| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
| |
Resolves #20475
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There's a bug in #25715:
If user pushed a commit into another repo with same branch name, the
no-related repo will display the recently pushed notification
incorrectly.
It is simple to fix this, we should match the repo id in the sql query.
The latest commit is 2 weeks ago.
The notification comes from another repo with same branch name:
After:
In forked repo:
New PR Link will redirect to the original repo:
In the original repo:
New PR Link:
In the same repo:
New PR Link:
08/15 Update:
Follow #26257, added permission check and logic fix mentioned in
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26257#discussion_r1294085203
2024/04/25 Update:
Fix #30611
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
1. "enter" doesn't work (I think it is the last enter support for #14843)
2. if a branch name contains something like `&`, then the branch selector doesn't update
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
forked repository (#30476)
Fix #30277
Caused by #29783
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sometimes you need to work on a feature which depends on another (unmerged) feature.
In this case, you may create a PR based on that feature instead of the main branch.
Currently, such PRs will be closed without the possibility to reopen in case the parent feature is merged and its branch is deleted.
Automatic target branch change make life a lot easier in such cases.
Github and Bitbucket behave in such way.
Example:
$PR_1$: main <- feature1
$PR_2$: feature1 <- feature2
Currently, merging $PR_1$ and deleting its branch leads to $PR_2$ being closed without the possibility to reopen.
This is both annoying and loses the review history when you open a new PR.
With this change, $PR_2$ will change its target branch to main ($PR_2$: main <- feature2) after $PR_1$ has been merged and its branch has been deleted.
This behavior is enabled by default but can be disabled.
For security reasons, this target branch change will not be executed when merging PRs targeting another repo.
Fixes #27062
Fixes #18408
---------
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
| |
|
| |
Fix #25351
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Follow #22719
### Major changes
1. `ServerError` doesn't do format, so remove the `%s`
2. Simplify `RenderBranchFeed` (slightly)
3. Remove unused `BranchFeedRSS`
4. Make `feed.RenderBranchFeed` respect `EnableFeed` config
5. Make `RepoBranchTagSelector.vue` respect `EnableFeed` setting,
otherwise there is always RSS icon
6. The `(branchURLPrefix + item.url).replace('src', 'rss')` doesn't seem
right for all cases, for example, the string `src` could appear in
`branchURLPrefix`, so we need a separate `rssURLPrefix`
7. The `<a>` in Vue menu needs `@click.stop`, otherwise the menu itself
would be triggered at the same time
8. Change `<a><button></button></a>` to `<a role=button>`
9. Use `{{PathEscapeSegments .TreePath}}` instead of `{{range $i, $v :=
.TreeNames}}/{{$v}}{{end}}`
Screenshot of changed parts:
<details>
</details>
### Other thoughts
Should we remove the RSS icon from the branch dropdown list? It seems
too complex for a list UI, and users already have the chance to get the
RSS feed URL from "branches" page.
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Also removes quotes in commit messages related to file modifications
made in the Web UI.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.
Fix #16132
Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
backend component (#21061)
The `go-licenses` make task introduced in #21034 is being run on make vendor
and occasionally causes an empty go-licenses file if the vendors need to
change. This should be moved to the generate task as it is a generated file.
Now because of this change we also need to split generation into two separate
steps:
1. `generate-backend`
2. `generate-frontend`
In the future it would probably be useful to make `generate-swagger` part of `generate-frontend` but it's not tolerated with our .drone.yml
Ref #21034
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
|
|
* Add initial playwright config
* Simplify Makefile
* Simplify Makefile
* Use correct config files
* Update playwright settings
* Fix package-lock file
* Don't use test logger for e2e tests
* fix frontend lint
* Allow passing TEST_LOGGER variable
* Init postgres database
* use standard gitea env variables
* Update playwright
* update drone
* Move empty env var to commands
* Cleanup
* Move integrations to subfolder
* tests integrations to tests integraton
* Run e2e tests with go test
* Fix linting
* install CI deps
* Add files to ESlint
* Fix drone typo
* Don't log to console in CI
* Use go test http server
* Add build step before tests
* Move shared init function to common package
* fix drone
* Clean up tests
* Fix linting
* Better mocking for page + version string
* Cleanup test generation
* Remove dependency on gitea binary
* Fix linting
* add initial support for running specific tests
* Add ACCEPT_VISUAL variable
* don't require git-lfs
* Add initial documentation
* Review feedback
* Add logged in session test
* Attempt fixing drone race
* Cleanup and bump version
* Bump deps
* Review feedback
* simplify installation
* Fix ci
* Update install docs
|
