| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#32680)
Resolve #31492
The response time for the Pull Requests API has improved significantly,
dropping from over `2000ms` to about `350ms` on my local machine. It's
about `6` times faster.
A key area for further optimization lies in batch-fetching data for
`apiPullRequest.ChangedFiles, apiPullRequest.Additions, and
apiPullRequest.Deletions`.
Tests `TestAPIViewPulls` does exist and new tests added.
- This PR also fixes some bugs in `GetDiff` functions.
- This PR also fixes data inconsistent in test data. For a pull request,
the head branch's reference should be equal to the reference in
`pull/xxx/head`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #32775
if permission denined, `prepareForReplaceOrAdd` will return nothing, and
this case is not handled.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Move GetFeeds from models to service layer, no code change.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are still some functions under `models` after last big refactor
about `models`. This change will move all team related functions to
service layer with no code change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## Solves
Currently for rules to re-order them you have to alter the creation
date. so you basicly have to delete and recreate them in the right
order. This is more than just inconvinient ...
## Solution
Add a new col for prioritization
## Demo WebUI Video
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/92182a31-9705-4ac5-b6e3-9bb74108cbd1
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #29654
Fix #32481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR rewrites `GetReviewer` function and move it to service layer.
Reviewers should not be watchers, so that this PR removed all watchers
from reviewers. When the repository is under an organization, the pull
request unit read permission will be checked to resolve the bug of
#32394
Fix #32394
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Found while working on #32433.
This branch will never be executed because we have would have already
made the same check a couple lines above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Move models/GetForks to services/FindForks
- Add doer as a parameter of FindForks to check permissions
- Slight performance optimization for get forks API with batch loading
of repository units
- Add tests for forking repository to organizations
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Users could add reviewers when creating new PRs.
---------
Co-authored-by: splitt3r <splitt3r@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Sauer <sauer.sebastian@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: bb-ben <70356237+bboerben@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- [x] Move `CreateRepositoryByExample` to service layer
- [x] Move `AddCollabrator` to service layer
- [x] Add a new parameter for `AddCollabrator` so that changing mode
immediately after that will become unnecessary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
From testing, I found that issue posters and users with repository write
access are able to edit attachment names in a way that circumvents the
instance-level file extension restrictions using the edit attachment
APIs. This snapshot adds checks for these endpoints.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use zero instead of 9999-12-31 for deadline
Fix #32291
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1. clarify the "filepath" could(should) contain "{ref}"
2. remove unclear RepoRefLegacy and RepoRefAny, use RepoRefUnknown to guess
3. by the way, avoid using AppURL
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`SERVE_DIRECT` enabled (#32365)
Fix #28121
I did some tests and found that the `missing signature key` error is
caused by an incorrect `Content-Type` header. Gitea correctly sets the
`Content-Type` header when serving files.
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/348d1d0f322ca57c459acd902f54821d687ca804/routers/api/packages/container/container.go#L712-L717
However, when `SERVE_DIRECT` is enabled, the `Content-Type` header may
be set to an incorrect value by the storage service. To fix this issue,
we can use query parameters to override response header values.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/API_GetObject.html
<img width="600px"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f2ff90f0-f1df-46f9-9680-b8120222c555"
/>
In this PR, I introduced a new parameter to the `URL` method to support
additional parameters.
```
URL(path, name string, reqParams url.Values) (*url.URL, error)
```
---
Most S3-like services support specifying the content type when storing
objects. However, Gitea always use `application/octet-stream`.
Therefore, I believe we also need to improve the `Save` method to
support storing objects with the correct content type.
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/b7fb20e73e63b8edc9b90c52073e248bef428fcc/modules/storage/minio.go#L214-L221
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This introduces a new flag `BlockAdminMergeOverride` on the branch
protection rules that prevents admins/repo owners from bypassing branch
protection rules and merging without approvals or failing status checks.
Fixes #17131
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
this will result in better api clients generated out of the openapi docs
... for SearchIssues
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
as title
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
|
|
|
| |
Resolves #20475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Close #278
Close #24076
## Solutions:
- Use
[google/licenseclassifier](https://github.com/google/licenseclassifier/)
Test result between
[google/licensecheck](https://github.com/google/licensecheck) and
[go-license-detector](https://github.com/go-enry/go-license-detector):
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24872#issuecomment-1560361167
Test result between
[google/licensecheck](https://github.com/google/licensecheck) and
[google/licenseclassifier](https://github.com/google/licenseclassifier/):
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24872#issuecomment-1576092178
- Generate License Convert Name List to avoid import license templates
with same contents
Gitea automatically get latest license data from[
spdx/license-list-data](https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data).
But unfortunately, some license templates have same contents. #20915
[click here to see the
list](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24872#issuecomment-1584141684)
So we will generate a list of these license templates with same contents
and create a new file to save the result when using `make
generate-license`. (Need to decide the save path)
- Save License info into a new table `repo_license`
Can easily support searching repo by license in the future.
## Screen shot
Single License:

Multiple Licenses:

Triggers:
- [x] Push commit to default branch
- [x] Create repo
- [x] Mirror repo
- [x] When Default Branch is changed, licenses should be updated
Todo:
- [x] Save Licenses info in to DB when there's a change to license file
in the commit
- [x] DB Migration
- [x] A nominal test?
- [x] Select which library to
use(https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24872#issuecomment-1560361167)
- [x] API Support
- [x] Add repo license table
- ~Select license in settings if there are several licenses(Not
recommended)~
- License board(later, not in this PR)

---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <m.huber@kithara.com>
Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.com>
|
|
|
| |
Fix #31423
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A 500 status code was thrown when passing a non-existent target to the
create release API. This snapshot handles this error and instead throws
a 404 status code.
Discovered while working on #31840.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR adds support for migrating repos from [AWS
CodeCommit](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codecommit/latest/userguide/welcome.html).
The access key ID and secret access key are required to get repository
information and pull requests. And [HTTPS Git
credentials](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codecommit/latest/userguide/setting-up-gc.html)
are required to clone the repository.
<img
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/82ecb2d0-8d43-42b0-b5af-f5347a13b9d0"
width="680" />
The AWS CodeCommit icon is from [AWS Architecture
Icons](https://aws.amazon.com/architecture/icons/).
<img
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3c44d21f-d753-40f5-9eae-5d3589e0d50d"
width="320" />
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Fix #31976
|
|
|
| |
A quick fix for #31871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #31707.
It's split from #31724.
Although #31724 could also fix #31707, it has change a lot so it's not a
good idea to backport it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Change condition to include `RepoID` equal to 0 for organization
secrets
---------
Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
| |
Partially fix #31707. Related to #30656
|
|
|
| |
user should be a collaborator of the base repo to create a PR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Document return type for the endpoints that fetch specific files from a
repository. This allows the swagger generated code to read the returned
data.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #22722
### Problem
Currently, it is not possible to force push to a branch with branch
protection rules in place. There are often times where this is necessary
(CI workflows/administrative tasks etc).
The current workaround is to rename/remove the branch protection,
perform the force push, and then reinstate the protections.
### Solution
Provide an additional section in the branch protection rules to allow
users to specify which users with push access can also force push to the
branch. The default value of the rule will be set to `Disabled`, and the
UI is intuitive and very similar to the `Push` section.
It is worth noting in this implementation that allowing force push does
not override regular push access, and both will need to be enabled for a
user to force push.
This applies to manual force push to a remote, and also in Gitea UI
updating a PR by rebase (which requires force push)
This modifies the `BranchProtection` API structs to add:
- `enable_force_push bool`
- `enable_force_push_whitelist bool`
- `force_push_whitelist_usernames string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_teams string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_deploy_keys bool`
### Updated Branch Protection UI:
<img width="943" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/7491899c-d816-45d5-be84-8512abd156bf">
### Pull Request `Update branch by Rebase` option enabled with source
branch `test` being a protected branch:

<img width="1038" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/57ead13e-9006-459f-b83c-7079e6f4c654">
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR only does "renaming":
* `Route` should be `Router` (and chi router is also called "router")
* `Params` should be `PathParam` (to distingush it from URL query param, and to match `FormString`)
* Use lower case for private functions to avoid exposing or abusing
|
|
|
| |
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/30876#discussion_r1637112394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add tag protection manage via rest API.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexander Kogay <kogay.a@citilink.ru>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
| |
have repo OrderBy definitions defined in one place and use a single type
for OrderBy database options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Enable [unparam](https://github.com/mvdan/unparam) linter.
Often I could not tell the intention why param is unused, so I put
`//nolint` for those cases like webhook request creation functions never
using `ctx`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #30483
---------
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR implemented object storages(LFS/Packages/Attachments and etc.)
for Azure Blob Storage. It depends on azure official golang SDK and can
support both the azure blob storage cloud service and azurite mock
server.
Replace #25458
Fix #22527
- [x] CI Tests
- [x] integration test, MSSQL integration tests will now based on
azureblob
- [x] unit test
- [x] CLI Migrate Storage
- [x] Documentation for configuration added
------
TODO (other PRs):
- [ ] Improve performance of `blob download`.
---------
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows `nix flake metadata` and nix in general to lock a *branch*
tarball link in a manner that causes it to fetch the correct commit even
if the branch is updated with a newer version.
Co-authored-by: Jade Lovelace <software@lfcode.ca>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fixes #22907
Tested:
- [x] issue content edit
- [x] issue content change tasklist
- [x] pull request content edit
- [x] pull request change tasklist

|
|
|
|
|
| |
When creating a repo, the "FORCE_PRIVATE" config option should be
respected, `readonly` doesn't work for checkbox, so it should use
`disabled` attribute.
|
|
|
| |
Fix #30921
|