summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/models/issues/issue.go
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Improve milestone filter on issues page (#22423)Lunny Xiao2023-04-301-2/+6
| | | | | | | | | | Now we have `All milestones`, `No milestones`, `Open milestones` and `Closed milestones`. Fix #11924 Fix #22411 <img width="1166" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/212243375-95eea035-a972-44b8-8088-53db614cb07e.png">
* Fix issue attachment handling (#24202)wxiaoguang2023-04-201-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Close #24195 Some of the changes are taken from my another fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/20147/commits/f07b0de997125c9b79cc5af27966a7cdd1803a4d in #20147 (although that PR was discarded ....) The bug is: 1. The old code doesn't handle `removedfile` event correctly 2. The old code doesn't provide attachments for type=CommentTypeReview This PR doesn't intend to refactor the "upload" code to a perfect state (to avoid making the review difficult), so some legacy styles are kept. --------- Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io> Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
* Make more functions use ctx instead of db.DefaultContext (#24068)wxiaoguang2023-04-141-2/+2
| | | | | | Continue the "ctx refactoring" work. There are still a lot db.DefaultContext, incorrect context could cause database deadlock errors.
* Add API to manage issue dependencies (#17935)qwerty2872023-03-281-9/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Adds API endpoints to manage issue/PR dependencies * `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` List issues that are blocked by this issue * `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` Block the issue given in the body by the issue in path * `DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` Unblock the issue given in the body by the issue in path * `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` List an issue's dependencies * `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` Create a new issue dependencies * `DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` Remove an issue dependency Closes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/15393 Closes #22115 Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Add "Reviewed by you" filter for pull requests (#22927)Brecht Van Lommel2023-02-241-0/+61
| | | | | | | | | | This includes pull requests that you approved, requested changes or commented on. Currently such pull requests are not visible in any of the filters on /pulls, while they may need further action like merging, or prodding the author or reviewers. Especially when working with a large team on a repository it's helpful to get a full overview of pull requests that may need your attention, without having to sift through the complete list.
* Fix intermittent panic in notify issue change content (#23019)zeripath2023-02-201-6/+8
| | | | | | | | Ensure that issue pullrequests are loaded before trying to set the self-reference. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev> Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
* Improve issues.LoadProject (#22982)yp053272023-02-201-1/+1
| | | | | issues.LoadProject() is no use change `issues.loadProject(ctx)` to issues.LoadProject(ctx)
* Scoped labels (#22585)Brecht Van Lommel2023-02-181-0/+27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/` prefix can be set on an issue. The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example `scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in different scopes and can coexist. Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a new label or replacing all labels. In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and batch editing. Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification: * Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus. * In label list, show description below label same as label menus. * Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer. * Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is closer to perceptually linear. * Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling. * Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function. Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu: * Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing. * Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate lines. * Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu. * Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and consistent with settings layout elsewhere. Custom exclusive scoped label rendering: * Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them similar to the `/` symbol. * In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line. --------- Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
* Rename `repo.GetOwner` to `repo.LoadOwner` (#22967)yp053272023-02-181-1/+1
| | | | | | | Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22963 --------- Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
* fix incorrect role labels for migrated issues and comments (#22914)Zettat1232023-02-151-0/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fix #22797. ## Reason If a comment was migrated from other platforms, this comment may have an original author and its poster is always not the original author. When the `roleDescriptor` func get the poster's role descriptor for a comment, it does not check if the comment has an original author. So the migrated comments' original authors might be marked as incorrect roles. --------- Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
* Use link in UI which returned a relative url but not html_url which contains ↵Lunny Xiao2023-02-061-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | an absolute url (#21986) partially fix #19345 This PR add some `Link` methods for different objects. The `Link` methods are not different from `HTMLURL`, they are lack of the absolute URL. And most of UI `HTMLURL` have been replaced to `Link` so that users can visit them from a different domain or IP. This PR also introduces a new javascript configuration `window.config.reqAppUrl` which is different from `appUrl` which is still an absolute url but the domain has been replaced to the current requested domain.
* Show all projects, not just repo projects and open/closed projects (#22640)Lunny Xiao2023-02-041-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This PR fixes two problems. One is when filter repository issues, only repository level projects are listed. Another is if you list open issues, only open projects will be displayed in filter options and if you list closed issues, only closed projects will be displayed in filter options. In this PR, both repository level and org/user level projects will be displayed in filter, and both open and closed projects will be listed as filter items. --------- Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
* Implement actions (#21937)Jason Song2023-01-311-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Close #13539. Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others. Related projects: - https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def - https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go - https://gitea.com/gitea/act - https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner ### Summary The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions", an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note that: - It is disabled by default; - It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently; - It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently; - Breaking changes may be made before it's stable. **Please comment on #13539 if you have any different product design ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**. ### ⚠️ Breaking `gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it. ### Some important reviews - What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954 - Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592 - Why DBFS? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178 - Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103 - Why there's no permission control for actions? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868 ### What it looks like <details> #### Manage runners <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png"> #### List runs <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png"> #### View logs <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png"> </details> ### How to try it <details> #### 1. Start Gitea Clone this branch and [install from source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source). Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions: ```ini [actions] ENABLED = true ``` Start it. If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners: <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png"> #### 2. Start runner Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner), and follow the [README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md) to start it. If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added: <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png"> #### 3. Enable actions for a repo Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox in settings and submit. <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png"> <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png"> If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions": <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png"> #### 4. Upload workflow files Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart) of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions in most cases, you can use the same demo: ```yaml name: GitHub Actions Demo run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions 🚀 on: [push] jobs: Explore-GitHub-Actions: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - run: echo "🎉 The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event." - run: echo "🐧 This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!" - run: echo "🔎 The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}." - name: Check out repository code uses: actions/checkout@v3 - run: echo "💡 The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner." - run: echo "🖥️ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner." - name: List files in the repository run: | ls ${{ github.workspace }} - run: echo "🍏 This job's status is ${{ job.status }}." ``` If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab: <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png"> #### 5. Check the logs of jobs Click a run and you'll see the logs: <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png"> #### 6. Go on You can try more examples in [the documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions) of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs. Come on, PRs are welcome. </details> See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/) --------- Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de> Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de> Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
* Issues: add Project filter to issues list and search (#22544)techknowlogick2023-01-291-0/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | Currently only a single project like milestone, not multiple like labels. Implements #14298 Code by @brechtvl --------- Co-authored-by: Brecht Van Lommel <brecht@blender.org>
* Support org/user level projects (#22235)Lunny Xiao2023-01-201-1/+1
| | | | | | | | Fix #13405 <img width="1151" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/209442911-7baa3924-c389-47b6-b63b-a740803e640e.png"> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* Improve utils of slices (#22379)Jason Song2023-01-111-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Move the file `compare.go` and `slice.go` to `slice.go`. - Fix `ExistsInSlice`, it's buggy - It uses `sort.Search`, so it assumes that the input slice is sorted. - It passes `func(i int) bool { return slice[i] == target })` to `sort.Search`, that's incorrect, check the doc of `sort.Search`. - Conbine `IsInt64InSlice(int64, []int64)` and `ExistsInSlice(string, []string)` to `SliceContains[T]([]T, T)`. - Conbine `IsSliceInt64Eq([]int64, []int64)` and `IsEqualSlice([]string, []string)` to `SliceSortedEqual[T]([]T, T)`. - Add `SliceEqual[T]([]T, T)` as a distinction from `SliceSortedEqual[T]([]T, T)`. - Redesign `RemoveIDFromList([]int64, int64) ([]int64, bool)` to `SliceRemoveAll[T]([]T, T) []T`. - Add `SliceContainsFunc[T]([]T, func(T) bool)` and `SliceRemoveAllFunc[T]([]T, func(T) bool)` for general use. - Add comments to explain why not `golang.org/x/exp/slices`. - Add unit tests.
* Always reuse transaction (#22362)Jason Song2023-01-081-1/+1
|
* Check primary keys for all tables and drop ForeignReference (#21721)Jason Song2022-12-231-55/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Some dbs require that all tables have primary keys, see - #16802 - #21086 We can add a test to keep it from being broken again. Edit: ~Added missing primary key for `ForeignReference`~ Dropped the `ForeignReference` table to satisfy the check, so it closes #21086. More context can be found in comments. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
* Rename almost all Ctx functions (#22071)Lunny Xiao2022-12-101-14/+10
|
* Fix issue/PR numbers (#22037)Jason Song2022-12-061-6/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | When deleting a closed issue, we should update both `NumIssues`and `NumClosedIssues`, or `NumOpenIssues`(`= NumIssues -NumClosedIssues`) will be wrong. It's the same for pull requests. Releated to #21557. Alse fixed two harmless problems: - The SQL to check issue/PR total numbers is wrong, that means it will update the numbers even if they are correct. - Replace legacy `num_issues = num_issues + 1` operations with `UpdateRepoIssueNumbers`.
* refactor some functions to support ctx as first parameter (#21878)Lunny Xiao2022-12-031-2/+2
| | | | Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
* Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files (#21840)flynnnnnnnnnn2022-11-271-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification. Fix #16132 Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github> Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
* Add `context.Context` to more methods (#21546)KN4CK3R2022-11-191-65/+49
| | | | | | | This PR adds a context parameter to a bunch of methods. Some helper `xxxCtx()` methods got replaced with the normal name now. Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
* Allow detect whether it's in a database transaction for a context.Context ↵Lunny Xiao2022-11-121-10/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (#21756) Fix #19513 This PR introduce a new db method `InTransaction(context.Context)`, and also builtin check on `db.TxContext` and `db.WithTx`. There is also a new method `db.AutoTx` has been introduced but could be used by other PRs. `WithTx` will always open a new transaction, if a transaction exist in context, return an error. `AutoTx` will try to open a new transaction if no transaction exist in context. That means it will always enter a transaction if there is no error. Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* Fix issues count bug (#21557)Lunny Xiao2022-10-251-10/+2
| | | | | fix #19349 , #19505 Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
* Replace all instances of fmt.Errorf(%v) with fmt.Errorf(%w) (#21551)delvh2022-10-241-44/+44
| | | | | | | | | Found using `find . -type f -name '*.go' -print -exec vim {} -c ':%s/fmt\.Errorf(\(.*\)%v\(.*\)err/fmt.Errorf(\1%w\2err/g' -c ':wq' \;` Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
* Fix viewing user subscriptions (#21482)zenofile2022-10-181-1/+2
| | | | | | | Fix enumeration of user subscriptions. `watch.mode` is not a boolean but a smallint. Fixes #21447 Regression of #17156
* Make every not exist error unwrappable to a fs.ErrNotExist (#20891)zeripath2022-10-181-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A lot of our code is repeatedly testing if individual errors are specific types of Not Exist errors. This is repetitative and unnecesary. `Unwrap() error` provides a common way of labelling an error as a NotExist error and we can/should use this. This PR has chosen to use the common `io/fs` errors e.g. `fs.ErrNotExist` for our errors. This is in some ways not completely correct as these are not filesystem errors but it seems like a reasonable thing to do and would allow us to simplify a lot of our code to `errors.Is(err, fs.ErrNotExist)` instead of `package.IsErr...NotExist(err)` I am open to suggestions to use a different base error - perhaps `models/db.ErrNotExist` if that would be felt to be better. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
* Add system setting table with cache and also add cache supports for user ↵Lunny Xiao2022-10-171-2/+2
| | | | setting (#18058)
* Refactor GetNextResourceIndex to make it work properly with transaction (#21469)wxiaoguang2022-10-161-7/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Related: * #21362 This PR uses a general and stable method to generate resource index (eg: Issue Index, PR Index) If the code looks good, I can add more tests ps: please skip the diff, only have a look at the new code. It's entirely re-written. Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
* Add pages to view watched repos and subscribed issues/PRs (#17156)qwerty2872022-09-291-0/+35
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Adds GitHub-like pages to view watched repos and subscribed issues/PRs This is my second try to fix this, but it is better than the first since it doesn't uses a filter option which could be slow when accessing `/issues` or `/pulls` and it shows both pulls and issues (the first try is #17053). Closes #16111 Replaces and closes #17053 ![Screenshot](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/80460567/134782937-3112f7da-425a-45b6-9511-5c9695aee896.png) Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
* Modify milestone search keywords to be case insensitive again (#20513)Tyrone Yeh2022-07-281-10/+3
| | | | Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
* Add more linters to improve code readability (#19989)Wim2022-06-201-7/+7
| | | | | | | | | | Add nakedret, unconvert, wastedassign, stylecheck and nolintlint linters to improve code readability - nakedret - https://github.com/alexkohler/nakedret - nakedret is a Go static analysis tool to find naked returns in functions greater than a specified function length. - unconvert - https://github.com/mdempsky/unconvert - Remove unnecessary type conversions - wastedassign - https://github.com/sanposhiho/wastedassign - wastedassign finds wasted assignment statements. - notlintlint - Reports ill-formed or insufficient nolint directives - stylecheck - https://staticcheck.io/docs/checks/#ST - keep style consistent - excluded: [ST1003 - Poorly chosen identifier](https://staticcheck.io/docs/checks/#ST1003) and [ST1005 - Incorrectly formatted error string](https://staticcheck.io/docs/checks/#ST1005)
* In code search, get code unit accessible repos in one (main) query (#19764)Hugo Hoitink2022-06-161-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | * When non-admin users use code search, get code unit accessible repos in one main query * Modified some comments to match the changes * Removed unnecessary check for Access Mode in Collaboration table Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
* Move issues related files into models/issues (#19931)Lunny Xiao2022-06-131-0/+2448
* Move access and repo permission to models/perm/access * fix test * fix git test * Move functions sequence * Some improvements per @KN4CK3R and @delvh * Move issues related code to models/issues * Move some issues related sub package * Merge * Fix test * Fix test * Fix test * Fix test * Rename some files
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2025-01-25 20:33:58 +0000