mirrors
/
fop
mirror of https://github.com/apache/fop.git


			
				
					
						
						
							123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119
							<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--
  Copyright 2005-2006 The Apache Software Foundation

  Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
  you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
  You may obtain a copy of the License at

       http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

  Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
  distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
  WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
  See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
  limitations under the License.
-->
<!-- $Id$ -->
<!DOCTYPE document PUBLIC "-//APACHE//DTD Documentation V2.0//EN" "http://forrest.apache.org/dtd/document-v20.dtd">
<document>
  <header>
    <title>Upgrading from an Earlier Version of Apache FOP</title>
    <version>$Revision$</version>
  </header>
  <body>
    <section id="important">
      <title>Important!</title>
      <p>
        If you're planning to upgrade to the latest FOP version there are a few very important things 
        to consider:
      </p>
      <ul>
        <li>
          More than half of the codebase has been rewritten over the last three years. The code is 
          relatively new and possibly not as stable as version 0.20.5 in every regard. But the code
          is <strong>quickly approaching production level</strong>, especially when you're happy 
          with only PDF and PostScript output.
        </li>
        <li>
          The API of FOP has changed considerably and is not backwards-compatible with version 0.20.5.
        </li>
        <li>
          There have been changes to the end-user API between 0.91 beta and 0.92 beta. With version 0.92, 
          the API is now considered stable. Some methods have been deprecated and will be removed with
          the next release. If you upgrade from 0.91 beta, you will need to adjust your Java code.
        </li>
        <li>
          <p>
            The new code is much more strict about the interpretation of the XSL-FO 1.0 specification.
            Things that worked fine in version 0.20.5 might start to produce warnings or even errors
            now. FOP 0.20.5 contains many bugs which have been corrected in the new code.
          </p>
          <note label="An example">
            While FOP 0.20.5 allowed you to have empty <code>fo:table-cell</code> elements, the new code
            will complain about that (unless relaxed validation is enabled) because the specification
            demands at least one block-level element (<code>(%block;)+</code>, see 
            <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/slice6.html#fo_table-cell">XSL-FO 1.0, 6.7.10</a>)
            inside an <code>fo:table-cell</code> element.
          </note>
        </li>
        <li>
          Extensions and Renderers written for version 0.20.5 will not work with the new code! The new FOP 
          extension for <a href="http://barcode4j.krysalis.org">Barcode4J</a> will be available in 
          January 2006.
        </li>
        <li>
          The PCL Renderer and the MIF Handler have not been resurrected, yet! They are currently non-functional
          and hope for someone to step up and reimplement them.
        </li>
        <li>
          By looking at the <a href="../compliance.html">Compliance page</a> you might get the impression
          that the new code is much more advanced than version 0.20.5. That's true but there may still
          be a few things that may not be handled as gracefully by the new code as by version 0.20.5.
        </li>
      </ul>
    </section>
    <section id="issues">
      <title>What you need to know when you upgrade!</title>
      <p>
        When you use your existing FO files or XML/XSL files which work fine with FOP version
        0.20.5 against this FOP version some things may not work as expected. The following
        list will hopefully help you to identify and correct those problems.
      </p>
      <ul>
        <li>
          Check the <a href="../compliance.html">Compliance page</a> for the feature causing
          trouble. It may contain the necessary information to understand and resolve the problem.
        </li>
        <li>
          Not all 0.20.5 output formats are supported. PDF and Postscript should be fully supported.
          See <a href="output.html">Output Targets</a> for a more complete description.
        </li>
        <li>
          As stated above empty table cells <code>&lt;fo:table-cell&gt;&lt;/fo:table-cell&gt;</code>
          are not allowed by the specification. The same applies to empty <code>static-content</code>
          and <code>block-container</code> elements, for example.
        </li>
        <li>
          0.20.5 is not XSL-FO compliant with respect to sizing images (<code>external-graphic</code>) 
          or <code>instream-foreign-object</code>
          objects. If images or SVGs are sized differently in your outputs with the new FOP version
          check <a href="http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37136">Bug 37136</a>
          as it contains some hints on what to. The file 
          <a href="http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/examples/fo/basic/images.fo?view=markup">
          <code>"examples/fo/basic/images.fo"</code></a> has
          a number of good examples that shows the new, more correct behaviour.
        </li>
        <li>
          The <code>fox:outline</code> extension not implemented in this version anymore. 
          It has been superseded by the new bookmark elements from XSL-FO 1.1.
        </li>
        <li>
          The <code>fox:destination</code> extension is also not implemented in this version
          although it may be added in the future. See also
          <a href="http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37157">Bug 37157</a>.
        </li>
      </ul>
    </section>
  </body>
</document>