diff options
author | Michał Gołębiowski-Owczarek <m.goleb@gmail.com> | 2023-02-14 10:11:40 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2023-02-14 10:11:40 +0100 |
commit | 68aa2ef7571e2d9f91fad1aa9e5f956c04dc9ee9 (patch) | |
tree | 810ac3b135de06ac113921112f42396759e54147 /src/css.js | |
parent | 2e644e845051703775b35b358eec5d3608a9465f (diff) | |
download | jquery-68aa2ef7571e2d9f91fad1aa9e5f956c04dc9ee9.tar.gz jquery-68aa2ef7571e2d9f91fad1aa9e5f956c04dc9ee9.zip |
Selector: Stop relying on CSS.supports( "selector(...)" )
`CSS.supports( "selector(...)" )` has different semantics than selectors passed
to `querySelectorAll`. Apart from the fact that the former returns `false` for
unrecognized selectors and the latter throws, `qSA` is more forgiving and
accepts some invalid selectors, auto-correcting them where needed - for
example, mismatched brackers are auto-closed. This behavior difference is
breaking for many users.
To add to that, a recent CSSWG resolution made `:is()` & `:where()` the only
pseudos with forgiving parsing; browsers are in the process of making `:has()`
parsing unforgiving.
Taking all that into account, we go back to our previous try-catch approach
without relying on `CSS.supports( "selector(...)" )`. The only difference
is we detect forgiving parsing in `:has()` and mark the selector as buggy.
The PR also updates `playwright-webkit` so that we test against a version
of WebKit that already has non-forgiving `:has()`.
Fixes gh-5194
Closes gh-5206
Ref gh-5098
Ref gh-5107
Ref w3c/csswg-drafts#7676
Co-authored-by: Richard Gibson <richard.gibson@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/css.js')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions