| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
closes #16872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This introduces a new flag `BlockAdminMergeOverride` on the branch
protection rules that prevents admins/repo owners from bypassing branch
protection rules and merging without approvals or failing status checks.
Fixes #17131
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
maintainers to edit" is enabled (#32215)
Fix #31539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Resolve #32181
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR fixes javascript errors when an anonymous user visits the
migration page.
It also makes task view checking more restrictive.
The router moved from `/user/task/{id}/status` to
`/username/reponame/-/migrate/status` because it's a migrate status.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Close #278
Close #24076
## Solutions:
- Use
[google/licenseclassifier](https://github.com/google/licenseclassifier/)
Test result between
[google/licensecheck](https://github.com/google/licensecheck) and
[go-license-detector](https://github.com/go-enry/go-license-detector):
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24872#issuecomment-1560361167
Test result between
[google/licensecheck](https://github.com/google/licensecheck) and
[google/licenseclassifier](https://github.com/google/licenseclassifier/):
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24872#issuecomment-1576092178
- Generate License Convert Name List to avoid import license templates
with same contents
Gitea automatically get latest license data from[
spdx/license-list-data](https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data).
But unfortunately, some license templates have same contents. #20915
[click here to see the
list](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24872#issuecomment-1584141684)
So we will generate a list of these license templates with same contents
and create a new file to save the result when using `make
generate-license`. (Need to decide the save path)
- Save License info into a new table `repo_license`
Can easily support searching repo by license in the future.
## Screen shot
Single License:

Multiple Licenses:

Triggers:
- [x] Push commit to default branch
- [x] Create repo
- [x] Mirror repo
- [x] When Default Branch is changed, licenses should be updated
Todo:
- [x] Save Licenses info in to DB when there's a change to license file
in the commit
- [x] DB Migration
- [x] A nominal test?
- [x] Select which library to
use(https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24872#issuecomment-1560361167)
- [x] API Support
- [x] Add repo license table
- ~Select license in settings if there are several licenses(Not
recommended)~
- License board(later, not in this PR)

---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <m.huber@kithara.com>
Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.com>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fix the error message for invalid file names. (#31507)
close #31478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR do some minor improvements for head branch display on pull
request view UI.
- [x] Remove the link if the head branch has been deleted with a
tooltip, so that users will not result in a 404 page
- [x] Display a label if this pull request is an agit based one.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fix #32080
## After
### for opened issues
<img width="1199" alt="Screenshot 2024-09-19 at 6 29 31 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/86cf48ad-5e4b-4dcb-8abe-4d7fd74e0aec">
### for closed issues
<img width="1208" alt="Screenshot 2024-09-19 at 6 29 37 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a16bc545-bfcf-49a4-be52-3e7334910482">
### for all issues
<img width="1340" alt="Screenshot 2024-09-20 at 12 07 12 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b2309c8f-e59d-44e9-ae3b-bf54e1196169">
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Resolves #31998
The first screenshot shows the tag page without any filter being
applied:

The second one, shows the page when the given filter returns no tag:

The last one shows a single tag being filtered:

Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Works in both organization and repository project boards
Fixes #21846
Replaces #21963
Replaces #27117

**Note** that implementation was made intentionally to work same as in
issue list so that URL can be bookmarked for quick access with
predefined filters in URL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR adds support for migrating repos from [AWS
CodeCommit](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codecommit/latest/userguide/welcome.html).
The access key ID and secret access key are required to get repository
information and pull requests. And [HTTPS Git
credentials](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codecommit/latest/userguide/setting-up-gc.html)
are required to clone the repository.
<img
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/82ecb2d0-8d43-42b0-b5af-f5347a13b9d0"
width="680" />
The AWS CodeCommit icon is from [AWS Architecture
Icons](https://aws.amazon.com/architecture/icons/).
<img
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3c44d21f-d753-40f5-9eae-5d3589e0d50d"
width="320" />
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#31924)
This Pull Request is a follow up to
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/31886:
1. Adds a UI indicator between official (green) and unofficial (grey)
approved pull requests on the Pull Request page (as suggested by
@kdumontnu )
2. Adds tooltips adding clarity to the type and status of a review on
the Pull Request page (as suggested by @kdumontnu)
3. Updates text adding more clarity to required approvals (as suggested
by @kdumontnu)
4. Updates text on the branch settings page explaining what branch
approval limitations (as suggested by @yp05327)
Official approval:
<img width="376" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-26 at 1 03 52 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/500f083d-bfc0-45c5-82b7-b98e20495696">
Unofficial approval:
<img width="442" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-26 at 12 53 15 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e8c565ff-5886-4ce1-8b79-a0fa26c282f7">
Rejected approval:
<img width="452" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-26 at 12 53 06 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aebc0e2f-7052-4dea-8098-7caa0db86617">
Stale approval:
<img width="546" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-26 at 1 07 59 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/da599ff3-e35c-4fa3-8141-ed80b738dd77">
Requested review tooltip:
<img width="434" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-26 at 12 53 22 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/460d163e-8724-43b6-8760-34b285da8fe2">
Updated text for approvals:
<img width="991" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-26 at 12 54 00 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ab3ff012-9742-4c1b-933d-21addcb89f2c">
Updated text for allowlisted/whitelisted approvals:
<img width="990" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-26 at 1 01 40 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1a5bae61-d9e0-4d96-b86f-92610b0940d1">
Protected branch settings text:
<img width="1022" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-26 at 1 01 14 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/892ce208-e1c2-41f7-8fec-46d5a0e7e776">
Comments list:
<img width="1048" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-28 at 9 25 31 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9c5c00c5-06cf-43b3-b413-4f7f673609b2">
---------
Co-authored-by: Kyle D. <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
|
|
|
| |
Fix #31640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #10036
This PR adds some labels for tags of this commit after the commit
message on the commits table. The tag template is share as commit
graph's.
Desktop:
<img width="1302" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/81045/ba94e1e6-2a3d-44f3-85a3-575fb5667c97">
Mobile:
<img width="370" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/81045/e3eb1f44-3686-4012-aa9d-52cd88b22c0e">
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fix #23668
My plan:
* In the `actions.list` method, if workflow is selected and IsAdmin,
check whether the on event contains `workflow_dispatch`. If so, display
a `Run workflow` button to allow the user to manually trigger the run.
* Providing a form that allows users to select target brach or tag, and
these parameters can be configured in yaml
* Simple form validation, `required` input cannot be empty
* Add a route `/actions/run`, and an `actions.Run` method to handle
* Add `WorkflowDispatchPayload` struct to pass the Webhook event payload
to the runner when triggered, this payload carries the `inputs` values
and other fields, doc: [workflow_dispatch
payload](https://docs.github.com/en/webhooks/webhook-events-and-payloads#workflow_dispatch)
Other PRs
* the `Workflow.WorkflowDispatchConfig()` method still return non-nil
when workflow_dispatch is not defined. I submitted a PR
https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/85 to fix it. Still waiting for them
to process.
Behavior should be same with github, but may cause confusion. Here's a
quick reminder.
*
[Doc](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#workflow_dispatch)
Said: This event will `only` trigger a workflow run if the workflow file
is `on the default branch`.
* If the workflow yaml file only exists in a non-default branch, it
cannot be triggered. (It will not even show up in the workflow list)
* If the same workflow yaml file exists in each branch at the same time,
the version of the default branch is used. Even if `Use workflow from`
selects another branch

```yaml
name: Docker Image CI
on:
workflow_dispatch:
inputs:
logLevel:
description: 'Log level'
required: true
default: 'warning'
type: choice
options:
- info
- warning
- debug
tags:
description: 'Test scenario tags'
required: false
type: boolean
boolean_default_true:
description: 'Test scenario tags'
required: true
type: boolean
default: true
boolean_default_false:
description: 'Test scenario tags'
required: false
type: boolean
default: false
environment:
description: 'Environment to run tests against'
type: environment
required: true
default: 'environment values'
number_required_1:
description: 'number '
type: number
required: true
default: '100'
number_required_2:
description: 'number'
type: number
required: true
default: '100'
number_required_3:
description: 'number'
type: number
required: true
default: '100'
number_1:
description: 'number'
type: number
required: false
number_2:
description: 'number'
type: number
required: false
number_3:
description: 'number'
type: number
required: false
env:
inputs_logLevel: ${{ inputs.logLevel }}
inputs_tags: ${{ inputs.tags }}
inputs_boolean_default_true: ${{ inputs.boolean_default_true }}
inputs_boolean_default_false: ${{ inputs.boolean_default_false }}
inputs_environment: ${{ inputs.environment }}
inputs_number_1: ${{ inputs.number_1 }}
inputs_number_2: ${{ inputs.number_2 }}
inputs_number_3: ${{ inputs.number_3 }}
inputs_number_required_1: ${{ inputs.number_required_1 }}
inputs_number_required_2: ${{ inputs.number_required_2 }}
inputs_number_required_3: ${{ inputs.number_required_3 }}
jobs:
build:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- run: ls -la
- run: env | grep inputs
- run: echo ${{ inputs.logLevel }}
- run: echo ${{ inputs.boolean_default_false }}
```


---------
Co-authored-by: TKaxv_7S <954067342@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #31625.
If `pull_service.NewPullRequest` return an error which misses each `if`
check, `CompareAndPullRequestPost` will return immediately, since it
doesn't write the HTTP response, a 200 response with empty body will be
sent to clients.
```go
if err := pull_service.NewPullRequest(ctx, repo, pullIssue, labelIDs, attachments, pullRequest, assigneeIDs); err != nil {
if repo_model.IsErrUserDoesNotHaveAccessToRepo(err) {
ctx.Error(http.StatusBadRequest, "UserDoesNotHaveAccessToRepo", err.Error())
} else if git.IsErrPushRejected(err) {
// ...
ctx.JSONError(flashError)
} else if errors.Is(err, user_model.ErrBlockedUser) {
// ...
ctx.JSONError(flashError)
} else if errors.Is(err, issues_model.ErrMustCollaborator) {
// ...
ctx.JSONError(flashError)
}
return
}
```
Not sure what kind of error can cause it to happen, so this PR just
expose it. And we can fix it when users report that creating PRs failed
with error responses.
It's all my guess since I cannot reproduce the problem, but even if it's
not related, the code here needs to be improved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #31395
This regression is introduced by #30273. To find out how GitHub handles
this case, I did [some
tests](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/31395#issuecomment-2278929115).
I use redirect in this PR instead of checking if the corresponding `.md`
file exists when rendering the link because GitHub also uses redirect.
With this PR, there is no need to resolve the raw wiki link when
rendering a wiki page. If a wiki link points to a raw file, access will
be redirected to the raw link.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We had an issue where a repo was using LFS to store a file, but the user
did not push the file. When trying to view the file, Gitea returned a
500 HTTP status code referencing `ErrLFSObjectNotExist`. It appears the
intent was the render this file as plain text, but the conditional was
flipped. I've also added a test to verify that the file is rendered as
plain text.
|
|
|
| |
Resolve #13955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #31784.
Before:
<img width="1648" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/03f32545-4a85-42ed-bafc-2b193a5d8023">
After:
<img width="1653" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e5bcaf93-49cb-421f-aac1-5122bc488b02">
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Moved repository visibility to the danger zone in the settings area. To
change the visibility, it is necessary to go to the danger zone, click
on the private/public button, and accept the change in the modal.
Resolves: #23826
---
## Screenshots
<details>
<summary>Before</summary>
Private repo:

Public repo:

</details>
<details>
<summary>After</summary>
Make private:

Make private modal


Make public:

Make public modal

</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Kemal Zebari <60799661+kemzeb@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
not enabled (#31805)
not enabled
quick-f-i-x https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/31433 ? , maybe
need more disscusion about better solutions.
example view:

adtion notes about how to enable `AutodetectManualMerge`

Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Proposal from
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/27911#issuecomment-2271982172
When visit latest run path, such as
`/{user}/{repo}/actions/runs/latest`. It renders latest run instead of
index=0 currently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
project (#29311)
Fix #27278
Replace #27816
This PR adds a meta-comment for an issue when dragging an issue from one
column to another of a project.
<img width="600" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/81045/5fc1d954-430e-4db0-aaee-a00006fa91f5">
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #31755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Part of #24256.
Clear up old action logs to free up storage space.
Users will see a message indicating that the log has been cleared if
they view old tasks.
<img width="1361" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9f0f3a3a-bc5a-402f-90ca-49282d196c22">
Docs: https://gitea.com/gitea/docs/pulls/40
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix: #31727
After:

|
|
|
| |
user should be a collaborator of the base repo to create a PR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#30156)
Fix #26685
If a commit status comes from Gitea Actions and the user cannot access
the repo's actions unit (the user does not have the permission or the
actions unit is disabled), a 404 page will occur after clicking the
"Details" link. We should hide the "Details" link in this case.
<img
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15528715/68361714-b784-4bb5-baab-efde4221f466"
width="400px" />
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A more complete fix for #31588
1. Make "generic" code more readable
2. Clarify HTML or Markdown for the payload content
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We have some instances that only allow using an external authentication
source for authentication. In this case, users changing their email,
password, or linked OpenID connections will not have any effect, and
we'd like to prevent showing that to them to prevent confusion.
Included in this are several changes to support this:
* A new setting to disable user managed authentication credentials
(email, password & OpenID connections)
* A new setting to disable user managed MFA (2FA codes & WebAuthn)
* Fix an issue where some templates had separate logic for determining
if a feature was disabled since it didn't check the globally disabled
features
* Hide more user setting pages in the navbar when their settings aren't
enabled
---------
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #22722
### Problem
Currently, it is not possible to force push to a branch with branch
protection rules in place. There are often times where this is necessary
(CI workflows/administrative tasks etc).
The current workaround is to rename/remove the branch protection,
perform the force push, and then reinstate the protections.
### Solution
Provide an additional section in the branch protection rules to allow
users to specify which users with push access can also force push to the
branch. The default value of the rule will be set to `Disabled`, and the
UI is intuitive and very similar to the `Push` section.
It is worth noting in this implementation that allowing force push does
not override regular push access, and both will need to be enabled for a
user to force push.
This applies to manual force push to a remote, and also in Gitea UI
updating a PR by rebase (which requires force push)
This modifies the `BranchProtection` API structs to add:
- `enable_force_push bool`
- `enable_force_push_whitelist bool`
- `force_push_whitelist_usernames string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_teams string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_deploy_keys bool`
### Updated Branch Protection UI:
<img width="943" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/7491899c-d816-45d5-be84-8512abd156bf">
### Pull Request `Update branch by Rebase` option enabled with source
branch `test` being a protected branch:

<img width="1038" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/57ead13e-9006-459f-b83c-7079e6f4c654">
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR only does "renaming":
* `Route` should be `Router` (and chi router is also called "router")
* `Params` should be `PathParam` (to distingush it from URL query param, and to match `FormString`)
* Use lower case for private functions to avoid exposing or abusing
|
|
|
| |
Fix #31395
|
|
|
| |
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/30876#discussion_r1637112394
|
|
|
| |
Fix #31362
|
|
|
| |
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
|
|
|
| |
Fix #31261
|
|
|
|
| |
Move the rule to the parent node. `tab-size` is inherited so will work
just as before.
|
|
|
|
| |
(#31219)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR implemented object storages(LFS/Packages/Attachments and etc.)
for Azure Blob Storage. It depends on azure official golang SDK and can
support both the azure blob storage cloud service and azurite mock
server.
Replace #25458
Fix #22527
- [x] CI Tests
- [x] integration test, MSSQL integration tests will now based on
azureblob
- [x] unit test
- [x] CLI Migrate Storage
- [x] Documentation for configuration added
------
TODO (other PRs):
- [ ] Improve performance of `blob download`.
---------
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
|
|
|
|
| |
Use a `gitrepo.Repository` in the markup's RenderContext but not store
the repository's path.
|
|
|
| |
Fix #31163
|