| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
| |
This PR will fix some missed checks for private repositories' data on
web routes and API routes.
|
|
|
|
| |
For those simple objects, it's unnecessary to write the find and count
methods again and again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
System users (Ghost, ActionsUser, etc) have a negative id and may be the
author of a comment, either because it was created by a now deleted user
or via an action using a transient token.
The GetPossibleUserByID function has special cases related to system
users and will not fail if given a negative id.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1425
(cherry picked from commit 6a2d2fa24390116d31ae2507c0a93d423f690b7b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1458
Some mails such as issue creation mails are missing the reply-to-comment
address. This PR fixes that and specifies which comment types should get
a reply-possibility.
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #27767
Add a test to ensure its behavior
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Display the issue task list on project cards.

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/27718#issuecomment-1773743014
. Add a test to ensure its behavior.
Why this test uses `ProjectBoardID=0`? Because in `SearchOptions`,
`ProjectBoardID=0` means what it is. But in `IssueOptions`,
`ProjectBoardID=0` means there is no condition, and
`ProjectBoardID=db.NoConditionID` means the board ID = 0.
It's really confusing. Probably it's better to separate the db search
engine and the other issue search code. It's really two different
systems. As far as I can see, `IssueOptions` is not necessary for most
of the code, which has very simple issue search conditions.
|
|
|
| |
https://github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/releases/tag/v1.55.0
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1. remove unused function `MoveIssueAcrossProjectBoards`
2. extract the project board condition into a function
3. use db.NoCondition instead of -1. (BTW, the usage of db.NoCondition
is too confusing. Is there any way to avoid that?)
4. remove the unnecessary comment since the ctx refactor is completed.
5. Change `b.ID != 0` to `b.ID > 0`. It's more intuitive but I think
they're the same since board ID can't be negative.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TODOs:
- [x] write test for `GetIssueTotalTrackedTime`
- [x] frontport kitharas template changes and make them mobile-friendly
---


---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Part of #27065
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #27380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Part of #27065
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Part of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/discussions/issues/61
This is workaround for a bug in MariaDB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- There's no need for `In` to be used, as it's a single parameter that's
being passed.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1521
(cherry picked from commit 4a4955f43ae7fc50cfe3b48409a0a10c82625a19)
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
make function name more descriptive as it would otherwise imply it could
be used for e.g. #26672 too ...
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Part of #27065
This PR touches functions used in templates. As templates are not static
typed, errors are harder to find, but I hope I catch it all. I think
some tests from other persons do not hurt.
|
|
|
| |
Fix #27306
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As title

|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This Column is missing index. It is used by
[issue_service.deleteIssue](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/7ea2a910cebaf51cfd13c0941029c404e408ae54/services/issue/issue.go#L300).
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR removed `unittest.MainTest` the second parameter
`TestOptions.GiteaRoot`. Now it detects the root directory by current
working directory.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Part of #27065
---------
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fix #27019
## testfixture yml
1. add issue20(a pr issue) in repo 23, org 17
2. add user15 to team 9
3. add four reviews about issue20
## test case
add two tests that are described with code comments
the code before pr #26784 failed the first test
<img width="479" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/1d9b5787-11b4-4c4d-931f-6a9869547f35">
current code failed the second test(as mentioned in #27019)
<img width="484" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/05608055-7587-43d1-bae1-92c688270819">
Any advice is appreciated.
---------
Co-authored-by: CaiCandong <50507092+CaiCandong@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes a performance bottleneck. It was discovered by Codeberg.
Every where query on that table (which has grown big over time) uses
this column, but there is no index on it.
See this part of the log which was posted on Matrix:
```
2023/09/10 00:52:01 ...rs/web/repo/issue.go:1446:ViewIssue() [W] [Slow SQL Query] UPDATE `issue_user` SET is_read=? WHERE uid=? AND issue_id=? [true x y] - 51.395434887s
2023/09/10 00:52:01 ...rs/web/repo/issue.go:1447:ViewIssue() [E] ReadBy: Error 1205 (HY000): Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction
2023/09/10 00:52:01 ...eb/routing/logger.go:102:func1() [I] router: completed GET /Codeberg/Community/issues/1201 for [::ffff:xxx]:0, 500 Internal Server Error in 52384.2ms @ repo/issue.go:1256(repo.ViewIssue)
```
|
|
|
| |
Part of #27065
|
|
|
| |
Next step of #27065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`indexer_test.go` (#27067)
Since the issue indexer has been refactored, the issue overview webpage
is built by the `buildIssueOverview` function and underlying
`indexer.Search` function and `GetIssueStats` instead of
`GetUserIssueStats`. So the function is no longer used.
I moved the relevant tests to `indexer_test.go` and since the search
option changed from `IssueOptions` to `SearchOptions`, most of the tests
are useless now.
We need more tests about the db indexer because those tests are highly
connected with the issue overview webpage and now this page has several
bugs.
Any advice about those test cases is appreciated.
---------
Co-authored-by: CaiCandong <50507092+CaiCandong@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#27052)
Currently 'userxx' and 'orgxx' are both used as username in test files
when the user type is org, which is confusing. This PR replaces all
'userxx' with 'orgxx' when the user type is org(`user.type==1`).
Some non-trivial changes
1. Rename `user3` dir to `org3` in `tests/git-repositories-meta`
2. Change `end` in `issue reference` because 'org3' is one char shorter
than 'user3'

3. Change the search result number of `user/repo2` because
`user3/repo21` can't be searched now

4. Change the first org name getting from API because the result is
ordered by alphabet asc and now `org 17` is before `org25`


Other modifications are just find all and replace all.
Unit tests with SQLite are all passed.
---------
Co-authored-by: caicandong <1290147055@qq.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix the wrong review requested number mentioned by #18808 .
Fix #18808
Before:

After:

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
roles and tooltips (#26658)
GitHub like role descriptor



---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Small Fix :-`ArchivedUnix` column changed only change the date when it is newly archived.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
move inner **countSession** of **getIssueStatsChunk** into it's own
function for reuse
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
related: #26012
### Bugs
1. missing project filter on the issue page.
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/1e76a824bcd71acd59cdfb2c4547806bc34b3d86/modules/indexer/issues/dboptions.go#L11-L15
3. incorrect SQL condition: some issue does not belong to a project but
exists on the project_issue table.
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/f5dbac9d36f1678b928bee04e85fbd045c725698/models/issues/issue_search.go#L233
### Before:

### After:

---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## Archived labels
This adds the structure to allow for archived labels.
Archived labels are, just like closed milestones or projects, a medium to hide information without deleting it.
It is especially useful if there are outdated labels that should no longer be used without deleting the label entirely.
## Changes
1. UI and API have been equipped with the support to mark a label as archived
2. The time when a label has been archived will be stored in the DB
## Outsourced for the future
There's no special handling for archived labels at the moment.
This will be done in the future.
## Screenshots


Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25237
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The xorm `Sync2` has already been deprecated in favor of `Sync`,
so let's do the same inside the Gitea codebase.
Command used to replace everything:
```sh
for i in $(ag Sync2 --files-with-matches); do vim $i -c ':%sno/Sync2/Sync/g' -c ':wq'; done
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Even if GetDisplayName() is normally preferred elsewhere, this change
provides more consistency, as usernames are also always being shown
when participating in a conversation taking place in an issue or
a pull request. This change makes conversations easier to follow, as
you would not have to have a mental association between someone's
username and someone's real name in order to follow what is happening.
This behavior matches GitHub's. Optimally, both the username and the
full name (if applicable) could be shown, but such an effort is a
much bigger task that needs to be thought out well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #26129
Replace #26258
This PR will introduce a transaction on creating pull request so that if
some step failed, it will rollback totally. And there will be no dirty
pull request exist.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Possible fix #26280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I noticed that `issue_service.CreateComment` adds transaction operations
on `issues_model.CreateComment`, we can merge the two functions and we
can avoid calling each other's methods in the `services` layer.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
By using a different color it's clear that the review isn't pointing to
the latest commit.
**Screenshots:**
Not stale review:

Stale review:

fixes #26306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
paging (#26012)
Fix #24662.
Replace #24822 and #25708 (although it has been merged)
## Background
In the past, Gitea supported issue searching with a keyword and
conditions in a less efficient way. It worked by searching for issues
with the keyword and obtaining limited IDs (as it is heavy to get all)
on the indexer (bleve/elasticsearch/meilisearch), and then querying with
conditions on the database to find a subset of the found IDs. This is
why the results could be incomplete.
To solve this issue, we need to store all fields that could be used as
conditions in the indexer and support both keyword and additional
conditions when searching with the indexer.
## Major changes
- Redefine `IndexerData` to include all fields that could be used as
filter conditions.
- Refactor `Search(ctx context.Context, kw string, repoIDs []int64,
limit, start int, state string)` to `Search(ctx context.Context, options
*SearchOptions)`, so it supports more conditions now.
- Change the data type stored in `issueIndexerQueue`. Use
`IndexerMetadata` instead of `IndexerData` in case the data has been
updated while it is in the queue. This also reduces the storage size of
the queue.
- Enhance searching with Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch, make them
fully support `SearchOptions`. Also, update the data versions.
- Keep most logic of database indexer, but remove
`issues.SearchIssueIDsByKeyword` in `models` to avoid confusion where is
the entry point to search issues.
- Start a Meilisearch instance to test it in unit tests.
- Add unit tests with almost full coverage to test
Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch indexer.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR adds a new dropdown to select a commit or a commit range
(shift-click like github) of a Pull Request.
After selection of a commit only the changes of this commit will be shown.
When selecting a range of commits the diff of this range is shown.
This allows to review a PR commit by commit or by viewing only commit ranges.
The "Show changes since your last review" mechanism github uses is implemented, too.
When reviewing a single commit or a commit range the "Viewed" functionality is disabled.
## Screenshots
### The commit dropdown

### Selecting a commit range

### Show changes of a single commit only

### Show changes of a commit range

Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/20989
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/19263
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To avoid deadlock problem, almost database related functions should be
have ctx as the first parameter.
This PR do a refactor for some of these functions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
automatically (#25882)
Fix #25858
The option `dissmiss stale approvals` was listed on protected branch but
never implemented. This PR fixes that.
<img width="1006" alt="图片"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/81045/60bfa968-4db7-4c24-b8be-2e5978f91bb9">
<img width="1021" alt="图片"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/81045/8dabc14d-2dfe-40c2-94ed-24fcbf6e0e8f">
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before:

After:

This issue comes from the change in #25468.
`LoadProject` will always return at least one record, so we use
`ProjectID` to check whether an issue is linked to a project in the old
code.
As other `issue.LoadXXX` functions, we need to check the return value
from `xorm.Session.Get`.
In recent unit tests, we only test `issueList.LoadAttributes()` but
don't test `issue.LoadAttributes()`. So I added a new test for
`issue.LoadAttributes()` in this PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <privat@denyskon.de>
|