| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
and migrate affected code
_last refactoring bits to replace **util.OptionalBool** with
**optional.Option[bool]**_
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts #25165 (5bb8d1924d77c675467694de26697b876d709a17), as there
was a chance some important reviews got missed.
so after reverting this patch it will be resubmitted for reviewing again
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25165#issuecomment-1960670242
temporary Open #5512 again
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/5512
This PR adds basic SAML support
- Adds SAML 2.0 as an auth source
- Adds SAML configuration documentation
- Adds integration test:
- Use bare-bones SAML IdP to test protocol flow and test account is
linked successfully (only runs on Postgres by default)
- Adds documentation for configuring and running SAML integration test
locally
Future PRs:
- Support group mapping
- Support auto-registration (account linking)
Co-Authored-By: @jackHay22
---------
Co-authored-by: jackHay22 <jack@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: morphelinho <morphelinho@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Fix #28231, and remove some unused code. The `db.HasEngine` doesn't seem
useful because the db engine is always initialized before web route.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
parameter is zero and also introduce new generic methods (#28220)
The function `GetByBean` has an obvious defect that when the fields are
empty values, it will be ignored. Then users will get a wrong result
which is possibly used to make a security problem.
To avoid the possibility, this PR removed function `GetByBean` and all
references.
And some new generic functions have been introduced to be used.
The recommand usage like below.
```go
// if query an object according id
obj, err := db.GetByID[Object](ctx, id)
// query with other conditions
obj, err := db.Get[Object](ctx, builder.Eq{"a": a, "b":b})
```
|
| |
|
|
| |
For those simple objects, it's unnecessary to write the find and count
methods again and again.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## Bug in Gitea
I ran into this bug when I accidentally used the wrong redirect URL for
the oauth2 provider when using mssql. But the oauth2 provider still got
added.
Most of the time, we use `Delete(&some{id: some.id})` or
`In(condition).Delete(&some{})`, which specify the conditions. But the
function uses `Delete(source)` when `source.Cfg` is a `TEXT` field and
not empty. This will cause xorm `Delete` function not working in mssql.
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/61ff91f9603806df2505907614b9006bf721b9c8/models/auth/source.go#L234-L240
## Reason
Because the `TEXT` field can not be compared in mssql, xorm doesn't
support it according to [this
PR](https://gitea.com/xorm/xorm/pulls/2062)
[related
code](https://gitea.com/xorm/xorm/src/commit/b23798dc987af776bec867f4537ca129fd66328e/internal/statements/statement.go#L552-L558)
in xorm
```go
if statement.dialect.URI().DBType == schemas.MSSQL && (col.SQLType.Name == schemas.Text ||
col.SQLType.IsBlob() || col.SQLType.Name == schemas.TimeStampz) {
if utils.IsValueZero(fieldValue) {
continue
}
return nil, fmt.Errorf("column %s is a TEXT type with data %#v which cannot be as compare condition", col.Name, fieldValue.Interface())
}
}
```
When using the `Delete` function in xorm, the non-empty fields will
auto-set as conditions(perhaps some special fields are not?). If `TEXT`
field is not empty, xorm will return an error. I only found this usage
after searching, but maybe there is something I missing.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
unactive auth source (#27798)
The steps to reproduce it.
First, create a new oauth2 source.
Then, a user login with this oauth2 source.
Disable the oauth2 source.
Visit users -> settings -> security, 500 will be displayed.
This is because this page only load active Oauth2 sources but not all
Oauth2 sources.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Part of #27065
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
(#23832)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.
Fix #16132
Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A lot of our code is repeatedly testing if individual errors are
specific types of Not Exist errors. This is repetitative and unnecesary.
`Unwrap() error` provides a common way of labelling an error as a
NotExist error and we can/should use this.
This PR has chosen to use the common `io/fs` errors e.g.
`fs.ErrNotExist` for our errors. This is in some ways not completely
correct as these are not filesystem errors but it seems like a
reasonable thing to do and would allow us to simplify a lot of our code
to `errors.Is(err, fs.ErrNotExist)` instead of
`package.IsErr...NotExist(err)`
I am open to suggestions to use a different base error - perhaps
`models/db.ErrNotExist` if that would be felt to be better.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
| |
|
