their ssh
public key is not very nice.
This PR improves this slightly.
Ref #22693
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When using the main branch, I found that some changed code didn't have
comments.
This PR adds some comments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
caused by #22680
`pushPayload.Ref` and `prPayload.PullRequest.Base.Ref` have the format
like `refs/heads/<branch_name>`, so we need to trim the prefix before
comparing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are 2 separate flows of creating a user: authentication and source
sync.
When a group filter is defined, source sync ignores group filter, while
authentication respects it.
With this PR I've fixed this behavior, so both flows now apply this
filter when searching users in LDAP in a unified way.
- Unified LDAP group membership lookup for authentication and source
sync flows
- Replaced custom group membership lookup (used for authentication flow)
with an existing listLdapGroupMemberships method (used for source sync
flow)
- Modified listLdapGroupMemberships and getUserAttributeListedInGroup in
a way group lookup could be called separately
- Added user filtering based on a group membership for a source sync
- Added tests to cover this logic
Co-authored-by: Pavel Ezhov <paejov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Same to https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22674 and
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22605
Sorry to create 3 PR to fix this.
I checked all span with class `org-visibility`, i think this is the last
one :)
And I found that private/limited user has no private/limited tag in
dashboard. but org does.
If it is ok i will add this feature in another pr.
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Follows #21094
Before:
There are 2 problems:
1. Sometimes, the header starts with a number, sometimes, it starts with
an icon button. It makes the UI look like misaligned.
2. The second item's bottom border is too thick (actually, that's an
empty element with border, which should be hidden as well)
3. (An old problem) the number is not mono-font
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/215935944-003fe2d3-69bf-413c-bbae-0a4668a508c3.png)
After:
Fix above problems.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/215944811-b867a20c-110c-47a2-aa52-572a8162a44d.png)
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adding `<br>` between each line is not necessary since the entire file
is rendered inside a `<pre>`
fixes https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/915
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Followup for #20908 to allow setting the scopes when creating new access
token via CLI.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Add main aria landmark to templates
* Adjust some titles to improve understanding of location in navigation
Contributed by @Forgejo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The `no-store` cache control added in #20432 is causing form input to be
cleared unnecessarily on page reload. Instead use
`max-age=0,private,must-revalidate` which avoids this.
This was particularly a problem when typing a long comment for an issue
and then for example changing the label. The page would be reloaded and
lose the unsubmitted comment.
Fixes #22603
|
|
|
|
| |
For some unknown reason, this was previously disabled.
Additionally removed an unused return value.
|
|
|
| |
This PR adds a [Conda](https://conda.io/) package registry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #22183
Replaces #22187
This PR adds secrets for users. I refactored the files for organizations
and repos to use the same logic and templates. I splitted the secrets
from deploy keys again and reverted the fix from #22187.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There was a missing `]` in imagediff.js:
```
const $range = $container.find("input[type='range'");
```
This PR simply adds this.
Fix #22702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#22661)
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22600
Add explanations to team unit access control.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR fixes two bugs with Webauthn support:
* There was a longstanding bug within webauthn due to the backend using
URLEncodedBase64 but the javascript using decoding using plain base64.
This causes intermittent issues with users reporting decoding errors.
* Following the recent upgrade to webauthn there was a change in the way
the library expects RPOrigins to be configured. This leads to the
Relying Party Origin not being configured and prevents registration.
Fix #22507
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
#21937 implemented only basic events based on name because of `act`'s
limitation. So I sent a PR to parse all possible events details in
https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/11 and it merged. The ref
documentation is
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows
This PR depends on that and make more detail responses for `push` events
and `pull_request` events. And it lefts more events there for future
PRs.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
EDIT: The main change of this PR was resolved by #22599. This
complements that PR for some cases without label and complicated layout
to be added.
NOTE: Contributed by @Forgejo.
|
|
|
|
| |
To go along with similar settings for issues, pulls, projects, packages.
|
|
|
| |
Use relative url in actions view.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If triggered by PR, the ref should be `pull/<index>/head` instead of
`repo.DefaultBranch`.
And improve UI:
<img width="493" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/215731280-312564f2-2450-45d0-b986-1accb0670976.png">
Related to #21937.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There was a mistake when choosing the structure for the repo avatars parent folder and it added a spurious /gitea.
The `data` directory should contain folders like:
- `attachments/`
- `avatars/`
- `log/`
- `repo-avatars/`
|
|
|
| |
These exist in the new issue form but were seemingly forgotten here.
|
|
|
| |
Fix #18785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR provides a contributed backport command to help create backports
for Gitea.
It represents a significant improvement on my previously described
shell-script.
It can be installed using `go install contrib/backport/backport.go`.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
|
|
|
| |
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Sometimes (e.g. renaming a file) nothing of the content is changed. In
this case, it makes no sense to show the collapse icon in a diff.
|
|
|
| |
Add tabindex to buttons of repository views.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Disable this test for the moment because the used imap container image
seems unstable which results in many failed CI builds.
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The use of ui colors (red, green, etc) should be limited to actionable
or dismissable entries. Before this commit, a green/red label was used
to display issues count on each repository. This did not add any
meaningful information to the list.
Removing the label reduces ambiguity and makes the list easier to scan
visually.
![label_compare](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/451841/215360696-a881b765-207d-4ffa-8bec-398f8e5dab1e.jpg)
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #22666 (Replace #22668)
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Same to https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22605
![user
package](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/215669905-71fe01c3-c011-4867-97a6-3df5f940a6bf.PNG)
![user
projects](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/215669909-1a4f74f1-bbde-4913-9ba5-51c44cc63862.PNG)
These two page are both used at user and org, so if i fixed the org
page, the user page will be also be fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes anchored markup links by adding `user-content-` (which is
prepended to IDs)
Closes https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Close #13539.
Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others.
Related projects:
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner
### Summary
The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions",
an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been
merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note
that:
- It is disabled by default;
- It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently;
- It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently;
- Breaking changes may be made before it's stable.
**Please comment on #13539 if you have any different product design
ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this
PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**.
### ⚠️ Breaking
`gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the
name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it.
### Some important reviews
- What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954
- Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592
- Why DBFS?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178
- Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103
- Why there's no permission control for actions?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868
### What it looks like
<details>
#### Manage runners
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png">
#### List runs
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png">
#### View logs
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png">
</details>
### How to try it
<details>
#### 1. Start Gitea
Clone this branch and [install from
source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source).
Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions:
```ini
[actions]
ENABLED = true
```
Start it.
If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png">
#### 2. Start runner
Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner), and follow
the
[README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md)
to start it.
If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png">
#### 3. Enable actions for a repo
Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox
in settings and submit.
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png">
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png">
If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions":
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png">
#### 4. Upload workflow files
Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can
follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart)
of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions
in most cases, you can use the same demo:
```yaml
name: GitHub Actions Demo
run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions 🚀
on: [push]
jobs:
Explore-GitHub-Actions:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- run: echo "🎉 The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event."
- run: echo "🐧 This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!"
- run: echo "🔎 The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}."
- name: Check out repository code
uses: actions/checkout@v3
- run: echo "💡 The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner."
- run: echo "🖥️ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner."
- name: List files in the repository
run: |
ls ${{ github.workspace }}
- run: echo "🍏 This job's status is ${{ job.status }}."
```
If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png">
#### 5. Check the logs of jobs
Click a run and you'll see the logs:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png">
#### 6. Go on
You can try more examples in [the
documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions)
of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs.
Come on, PRs are welcome.
</details>
See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea
Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/)
---------
Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
|