summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/services/auth/oauth2.go
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Implement actions (#21937)Jason Song2023-01-311-3/+16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Close #13539. Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others. Related projects: - https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def - https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go - https://gitea.com/gitea/act - https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner ### Summary The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions", an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note that: - It is disabled by default; - It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently; - It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently; - Breaking changes may be made before it's stable. **Please comment on #13539 if you have any different product design ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**. ### ⚠️ Breaking `gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it. ### Some important reviews - What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954 - Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592 - Why DBFS? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178 - Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103 - Why there's no permission control for actions? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868 ### What it looks like <details> #### Manage runners <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png"> #### List runs <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png"> #### View logs <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png"> </details> ### How to try it <details> #### 1. Start Gitea Clone this branch and [install from source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source). Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions: ```ini [actions] ENABLED = true ``` Start it. If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners: <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png"> #### 2. Start runner Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner), and follow the [README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md) to start it. If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added: <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png"> #### 3. Enable actions for a repo Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox in settings and submit. <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png"> <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png"> If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions": <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png"> #### 4. Upload workflow files Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart) of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions in most cases, you can use the same demo: ```yaml name: GitHub Actions Demo run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions 🚀 on: [push] jobs: Explore-GitHub-Actions: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - run: echo "🎉 The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event." - run: echo "🐧 This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!" - run: echo "🔎 The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}." - name: Check out repository code uses: actions/checkout@v3 - run: echo "💡 The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner." - run: echo "🖥️ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner." - name: List files in the repository run: | ls ${{ github.workspace }} - run: echo "🍏 This job's status is ${{ job.status }}." ``` If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab: <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png"> #### 5. Check the logs of jobs Click a run and you'll see the logs: <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png"> #### 6. Go on You can try more examples in [the documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions) of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs. Come on, PRs are welcome. </details> See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/) --------- Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de> Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de> Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
* Support scoped access tokens (#20908)Chongyi Zheng2023-01-171-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This PR adds the support for scopes of access tokens, mimicking the design of GitHub OAuth scopes. The changes of the core logic are in `models/auth` that `AccessToken` struct will have a `Scope` field. The normalized (no duplication of scope), comma-separated scope string will be stored in `access_token` table in the database. In `services/auth`, the scope will be stored in context, which will be used by `reqToken` middleware in API calls. Only OAuth2 tokens will have granular token scopes, while others like BasicAuth will default to scope `all`. A large amount of work happens in `routers/api/v1/api.go` and the corresponding `tests/integration` tests, that is adding necessary scopes to each of the API calls as they fit. - [x] Add `Scope` field to `AccessToken` - [x] Add access control to all API endpoints - [x] Update frontend & backend for when creating tokens - [x] Add a database migration for `scope` column (enable 'all' access to past tokens) I'm aiming to complete it before Gitea 1.19 release. Fixes #4300
* refactor auth interface to return error when verify failure (#22119)Lunny Xiao2022-12-281-9/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This PR changed the Auth interface signature from `Verify(http *http.Request, w http.ResponseWriter, store DataStore, sess SessionStore) *user_model.User` to `Verify(http *http.Request, w http.ResponseWriter, store DataStore, sess SessionStore) (*user_model.User, error)`. There is a new return argument `error` which means the verification condition matched but verify process failed, we should stop the auth process. Before this PR, when return a `nil` user, we don't know the reason why it returned `nil`. If the match condition is not satisfied or it verified failure? For these two different results, we should have different handler. If the match condition is not satisfied, we should try next auth method and if there is no more auth method, it's an anonymous user. If the condition matched but verify failed, the auth process should be stop and return immediately. This will fix #20563 Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me> Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
* refactor some functions to support ctx as first parameter (#21878)Lunny Xiao2022-12-031-1/+1
| | | | Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
* Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files (#21840)flynnnnnnnnnn2022-11-271-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification. Fix #16132 Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github> Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
* Move some files into models' sub packages (#20262)Lunny Xiao2022-08-251-7/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * Move some files into models' sub packages * Move functions * merge main branch * Fix check * fix check * Fix some tests * Fix lint * Fix lint * Revert lint changes * Fix error comments * Fix lint Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* Move almost all functions' parameter db.Engine to context.Context (#19748)Lunny Xiao2022-05-201-1/+1
| | | | * Move almost all functions' parameter db.Engine to context.Context * remove some unnecessary wrap functions
* Refactor jwt.StandardClaims to RegisteredClaims (#18344)zeripath2022-01-201-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * Refactor jwt.StandardClaims to RegisteredClaims go-jwt/jwt has deprecated the StandardClaims interface to use RegisteredClaims instead. This PR migrates to use this new format. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com>
* format with gofumpt (#18184)65432022-01-201-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | * gofumpt -w -l . * gofumpt -w -l -extra . * Add linter * manual fix * change make fmt
* Refactor auth package (#17962)Lunny Xiao2022-01-021-3/+3
|
* Move user related model into models/user (#17781)Lunny Xiao2021-11-241-3/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | * Move user related model into models/user * Fix lint for windows * Fix windows lint * Fix windows lint * Move some tests in models * Merge
* Move login related structs and functions to models/login (#17093)Lunny Xiao2021-09-241-2/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * Move login related structs and functions to models/login * Fix test * Fix lint * Fix lint * Fix lint of windows * Fix lint * Fix test * Fix test * Only load necessary fixtures when preparing unit tests envs * Fix lint * Fix test * Fix test * Fix error log * Fix error log * Fix error log * remove unnecessary change * fix error log * merge main branch
* Move db related basic functions to models/db (#17075)Lunny Xiao2021-09-191-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * Move db related basic functions to models/db * Fix lint * Fix lint * Fix test * Fix lint * Fix lint * revert unnecessary change * Fix test * Fix wrong replace string * Use *Context * Correct committer spelling and fix wrong replaced words Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
* Decoupled code from DefaultSigningKey (#16743)KN4CK3R2021-08-271-2/+2
| | | Decoupled code from `DefaultSigningKey`. Makes testing a little bit easier and is cleaner.
* Added introspection endpoint. (#16752)KN4CK3R2021-08-201-1/+11
| | | Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
* Refactor: Move login out of models (#16199)zeripath2021-07-241-13/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | `models` does far too much. In particular it handles all `UserSignin`. It shouldn't be responsible for calling LDAP, SMTP or PAM for signing in. Therefore we should move this code out of `models`. This code has to depend on `models` - therefore it belongs in `services`. There is a package in `services` called `auth` and clearly this functionality belongs in there. Plan: - [x] Change `auth.Auth` to `auth.Method` - as they represent methods of authentication. - [x] Move `models.UserSignIn` into `auth` - [x] Move `models.ExternalUserLogin` - [x] Move most of the `LoginVia*` methods to `auth` or subpackages - [x] Move Resynchronize functionality to `auth` - Involved some restructuring of `models/ssh_key.go` to reduce the size of this massive file and simplify its files. - [x] Move the rest of the LDAP functionality in to the ldap subpackage - [x] Re-factor the login sources to express an interfaces `auth.Source`? - I've done this through some smaller interfaces Authenticator and Synchronizable - which would allow us to extend things in future - [x] Now LDAP is out of models - need to think about modules/auth/ldap and I think all of that functionality might just be moveable - [x] Similarly a lot Oauth2 functionality need not be in models too and should be moved to services/auth/source/oauth2 - [x] modules/auth/oauth2/oauth2.go uses xorm... This is naughty - probably need to move this into models. - [x] models/oauth2.go - mostly should be in modules/auth/oauth2 or services/auth/source/oauth2 - [x] More simplifications of login_source.go may need to be done - Allow wiring in of notify registration - *this can now easily be done - but I think we should do it in another PR* - see #16178 - More refactors...? - OpenID should probably become an auth Method but I think that can be left for another PR - Methods should also probably be cleaned up - again another PR I think. - SSPI still needs more refactors.* Rename auth.Auth auth.Method * Restructure ssh_key.go - move functions from models/user.go that relate to ssh_key to ssh_key - split ssh_key.go to try create clearer function domains for allow for future refactors here. Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Add sso.Group, context.Auth, context.APIAuth to allow auth special routes ↵Lunny Xiao2021-06-091-0/+144
(#16086) * Add sso.Group, context.Auth, context.APIAuth to allow auth special routes * Remove unnecessary check * Rename sso -> auth * remove unused method of Auth interface