Same perl replacement as https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25686
but for 1.20 to ease future backporting.

Backport #25581 by @wolfogre

Resolve #24789

## :warning: BREAKING :warning:

Before this, `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` cound be set to any custom URLs like
`https://gitea.com` or `http://your-git-server,https://gitea.com`, and
the default value was `https://gitea.com`.

But now, `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` supports only
`github`(`https://github.com`) or `self`(the root url of current Gitea
instance), and the default value is `github`.

If it has configured with a URL, an error log will be displayed and it
will fallback to `github`.

Actually, what we really want to do is always make it
`https://github.com`, however, this may not be acceptable for some
instances of internal use, so there's extra support for `self`, but no
more, even `https://gitea.com`.

Please note that `uses: https://xxx/yyy/zzz` always works and it does
exactly what it is supposed to do.

Although it's breaking, I belive it should be backported to `v1.20` due
to some security issues.

Follow-up on the runner side:

- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/262
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/70

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>

Backport #25358 by @nephatrine

Fix #25357 .

Just a simple fix the result of `${{ gitea.ref_name }}` to show the
shortened name rather than the full ref.

Co-authored-by: Daniel Wolf <1461334+nephatrine@users.noreply.github.com>

Backport #25195 by @lunny

Fix #25185 
Caused by #24634

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>

This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the
code more maintainable.

Fix #15367
Replaces #23070 
It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune
origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed.

We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git
remote update origin` to do the sync.

Some answer from ChatGPT as ref.

> If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected,
there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check:
> 
>Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your
system. You can check the version by running git --version in your
terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if
that resolves the issue.
> 
>Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the
remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config
--get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes
+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git
config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*".
> 
>Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the
remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags
origin to list all the tags on the remote repository.
> 
>Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags
on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the
git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete
local tags using the git tag -d command.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>

Replace #16455

Close #21803

Mixing different Gitea contexts together causes some problems:

1. Unable to respond proper content when error occurs, eg: Web should
respond HTML while API should respond JSON
2. Unclear dependency, eg: it's unclear when Context is used in
APIContext, which fields should be initialized, which methods are
necessary.


To make things clear, this PR introduces a Base context, it only
provides basic Req/Resp/Data features.

This PR mainly moves code. There are still many legacy problems and
TODOs in code, leave unrelated changes to future PRs.

Implement action artifacts server api.

This change is used for supporting
https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact and
https://github.com/actions/download-artifact in gitea actions. It can
run sample workflow from doc
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/storing-workflow-data-as-artifacts.
The api design is inspired by
https://github.com/nektos/act/blob/master/pkg/artifacts/server.go and
includes some changes from gitea internal structs and methods.

Actions artifacts contains two parts:

- Gitea server api and storage (this pr implement basic design without
some complex cases supports)
- Runner communicate with gitea server api (in comming)

Old pr https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22345 is outdated after
actions merged. I create new pr from main branch.


![897f7694-3e0f-4f7c-bb4b-9936624ead45](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2142787/219382371-eb3cf810-e4e0-456b-a8ff-aecc2b1a1032.jpeg)

Add artifacts list in actions workflow page.

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>

As discussed in https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/issues/147
`github.base_ref` is empty.
This change adds these fields to the server side context data.

See [Defining outputs for
jobs](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-jobs/defining-outputs-for-jobs)
and [Example usage of the needs
context](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/contexts#example-usage-of-the-needs-context).

Related to:
- [actions-proto-def
#5](https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def/pulls/5)
- [act_runner #133](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/133)

<details>
<summary>Tests & screenshots</summary>

Test workflow file:
```yaml
name: outputs
on: push

jobs:
  job1:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    outputs:
      output1: ${{ steps.step1.outputs.output1 }}
      output2: ${{ steps.step2.outputs.output2 }}
    steps:
      - name: step1
        id: step1
        run: |
          date -Is > output1
          cat output1
          echo "output1=$(cat output1)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
      - name: step2
        id: step2
        run: |
          cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid > output2
          cat output2
          echo "output2=$(cat output2)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
  job2:
    needs: job1
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - run: echo ${{ needs.job1.outputs.output1 }}
      - run: echo ${{ needs.job1.outputs.output2 }}
      - run: echo ${{ needs.job1.result }}
```

<img width="397" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/233313322-903e7ebf-49a7-48e2-8c17-95a4581b3284.png">
<img width="385" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/233313442-30909135-1711-4b78-a5c6-133fcc79f47c.png">



</details>

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>

Fix #23943
When trigger event is `release`, ref should be like
`refs/tags/<tag_name>` instead of `CommitID`

Before:
<img width="353" alt="xnip_230329_163852"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/228479807-424452df-10fa-45cf-ae4b-09939c0ed54c.png">
After:
<img width="508" alt="xnip_230329_163358"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/228479923-537b54fe-9564-4105-a068-bcc75fa2a7ea.png">

Highlights:
- Treat `StatusSkipped` as `CommitStatusSuccess` instead of
`CommitStatusFailure`, so it fixed #23599.
- Use the bot user `gitea-actions` instead of the trigger as the creator
of commit status.
- New format `<run_name> / <job_name> / (<event>)` for the context of
commit status to avoid conflicts.
- Add descriptions for commit status.
- Add the missing calls to `CreateCommitStatus`.
- Refactor `CreateCommitStatus` to make it easier to use.

Close: #23489 

### Change
1. Add version column to action_runner table.
2. Read the runner version from the request header, and update it in DB.
3. Display version in runner list

### Screenshot

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/225220990-98bc0158-4403-4e6c-9805-31bbbc65a802.png)

When creating commit status for Actons jobs, a payload with nil
`HeadCommit` will cause panic.

Reported at:
https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/issues/28#issuecomment-732166

Although the `HeadCommit` probably can not be nil after #23215,
`CreateCommitStatus` should protect itself, to avoid being broken in the
future.

In addition, it's enough to print error log instead of returning err
when `CreateCommitStatus` failed.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>

Fixes the grammar in the error message in case a runner token has
already been activated

The name of the job or step comes from the workflow file, while the name
of the runner comes from its registration. If the strings used for these
names are too long, they could cause db issues.

Close #13539.

Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others.

Related projects:
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner

### Summary

The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions",
an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been
merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note
that:

- It is disabled by default;
- It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently;
- It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently;
- Breaking changes may be made before it's stable.

**Please comment on #13539 if you have any different product design
ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this
PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**.

### ⚠️ Breaking

`gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the
name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it.

### Some important reviews

- What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954
- Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592
- Why DBFS?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178
- Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103
- Why there's no permission control for actions?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868

### What it looks like

<details>

#### Manage runners

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png">

#### List runs

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png">


#### View logs

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png">



</details>

### How to try it

<details>

#### 1. Start Gitea

Clone this branch and [install from
source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source).

Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions:

```ini
[actions]
ENABLED = true
```

Start it.

If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png">


#### 2. Start runner

Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner), and follow
the
[README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md)
to start it.

If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png">

#### 3. Enable actions for a repo

Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox
in settings and submit.

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png">
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png">

If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions":

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png">

#### 4. Upload workflow files

Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can
follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart)
of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions
in most cases, you can use the same demo:

```yaml
name: GitHub Actions Demo
run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions 🚀
on: [push]
jobs:
  Explore-GitHub-Actions:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - run: echo "🎉 The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event."
      - run: echo "🐧 This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!"
      - run: echo "🔎 The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}."
      - name: Check out repository code
        uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - run: echo "💡 The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner."
      - run: echo "🖥️ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner."
      - name: List files in the repository
        run: |
          ls ${{ github.workspace }}
      - run: echo "🍏 This job's status is ${{ job.status }}."
```

If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png">

#### 5. Check the logs of jobs

Click a run and you'll see the logs:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png">

#### 6. Go on

You can try more examples in [the
documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions)
of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs.

Come on, PRs are welcome.

</details>

See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea
Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/)

---------

Co-authored-by: a101211279 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>