| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
| |
As title.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The merge and update branch code was previously a little tangled and had
some very long functions. The functions were not very clear in their
reasoning and there were deficiencies in their logging and at least one
bug in the handling of LFS for update by rebase.
This PR substantially refactors this code and splits things out to into
separate functions. It also attempts to tidy up the calls by wrapping
things in "context"s. There are also attempts to improve logging when
there are errors.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Close #23265, the code editor diff preview has been broken for long
time.
* Fix the regression for `data-line-num`
* `.code-diff` is necessary to show the line number
* Fix the regression for #12434
* The diff:
[12434](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/12434/files?diff=unified&w=1)
* It hides the Type(4) (aka HunkHeader) for unexpected cases.
Diff with ignoring whitespaces:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23307/files?diff=unified&w=1
Before: see the issue #23265
After:
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
submitting a single comment (#23245)
Close #23241
Before: press Ctrl+Enter in the Code Review Form, a single comment will
be added.
After: press Ctrl+Enter in the Code Review Form, start the review with
pending comments.
The old name `is_review` is not clear, so the new code use
`pending_review` as the new name.
Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When creating commit status for Actons jobs, a payload with nil
`HeadCommit` will cause panic.
Reported at:
https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/issues/28#issuecomment-732166
Although the `HeadCommit` probably can not be nil after #23215,
`CreateCommitStatus` should protect itself, to avoid being broken in the
future.
In addition, it's enough to print error log instead of returning err
when `CreateCommitStatus` failed.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#23215)
Just like what has been done when pushing manually:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/7a5af25592003ddc3017fcd7b822a3e02fc40ef6/services/repository/push.go#L225-L226
Before:
<img width="448" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/222100123-cd4839d1-2d4d-45f7-b7a0-0cbc73162b44.png">
After:
<img width="448" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/222100225-f3c5bb65-7ab9-41e2-8e39-9d84c23c352d.png">
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Close: #22784
1. On GH, we can reopen a PR which was closed before after pushing
commits. After reopening PR, we can see the commits that were pushed
after closing PR in the time line. So the case of
[issue](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22784) is a bug which
needs to be fixed.
2. After closing a PR and pushing commits, `headBranchSha` is not equal
to `sha`(which is the last commit ID string of reference). If the
judgement exists, the button of reopen will not display. So, skip the
judgement if the status of PR is closed.
3. Even if PR is already close, we should still insert comment record
into DB when we push commits.
So we should still call function `CreatePushPullComment()`.
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/067b0c2664d127c552ccdfd264257caca4907a77/services/pull/pull.go#L260-L282
So, I add a switch(`includeClosed`) to the
`GetUnmergedPullRequestsByHeadInfo` func to control whether the status
of PR must be open. In this case, by setting `includeClosed` to `true`,
we can query the closed PR.
4. In the loop of comments, I use the`latestCloseCommentID` variable to
record the last occurrence of the close comment.
In the go template, if the status of PR is closed, the comments whose
type is `CommentTypePullRequestPush(29)` after `latestCloseCommentID`
won't be rendered.
e.g.
1). The initial status of the PR is opened.
2). Then I click the button of `Close`. PR is closed now.
3). I try to push a commit to this PR, even though its current status is
closed.
But in comments list, this commit do not display.This is as expected ：）
4). Click the `Reopen` button, the commit which is pushed after closing
PR display now.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Extract from #11669 and enhancement to #22585 to support exclusive
scoped labels in label templates
* Move label template functionality to label module
* Fix handling of color codes
* Add Advanced label template
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When fetching remotes for conflict checking, skip unnecessary and
potentially slow writing of commit graphs.
In a test with the Blender repository, this reduces conflict checking
time for one pull request from about 2s to 0.1s.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use context parameter in `services/repository`.
And use `cache.WithCacheContext(ctx)` to generate push action history
feeds.
Fix #23160
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, Gitea will run actions automatically which are triggered by
fork pull request. It's a security risk, people can create a PR and
modify the workflow yamls to execute a malicious script.
So we should require approval for first-time contributors, which is the
default strategy of a public repo on GitHub, see [Approving workflow
runs from public
forks](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/managing-workflow-runs/approving-workflow-runs-from-public-forks).
Current strategy:
- don't need approval if it's not a fork PR;
- always need approval if the user is restricted;
- don't need approval if the user can write;
- don't need approval if the user has been approved before;
- otherwise, need approval.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/217207121-badf50a8-826c-4425-bef1-d82d1979bc81.mov
GitHub has an option for that, you can see that at
`/<owner>/<repo>/settings/actions`, and we can support that later.
<img width="835" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/217199990-2967e68b-e693-4e59-8186-ab33a1314a16.png">
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix: #22990
---
Before, the return value of the api is always false,regrardless of
whether the entry of `sync_on_commit` is true or false.
I have confirmed that the value of `sync_on_commit` dropped into the
database is correct.
So, I think it is enough to make some small changes.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
minio/sha256-simd provides additional acceleration for SHA256 using
AVX512, SHA Extensions for x86 and ARM64 for ARM.
It provides a drop-in replacement for crypto/sha256 and if the
extensions are not available it falls back to standard crypto/sha256.
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Close #22614.
Refer to [Github's
API](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/git/trees?apiVersion=2022-11-28#get-a-tree),
if a tree entry is a submodule, its url will be an empty string.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
| |
Fix #23000.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Close #23027
`git commit` message option _only_ supports 4 formats (well, only ....):
* `"commit", "-m", msg`
* `"commit", "-m{msg}"` (no space)
* `"commit", "--message", msg`
* `"commit", "--message={msg}"`
The long format with `=` is the best choice, and it's documented in `man
git-commit`:
`-m <msg>, --message=<msg> ...`
ps: I would suggest always use long format option for git command, as
much as possible.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ensure that issue pullrequests are loaded before trying to set the
self-reference.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When users rename an existing branch protection rule, a new rule with
the new name will be created and the old rule will still exist.
---
The reason is that the `SettingsProtectedBranchPost` function only get
branch protection rule by name before updating or creating a rule. When
the rule name changes, the function cannot find the existing rule so it
will create a new rule rather than update the existing rule. To fix the
bug, the function should get rule by id first.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some bugs caused by less unit tests in fundamental packages. This PR
refactor `setting` package so that create a unit test will be easier
than before.
- All `LoadFromXXX` files has been splited as two functions, one is
`InitProviderFromXXX` and `LoadCommonSettings`. The first functions will
only include the code to create or new a ini file. The second function
will load common settings.
- It also renames all functions in setting from `newXXXService` to
`loadXXXSetting` or `loadXXXFrom` to make the function name less
confusing.
- Move `XORMLog` to `SQLLog` because it's a better name for that.
Maybe we should finally move these `loadXXXSetting` into the `XXXInit`
function? Any idea?
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Same as https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22967
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the
label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/`
prefix can be set on an issue.
The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example
`scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in
different scopes and can coexist.
Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they
are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically
removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a
new label or replacing all labels.
In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as
radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a
single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be
used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and
batch editing.
Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification:
* Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips
everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus.
* In label list, show description below label same as label menus.
* Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer.
* Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance
in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is
closer to perceptually linear.
* Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing
only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling.
* Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function.
Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu:
* Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing.
* Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate
lines.
* Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu.
* Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and
consistent with settings layout elsewhere.
Custom exclusive scoped label rendering:
* Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and
lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them
similar to the `/` symbol.
* In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line.
---------
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22963
---------
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To avoid duplicated load of the same data in an HTTP request, we can set
a context cache to do that. i.e. Some pages may load a user from a
database with the same id in different areas on the same page. But the
code is hidden in two different deep logic. How should we share the
user? As a result of this PR, now if both entry functions accept
`context.Context` as the first parameter and we just need to refactor
`GetUserByID` to reuse the user from the context cache. Then it will not
be loaded twice on an HTTP request.
But of course, sometimes we would like to reload an object from the
database, that's why `RemoveContextData` is also exposed.
The core context cache is here. It defines a new context
```go
type cacheContext struct {
ctx context.Context
data map[any]map[any]any
lock sync.RWMutex
}
var cacheContextKey = struct{}{}
func WithCacheContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context {
return context.WithValue(ctx, cacheContextKey, &cacheContext{
ctx: ctx,
data: make(map[any]map[any]any),
})
}
```
Then you can use the below 4 methods to read/write/del the data within
the same context.
```go
func GetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) any
func SetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key, value any)
func RemoveContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any)
func GetWithContextCache[T any](ctx context.Context, cacheGroupKey string, cacheTargetID any, f func() (T, error)) (T, error)
```
Then let's take a look at how `system.GetString` implement it.
```go
func GetSetting(ctx context.Context, key string) (string, error) {
return cache.GetWithContextCache(ctx, contextCacheKey, key, func() (string, error) {
return cache.GetString(genSettingCacheKey(key), func() (string, error) {
res, err := GetSettingNoCache(ctx, key)
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
return res.SettingValue, nil
})
})
}
```
First, it will check if context data include the setting object with the
key. If not, it will query from the global cache which may be memory or
a Redis cache. If not, it will get the object from the database. In the
end, if the object gets from the global cache or database, it will be
set into the context cache.
An object stored in the context cache will only be destroyed after the
context disappeared.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#22862)
Add setting to allow edits by maintainers by default, to avoid having to
often ask contributors to enable this.
This also reorganizes the pull request settings UI to improve clarity.
It was unclear which checkbox options were there to control available
merge styles and which merge styles they correspond to.
Now there is a "Merge Styles" label followed by the merge style options
with the same name as in other menus. The remaining checkboxes were
moved to the bottom, ordered rougly by typical order of operations.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Move delete user to service
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes: #22843
### Cause:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/affdd40296960a08a4223330ccbd1fb88c96ea1a/services/repository/files/content.go#L161
Previously, we did not escape the **"%"** that might be in "treePath"
when call "url.parse()".
This function will check whether "%" is the beginning of an escape
character. Obviously, the "%" in the example (hello%mother.txt) is not
that. So, the function will return a error.
### Solution:
We can escape "treePath" by call "url.PathEscape()" function firstly.
### Screenshot:
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Original Issue: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22102
This addition would be a big benefit for design and art teams using the
issue tracking.
The preview will be the latest "image type" attachments on an issue-
simple, and allows for automatic updates of the cover image as issue
progress is made!
This would make Gitea competitive with Trello... wouldn't it be amazing
to say goodbye to Atlassian products? Ha.
First image is the most recent, the SQL will fetch up to 5 latest images
(URL string).
All images supported by browsers plus upcoming formats: *.avif *.bmp
*.gif *.jpg *.jpeg *.jxl *.png *.svg *.webp
The CSS will try to center-align images until it cannot, then it will
left align with overflow hidden. Single images get to be slightly
larger!
Tested so far on: Chrome, Firefox, Android Chrome, Android Firefox.
Current revision with light and dark themes:
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In Go code, HTMLURL should be only used for external systems, like
API/webhook/mail/notification, etc.
If a URL is used by `Redirect` or rendered in a template, it should be a
relative URL (aka `Link()` in Gitea)
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Use the proxy (if one is specified) for pull mirrors syncs.
- Pulled the code from
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/c2774d9e80d9a436d9c2044960369c4db227e3a0/modules/git/repo.go#L164-L170
Downstream issue: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/302
---------
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
|
| |
|
|
| |
The branch this is force pushing to is the head branch in the head repo,
so it should be checking if that is protected, not the base.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #22821
Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #19555
Test-Instructions:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21441#issuecomment-1419438000
This PR implements the mapping of user groups provided by OIDC providers
to orgs teams in Gitea. The main part is a refactoring of the existing
LDAP code to make it usable from different providers.
Refactorings:
- Moved the router auth code from module to service because of import
cycles
- Changed some model methods to take a `Context` parameter
- Moved the mapping code from LDAP to a common location
I've tested it with Keycloak but other providers should work too. The
JSON mapping format is the same as for LDAP.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #22758
Otherwise we would need to rewrite the structs in `oci.go`.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR implements a [Chef registry](https://chef.io/) to manage
cookbooks. This package type was a bit complicated because Chef uses RSA
signed requests as authentication with the registry.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Should call `PushToBaseRepo` before
`notification.NotifyPullRequestSynchronized`.
Or the notifier will get an old commit when reading branch
`pull/xxx/head`.
Found by ~#21937~ #22679.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR implements a [Cargo registry](https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/)
to manage Rust packages. This package type was a little bit more
complicated because Cargo needs an additional Git repository to store
its package index.
Screenshots:
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#22541)
Most of the time forks are used for contributing code only, so not
having
issues, projects, release and packages is a better default for such
cases.
They can still be enabled in the settings.
A new option `DEFAULT_FORK_REPO_UNITS` is added to configure the default
units on forks.
Also add missing `repo.packages` unit to documentation.
code by: @brechtvl
## :warning: BREAKING :warning:
When forking a repository, the fork will now have issues, projects,
releases, packages and wiki disabled. These can be enabled in the
repository settings afterwards. To change back to the previous default
behavior, configure `DEFAULT_FORK_REPO_UNITS` to be the same value as
`DEFAULT_REPO_UNITS`.
Co-authored-by: Brecht Van Lommel <brecht@blender.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR follows #21535 (and replace #22592)
## Review without space diff
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22678/files?diff=split&w=1
## Purpose of this PR
1. Make git module command completely safe (risky user inputs won't be
passed as argument option anymore)
2. Avoid low-level mistakes like
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22098#discussion_r1045234918
3. Remove deprecated and dirty `CmdArgCheck` function, hide the `CmdArg`
type
4. Simplify code when using git command
## The main idea of this PR
* Move the `git.CmdArg` to the `internal` package, then no other package
except `git` could use it. Then developers could never do
`AddArguments(git.CmdArg(userInput))` any more.
* Introduce `git.ToTrustedCmdArgs`, it's for user-provided and already
trusted arguments. It's only used in a few cases, for example: use git
arguments from config file, help unit test with some arguments.
* Introduce `AddOptionValues` and `AddOptionFormat`, they make code more
clear and simple:
* Before: `AddArguments("-m").AddDynamicArguments(message)`
* After: `AddOptionValues("-m", message)`
* -
* Before: `AddArguments(git.CmdArg(fmt.Sprintf("--author='%s <%s>'",
sig.Name, sig.Email)))`
* After: `AddOptionFormat("--author='%s <%s>'", sig.Name, sig.Email)`
## FAQ
### Why these changes were not done in #21535 ?
#21535 is mainly a search&replace, it did its best to not change too
much logic.
Making the framework better needs a lot of changes, so this separate PR
is needed as the second step.
### The naming of `AddOptionXxx`
According to git's manual, the `--xxx` part is called `option`.
### How can it guarantee that `internal.CmdArg` won't be not misused?
Go's specification guarantees that. Trying to access other package's
internal package causes compilation error.
And, `golangci-lint` also denies the git/internal package. Only the
`git/command.go` can use it carefully.
### There is still a `ToTrustedCmdArgs`, will it still allow developers
to make mistakes and pass untrusted arguments?
Generally speaking, no. Because when using `ToTrustedCmdArgs`, the code
will be very complex (see the changes for examples). Then developers and
reviewers can know that something might be unreasonable.
### Why there was a `CmdArgCheck` and why it's removed?
At the moment of #21535, to reduce unnecessary changes, `CmdArgCheck`
was introduced as a hacky patch. Now, almost all code could be written
as `cmd := NewCommand(); cmd.AddXxx(...)`, then there is no need for
`CmdArgCheck` anymore.
### Why many codes for `signArg == ""` is deleted?
Because in the old code, `signArg` could never be empty string, it's
either `-S[key-id]` or `--no-gpg-sign`. So the `signArg == ""` is just
dead code.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Our trace logging is far from perfect and is difficult to follow.
This PR:
* Add trace logging for process manager add and remove.
* Fixes an errant read file for git refs in getMergeCommit
* Brings in the pullrequest `String` and `ColorFormat` methods
introduced in #22568
* Adds a lot more logging in to testPR etc.
Ref #22578
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are 2 separate flows of creating a user: authentication and source
sync.
When a group filter is defined, source sync ignores group filter, while
authentication respects it.
With this PR I've fixed this behavior, so both flows now apply this
filter when searching users in LDAP in a unified way.
- Unified LDAP group membership lookup for authentication and source
sync flows
- Replaced custom group membership lookup (used for authentication flow)
with an existing listLdapGroupMemberships method (used for source sync
flow)
- Modified listLdapGroupMemberships and getUserAttributeListedInGroup in
a way group lookup could be called separately
- Added user filtering based on a group membership for a source sync
- Added tests to cover this logic
Co-authored-by: Pavel Ezhov <paejov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
This PR adds a [Conda](https://conda.io/) package registry.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
#21937 implemented only basic events based on name because of `act`'s
limitation. So I sent a PR to parse all possible events details in
https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/11 and it merged. The ref
documentation is
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows
This PR depends on that and make more detail responses for `push` events
and `pull_request` events. And it lefts more events there for future
PRs.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
To go along with similar settings for issues, pulls, projects, packages.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If triggered by PR, the ref should be `pull/<index>/head` instead of
`repo.DefaultBranch`.
And improve UI:
<img width="493" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/215731280-312564f2-2450-45d0-b986-1accb0670976.png">
Related to #21937.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Close #13539.
Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others.
Related projects:
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner
### Summary
The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions",
an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been
merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note
that:
- It is disabled by default;
- It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently;
- It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently;
- Breaking changes may be made before it's stable.
**Please comment on #13539 if you have any different product design
ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this
PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**.
### ⚠️ Breaking
`gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the
name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it.
### Some important reviews
- What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954
- Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592
- Why DBFS?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178
- Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103
- Why there's no permission control for actions?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868
### What it looks like
<details>
#### Manage runners
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png">
#### List runs
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png">
#### View logs
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png">
</details>
### How to try it
<details>
#### 1. Start Gitea
Clone this branch and [install from
source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source).
Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions:
```ini
[actions]
ENABLED = true
```
Start it.
If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png">
#### 2. Start runner
Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner), and follow
the
[README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md)
to start it.
If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png">
#### 3. Enable actions for a repo
Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox
in settings and submit.
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png">
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png">
If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions":
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png">
#### 4. Upload workflow files
Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can
follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart)
of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions
in most cases, you can use the same demo:
```yaml
name: GitHub Actions Demo
run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions 🚀
on: [push]
jobs:
Explore-GitHub-Actions:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- run: echo "🎉 The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event."
- run: echo "🐧 This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!"
- run: echo "🔎 The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}."
- name: Check out repository code
uses: actions/checkout@v3
- run: echo "💡 The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner."
- run: echo "🖥️ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner."
- name: List files in the repository
run: |
ls ${{ github.workspace }}
- run: echo "🍏 This job's status is ${{ job.status }}."
```
If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png">
#### 5. Check the logs of jobs
Click a run and you'll see the logs:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png">
#### 6. Go on
You can try more examples in [the
documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions)
of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs.
Come on, PRs are welcome.
</details>
See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea
Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/)
---------
Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
The test coverage has revealed that container packages were not checked
against the quota limits.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The code for checking if a commit has caused a change in a PR is
extremely inefficient and affects the head repository instead of using a
temporary repository.
This PR therefore makes several significant improvements:
* A temporary repo like that used in merging.
* The diff code is then significant improved to use a three-way diff
instead of comparing diffs (possibly binary) line-by-line - in memory...
Ref #22578
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
only creating comment on locked issue request write permission,
for others, read permission is enough.
related to https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22056
/cc @KN4CK3R
---------
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The `commit_id` property name is the same as equivalent functionality in
GitHub. If the action was not caused by a commit, an empty string is
used.
This can for example be used to automatically add a Resolved label to an
issue fixed by a commit, or clear it when the issue is reopened.
|
