| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
roles and tooltips (#26658)
GitHub like role descriptor
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/ceaed92c-6749-47b3-89e8-0e0e7ae65321)
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/8193ec34-cbf0-47f9-b0de-10dbddd66970)
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/56c7ed85-6177-425e-9f2f-926e99770782)
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Small Fix :-`ArchivedUnix` column changed only change the date when it is newly archived.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
move inner **countSession** of **getIssueStatsChunk** into it's own
function for reuse
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
related: #26012
### Bugs
1. missing project filter on the issue page.
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/1e76a824bcd71acd59cdfb2c4547806bc34b3d86/modules/indexer/issues/dboptions.go#L11-L15
3. incorrect SQL condition: some issue does not belong to a project but
exists on the project_issue table.
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/f5dbac9d36f1678b928bee04e85fbd045c725698/models/issues/issue_search.go#L233
### Before:
![before](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/50507092/1dcde39e-3e2f-4151-b2c6-4d67bf493c2f)
### After:
![after](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/50507092/badfb81f-056d-4a2f-9838-1cba9c15768d)
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## Archived labels
This adds the structure to allow for archived labels.
Archived labels are, just like closed milestones or projects, a medium to hide information without deleting it.
It is especially useful if there are outdated labels that should no longer be used without deleting the label entirely.
## Changes
1. UI and API have been equipped with the support to mark a label as archived
2. The time when a label has been archived will be stored in the DB
## Outsourced for the future
There's no special handling for archived labels at the moment.
This will be done in the future.
## Screenshots
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/80308335/208f95cd-42e4-4ed7-9a1f-cd2050a645d4)
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/80308335/746428e0-40bb-45b3-b992-85602feb371d)
Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25237
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The xorm `Sync2` has already been deprecated in favor of `Sync`,
so let's do the same inside the Gitea codebase.
Command used to replace everything:
```sh
for i in $(ag Sync2 --files-with-matches); do vim $i -c ':%sno/Sync2/Sync/g' -c ':wq'; done
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Even if GetDisplayName() is normally preferred elsewhere, this change
provides more consistency, as usernames are also always being shown
when participating in a conversation taking place in an issue or
a pull request. This change makes conversations easier to follow, as
you would not have to have a mental association between someone's
username and someone's real name in order to follow what is happening.
This behavior matches GitHub's. Optimally, both the username and the
full name (if applicable) could be shown, but such an effort is a
much bigger task that needs to be thought out well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #26129
Replace #26258
This PR will introduce a transaction on creating pull request so that if
some step failed, it will rollback totally. And there will be no dirty
pull request exist.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Possible fix #26280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I noticed that `issue_service.CreateComment` adds transaction operations
on `issues_model.CreateComment`, we can merge the two functions and we
can avoid calling each other's methods in the `services` layer.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
By using a different color it's clear that the review isn't pointing to
the latest commit.
**Screenshots:**
Not stale review:
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/1135157/2901ad69-e0d8-4041-b760-277d02dafd45)
Stale review:
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/1135157/500b306e-a994-42d4-a2fd-1174774ba5ee)
fixes #26306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
paging (#26012)
Fix #24662.
Replace #24822 and #25708 (although it has been merged)
## Background
In the past, Gitea supported issue searching with a keyword and
conditions in a less efficient way. It worked by searching for issues
with the keyword and obtaining limited IDs (as it is heavy to get all)
on the indexer (bleve/elasticsearch/meilisearch), and then querying with
conditions on the database to find a subset of the found IDs. This is
why the results could be incomplete.
To solve this issue, we need to store all fields that could be used as
conditions in the indexer and support both keyword and additional
conditions when searching with the indexer.
## Major changes
- Redefine `IndexerData` to include all fields that could be used as
filter conditions.
- Refactor `Search(ctx context.Context, kw string, repoIDs []int64,
limit, start int, state string)` to `Search(ctx context.Context, options
*SearchOptions)`, so it supports more conditions now.
- Change the data type stored in `issueIndexerQueue`. Use
`IndexerMetadata` instead of `IndexerData` in case the data has been
updated while it is in the queue. This also reduces the storage size of
the queue.
- Enhance searching with Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch, make them
fully support `SearchOptions`. Also, update the data versions.
- Keep most logic of database indexer, but remove
`issues.SearchIssueIDsByKeyword` in `models` to avoid confusion where is
the entry point to search issues.
- Start a Meilisearch instance to test it in unit tests.
- Add unit tests with almost full coverage to test
Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch indexer.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR adds a new dropdown to select a commit or a commit range
(shift-click like github) of a Pull Request.
After selection of a commit only the changes of this commit will be shown.
When selecting a range of commits the diff of this range is shown.
This allows to review a PR commit by commit or by viewing only commit ranges.
The "Show changes since your last review" mechanism github uses is implemented, too.
When reviewing a single commit or a commit range the "Viewed" functionality is disabled.
## Screenshots
### The commit dropdown
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/51889757/0db3ae62-1272-436c-be64-4730c5d611e3)
### Selecting a commit range
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/51889757/ad81eedb-8437-42b0-8073-2d940c25fe8f)
### Show changes of a single commit only
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/51889757/6b1a113b-73ef-4ecc-adf6-bc2340bb8f97)
### Show changes of a commit range
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/51889757/6401b358-cd66-4c09-8baa-6cf6177f23a7)
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/20989
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/19263
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To avoid deadlock problem, almost database related functions should be
have ctx as the first parameter.
This PR do a refactor for some of these functions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
automatically (#25882)
Fix #25858
The option `dissmiss stale approvals` was listed on protected branch but
never implemented. This PR fixes that.
<img width="1006" alt="图片"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/81045/60bfa968-4db7-4c24-b8be-2e5978f91bb9">
<img width="1021" alt="图片"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/81045/8dabc14d-2dfe-40c2-94ed-24fcbf6e0e8f">
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/1ab476dc-2f9b-4c85-9e87-105fc73af1ee)
After:
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/786f984d-5c27-4eff-b3d9-159f68034ce4)
This issue comes from the change in #25468.
`LoadProject` will always return at least one record, so we use
`ProjectID` to check whether an issue is linked to a project in the old
code.
As other `issue.LoadXXX` functions, we need to check the return value
from `xorm.Session.Get`.
In recent unit tests, we only test `issueList.LoadAttributes()` but
don't test `issue.LoadAttributes()`. So I added a new test for
`issue.LoadAttributes()` in this PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <privat@denyskon.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Update all tool dependencies
- Lock `govulncheck` and `actionlint` to their latest tags
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <m.huber@kithara.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Result of running `perl -p -i -e 's#interface\{\}#any#g' **/*` and `make fmt`.
Basically the same [as golang did](https://github.com/golang/go/commit/2580d0e08d5e9f979b943758d3c49877fb2324cb).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
this will allow us to fully localize it later
PS: we can not migrate back as the old value was a one-way conversion
prepare for #25213
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Close #25127
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/7d6be811-8e4a-4982-a5e4-857d171758d4)
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If enabled show a clickable label in the comment. A click on the label
opens the Conversation tab with the comment focussed - there you're able
to view the old diff (or original diff the comment was created on).
**Screenshots**
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/1135157/63ab9571-a9ee-4900-9f02-94ab0095f9e7)
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/1135157/78f7c225-8d76-46f5-acfd-9b8aab988a6c)
When resolved and outdated:
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/1135157/6ece9ebd-c792-4aa5-9c35-628694e9d093)
Option to enable/disable this (stored in user settings - default is
disabled):
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/1135157/ed99dfe4-76dc-4c12-bd96-e7e62da50ab5)
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/1135157/e837a052-e92e-4a28-906d-9db5bacf93a6)
fixes #24913
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
so template/browser can deal with string format
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25094
`GetBlobContent` will only get the first 1024 bytes, if the README.md
size is larger than 1024 bytes,
We can not render the rest of them.
After this fix, we should provide the limited size to read when call
`GetBlobContent`.
After:
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/22a42936-4cf8-40b4-a5c7-e384082beb0d)
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Enable deduplication of unofficial reviews. When pull requests are
configured to include all approvers, not just official ones, in the
default merge messages it was possible to generate duplicated
Reviewed-by lines for a single person. Add an option to find only
distinct reviews for a given query.
fixes #24795
---------
Signed-off-by: Cory Todd <cory.todd@canonical.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Hello.
This PR adds a github like configuration for the CODEOWNERS file.
Resolves: #10161
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This addressees some things from #24406 that came up after the PR was
merged. Mostly from @delvh.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds the ability to pin important Issues and Pull Requests. You can
also move pinned Issues around to change their Position. Resolves #2175.
## Screenshots
![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123207-0aa39869-bb48-45c3-abe2-ba1e836046ec.png)
![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123297-152a16ea-a857-451d-9a42-61f2cd54dd75.png)
![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235640782-cbfe25ec-6254-479a-a3de-133e585d7a2d.png)
The Design was mostly copied from the Projects Board.
## Implementation
This uses a new `pin_order` Column in the `issue` table. If the value is
set to 0, the Issue is not pinned. If it's set to a bigger value, the
value is the Position. 1 means it's the first pinned Issue, 2 means it's
the second one etc. This is dived into Issues and Pull requests for each
Repo.
## TODO
- [x] You can currently pin as many Issues as you want. Maybe we should
add a Limit, which is configurable. GitHub uses 3, but I prefer 6, as
this is better for bigger Projects, but I'm open for suggestions.
- [x] Pin and Unpin events need to be added to the Issue history.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Migration
**The feature itself is currently fully working, so tester who may find
weird edge cases are very welcome!**
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16321
Provided a webhook trigger for requesting someone to review the Pull
Request.
Some modifications have been made to the returned `PullRequestPayload`
based on the GitHub webhook settings, including:
- add a description of the current reviewer object as
`RequestedReviewer` .
- setting the action to either **review_requested** or
**review_request_removed** based on the operation.
- adding the `RequestedReviewers` field to the issues_model.PullRequest.
This field will be loaded into the PullRequest through
`LoadRequestedReviewers()` when `ToAPIPullRequest` is called.
After the Pull Request is merged, I will supplement the relevant
documentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Access the issue list page and select `No assignee`, you will get 500
error:
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/a7435fd3-c3d5-4801-894e-9353a8ddc1af)
You can see this page in try.gitea.io:
https://try.gitea.io/yp05327/testrepo/issues?q=&type=all&sort=&state=open&labels=&milestone=0&project=0&assignee=-1&poster=0
Caused by
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24707/files#diff-d7c7dc2da4fcfdc09997648e11a018414dc116472054350b5590ab407adcd44dR1748
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## ⚠️ Breaking
The `log.<mode>.<logger>` style config has been dropped. If you used it,
please check the new config manual & app.example.ini to make your
instance output logs as expected.
Although many legacy options still work, it's encouraged to upgrade to
the new options.
The SMTP logger is deleted because SMTP is not suitable to collect logs.
If you have manually configured Gitea log options, please confirm the
logger system works as expected after upgrading.
## Description
Close #12082 and maybe more log-related issues, resolve some related
FIXMEs in old code (which seems unfixable before)
Just like rewriting queue #24505 : make code maintainable, clear legacy
bugs, and add the ability to support more writers (eg: JSON, structured
log)
There is a new document (with examples): `logging-config.en-us.md`
This PR is safer than the queue rewriting, because it's just for
logging, it won't break other logic.
## The old problems
The logging system is quite old and difficult to maintain:
* Unclear concepts: Logger, NamedLogger, MultiChannelledLogger,
SubLogger, EventLogger, WriterLogger etc
* Some code is diffuclt to konw whether it is right:
`log.DelNamedLogger("console")` vs `log.DelNamedLogger(log.DEFAULT)` vs
`log.DelLogger("console")`
* The old system heavily depends on ini config system, it's difficult to
create new logger for different purpose, and it's very fragile.
* The "color" trick is difficult to use and read, many colors are
unnecessary, and in the future structured log could help
* It's difficult to add other log formats, eg: JSON format
* The log outputer doesn't have full control of its goroutine, it's
difficult to make outputer have advanced behaviors
* The logs could be lost in some cases: eg: no Fatal error when using
CLI.
* Config options are passed by JSON, which is quite fragile.
* INI package makes the KEY in `[log]` section visible in `[log.sub1]`
and `[log.sub1.subA]`, this behavior is quite fragile and would cause
more unclear problems, and there is no strong requirement to support
`log.<mode>.<logger>` syntax.
## The new design
See `logger.go` for documents.
## Screenshot
<details>
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/4462d713-ba39-41f5-bb08-de912e67e1ff)
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/b188035e-f691-428b-8b2d-ff7b2199b2f9)
![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/132e9745-1c3b-4e00-9e0d-15eaea495dee)
</details>
## TODO
* [x] add some new tests
* [x] fix some tests
* [x] test some sub-commands (manually ....)
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
| |
As title.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR
- [x] Move some functions from `issues.go` to `issue_stats.go` and
`issue_label.go`
- [x] Remove duplicated issue options `UserIssueStatsOption` to keep
only one `IssuesOptions`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR
- [x] Move some code from `issue.go` to `issue_search.go` and
`issue_update.go`
- [x] Use `IssuesOptions` instead of `IssueStatsOptions` becuase they
are too similiar.
- [x] Rename some functions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since milestones has been implemented, this PR will fix #3407
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#24586)
Close #24508
Main changes:
As discussed in the issue
1. Change luminance calculation function to use [Relative
Luminance](https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Relative_luminance)
2. Move the luminance related functions into color.go/color.js
3. Add tests for both the files (Not sure if test cases are too many
now)
Before (tests included by `UseLightTextOnBackground` are labels started
with `##`):
https://try.gitea.io/HesterG/testrepo/labels
After:
<img width="1307" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-08 at 13 37 55"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/236742562-fdfc3a4d-2fab-466b-9613-96f2bf96b4bc.png">
<img width="1289" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-08 at 13 38 06"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/236742570-022db68e-cec0-43bb-888a-fc54f5332cc3.png">
<img width="1299" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-08 at 13 38 20"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/236742572-9af1de45-fb7f-460b-828d-ba25fae20f51.png">
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Fix regression with icons wrapping from
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24459
- Fix box misalignment on small screen
- Fix avatar misalignment on review comment
- Fix incorrect underline hover effect on review icons
- Move status icon to left side in review box
- Enhance review icon colors, add helper function for it
- Add missing inline avatars in review comments
- Tweak icon sizes because some octicons have inconsistent sizing
### Before
<img width="655" alt="Screenshot 2023-05-04 at 20 50 28"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/236301230-92325507-6e03-47ac-bfb4-c9ddde310571.png">
<img width="260" alt="Screenshot 2023-05-04 at 20 50 42"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/236301236-0dfa50e7-b8fc-4179-ae68-d872bc90f1f3.png">
### After
<img width="498" alt="Screenshot 2023-05-04 at 20 55 08"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/236301810-23862c2c-c0a9-43a4-a3eb-ee611c14a7f4.png">
<img width="219" alt="Screenshot 2023-05-04 at 20 55 16"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/115237/236301817-d0de02ea-6ab5-43e1-9183-6b3848b72995.png">
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Close #24213
Replace #23830
#### Cause
- Before, in order to making PR can get latest commit after reopening,
the `ref`(${REPO_PATH}/refs/pull/${PR_INDEX}/head) of evrey closed PR
will be updated when pushing commits to the `head branch` of the closed
PR.
#### Changes
- For closed PR , won't perform these behavior: insert`comment`, push
`notification` (UI and email), exectue
[pushToBaseRepo](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/74225033413dc0f2b308bbe069f6d185b551e364/services/pull/pull.go#L409)
function and trigger `action` any more when pushing to the `head branch`
of the closed PR.
- Refresh the reference of the PR when reopening the closed PR (**even
if the head branch has been deleted before**). Make the reference of PR
consistent with the `head branch`.
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR will merge 3 Init functions on setting packages as 1 and
introduce an options struct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now we have `All milestones`, `No milestones`, `Open milestones` and
`Closed milestones`.
Fix #11924
Fix #22411
<img width="1166" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/212243375-95eea035-a972-44b8-8088-53db614cb07e.png">
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a comment dismisses a review, we need to load the reviewer to show
whose review has been dismissed.
Related to:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/20b6ae0e5399cfc22c6a0989d8e520194e920bdd/templates/repo/issue/view_content/comments.tmpl#L765-L770
We don't need `.Review.Reviewer` for all comments, because
"dismissing" doesn't happen often, or we would have already received
error reports.
|
|
|
|
| |
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Close #24195
Some of the changes are taken from my another fix
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/20147/commits/f07b0de997125c9b79cc5af27966a7cdd1803a4d
in #20147 (although that PR was discarded ....)
The bug is:
1. The old code doesn't handle `removedfile` event correctly
2. The old code doesn't provide attachments for type=CommentTypeReview
This PR doesn't intend to refactor the "upload" code to a perfect state
(to avoid making the review difficult), so some legacy styles are kept.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Continue the "ctx refactoring" work.
There are still a lot db.DefaultContext, incorrect context could cause
database deadlock errors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- With #23988 in place, we can improve these timestamps
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adds API endpoints to manage issue/PR dependencies
* `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` List issues that are
blocked by this issue
* `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` Block the issue
given in the body by the issue in path
* `DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` Unblock the issue
given in the body by the issue in path
* `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` List an
issue's dependencies
* `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` Create a new
issue dependencies
* `DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` Remove an
issue dependency
Closes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/15393
Closes #22115
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
this is a simple endpoint that adds the ability to rename users to the
admin API.
Note: this is not in a mergeable state. It would be better if this was
handled by a PATCH/POST to the /api/v1/admin/users/{username} endpoint
and the username is modified.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Close: #22784
1. On GH, we can reopen a PR which was closed before after pushing
commits. After reopening PR, we can see the commits that were pushed
after closing PR in the time line. So the case of
[issue](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22784) is a bug which
needs to be fixed.
2. After closing a PR and pushing commits, `headBranchSha` is not equal
to `sha`(which is the last commit ID string of reference). If the
judgement exists, the button of reopen will not display. So, skip the
judgement if the status of PR is closed.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222037529-651fccf9-0bba-433e-b2f0-79c17e0cc812.png)
3. Even if PR is already close, we should still insert comment record
into DB when we push commits.
So we should still call function `CreatePushPullComment()`.
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/067b0c2664d127c552ccdfd264257caca4907a77/services/pull/pull.go#L260-L282
So, I add a switch(`includeClosed`) to the
`GetUnmergedPullRequestsByHeadInfo` func to control whether the status
of PR must be open. In this case, by setting `includeClosed` to `true`,
we can query the closed PR.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222621045-bb80987c-10c5-4eac-aa0c-1fb9c6aefb51.png)
4. In the loop of comments, I use the`latestCloseCommentID` variable to
record the last occurrence of the close comment.
In the go template, if the status of PR is closed, the comments whose
type is `CommentTypePullRequestPush(29)` after `latestCloseCommentID`
won't be rendered.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222058913-c91cf3e3-819b-40c5-8015-654b31eeccff.png)
e.g.
1). The initial status of the PR is opened.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453617-33c5093e-f712-4cd6-8489-9f87e2075869.png)
2). Then I click the button of `Close`. PR is closed now.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453694-25c588a9-c121-4897-9ae5-0b13cf33d20b.png)
3). I try to push a commit to this PR, even though its current status is
closed.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453916-361678fb-7321-410d-9e37-5a26e8095638.png)
But in comments list, this commit do not display.This is as expected :)
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222454169-7617a791-78d2-404e-be5e-77d555f93313.png)
4). Click the `Reopen` button, the commit which is pushed after closing
PR display now.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222454533-897893b6-b96e-4701-b5cb-b1800f382b8f.png)
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|