| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix #14459
The following users can add/remove review requests of a PR
- the poster of the PR
- the owner or collaborators of the repository
- members with read permission on the pull requests unit
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #28660
Fixes an admin api bug related to `user.LoginSource`
Fixed `/user/emails` response not identical to GitHub api
This PR unifies the user update methods. The goal is to keep the logic
only at one place (having audit logs in mind). For example, do the
password checks only in one method not everywhere a password is updated.
After that PR is merged, the user creation should be next.
|
| |
|
| |
Related #28390
|
| |
|
|
| |
This PR will fix some missed checks for private repositories' data on
web routes and API routes.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fix #27019
## testfixture yml
1. add issue20(a pr issue) in repo 23, org 17
2. add user15 to team 9
3. add four reviews about issue20
## test case
add two tests that are described with code comments
the code before pr #26784 failed the first test
<img width="479" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/1d9b5787-11b4-4c4d-931f-6a9869547f35">
current code failed the second test(as mentioned in #27019)
<img width="484" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/05608055-7587-43d1-bae1-92c688270819">
Any advice is appreciated.
---------
Co-authored-by: CaiCandong <50507092+CaiCandong@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
| |
|
|
| |
1. Give the global variable clear names
2. Use generic parameter for `onGiteaRun`
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR adds a new dropdown to select a commit or a commit range
(shift-click like github) of a Pull Request.
After selection of a commit only the changes of this commit will be shown.
When selecting a range of commits the diff of this range is shown.
This allows to review a PR commit by commit or by viewing only commit ranges.
The "Show changes since your last review" mechanism github uses is implemented, too.
When reviewing a single commit or a commit range the "Viewed" functionality is disabled.
## Screenshots
### The commit dropdown
### Selecting a commit range
### Show changes of a single commit only
### Show changes of a commit range
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/20989
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/19263
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1. The "web" package shouldn't depends on "modules/context" package,
instead, let each "web context" register themselves to the "web"
package.
2. The old Init/Free doesn't make sense, so simplify it
* The ctx in "Init(ctx)" is never used, and shouldn't be used that way
* The "Free" is never called and shouldn't be called because the SSPI
instance is shared
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#23874)
- close #22301
workaround for https://github.com/go-chi/chi/issues/781
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the
label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/`
prefix can be set on an issue.
The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example
`scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in
different scopes and can coexist.
Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they
are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically
removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a
new label or replacing all labels.
In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as
radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a
single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be
used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and
batch editing.
Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification:
* Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips
everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus.
* In label list, show description below label same as label menus.
* Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer.
* Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance
in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is
closer to perceptually linear.
* Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing
only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling.
* Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function.
Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu:
* Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing.
* Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate
lines.
* Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu.
* Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and
consistent with settings layout elsewhere.
Custom exclusive scoped label rendering:
* Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and
lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them
similar to the `/` symbol.
* In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line.
---------
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
... using
[github.com/xeipuuv/gojsonschema](https://github.com/xeipuuv/gojsonschema)
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.
Fix #16132
Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #21206
If user and viewer are equal the method should return true.
Also the common organization check was wrong as `count` can never be
less then 0.
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
|
* Add initial playwright config
* Simplify Makefile
* Simplify Makefile
* Use correct config files
* Update playwright settings
* Fix package-lock file
* Don't use test logger for e2e tests
* fix frontend lint
* Allow passing TEST_LOGGER variable
* Init postgres database
* use standard gitea env variables
* Update playwright
* update drone
* Move empty env var to commands
* Cleanup
* Move integrations to subfolder
* tests integrations to tests integraton
* Run e2e tests with go test
* Fix linting
* install CI deps
* Add files to ESlint
* Fix drone typo
* Don't log to console in CI
* Use go test http server
* Add build step before tests
* Move shared init function to common package
* fix drone
* Clean up tests
* Fix linting
* Better mocking for page + version string
* Cleanup test generation
* Remove dependency on gitea binary
* Fix linting
* add initial support for running specific tests
* Add ACCEPT_VISUAL variable
* don't require git-lfs
* Add initial documentation
* Review feedback
* Add logged in session test
* Attempt fixing drone race
* Cleanup and bump version
* Bump deps
* Review feedback
* simplify installation
* Fix ci
* Update install docs
|
