Backport #28942 by @Zettat123

In #28691, schedule plans will be deleted when a repo's actions unit is
disabled. But when the unit is enabled, the schedule plans won't be
created again.

This PR fixes the bug. The schedule plans will be created again when the
actions unit is re-enabled

---------

Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>

Fix #28157
Backport #28691 

This PR fix the possible bugs about actions schedule.

- Move `UpdateRepositoryUnit` and `SetRepoDefaultBranch` from models to
service layer
- Remove schedules plan from database and cancel waiting & running
schedules tasks in this repository when actions unit has been disabled
or global disabled.
- Remove schedules plan from database and cancel waiting & running
schedules tasks in this repository when default branch changed.

Replace #22751 

1. only support the default branch in the repository setting.
2. autoload schedule data from the schedule table after starting the
service.
3. support specific syntax like `@yearly`, `@monthly`, `@weekly`,
`@daily`, `@hourly`

## How to use

See the [GitHub Actions
document](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#schedule)
for getting more detailed information.

```yaml
on:
  schedule:
    - cron: '30 5 * * 1,3'
    - cron: '30 5 * * 2,4'

jobs:
  test_schedule:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Not on Monday or Wednesday
        if: github.event.schedule != '30 5 * * 1,3'
        run: echo "This step will be skipped on Monday and Wednesday"
      - name: Every time
        run: echo "This step will always run"
```

Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi.Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>

---------


Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>

Follow #25229

Copy from
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26290#issuecomment-1663135186

The bug is that we cannot get changed files for the
`pull_request_target` event. This event runs in the context of the base
branch, so we won't get any changes if we call
`GetFilesChangedSinceCommit` with `PullRequest.Base.Ref`.

Follow #25229

At present, when the trigger event is `pull_request_target`, the `ref`
and `sha` of `ActionRun` are set according to the base branch of the
pull request. This makes it impossible for us to find the head branch of
the `ActionRun` directly. In this PR, the `ref` and `sha` will always be
set to the head branch and they will be changed to the base branch when
generating the task context.

Fix #25736 
Caused by #24048

Right now we only check the activity type for `pull_request` event when
`types` is specified or there are no `types` and filter. If a workflow
only specifies filters but no `types` like this:
```
on:
  pull_request:
    branches: [main]
```
the workflow will be triggered even if the activity type is not one of
`[opened, reopened, sync]`. We need to check the activity type in this
case.

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>

Result of running `perl -p -i -e 's#interface\{\}#any#g' **/*` and `make fmt`.

Basically the same [as golang did](2580d0e08d).

Hi!
This pull request adds support for downloading raw task logs for Gitea
Actions, similar to Github Actions
It looks like the following:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/945339/235376746-405d5019-710b-468b-8113-9e82eab8e752.png)

Fix #25451.

Bugfixes:
- When stopping the zombie or endless tasks, set `LogInStorage` to true
after transferring the file to storage. It was missing, it could write
to a nonexistent file in DBFS because `LogInStorage` was false.
- Always update `ActionTask.Updated` when there's a new state reported
by the runner, even if there's no change. This is to avoid the task
being judged as a zombie task.

Enhancement:
- Support `Stat()` for DBFS file.
- `WriteLogs` refuses to write if it could result in content holes.

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>

Fix #25088

This PR adds the support for
[`pull_request_target`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_target)
workflow trigger. `pull_request_target` is similar to `pull_request`,
but the workflow triggered by the `pull_request_target` event runs in
the context of the base branch of the pull request rather than the head
branch. Since the workflow from the base is considered trusted, it can
access the secrets and doesn't need approvals to run.

This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the
code more maintainable.

Fix #15367
Replaces #23070 
It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune
origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed.

We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git
remote update origin` to do the sync.

Some answer from ChatGPT as ref.

> If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected,
there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check:
> 
>Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your
system. You can check the version by running git --version in your
terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if
that resolves the issue.
> 
>Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the
remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config
--get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes
+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git
config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*".
> 
>Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the
remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags
origin to list all the tags on the remote repository.
> 
>Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags
on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the
git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete
local tags using the git tag -d command.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>

As title, follow #24124


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/25342410/233763031-8c5ab4a1-a4db-4173-87f7-cef41860f1db.png)

---------

Signed-off-by: a101211279 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>

This PR is to support triggering workflows by wiki related events like
creating, editing or deleting wiki pages. In GitHub, this event is
called
[gollum](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#gollum)

Some workflow trigger events can have multiple activity types, such as
`issues` and `pull_request`, and user can specify which types can
trigger the workflow. See GitHub documentation:
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows

Now some hook events cannot match the workflow trigger events correctly
because we don't check the activity types. For example,
`pull_request_label` is an individual hook event. But there isn't a
`pull_request_label` workflow trigger event, we can only use
`pull_request` event's `label` activity type. If we don't check the
activity types, the workflows without the `label` activity type may be
triggered by the `pull_request_label` event by mistake. We need to
improve the match logic.

- [x] [`issues`
](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issues)
- [x]
[`issue_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#issue_comment)
- [x]
[`pull_request`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request)
- [x]
[`pull_request_review`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review)
- [x]
[`pull_request_review_comment`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_review_comment)
- [x]
[`release`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#release)
- [x]
[`registry_package`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#registry_package)

Fix #23658.

Related to https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/39

Fix:
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/issues/77
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/issues/81

Before:
<img width="1489" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/228501567-f752cf87-a7ed-42c6-8f3d-ba741795c1fe.png">

Highlights:
- Upgrade act to make things doable, related to
  - https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/32
  - https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/33
  - https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/35
- Make `needs` works
- Sort jobs in the original order in the workflow files

Replaces the current globbing library with a
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#filter-pattern-cheat-sheet
compatible one.

This adds support for
- `paths-ignore`, `tags-ignore` and `branches-ignore` filters.
- negative patterns in `paths`, `tags` and `branches` filters
- using both `tags` and `paths` filter on the push event

Original PR https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/13.
nektos/act PR https://github.com/nektos/act/pull/1618 for the
workflowpattern package (It can take some months for it to appear in
https://gitea.com/gitea/act)

Related to https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/13539

Follow #23037 
Fix [#22598
comment](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22958#issuecomment-1475763042)

Workflows with `pull_request` trigger event can't be triggered by
`pull_request_sync` event. This PR adds the `canGithubEventMatch`
function to check if a Github event can match any Gitea event. If the
Github event matches a Gitea event, the related workflows should be
triggered.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>

Follow #22680

Partially Fix #22958, on pull_request, `opened`, `reopened`,
`synchronize` supported, `edited` hasn't been supported yet because
Gitea doesn't trigger that events.

---------

Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/224237847-07a30029-32d4-4af7-a36e-e55f0ed899aa.png)

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/224239309-a96120e1-5eec-41c0-89aa-9cf63d1df30c.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <matti@mdranta.net>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>

caused by #22680 

`pushPayload.Ref` and `prPayload.PullRequest.Base.Ref` have the format
like `refs/heads/<branch_name>`, so we need to trim the prefix before
comparing.

#21937 implemented only basic events based on name because of `act`'s
limitation. So I sent a PR to parse all possible events details in
https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/11 and it merged. The ref
documentation is
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows

This PR depends on that and make more detail responses for `push` events
and `pull_request` events. And it lefts more events there for future
PRs.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>

Close #13539.

Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others.

Related projects:
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner

### Summary

The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions",
an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been
merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note
that:

- It is disabled by default;
- It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently;
- It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently;
- Breaking changes may be made before it's stable.

**Please comment on #13539 if you have any different product design
ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this
PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**.

### ⚠️ Breaking

`gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the
name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it.

### Some important reviews

- What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954
- Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592
- Why DBFS?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178
- Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103
- Why there's no permission control for actions?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868

### What it looks like

<details>

#### Manage runners

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png">

#### List runs

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png">


#### View logs

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png">



</details>

### How to try it

<details>

#### 1. Start Gitea

Clone this branch and [install from
source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source).

Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions:

```ini
[actions]
ENABLED = true
```

Start it.

If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png">


#### 2. Start runner

Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner), and follow
the
[README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md)
to start it.

If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png">

#### 3. Enable actions for a repo

Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox
in settings and submit.

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png">
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png">

If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions":

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png">

#### 4. Upload workflow files

Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can
follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart)
of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions
in most cases, you can use the same demo:

```yaml
name: GitHub Actions Demo
run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions 🚀
on: [push]
jobs:
  Explore-GitHub-Actions:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - run: echo "🎉 The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event."
      - run: echo "🐧 This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!"
      - run: echo "🔎 The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}."
      - name: Check out repository code
        uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - run: echo "💡 The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner."
      - run: echo "🖥️ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner."
      - name: List files in the repository
        run: |
          ls ${{ github.workspace }}
      - run: echo "🍏 This job's status is ${{ job.status }}."
```

If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png">

#### 5. Check the logs of jobs

Click a run and you'll see the logs:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png">

#### 6. Go on

You can try more examples in [the
documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions)
of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs.

Come on, PRs are welcome.

</details>

See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea
Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/)

---------

Co-authored-by: a101211279 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>