Fix ResolveMerger not to add paths with FileMode 0
When ResolveMerger finds a path where it has to do a content merge it
will try the content merge and if that succeeds it'll add the newly
produced content to the index. For the FileMode of this new index entry
it blindly copies the FileMode it finds for that path in the common base
tree. If by chance the common base tree does not contain this path it'll
try to add FileMode 0 (MISSING) to the index.
One could argue that this can't happen: how can the ResolveMerger
successfully (with no conflicts) merge two contents if there is no
common base? This was due to another bug in ResolveMerger. It failed to
find out that for two files which differ only in the FileMode (e.g. 644
vs. 755) it should not try a content merge.
Change-Id: I7a00fe1a6c610679be475cab8a3f8aa4c08811a1
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
Adapt merge message to C Git for remote-tracking branch
Commit 13931236b9 in C Git (2011-11-02)
changed the message format:
-Merge remote branch 'origin/foo'
+Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/foo'
This change does the same in EGit to be consistent.
Change-Id: I7d9c5afa95771dbfe6079b5f89a10b248fee0172
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
Test was added which reproduce the ClassCastException when ours or
theirs merge strategy is set to MergeCommand. Merger and MergeCommand
were updated in order to avoid exception.
Change-Id: I4c1284b4e80d82638d0677a05e5d38182526d196
Signed-off-by: Denys Digtiar <duemir@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>
Change Ia2ab4f8dc95020f2914ff01c2bf3b1bc62a9d45d added merge
support for when OURS or THEIRS was simultaneously deleted
and modified. That changeset however did not add create an
entry in the conflicts table so clients would see a CONFLICTING
result but getConflicts() would return null.
This change creates a MergeResult for the conflicting file.
Bug: 345684
Change-Id: I52acb81c1729b49c9fb3e7a477c6448d8e55c317
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>
Optimize MergeAlgorithm if ours or theirs is empty
Previously when merging two contents with a non-empty base and one of
the contents was empty (size == 0) and the other was modified there
was a potentially expensive calculation until we finally always come
to the same result -> the complete non-deleted content should collide
with the empty content.
This proposal adds an optimization to detect empty input content and
to produce the appropriate result immediatly.
Change-Id: Ie6a837260c19d808f0e99173f570ff96dd22acd3
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Merging into a non-master branch would result in the following message:
Merge branch 'a' into HEAD
Now the merge message is correct:
Merge branch 'a' into b
Change-Id: I488f97190e4c1711c23a7a3cbd64f8b13a87bbac
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
Implemented merge for parallel delete/modification
Duplicates cgit behaviour for merging the case where
OURS is deleted and THEIRS is modified as well as
OURS is modified and THEIRS id deleted.
Change-Id: Ia2ab4f8dc95020f2914ff01c2bf3b1bc62a9d45d
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>
Add handling of CHERRY_PICK_HEAD file in .git (similar to MERGE_HEAD),
which is written in case of a conflicting cherry-pick merge.
It is used so that Repository.getRepositoryState can return the new
states CHERRY_PICKING and CHERRY_PICKING_RESOLVED. These states, as well
as CHERRY_PICK_HEAD can be used in EGit to properly show the merge tool.
Also, in case of a conflict, MERGE_MSG is written with the original
commit message and a "Conflicts" section appended. This way, the
cherry-picked message is not lost and can later be re-used in the commit
dialog.
Bug: 339092
Change-Id: I947967fdc2f1d55016c95106b104c2afcc9797a1
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>
This change contains a simple renaming. Instead of using the
expression 'abnormal failure', we just treat this kind of situation
as 'failure'. This is specific enough as conflicts are already handled
separately.
Change-Id: I535acdc7d022543ed0f5ac6151b09a6985f4ef38
Signed-off-by: Philipp Thun <philipp.thun@sap.com>
Add paths causing abnormal merge failures (e.g. due to unstaged
changes) to the MergeResult returned by MergeCommand. This helps
callers to better handle (e.g. present) merge results.
Change-Id: Idb8cf04c5cecfb6a12cb880e16febfc3b9358564
Signed-off-by: Philipp Thun <philipp.thun@sap.com>
In case a file needs to be checked out (from THEIRS) during a merge
operation, it has to be checked if the worktree version of this file
is dirty. If this is true, merge shall fail.
Change-Id: I17c24845584700aad953c3d4f2bea77a0d665ec4
Signed-off-by: Philipp Thun <philipp.thun@sap.com>
1. Perform an explicit check for untracked files.
2. Extract 'dirty checks' into separate methods
3. Clean up comments.
4. Tests: also check contents of files not affected by merge.
Change-Id: Ieb089668834d0a395c9ab192c555538917dfdc47
Signed-off-by: Philipp Thun <philipp.thun@sap.com>
Don't print "into HEAD" when merging refs/heads/master
When MergeMessageFormatter was given a symbolic ref HEAD which points to
refs/heads/master (which is the case when merging a branch in EGit), it
would result in a merge message like the following:
Merge branch 'a' into HEAD
But it should print the following (as C Git does):
Merge branch 'a'
The solution is to use the leaf ref when checking for refs/heads/master.
Change-Id: I28ae5713b7e8123a0176fc6d7356e469900e7e97
Sasa and I were reviewing this code today and Sasa pointed out we
can simplify the conflict logic, as the two cases (subtree and file)
are logically identical.
Change-Id: Ie0d40b2dd15605785eff453a846b1d20a2d021fc
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Reviewed-by: Sasa Zivkov <zivkov@gmail.com>
To improve runtime performance, caching the WorkingTreeOptions inside
of the Config object using the Config.SectionParser API allows
the WorkingTreeOptions to be accessed more efficiently whenever a
FileTreeIterator is constructed for the Repository.
Instead of passing the filemode handling option into isModified(),
the WorkingTreeIterator should always honor whatever setting has
been configured in this repository, as defined by its own copy of
the WorkingTreeOptions. This simplifies all of the callers as they
no longer need to lookup core.filemode on their own.
A few locations were changed from always using a hardcoded "true"
on the file mode to passing what is actually configured in the
repository. This is a behavior change, but corrects what should be
considered to be bugs as the core.filemode variable wasn't always
being used.
Change-Id: Idb176736fa0dc97af372f1d652a94ecc72fb457c
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Some method parameters in WorkingTreeIterator are never used. Remove
them. Especially the removal of the FS parameter in isModified()
simplifies upcoming performance optimizations.
Change-Id: I7c449589283a4a6b6e23f2586cd784febdca8bcd
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>
Its confusing that a new TreeWalk() needs to have reset() invoked
on it before addTree(). This is a historical accident caused by
how TreeWalk was abused within ObjectWalk.
Drop the initial empty tree from the TreeWalk and thus remove a
number of pointless reset() operations from unit tests and some of
the internal JGit code.
Existing application code which is still calling reset() will simply
be incurring a few unnecessary field assignments, but they should
consider cleaning up their code in the future.
Change-Id: I434e94ffa43491019e7dff52ca420a4d2245f48b
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
java.io.File.delete() reports failure as an exceptional
return value false. Fix the code which silently ignored
this exceptional return value. Also remove some duplicate
deletion helper methods.
Change-Id: I80ed20ca1f07a2bc6e779957a4ad0c713789c5be
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
When in OURS and THEIRS a new file is created we want a conflict
when the two contents differ. If on two branches the same file
with the same content is created this should not be a conflict.
But: the current merge algorithm is throwing NPEs in this case.
Fix this by choosing an empty RawText as common base if the
base is empty.
Change-Id: I21cb23f852965b82fb82ccd66ec961c7edb3ac3d
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Change default diff algorithm to histogram and add tests
The referenced bug showed that JGit produced different merge results
compared to C Git. Unit test was added to reproduce the issue. The
problem can be solved by switching to histogram diff algorithm.
Bug: 331078
Change-Id: I54f30afb3a9fef1dbca365ca5f98f4cc846092e3
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Thun <philipp.thun@sap.com>
The diff algorithm which is used by Merge, Cherry-Pick, Rebase
should be configurable. A new configuration parameter "diff.algorithm"
is introduced which currently accepts the values "myers" or
"histogram". Based on this parameter for example the ResolveMerger
will choose a diff algorithm. The reason for this is bug 331078.
This bug shows that JGit is more compatible with C Git when
histogram diff is in place. But since histogram diff is quite new we
need an easy way to fall back to Myers diff.
Bug: 331078
Change-Id: I2549c992e478d991c61c9508ad826d1a9e539ae3
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Thun <philipp.thun@sap.com>
Fix bug regarding handling of non-versioned files during merge
There was a bug introduced by commit 0e815fe. For non-versioned files
the merge algorithm detected an incoming deletion from THEIRS.
Consequently such files were deleted. That's a severe bug which was
fixed by more precisely detecting incoming deletions.
Change-Id: I4385d3c990db11d62e371a385dc8ee89841db84a
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Thun <philipp.thun@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Fixed ResolveMerger regarding handling of deletions
There was a bug in ResolveMerger which is one reason for
bug 328841. If a merge was failing because of conflicts
deletions where not handled correctly. Files which have
to be deleted (because there was a non-conflicting deletion
coming in from THEIRS) are not deleted. In the
non-conflicting case we also forgot to delete the file but
in this case we explicitly checkout in the end these files
get deleted during that checkout.
This is fixed by handling incoming deletions explicitly.
Bug: 328841
Change-Id: I7f4c94ab54138e1b2f3fcdf34fb803d68e209ad0
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
The automatically generated commit message of a merge should have the
same structure as in C Git for consistency (as per git fmt-merge-msg).
Before this change:
merging refs/heads/a into refs/heads/master
After:
Merge branch 'a'
Plurals, "into" and joining by "," and "and" also work.
Change-Id: I9658ce2817adc90d2df1060e8ac508d7bd0571cb
JGit merge algorithm behaved differently from C Git when
we had adjacent modifications. If line 9 was modified by
OURS and line 10 by theirs then C Git will return a
conflict while JGit was seeing this as independent
modifications. This change is not only there to achieve
compatibility, but there where also some really wrong
merge results produced by JGit in the area of adjacent
modifications.
Change-Id: I8d77cb59e82638214e45b3cf9ce3a1f1e9b35c70
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
As described in Bug 328551 there was a bug that the merge algorithm
was not always reporting conflicts when the same line was deleted
and modified. This problem was introduced during commit
0c017188b4 when reported conflicts have
been checked for common pre- and suffixes.
This was fixed here by better determining whether after stripping
off common prefixes and suffixes from a conflicting region there
is still some conflicting part left.
I also added a unit test to test this situation.
Bug: 328551
Change-Id: Iec6c9055d00e5049938484a27ab98dda2577afc4
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Optional inCore parameter to Resolver/Strategy will
instruct it to perform all the operations in memory
and avoid modifying working folder even if there is one.
Change-Id: I5b873dead3682f79110f58d7806e43f50bcc5045
This makes it easier to parametrize DiffFormatter with a different
implementation, as we later plan to add PatienceDiff to JGit.
Change-Id: Id35ef478d5fa20fe10a1ba297f9436fd7adde9ce
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Instead of making the sequence itself responsible for the equivalence
function, use an external function that is supplied by the caller.
This cleans up the code because we now say cmp.equals(a, ai, b, bi)
instead of a.equals(ai, b, bi).
This refactoring also removes the odd concept of creating different
types of sequences to have different behaviors for whitespace
ignoring. Instead DiffComparator now supports singleton functions
that apply a particular equivalence algorithm to a type of sequence.
Change-Id: I559f494d81cdc6f06bfb4208f60780c0ae251df9
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Improve MergeAlgorithm to produce smaller conflicts
The merge algorithm was reporting conflicts which where to big.
Example: The common base was "ABC", the "ours" version contained
"AB1C" (the addition of "1" after pos 2) and the "theirs" version also
contained "AB1C". We have two potentially conflicting edits in the
same region which happen to bring in exactly the same content. This
should not be a conflict - but was previously reported as
"AB<<<1===1>>>C".
This is fixed by checking every conflicting chunk whether the
conflicting regions have a common prefix or suffix and by removing
this regions from the conflict.
Change-Id: I4dc169b8ef7a66ec6b307e9a956feef906c9e15e
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
This adds the first merge strategy to JGit which does real
content-merges if necessary. The new merge strategy "resolve" takes as
input three commits: a common base, ours and theirs. It will simply takeover
changes on files which are only touched in ours or theirs. For files
touched in ours and theirs it will try to merge the two contents
knowing taking into account the specified common base.
Rename detection has not been introduced for now.
Change-Id: I49a5ebcdcf4f540f606092c0f1dc66c965dc66ba
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Lay <stefan.lay@sap.com>
The Merger was was only exposing the merge base as an
AbstractTreeIterator. Since we need the merge base as
RevCommit to generate the merge result I expose it here.
Change-Id: Ibe846370a35ac9bdb0c97ce2e36b2287577fbcad
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
There were some broken links, incorrect uses of @value, an invalid
tag and an outdated comment.
Change-Id: I22886bcc869a4b62bd606ebed40669f7b4723664
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Rather than building a custom reader, have the caller supply us one.
Change-Id: Ief2b5a6b1b75f05c8a6bc732a60d4d1041dd8254
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
We don't actually need a Repository object here, just an ObjectReader
that can load content for us. So change the API to depend on that.
However, this breaks the asCommit and asTag legacy translation methods
on RevCommit and RevTag, so we still have to keep the Repository
inside of RevWalk for those two types. Hopefully we can drop those in
the future, and then drop the Repository off the RevWalk.
Change-Id: Iba983e48b663790061c43ae9ffbb77dfe6f4818e
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
By doing the release at the higher level class, we can ensure
the release occurs if the inserter was allocated, even if the
implementation forgets to do this. Since the higher level class
is what allocated it, it makes sense to have it also do the release.
Change-Id: Id617b2db864c3208ed68cba4eda80e51612359ad
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The WindowCache is an implementation detail of PackFile and how its
used by ObjectDirectory. Lets start to hide it and replace the public
API with a more generic concept, ObjectReader.
Because PackedObjectLoader is also considered a private detail of
PackFile, we have to make PackWriter temporarily dependent upon the
WindowCursor and thus FileRepository and ObjectDirectory in order to
just start the refactoring. In later changes we will clean up the
APIs more, exposing sufficient support to PackWriter without needing
the file specific implementation details.
Change-Id: I676be12b57f3534f1285854ee5de1aa483895398
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Start using ObjectInserter instead of ObjectWriter
Some newer style APIs are updated to use the newer ObjectInserter
interface instead of the now deprecated ObjectWriter. In many of
the unit tests we don't bother to release the inserter, these are
typically using the file backend which doesn't need a release,
but in the future should use an in-memory HashMap based store,
which really wouldn't need it either.
Change-Id: I91a15e1dc42da68e6715397814e30fbd87fa2e73
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The strings are externalized into the root resource bundles.
The resource bundles are stored under the new "resources" source
folder to get proper maven build.
Strings from tests are, in general, not externalized. Only in
cases where it was necessary to make the test pass the strings
were externalized. This was typically necessary in cases where
e.getMessage() was used in assert and the exception message was
slightly changed due to reuse of the externalized strings.
Change-Id: Ic0f29c80b9a54fcec8320d8539a3e112852a1f7b
Signed-off-by: Sasa Zivkov <sasa.zivkov@sap.com>
Adds the file content merge alorithm and tests for merge to jgit.
The merge algorithm:
- Gets as input parameters the common base, the two new contents
called "ours" and "theirs".
- Computes the Edits from base to ours and from base to theirs with
the help of MyersDiff.
- Iterates over the edits.
- Independent edits from ours or from theirs will just be applied
to the result.
- For conflicting edits we first harmonize the ranges of the edits
so that in the end we have exactly two edits starting and ending
at the same points in the common base. Then we write the two
conclicting contents into the result stream.
Change-Id: I411862393e7bf416b6f33ca55ec5af608ff4663
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
[sp: Fixed up two awkard comments in documentation.]
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Per CQ 3448 this is the initial contribution of the JGit project
to eclipse.org. It is derived from the historical JGit repository
at commit 3a2dd9921c.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Christian Halstrick
Robin Stocker
Shawn O. Pearce
Denys Digtiar
Matthias Sohn
Bernard Leach
Philipp Thun
Robin Rosenberg
Dmitry Fink
Sasa Zivkov
Git Development Community